Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Specifications for NuMI Primary Beam Instrumentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, R. Nicholson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England.
FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
The 2nd Tevatron Electron Lens and tests of a new electron gun in the framework of Beam-Beam Compensation project Yu. Alexahin, V. Kamerdzhiev, G. Kuznetsov,
Status and Future of Fermilab Test Beam Facility Erik Ramberg LCWS07 Performance of New Beamline Tracking, Cerenkov and TOF CALICE and MINERVA tests Potential.
MC_ Muon Beam Lines 8/3/06 Want a  beam of ~300MeV/c –This requires a  beam of ~300 MeV/c Possible Sources: SY Proton Beam line components removed.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
1 NuMI BEAM POSITION MONITOR via MAIN INJECTOR, and RECYCLER Brajesh Choudhary, 06.Mar.2003 MINOS Collaboration Meeting University of South Carolina, Columbia.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Craig Drennan Linac and Booster Beam Diagnostics Proton Source Workshop December 7 and 8, 2010.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
A Fiber Profile Monitor for Low Beam Intensities * G. Tassotto †, H.Nguyen, G. Sellberg, D. Schoo, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510,
Muon Campus Projects Jerry Annala Jan 23, µ AIP Scope Recycler RF system to provide needed bunch structure to future Muon Experiments Recycler RF.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Uli Raich CERN BE/BI Instrumentation for the new H - Source Test Bench Linac-4 Ion Source Review 2011 Uli Raich CERN BE/BI Linac 4 ion source review, CERN.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Status of Beam loss Monitoring on CTF3 Results of Tests on LINAC and PETS as R&D for TBL Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Thibaut Lefevre CERN CTF3.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
FFAG-Workshop Dec Kumatori Japan Diagnostics for FFAG- accelerator Takahisa ITAHASHI Department of Physics, Osaka Univ. Toyonaka, Osaka, ,Japan.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
F NuMI Beamline Accelerator Advisory Committee Presentation May 10, 2006 Mike Martens Fermilab Beams Division.
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
NuMI Primary BooNE / NuMI S. Childress (FNAL) Primary Beams for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Craig Moore and Al Russell Includes.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Doug Michael Sep. 16, GeV protons 1.9 second cycle time 4x10 13 protons/pulse 0.4 MW! Single turn extraction (10  s) 4x10 20 protons/year 700.
Craig Drennan Linac and Booster Beam Diagnostics Proton Source Workshop December 7 and 8, 2010.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hair System NuMI Horn Alignment Cross-hairs Target Hall Instrumentation Review November 18, 2002 David Ayres Argonne National.
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
August 12, Machine Status: 2013  Proton Source Commissioning and Studies RFQ Injector Line (RIL) Linac : Roof hatch installed Booster : Magnet.
Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.
NUMI Primary Beam Review August 14, 2001 NUMI PRIMARY BEAM INSTRUMENTATION Multiwires, Loss Monitors, Toroids Gianni Tassotto.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
NuMI PS Specs June 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
HB2008 – WG F: 27 Aug. S. Childress – Diagnostics_2MW 1 NuMI Beam Diagnostics and Control Steps to 2 MW S. Childress Fermilab.
PROFILE MONITORS FOR kW PROTON BEAM G. Tassotto, S. Childress, D. Jensen, D. Schoo Sept 24, 2014 NBI2014.
Requirements from BI and new instruments after LS1 LHC Optics Measurement and Correction Review; B.Dehning 1 Bernd Dehning CERN BE/BI
Primary Design Parameters July 13,2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Besides design specifications driven by physics and Main Injector beam parameters, significant.
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
Cryo Problem MD Planning Tue (1.11.) C B Day Time MD MP Tue 01:00
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Beam Tests of Ionization Chambers for the NuMI Neutrino Beam Monitoring System MINOS.
Proton Beam Diagnostics
Extract from today’s talk given to DCB
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011
Presentation transcript:

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Specifications for NuMI Primary Beam Instrumentation

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 2 NuMI Types of beam monitoring needs covered by P. Lucas. For each type of monitoring provide quantitative assessment of functional requirements. From these develop specifications for each type of primary beam instrumentation A general consideration is to utilize existing instrumentation designs - when these are compatible with requirements. Outline

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 3 NuMI Beam Intensity & Spill Requirements NuMI operational requirements are for the highest possible intensity which can be provided from the Main Injector, in parallel with targeting for Pbar production. For current machine function, the first Booster batch would be sent to AP0, with remaining 5 batches or ~ 80% of MI intensity extracted to NuMI. For NuMI system design requirements, we utilize an intensity limit of 4x10 13 protons / pulse at 120 GeV, with a 1.87 sec. cycle time. Beam is extracted with single turn kicker extraction. Use of single turn extraction is driven by excessive unavoidable beam loss with originally planned resonant extraction. Significantly reduced intensity is required for beam tuning, and near detector rate studies. Viable lower intensity capability is 2.5x10 11 protons/ pulse with one Booster batch, or 3x10 9 protons / bunch.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 4 NuMI Intensity Monitors Specified are two Torroid (beam current transformer) units of standard design. Features include: –Absolute intensity measurement to ~ 3% –No material in beam –Bandwidth ~ 4 MHz Plan also to have intensity outputs for beam position monitors (described later)

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 5 NuMI Beam Loss Monitoring NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period of several years. For each MI accelerator cycle, 5 of 6 batches will be sent to NuMI. Transport of this intense beam is in a tunnel located in the protected groundwater aquifer region. Shielding of the primary beam transport, as is done for the target hall, would be cost prohibitive. These constraints lead to a requirement for rigorous monitoring and control of beam loss during primary transport. Detailed MARS modeling of beam loss modes indicates the need to control NuMI high intensity beam loss to ~ of the transmitted intensity.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 6 NuMI Loss Monitor Requirements The single most important NuMI primary beam instrumentation requirement is to provide complete loss monitor coverage including: –sensitivity to all possible beam loss modes –redundancy for demonstration of full loss coverage –continuous checks for loss monitor function (crate high voltage, heartbeat sensor for a comprehensive set of monitors) –calibrated response, with a means of regularly checking monitor calibrations –dynamic range over a continuous spectrum of fractional beam loss from of the high intensity beam to a full beam loss

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 7 NuMI Loss Monitor Selection Three types of loss monitor units have been in general use in our beam systems. Two of these address NuMI loss monitoring needs, and are the types specified: –Lab standard sealed units (Argon gas), with new electronics designed for MI transfer lines. Thirty-five of these units are specified.. One issue to address is the need for dynamic range over a continuous spectrum of fractional beam loss from of the high intensity beam to a full beam loss These will provide the precision monitoring of beam loss points, with monitor mounting in a uniform manner on beam transport magnets. –Long loss monitors. These are heliax cables with ArCO 2 gas flow. Use is to provide continuous total loss monitor coverage for carrier pipe and pre- target tunnels. An issue to address is continuous checks for loss monitor function (crate high voltage, heartbeat signal)

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 8 NuMI Beam Profile Monitoring Beam profile monitors are essential to understand beam-line optics, emittance, momentum spread, etc. Existing types of external beam profile monitors (SWIC’s, Multiwires) obtain a profile distribution by passage of beam through precision planes [horizontal and vertical] of wires. For high intensity NuMI operation, beam loss from interactions in the monitor material preclude continuous use of either monitor type in the beam. Also monitor degradation from continuous beam exposure would be a concern. The alternative is to use non-interacting beam position monitors (BPM’s) for continuous monitoring of beam centroid position. Then the profile monitor material exposed to the beam must be sufficiently thin to enable diagnostic insertion into the beam.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 9 NuMI Beam Profile Monitors Monitor wire plane spacing requirements are compatible with existing designs for either SWICS or Multiwires: –1 mm along beam transport –0.5 mm for targeting lineup. Beam centroid determination can be as good as 1/12 of the wire spacing for a Gaussian beam distribution. Affecting absolute accuracy are alignment and fiducialization errors, plus errors in monitor insertion into the beam Either type of monitor uses the same 48 channel scanner for signal processing Remote capability for controlling in/out motion of monitor is needed, as well as a robust signal indicating monitor position status. A robust in/out motion is needed to maintain measurement accuracy. This indicates positioning reproducibility to < 50 microns.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 10 NuMI SWIC’s vs Multi-wires SWIC’s (Segmented wire ionization chambers) have been the external beam standard for beam profile / position monitoring since the mid 1970’s. Multi-wires (Secondary emission signal output) were developed for the collider transfer lines in the 1980’s. Each has comparable wire spacings, identical scanner readout systems, switchable gain for intensity range, and can be remotely positioned in or out of the beam. – Previous multi-wire positioning system has not been robust. New upgraded design effort (G. Tassotto, R. Ford). Existing SWIC’s were available for use, while new multi-wires must be built.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 11 NuMI Fundamental Multi-wire Advantages For NuMI primary beam, Multi-wires have fundamental advantages over SWICS: –Material in beam. Vacuum SWIC ~ 1.5 x fractional beam loss Multiwire 8 x fractional loss The ability to put SWICS in the beam at high intensity would be severely restricted. Also, the multi-wire provides an appropriate thickness target for absolute calibration of beam loss monitors in the loss region of interest. The SWIC interacts too much beam for a credible calibration of beam loss in the < region. –Accuracy of measurement for beam tails. SWIC profiles for tails of the beam distribution are strongly biased; multi-wire distributions are much more accurate. –Current SWIC design is not well matched to the vacuum levels needed for NuMI - organic seals, mylar windows,etc. Multi-wires are designed for lines with better vacuum than milli-Torr levels. Hence, the specification of multi-wires for NuMI profile monitors.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 12 NuMI Beam Position Monitors An essential feature of NuMI beam position monitors is that they must be always active and in place for measurement whenever beam is present. –Of existing detectors this feature is met only by non-interacting beam position monitors (BPM’s), as used in the accelerators. For similar reasons, these are also used in the MI to AP0 transport lines. –While not providing information re. beam profile, BPM’s give both beam intensity and position of the charge centroid of the beam. –Differences in NuMI BPM requirements beyond those used in current MI transfer lines are of two types, and are driven by the NuMI need for very good beam control. Sub-millimeter functional accuracy (resolution plus stability) Specification is for 0.2 mm along the transport, and 0.05 mm for target line-up. Need for reliable detector function calibration

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 13 NuMI BPM Specifications (continued) For each BPM detector, beam position and intensity should be provided for each Booster batch of the extracted spill. Provision must be made to avoid the possible use of stale BPM data. A goal is dynamic range meeting position accuracy specifications for an intensity range of 2.5 x to an upper limit of 8 x protons / batch. –The most important requirement is maintaining accuracy needs for high intensity operation. If conflict exists between this and dynamic intensity range, priority should be given to high intensity measurement precision. As example, current log-amp electronics provides large dynamic range, but at the expense of functional measurement accuracy. An engineering prototyping effort is underway (C. Drennan) to evaluate alternate BPM electronics designs.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 14 NuMI Beam Instrumentation Stations A total of seven beam position / profile instrumentation stations are located along the NuMI primary transport. Each station has horizontal and vertical BPM’s, and a multi-wire (H & V planes), except for the most upstream station, where limited transverse space allows only BPM’s. Horizontal and vertical correctors are positioned in close proximity to the beam instrumentation to the extent feasible. These locations are shown graphically, along with beam transverse size, in the following two figures. A total of 35 sealed beam loss monitors are positioned on transport magnets to provide full geometrical coverage of beam loss conditions (confirmed with MARS runs).

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 15 NuMI System Function of Instrumentation To provide the capability for the precision beam control needed for NuMI, a comprehensive system approach is needed in the use of beam instrumentation. Examples include: –The use of multi-wires as targets to provide absolute calibration of beam loss monitors for low beam loss levels. –Regular precision calibration of BPM function with use of multi-wires. –Quantitative monitoring of BPM intensities in comparison to Torroids as a functional check for both devices. –Closed loop auto-tune beam position control to enable position corrections without the typical beam losses produced in the correction process. –A comprehensive beam extraction permit system to preclude sustained high beam loss situations, and many individual beam cycle problems. –Beam loss budget monitor system to provide verification of clean primary beam transport.

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 16 NuMI Auto-tune Beam Control Automatic computer controlled correction of small (few mm) beam position excursions, using MI correctors and beam position monitors. Corrections are applied for the full beam line at one time, eliminating the beam loss during correction process which is common with manual beam tuning. Needs always active beam position instrumentation - BPM’s. –More severe requirements on BPM function than for many applications. In previous usage of auto-tune beam control, computer controlled tuning was initiated when positions from nominal deviated by the following amounts: –Switchyard: along beam transport microns (0.4 mm) septa lineup microns (0.2 mm) –KTeV: along beam transport microns (1.0 mm) (used wire profile detectors) target line-up - 50 microns (0.05 mm) –NuMI (projected): along beam transport microns (1.0 mm) target line-up -250 microns (0.25 mm)

Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 17 NuMI Upcoming Reviews Instrumentation - Part 2: - Aug. 14 Engineering design / construction progress Note: changed from original date of Aug. 6 Beam Extraction Permit System - Aug. 17