1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
SAFETY NET NETWORK LEADERSHIP AND ADVISORY GROUP MEETING Wednesday, June 19, 2013.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Session 321 An Implementation Strategy: Identifies who is responsible for which actions Identifies what funding mechanisms and other resources are available.
VOLUNTEER MANAGEMENT INTERNAL KICKOFF DATE The Leadership Development and Strategic HR Practice Area is presented by American Express. This Service Grant.
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Welcome to the Business and Operational Planning for School-Based Health Centers RFP Workshop April 12, 2010.
Purpose of Project  To assess the state of oral health within Douglas County  To develop a strategic plan, utilizing the data obtained from the assessment,
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 3-1.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Identifying Effective Practice-Based Strategies for Engaging Families and Youth Bill Hobstetter & Carol Cecil Kentucky Partnership for Families and Children.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
All Youth Ready at 21. Connecticut Youth Futures Policy Team  Participates in: Youth Policy Institute of the National Conference of State Legislatures,
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
January 23, 2015 This product is supported by Florida Department of Children and Families Substance Abuse and Mental Health Program Office funding.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
A Case Study for Effective Collaboration for Health St. Clair County, Illinois Mark Peters Director of Community Health St. Clair County Health Department.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs that Promote the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children Part II Roxane Kaufmann, Karen Blase,
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
MHSA Technical Assistance and Planning Update CMHDA All Directors Meeting January 13, 2005.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Jeb Bush Governor Lucy D. Hadi Secretary 1 OQM, PaRTs, Sterling Overview Florida Department of Children and Families Office of Quality Management Child.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
Key Functions & Responsibilities (from the old governance document) – Coordinates the program-level adaptive management system and assists the GITs in.
Enhancing capacity in the Child & Youth sector through situated supported distance learning Building Capacity through a Participatory Institutional Assessment.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
An Overview of Rural PACE 1 st Educational Series Conference Call – 2:00 PM, 1/26/04 Presented by: Rural PACE Technical Assistance Program.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
1 This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Accreditation Canada Medicine Accreditation 2016.
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
Kathleen Amos, MLIS & C. William Keck, MD, MPH
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Presentation transcript:

1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute

2 Mission and Purpose CBC Peer Review Quality Assurance and Technical Assistance Teams, in partnership with DCF, CBC Lead Agencies, and Community Alliances, will assist in the quality assurance review and provision of technical assistance to insure that Districts and new Lead Agencies are fully prepared to implement their Community-Based Care services.

3 Background 1998 – CBC Office produces Prototype Lead Agency Readiness Assessment – District 5 Start-Up –Focus on Lead Agency readiness activities and deliverables –Criteria centered on infrastructure development and operational implementation of programmatic plans Incorporated into Start-Up Deliverables for all subsequent start-up projects through 2002 January 2003 – Prototype Peer Review Concept Implemented through FMHI Partnership Contract

4 January 2003–June 2003 Prototype Peer Review Concept Implementation Steps B. Initial Peer Reviews: District 10: -Initial Review and Report: March 5 th and 6 th Final Review and Report: June 23, 2003 District 4 Duval County: -Initial Review and Report: April 22 nd 23 rd Final Review and Report: June 18, 2003 Background con’t A. February 2003 – Completed Collaborative Planning and Development Workshops  Produced initial District/CBC Integrated Tool  Developed Review Process and Procedures

5 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. C.Additional Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures for: January 2003–June 2003 Prototype Peer Review Concept Implementation Steps

6 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Procedure: Community Alliance members added to Peer Team Process for all Projects Alliance members provide the Team with local priorities

7 Alliance Participation Procedure DA and CBC CEO request local Alliance participation Alliance Member(s) appointed by local Community Alliance to the Team Included as member of the Team throughout the Process Identifies for the Team the Alliance’s local priorities. Coordinates with the District and Project to ensure priorities are agreed upon and addressed in project plan.

8 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…services to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Action Steps Completed: 1) Readiness Assessment Tool is aligned with statutory, contract, and policy requirements: A Set of Uniform Criteria reflecting national accreditation standards that evaluate:  Programmatic Competency  Financial Competency  Technical Assistance  Training Competency  Organizational Competency 2) Local Criteria including community alliance priorities provide by Alliance member

9 Selection of Peer Reviewers Team Leaders Identified based on: –District or Lead Agency Leadership position –willingness and availability to assist in the entire review process –Prior experience successfully transitioning services to a CBC agency Remaining members identified based on: –Demonstrated competency in area of need –Willingness and availability to assist in the entire review process –Areas of expertise chosen for an individual review are based on local request for assistance

10 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Other Statutory Requirements Managed through Process: Team Exit Conference Written and documented specific evidence of readiness on each element of the readiness instrument. Description of each element of readiness needing improvement and strategies being implemented to address each.

11 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

12 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Assists the District and Lead Agency in a preliminary Project assessment and preparation for Team Site Visit. Provides an external quality assurance review of Readiness deliverables On-site Visits Provision of model start-up deliverables, best practice information. Review of project deliverables and plans; feedback and technical assistance Identify available technical assistance from other districts/projects

13 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Coordinates the recruitment of peer review team members, schedules site visit dates and associated logistics Provides Team with project information including all desk review material Supports team’s activities during site visit; moderates group meetings Prepares initial and final reports Provides follow-up and coordination of technical support to the districts as needed

14 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

15 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS District DCF and Lead Agency Budget side-by-side Comparison Lead Agency Table of Organization System of Care Overview Services Implementation Plan Quality Assurance Plans Interim Services Contract (Service Scope and Tasks) Other as May be Requested by Team

16 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

17 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

18 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

19 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

20 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

21 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

22

23

24

25

26

27

28