© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Controls Assurance and Institutional Risk Management Gary Roper Research Governance Manager.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality

Advertisements

Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.

1 Documentation Legal Framework Air Navigation Orders Guidelines ATS Manual Airport Manual Safety Management Manual ICAO Annexes Licenses / Certificates.

1 Regulation. 2 Organisational separation 3 Functional Separation.

A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation

Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit

New Trials If you are seeking a collaboration with the UCL CCTU we require you to apply: At least 3 months before the application deadline By using the.

Quality Management within the Clinical Research Process

 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.

A Blueprint For Clinical Research: Standard Operating Procedures

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER New York State Office of the State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, Comptroller Office of Operations John.

Responsible Sponsorship A case study Dr Birgit Whitman, Head of Research Governance.

Managing Sponsorship Research Services University of Oxford.

Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.

CEET Conference 2008 Is Quality Assurance Improving? Rob Fearnside, Deputy Director VRQA.

What Is Quality by Design?. Quality by Design: QbD Defined Prospectively examining the objectives of a trial and defining factors critical to meeting.

Health and Safety Risk Assessment (RA) End presentation Risk Assessment (RA)

Health and Safety Risk Assessment (RA) Health and Safety RAs are developed for all incident type TOG and other specific subject matters to identify the.

Structure and Responsibility

PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.

Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 112 Communicating Internal Control Related Matters Identified in an Audit.

Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Financial Intermediaries and Resettlement Planning Instruments.

Internal Auditing and Outsourcing

ASSESSMENT OF CATASTROPHE RISK IN INDUSTRY Paul Kleindorfer Technology and Operations Management, INSEAD Ulku Oktem Risk Management and Decision Processes.

© 2010 Plexent – All rights reserved. 1 Change –The addition, modification or removal of approved, supported or baselined CIs Request for Change –Record.

Audits & Assessments: What are the Differences and How Do We Learn from the Results? Brown Bag March 12, 2009 Sal Rubano – Director, Office of the Vice.

Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,

Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training ISR Systems Danbury, CT 2011.

Lisa Haddow.  Met 4 times since Sept 2012  Carried out a Cardio Lite (Collaborative Assessment of Research and Data Infrastructure and Objectives) exercise.

Driving Innovation to Market. Partnering with the Office of Intellectual Property and Industry Sponsored Research December 10, 2013 Tara A. Kamin, Esq.

Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation

University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.

General Principles for the Procurement of Goods and Services Asst. Prof. Muhammad Abu Sadah.

Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.

UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.

UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.

Raymond F. Anton, MD for The COMBINE Study Research Group

Manage Risk through Simple Project Management Peter Williamson Barker College.

© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Risk Management QMS Training.

CAURA Ontario 2013 November 25, 2013 Presented by: Susan Munro, Assistant Director, Research Finance, McMaster University Annie Rémillard, Team Leader,

QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool

Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TEMPLATE Svilena Simeonova, Director of Internal Control Directorate, Ministry of Finance, Bulgaria.

R&D Annual Report SLaM Board, Sept 2004 Graham Thornicroft Gill Dale.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Health and safety audit Imperial College’s methodology Julia Cotton College Safety Auditor.

8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.

RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR CONVERGING MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDER’S EXPECTATIONS Organised by National Treasury Presented by WELEKAZI DUKUZA CEREBRO.

Major Project Governance Assessment Toolkit Mark Ritchie, University of Edinburgh Pauline Woods-Wilson, Lancaster University Project and Change Management.

Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Risk Management for Partnerships Chris Bealey, LSIS Partnership Adviser Terry McHale, Open4learning Partnership.

Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor

Auditors’ Dilemma – reporting requirements on Internal Financial Controls under the Companies Act 2013 and Clause 49 of the Listing agreement V. Venkataramanan.

SUNY Maritime Internal Control Program. New York State Internal Control Act of 1987 Establish and maintain guidelines for a system of internal controls.

Risk Assessment Beginning an Analysis Date by Jim Bowman.

An Overview on Risk Management

Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor

Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions

Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Finance

OSG Computer Security Plans

Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)

Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training

Continuity of Operations Plan/Continuity of Government (COOP/COG)

Elements of an Organized Regulatory Binder

Change Assurance Dashboard

Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Planning Instruments

MANAGING HSE IN CONTRACTS 2017 GU140 (C9)

Internal controls 01-Nov-2017.

Change Assurance Update

There is a significant amount of diversity across the 38 rural councils in terms of the challenges faced, as well as capacity, resourcing and uptake.

Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials

Presentation transcript:

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Controls Assurance and Institutional Risk Management Gary Roper Research Governance Manager

© Imperial College LondonPage 2 Overview Institutional Controls Assurance Gap Analysis Working Document Change Implementation Project specific risk assessment Summary

© Imperial College LondonPage 3 Controls Assurance Staging and gap analysis process Simple way to separate provision and needs Allows clear goal setting Provides documentation to support compliance Provides core assessment for change management.

© Imperial College LondonPage 4 Gap Analysis Working Document CT Toolkit template from ‘Managing a portfolio of trials 3’ document. Based on UCL system. Originally complemented NHS system – now superseded. Identified Compliance Measures

© Imperial College LondonPage 5 Gap Analysis Working Document Levels of Responsibility Designation of Responsibility Financial Probity Reviews and Approvals Written Agreements Honorary Contracts Compliance

© Imperial College LondonPage 6 Gap Analysis Working Document Event Reporting Sponsorship Fraud and Misconduct Records Management Training

© Imperial College LondonPage 7 Gap Analysis Working Document Best Practice Previous Actions Current Review Actions Required Comments A. Council level responsibility for research governance is clearly defined and there are clear lines of accountability throughout the University leading to Council. B. There is a designated person with responsibility for the management of all clinical research undertaken

© Imperial College LondonPage 8 Change Implementation

© Imperial College LondonPage 9 Project Specific Risk Assessment Incorporated as part of sponsorship assessment and approval system. Allows review of potential risk to the Institution. Is used as a marker for monitoring and audit provision. Useful as an additional stage of project review.

© Imperial College LondonPage 10 Project Specific Risk Assessment HazardImpactLikelihoodScore Potential for adverse publicity/controversy Approvals process not adhered to Facilities not able to met project needs Financial costings not fully met Inadequate arrangements with collaborators Lack of training/experience Potential for adverse reactions Project management not clearly defined IP and/or publication process not defined Provision for vulnerable subjects

© Imperial College LondonPage 11 Project Specific Risk Assessment Grading score 1 (minimal) to 5 (catastrophic). Impact x Likelihood = hazard score. Mean hazard score provided overall project risk between 1 and 25. The greater the number the greater the risk.

© Imperial College LondonPage 12 Summary Controls Assurance and project risk assessment are two extremes of the same compliance process. Analysis essential for service provision and development. Both exercises provide valuable data to complement monitoring and audit requirements.