Simple Noninvasive Systems Predict long-term Outcome of Patients With NAFLD Angulo P, Bugianesi E, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Mills PR, Barrera.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 25, 2006 Propensity Score Adjustment in Survival Models Carolyn Rutter Group Health Cooperative AcademyHealth, Seattle WA.
Advertisements

Coronary heart disease (CHD) event rates in secondary prevention and acute coronary syndrome trials A. Kumar, C.P. Cannon. Arch Med Sci 2007;3:S115-S125.
Liver Fibrosis Are Non-invasive markers sufficient? William Rosenberg Prof of Hepatology University of Southampton CSO iQur Limited; Consultant to Bayer.
Prevalence of and Progression to Abnormal Non-Invasive Markers of Liver Disease (APRI and FIB-4) among US HIV-infected Youth Kapogiannis B, Leister E,
The Progression of Liver Fibrosis is Associated with the Severity of the HIV Disease in HIV-HCV Co-infected Female Patients Mohammad K. Mohammad 1, Babu.
UK Renal Registry 16th Annual Report Figure 8.1. Trend in 1 year after 90 day incident patient survival by first modality, 2005–2011 cohort (adjusted to.
Clinical Model for NASH and Advanced Fibrosis in Adult Patients With Diabetes and NAFLD: Guidelines for Referral in NAFLD Featured Article: Jessica Bazick,
Glucose Levels and Risk of Dementia Presented by - Anas Kabaha, MD Sheba medical center Sheba medical center August 8,2013.
Deranged LFTs Pathways A H Mohsen Dr A H Mohsen MD (KCL), MRCP, DTM&H Consultant Gastroenterologist.
Impact of weight management in chronic HCV Egyptian patients on liver fibrosis. By: Dr. Osama A. Fekry Lecturer of CN at the AUC Head of clinical Nutrition.
Periportal Fibrosis Without Cirrhosis Does Not Affect Outcomes Following Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Jonathon E. Sargent, BS,
Dr Laura Bonnett Department of Biostatistics. UNDERSTANDING SURVIVAL ANALYSIS.
Lower the better; the case for glucose Professor Taner DAMCI Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Medical School, TURKEY.
Figure 6: Risks of outcomes in the primary (A) and secondary (B) prevention cohorts for men in various BMI groups compared to patients in the “normal BMI”
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
A Claims Database Approach to Evaluating Cardiovascular Safety of ADHD Medications A. J. Allen, M.D., Ph.D. Child Psychiatrist, Pharmacologist Global Medical.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Trial profile Prakash Deedwania, et al. Lancet 2006; 368:
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Incidence, Temporal Trends, and Prognostic Impact.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease / Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis 소화기내과 R3 신아리 1.
Quali differenze in rapporto al sesso nella monoinfezione HCV PITER cohort data Loreta Kondili Istituto Superiore di Sanità.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Understanding the Inflammatory Cytokine Response.
Clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis NAFLD and NASH Prevalence in US Cohort Slideset on: Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Use and Outcomes of Triple Therapy Among Older Patients.
Table S1. Logistic regression analysis for the variables associated with the degree of change in cTnT between 2 time points (n=89) UnivariateMultivariate.
Supplementary Appendix Thrombotic Risk Scores % of Patients Risk Categories Low Risk (n=3491) Intermediate Risk (n=2806)
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Nonfasting Glucose, Ischemic Heart Disease, and.
The SPRINT Research Group
Figure 1 Proposed risk stratification for patients with NAFLD
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e1 (January 2010)
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
Alina M. Allen MD, Patrick S. Kamath MD, Joseph J. Larson,
Eradication of HCV induced by DAAs
UK Renal Registry 18th Annual Report
Clinical outcome after SVR: Veterans Affairs
Copyright © 2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Supplementary Table 1. Dissociation cases of EI and Fibrosis Case 1 2
More Than Meets the Eye: Identifying Who Is at Risk for NASH
Determinants of new onset diabetes among hypertensive patients randomised in the ASCOT-BPLA Trial Dr Ajay K Gupta International Centre for Circulatory.
Volume 136, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Individualized prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis  Astrid Marot, Jean Henrion, Jean-François.
Volume 145, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2013)
Volume 154, Issue 8, Pages e8 (June 2018)
Prevalence of NAFLD (panel A) and advanced fibrosis (panel B) in the general population and in patients with T2DM according to different diagnostic tools.
Clinical outcome after SVR: ANRS CO22 HEPATHER
Volume 140, Issue 7, Pages e3 (June 2011)
NAFLD Paul Trembling Consultant Hepatologist
Impact of Educational Attainment on Health Outcomes in Moderate to Severe CKD  Rachael L. Morton, PhD, Iryna Schlackow, DPhil, Natalie Staplin, PhD, Alastair.
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e1 (January 2010)
Kaplan Meier survival curve free of CV events and Cox proportional hazards model. Comparison of ATPIII and IDF classifications Kaplan Meier survival.
Cumulative incidences of events, according to glucose-control strategy
Baseline Characteristics According to Sex
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants
Prevalence of Antibodies Against JC Virus in Patients With Refractory Crohn’s Disease and Effects of Natalizumab Therapy  Emanuelle Bellaguarda, Kian.
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Association of Vascular Disease Before Transplantation With Long-term Transplant and Patient Outcomes After Kidney.
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Laurent Castera, Mireen Friedrich-Rust, Rohit Loomba  Gastroenterology 
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Time to disease progression or death in a) the whole Bosentan Use in Interstitial Lung Disease (BUILD)-1 study population and b) the subpopulation with.
Incidence of HCC after HCV treatment with DAAs: ERCHIVES
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Thiazolidinedione use is associated with better survival in hemodialysis patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes  Steven M. Brunelli, Ravi Thadhani,
Associations of hemodialysis dose and session length with mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand patients  M.R. Marshall, B.G. Byrne, P.G. Kerr,
A: Probability of SICH by baseline glucose level.
NAFLD and NASH in Europe and Canada
Risk of type 2 diabetes as a function of ABCA1 and ABCG1 genotype in CCHS. Hazard ratios were multifactorially adjusted for age, sex, BMI, hypertension,
Validation of serological biomarkers for detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and/or advanced liver fibrosis in people living with HIV.
Presentation transcript:

Simple Noninvasive Systems Predict long-term Outcome of Patients With NAFLD Angulo P, Bugianesi E, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Mills PR, Barrera F, Haflidadottir S, Day CP, George J

NAFLD Prevalence 20-30% in Europe 2nd - 4th most common indication for transplantation in the US

Predictive value of scoring systems for NAFLD  <1% progression to cirrhosis  7-11% progression to cirrhosis

Scoring systems for fibrosis in NAFLD NAFLD fibrosis score APRI-Score FIB-4 Score BARD Score

Study design - NAFLD based on liver biopsy - Follow up (mean 104 months) - Multicenter cohort study patients

Correlation of scores with fibrosis

Liver- related events Outcome Death/ Tx Death/ Tx

Assignment of patients to risk groups NAFLD fibrosis score – age, BMI, diabetes, AST/ALT, platelets, albumin APRI – AST, platelets FIB-4 – age, AST, ALT, platelets BARD – BMI, AST/ALT, diabetes Low intermediate high  According to pre-described cut-off values

Correlation outcome- risk groups Liver- related events Low intermediate high 1,6% (2/125) 10,4% (12/115) 42% (29/69) NAFLD fibrosis score BARD-Score 1,7% (2/119) 19,3% (23/119) 25,4% (18/71) APRI-Score 1,1% (1/90) 13% (21/162) 36,8% (21/57) FIB-4 Score 2,7% (3/111) 3,6% (4/112) 41,9% (36/86)

Death/ Tx Death/ Tx Correlation outcome- risk groups Low intermediate high 4% (5/125) 16,7% (20/120) 21,3% (16/75) NAFLD fibrosis score BARD-Score 4,2% 16,9% 19,5% APRI-Score 9,7% 10% 25% FIB-4 Score 5,4% 12% 22,8%

Cumulative probability Kaplan-Meier analysis

Adjusted Hazard Ratios Cox proportional harzard regression analysis Adjustment by sex, hypertension, race, statin use, fibrosis, (age, diabetes, BMI)

Adjusted Hazard Ratios Risk for Liver- events NAFLD FS 1 7,7 34,2 Low intermediate high BARD 1 6,2 6,6 APRI 1 8,8 20,9 FIB-4 1 0,92 14,6 Risk for Death/ Tx Risk for Death/ Tx 1 4,2 9,8 11,8 1,6 11,1 3,2 12,3 6,9 - Confidence intervals not shown

Study design evaluation Large population Long follow up Diagnosis by biopsy Adjustment of other risk factors Selection bias No standardized monitoring No standardized treatment Large CI Likeliness of developping cirrhosis?