Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Janet Bohrer Development Officer Development and Enhancement Group Student involvement in quality assurance processes of the QA agencies ENQA workshop.
Advertisements

Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
The Academic Infrastructure and IQER Wendy Stubbs Assistant Director
Quality assurance considerations in work- based learning provision
Student Engagement: Indicators 5, 6 and 7 Dr Sarah Williamson Head of Learning and Teaching Support and Sarah Ingram Student Voice Officer
External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Mary Watkins.
External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Pauline Kneale Pro-Vice Chancellor, Teaching and Learning.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
UWE Bristol External Examiner Annual Reporting Rebecca Smith, Curriculum Enhancement Manager
How do we ensure quality in an expanding system? Liz Shutt, Head of Policy University Alliance.
Student Induction Student Representation
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
ACADEMIC QUALITY & STANDARDS TEAM 2008 QAA Institutional Audit Features of good practice: the development, consistent use and presentation of the Strategy.
Management of the quality assurance system at the University of East London Ruth Carter Head of Quality Assurance and Enhancement EUROPOS SĄJUNGA Europos.
Launch of Quality Management System
Recognition as a Professional Teacher in Higher Education: The Higher Education Academy professional recognition scheme Helen Barefoot Deputy Head of the.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
QUALITY IN TEACHING & LEARNING – WHAT WORKS Anthony McClaran Chief Executive, QAA Tuesday 22 May 2012 HEPI Conference ( Higher Education Policy Institute)
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
© Engineering Council 2011 UK Engineering Degree Accreditation Engineering Doctorate EngD ENAEE, November 2012 Deborah Seddon, Head of Policy and.
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
1Induction for Subject External Examiners Nicola Clarke Academic Standards and Quality Assurance Manager.
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
Partnership Forum 2014 Welcome. What’s New in the QA Office? Two Dedicated Collaborative Provision Staff Tina Hagger – New Collaborative Provision
Embedding quality – a quality enhancement driven approach Jill Morgan Assistant Dean, Learning and Teaching, Quality Enhancement, School of Arts and Media.
Quality Assurance in English Higher Education Cross Border Issues and Transferability Bev Thomas Deputy Director for HE Access and Quality Department for.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Student Education Service QUALITY ASSURANCE QAA Update HEFCE consultation on future of quality assessment arrangements QAA Quality Code Alignment - programme.
Student Representation September 2013 Professor Patricia Price PVC: Student Experience and Academic Standards Cardiff University.
Validation, Annual Review and Periodic Subject Review at the University of Northampton Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25 April.
‘to safeguardthe public interest in sound standards of higher education qualifications and to inform and encourage continuous improvement in the management.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
University of Glamorgan Faculty of Business & Society FGM Development Day Wednesday 18 th July 2012 The UK Quality Code for Higher Education A Brief Guide.
Quality and Standards for Higher Education. The QAA Established in 1997, QAA safeguards quality and standards in UK HE. Primary responsibility for quality.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
DEVELOPMENTS IN UK QUALITY ASSURANCE Anthony McClaran Chief Executive, QAA June 2012.
Qualifications frameworks and qualifications standards Bryan Maguire Quality and Qualifications Ireland Conference on National Qualifications Framework.
Directorate of Academic Affairs and Registrar Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Annual Institutional Report (AIR) Reporting Period: 1 January –
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Exploring chapter B7 of the UK Quality Code and what external examining means to Institutional Review (IRENI) The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
QUALITY ASSURANCE & ENHANCEMENT IN THE UK AEUA Presidents’ Meeting, 4 July 2011, Groningen Professor Ella Ritchie Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Newcastle University.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
The Potential of UKPSF at NU
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Quality and Standards An introduction.
The view from the ‘regulator’
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Meeting Quality Standards when working in collaboration
External Examiner Reports
Student engagement in QA in Scotland
Quality Assurance and Enhancement
External Examiners Briefing Session Friday 14th December 2018
Validation and Periodic Programme Review Chairs and Panel Members
Validation Programme Developers
Presentation transcript:

Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013

2 ThenNow?

What is quality assurance? 3 System/procedure EvidenceAnalysis/judgements Improvements

Key components of quality assurance Academic standards – setting and maintaining Quality of learning opportunities Enhancement 4

5 Quality assurance – the external environment (1) An ever-changing environment – previously QAA carried out subject level reviews and institutional level audits Inspection Changed attitudes Mistrust Systems put in place Bureaucratic Closing the loop Tick-box-approach Student views Expensive Evidence Time-consuming Equity

Quality assurance – the external environment (2) Alongside audit and reviews the Quality Assurance Agency introduced the various components of the “academic infrastructure” The Framework for Higher Education Qualification – aligns to Bologna process and the Dublin descriptors Subject benchmark statements Programme specifications The Code of practice Following a national review the academic infrastructure is now being re-formulated as the UK Quality code for higher education 6

Quality assurance – the external environment (3) What do we have now? Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) carries out reviews of institutions on a six year cycle, no more subject level review Continued commitment to review being a peer process not inspection Greater emphasis on quality enhancement Greater involvement of students – students are now on the review panel Transparency Emphasis on public information Recent national consultation on a revised method for institutional review – a risk-based approach National Student Survey (NSS) 7

Quality assurance – the external environment (4) QAA Institutional Review involves : Production of a Self-evaluation document by the institution setting out how quality assurance works and a Student Written Submission Two visits to the institution by the QAA review team over a six week period Meetings during these visits with staff and students Reading the Self-evaluation document, Student Written Submission and other documents Assessing from the written and verbal evidence, and judged against the QAA Quality code, whether the institution is managing its quality assurance processes appropriately Published report – judgements, recommendations and features of good practice 8

9 Quality assurance – the external environment (5) What effect does the external quality assurance environment have on us at King’s? Our own quality assurance systems need to be in harmony with the external environment Changes to the requirements of the external environment mean changes to our systems Sometimes this is a simple matter of making adjustments to a process Sometimes this means introducing a new process

10 Quality assurance – the King’s approach (1) The College’s philosophy of quality assurance has been to embed it as part of “normal” activity – it is the responsibility of everyone Quality assurance is best undertaken close to the place of delivery as it engages those involved in the activity and allows it to become developmental

11 Quality assurance – the King’s approach (2) governance and management King’s operates a devolved structure in which the nine Schools of study operate with a large degree of autonomy – this recognises the diversity of the Schools and the environment in which they operate Schools have a responsibility to ensure the quality of their own activities but this autonomy has to operate within an agreed framework – this framework is agreed by the committee governance structure The challenge in such a structure is to ensure an appropriate balance between central oversight and local decision making

12 Quality assurance – key features (1) Regulatory and policy framework Process for the approval of new degree programmes which operates at School level Annual reports from Schools to the College Education Committee Review of degree programmes at School level every six years for approval at College level Regulations and procedures for operating assessment with a common scheme for degree classifications Involvement of External Examiners in the assessment process and use of their reports Student views on teaching and teachers - Staff/Student Liaison Committees, student feedback questionnaires Use of student-related data to analyse performance Induction and development of staff for their role in teaching Importance also of quality enhancement to make improvements

13 Quality assurance – key features (2) All the above features of a quality assurance framework are designed to ensure academic standards and the quality of student learning opportunities Underpinned by an infrastructure in terms of learning resources, information technology and student support mechanisms eg personal tutors, welfare support The challenge is to fit all the pieces of the framework together as part of a coherent structure so that the evidence generated allows identification of problems and solutions

14 Academic standards Learning opportunities Programme approval Programme review Use of QAA Quality Code PSRB guidelines Student support – academic and pastoral Student complaints and appeals Admissions policies Assessment policies and regulations External Examiners’ reports Student representation Student feedback National Student Survey Annual reports Analysis of student performance data Information for students Collaborative provision Staff induction, development and reward Resources for learning

15 Current/future challenges (1) On-going balance between central oversight and local autonomy in quality assurance Effect of increased tuition fees – are students becoming more demanding in their expectations? Expansion of student numbers – ensuring that resources can continue to meet the demand and that all students still receive an excellent learning experience Making better use of technology to support quality assurance processes Increasing expectations of the professionalisation of academic staff in their teaching role and ensuring appropriate reward structures for teaching

Current/future challenges (2) Increasing collaborative delivery – joint degrees, partnership programmes, study abroad Diversified curriculum - flexible and distributed learning Diverse student body Information explosion Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) 16