What does Indicator #13 say? Virginia Department of Education  “Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEP Planning Process Beginning at age 14 the IEP should be focused on meeting the student’s postsecondary goals. The IEP is a plan for preparing the student.
Advertisements

Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
Telling Your Data Story: Collection Through Reporting Marianne Moore, VDOE Paul Raskopf, VDOE Elizabeth Evans Getzel, VCU-RRTC Transition Forum 2010 Roanoke,
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Indicator #13:Transition Services for Students Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and.
TRANSITION SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 INDICATOR 13 BASIC REQUIREMENTS.
B13 Secondary Transition Updates
STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 Secondary Transition Update Secondary Transition Update.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Transition 101 I-13 Compliance: Transition Activities for Before, During and After the IEP Meeting.
Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS) Indicator B13 Secondary Transition January 2015.
Checklist and Example of Goals. 1. KIDS ID________________ Student Name______________________ 2. District Number____________ 3. IEP Date___________________.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
Indicator 13 August, Contacts Paul Sherman, DPI Procedural Compliance Workgroup, or
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Career, Vocational, and Transition Planning Fall 2011 Drake University.
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance & Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
FAQs about New Transition Plans DSD Related Services Department 1/27/2012.
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance & Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Indicator 13 File Review 1)Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
 Engaging Students  Empowering Self-advocacy  Enabling Postsecondary Success Bridging The Gap… Michigan Transition Outcomes Project.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
2010 B13 Data Collection March 24, 2010 Craig Wiles Public Sector Consultants Chuck Saur MI-TOP.
Indicator 13 Assessment Webcast Section 3: Evaluating Transition Plans Complete by November 15, 2011.
Indicator #13 Question 1 Virginia Department of Education 1.Did the LEA hold an IEP meeting to discuss measurable postsecondary goals for the student.
B 13 Secondary Transition Preparing for the 2015 IEP Review and Data Collection.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
Secondary Transition Services YTP Statewide Conference Hood River, Oregon February 18, 2010 February 2010Oregon Department of Education1.
Transition: Indicator 13 Professional Development August 2009.
District 214 – Transition Planning System Buffalo Grove High School Special Education Department.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx March 22, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
Getting to Know Indicator 13 MITS Summit 2010 Bonnie Boaz, Coordinator.
Indicator 13 Kentucky Transition Compliance Referencing Kentucky Compliance Record Review School Year
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
Post-Secondary Transition. Kentucky Transition Indicator 13 “Sub-Indicators” 49a Postsecondary Goals 49b Transition Services 49c Agency Involvement 49d.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Monitoring in California Special Education Division California.
IEP Team. Develops the IEP including the transition component for a single student.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Post-Secondary Transition
Appleton Area School District
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSITION PLANNING For Students with Disabilities
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Indicator 13, Secondary Transition IEP Record Reviews
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
California State Performance Plan
STARS Changes In Special Education
Post-Secondary Transition
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
The Transition Planning Process
Presentation transcript:

What does Indicator #13 say? Virginia Department of Education  “Percent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals that are annually updated and based upon an age appropriate transition assessment, transition services, including courses of study, that will reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals, and annual IEP goals related to the student’s transition services needs. There also must be evidence that the student was invited to the IEP Team meeting where transition services are to be discussed and evidence that, if appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who has reached the age of majority.” (20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(B)) Indicator #13

How will you review files? Virginia Department of Education  School divisions will report on IEPs developed between July 1 and June 30.  Each school division will review a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of IEPs for youth 16 and older, including students placed in other settings (private schools, employment, residential, etc). Indicator #13

How will you review files? Virginia Department of Education  Select records that represent:  all ages, 16 through 21  all schools within the school division  all disability categories proportionately represented  placements in settings outside of the public schools Indicator #13

How will you determine the number of files to review? Virginia Department of Education  Determine the total number of students with IEPs in the school division that are 16 years and older.  Select for review 20% of the school division’s total special education population, 16 years and older. Indicator #13

Here are some examples Virginia Department of Education  If the school division’s special education population, 16 years and older is 400, then select 20% of the records for 400 students.  20% of 400 or.20 X 400 = 80 REVIEW 80 Records  There are 1250 students in the school division ages 16 and older who have IEPs so select 20% of the records for 1250 students.  20% of 1250 or.20 X 1250 = 250 REVIEW 250 Records Indicator #13

How will you represent all the disabilities and settings? Virginia Department of Education  In selecting, identify records that proportionately represent each disability category within the school division (e.g., LD, OHI, VI, etc.).  In selecting, identify records from all schools within the school division with students 16 years and older, include students placed in other settings (school division placements in private schools, employment, residential, etc). Indicator #13

Here is an example Virginia Department of Education  Review 80 records; Proportionate representation  LD: 70% 70% of 80 or.70 X 80= 56  HI: 1% 1% of 80 or.01 X 80=.8 1  ED: 9% 9% of 80 or.09 X 80=  Intellectual Disability: 5% 5% of 80 or.05 X 80 4  OHI: 12% 12% of 80 or.12 X 80=  Autism: 3% 3% of 80 or.3% X 80= Indicator #13

Small Numbers Virginia Department of Education  When 20% of the school division’s IEPs are 15 or less all records should be reviewed.  When the total population is less than 15, all records should be reviewed and reported. Indicator #13

Here are some examples Virginia Department of EducationIndicator #13

Large Numbers Virginia Department of Education  When 20% of the school division’s IEPs are more than 250, review and report on at least 250 IEPs.  An example:  2040 students age 16 and older with IEPs. 20% of 2040;.20 X 2040= 408; Review at least 250 files Indicator #13

More Questions? Virginia Department of Education Questions about using the survey or the web site? Contact Liz Getzel at Questions about the survey questions? Contact Marianne Moore at Need Transition technical assistance? Contact your regional T/TAC Indicator #13