LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 HAM Suspensions Update Advanced LIGO Suspensions LIGO-Virgo Meeting March 2009 Derek Bridges representing Advanced LIGO Suspensions team

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO2 Advanced LIGO SUS Team LIGO Caltech: M. Barton, D. Coyne, J. Heefner, A. Heptonstall, K. Mailand, N. Robertson (also at Glasgow), C. Torrie LIGO MIT: P. Fritschel, R. Mittleman, B. Shapiro LIGO LHO: B. Bland, D. Cook, G. Moreno LIGO LLO: D. Bridges, M. Meyer, B. Moore, J. Romie, D. Sellers, G. Traylor University of Glasgow: C. Craig, L. Cunningham, A. Cumming, G. Hammond, K. Haughian, J. Hough, R. Jones, R. Kumar, I. Martin, S. Rowan, K. Strain, K. Tokmakov, M. van Veggel, A. Wanner Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL): A. Brummitt, J. Greenhalgh, J. O’Dell University of Birmingham: S. Aston, R. Cutler, D. Lodhia, A. Vecchio University of Strathclyde: N. Lockerbie

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO3 HAM Suspension Overview Four types of suspensions sit on HAM optical tables Large Triple suspension (HLTS) – 265mm dia. optic Power Recycling Cavity Mirror (PR3) Signal Recycling Cavity Mirror (SR3) Small Triple suspension (HSTS) – 150mm dia. optic Input Mode Cleaner (IMC) Power Recycling Cavity Mirrors (PRM, PR2) Signal Recycling Cavity Mirrors (SRM, SR2) Double suspension – 450mm × 150mm × 38mm optical bench Output Mode Cleaner (OMC) Single suspension – 76mm dia. optic – iLIGO Small Optic Suspension (SOS) Input Mode Matching Telescopes Steering Mirrors

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO4 Stable Recycling Layout HAM2 HAM3 HAM4 HAM5 HAM6 Large Triple (HLTS) Small Triple (HSTS) Double (OMC)

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO5 HAM2 Layout To HAM1 To HAM3 SOS IMC3 IMC1 PR3 PRM

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO6 HAM3 Layout To HAM2 To BSC2IMC2 PR2

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO7 HAM Suspensions Status Triples Preliminary design review complete Triples electronics Design pursued by SUS-US building on SUS-UK work Production by SUS-UK Large Triples (HLTS) Prototype being fabricated Stainless steel welded structure – resonance testing done Minor redesign of some parts underway Small Triples (HSTS) Input Mode Cleaner prototypes fully tested at LASTI Upcoming triple-quad cavity test at LASTI

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO8 HAM Suspensions Status (cont.) Doubles (OMC) Output Mode Cleaners installed, being tested and commissioned for Enhanced LIGO at LLO and LHO Final design review ongoing Procurement to start by May 1, 2009 Singles Baseline – reuse iLIGO SOS’s (Small Optic Suspension) Wires and clamps to be replaced

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO9 Triples PDR Preliminary design review for triple suspensions conducted Nov Jan Result: Proceed with final design Recommendations: Investigate stronger/higher-stress blade springs to increase vertical isolation Consider design with higher stress in wires to lower highest vertical frequency (28 Hz) Collaborate with SEI – does modeling indicate coupling (at 28 Hz peak in vertical) between HAM-ISI and suspension? Coordinate with SYS on max. acceptable weight based on layout Separate PDR to be held for electronics

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO10 HLTS (HAM Large Triple SUS) Used for large optics in stable recycling cavities Prototype being fabricated SSTL welded structure Resonance test results well-correlated with FE analysis (~140 Hz) Electronics test stand ready Some minor redesign of parts to simplify assembly Prototype testing at LLO

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO11 HSTS (HAM Small Triple SUS) Originally designed for Input Mode Cleaner Now also used for small Recycling Mirrors IMC configuration tested at LASTI Problem with structural resonant frequencies Measured: First resonance = ~50 Hz Subsequent requirement: First resonance >150 Hz (to avoid affecting HAM-ISI controls) Need to increase frequency while maintaining footprint (crowding in HAM2)

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO12 HSTS (HAM Small Triple SUS) Structural redesign (T080318) Thicker base plate (1” → ~60 Hz) Addition of crossmembers and gussets (~85 Hz) Switch structure material from Al to SSTL Heavier Easier to weld Reduce mass of nonsuspended items Tablecloth – SSTL to Al Current FEA – ~105 Hz Increase size of structural members Provision for struts Baffle design (with IO) – still in progress

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO13 Output Mode Cleaner LLO OMCLHO OMC

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO14 LLO OMC Transfer Functions Magnitude Frequency [Hz] X-direction [Longitudinal] Y-direction [Lateral] Z-direction [Vertical] Roll [Rotation about X (RX)] Pitch [Rotation about Y (RY)] Yaw [Rotation about Z (RZ)] Credit: D. Bridges, T. Fricke Matlab model predictions Hz (X) 1.12 Hz (Z) 6.85 Hz (RX) 3.59 Hz (RZ) 2.54 Hz (X) 2.53 Hz (Y) Hz (RZ) 4.48 Hz (Z) 3.93 Hz (RY) Hz (RX) Hz (Y) Hz (RX)

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO15 LLO OMC Damping Tests HAM-ISI Actuation: 1000 nrad in roll Response: OSEM counts in Y Active Damping: Requirement to damp to e -1 = 36.8% in <10 seconds achieved Passive Damping: Measured Q values – ~90 (long.), ~70 (vert.) Values lower than modeled; however no requirement has been set Attributed to electronic cabling – investigation ongoing 10 seconds HAM-ISI Actuation: 2000 nm in X Response: OSEM counts in X Credit: D. Bridges, J. Kissel Time

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO16 Maraging Steel Blade Springs RFQ for more prototype blades Enlarge vendor pool Investigate higher-stress blades Thinner blades → Tighter blade curvature Testing of linear behavior, overload recovery to be done Electroless nickel-plating of blades now included in process specification (E ) Prevents corrosion Samples tested under multiple loadings – no flaking, no performance degradation

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO17 Misc. Engineering Improvements Many initiatives to streamline engineering work Opto-Mechanical meetings (twice monthly) – sharing of data between engineers in SUS, SEI, SYS, AOS Reinstated SUS technical meetings (weekly) New Advanced LIGO drawing templates (M. Meyer, B. Moore) New color coding system for materials (D. Bridges) More training in SolidWorks and PDMWorks Vault (version control for models and drawings), streamlined processes for new DCC New hires for drafting, logistics, clean and bake These initiatives support adherence to aggressive schedule Final Design Reviews – HSTS (summer), HLTS (autumn)

LIGO-G v1 Form F v1 Advanced LIGO18 Conclusions SUS teamwork continues Development work through FY 2009 in parallel with project work HSTS/HLTS – Design, prototyping, assembly, testing, final design reviews Triple Electronics – Finish design, build prototypes, design reviews OMC - Final design review actions, start production iLIGO OSEMs – Complete value engineering, design review, start production Quad SUS – Complete training (incl. electronics), receive production parts, start assembly