1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C2 to C5 fit up review-R41 Review of MC Type C to C assembly clearances with C2 to C5 shell surface interface details 12/19/06 Rev 4.
Advertisements

Deviations from fiducial locations are unacceptable in areas despite high accuracy at alignment points.
Mu2e Production Target Remote Handling By: Michael R. Campbell, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, , System Layout Basic.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
1 MC Assembly via Test Cell Crane FPA Stage 3 Peer Review August 12, 2005 T. Brown.
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
Update of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
K. Alam, CLIC workshop, October 16-18, CLIC workshop, October 2007 Working group “ Two beam hardware and integration” Test module in the two.
DROP IN ANCHOR DETAIL COMMERCIAL SERIES LIFTS INSTALLATION MANUAL Drop In Anchor/COMMERCIAL SERIES.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
MC Type-B fit up review1 Review of MC Type B assembly clearances reviewing A-to-B and B-to-C interfaces 3/1/07 Summary: Wing interfaces look okay between.
2.5.5 Student Book © 2004 Propane Education & Research CouncilPage Coordinating Loading and Unloading of ASME Tanks Using Contractor- Operated.
NCSX Modular Coil Turning Fixture FDR. Background Modular Coil winding forms are cast structures which provide the foundation on which the coils are constructed.
1 Dimensional Control for the National Compact Stellarator Experiment R. Ellis, A. Brooks, T. Brown, W. Reiersen, S. Raftopoulos, B. Stratton Presented.
1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown. 2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) – Stage 3 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined.
1 MCHP-1 clamp and MC port opening metrology review ProE model: stb-mchp-1_vvsa1_pppl_best_fit.asm stb-fpa_mech_left_side.asm, Rep: mchp-1_clamp_metrol_pts.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
Defining the Vacuum Vessel Geometry NCSX Project Meeting November 27, 2002 Art Brooks.
January 25, 2005GRETINA 2004 Review1 GRETINA 2004 Annual Review Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Mechanical System.
ZDC Remote Handling Tool Structure and Force Analysis P. Debbins University of Iowa December 10, 2009.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Thermal Insulation Final Design Review July 31, 2006 WBS12 NCSX.
NCSX Metrology. Goals –Need to accurately make measure measurements for several NCSX systems Modular coil –As-built measurements of coil form –Conductor,
Metrology Milestones Metrology Task Force –Vacuum vessel manufacture - P. Goranson –Mod. Coil Form manufacture - D. Williamson –Mod. Coil winding- S. Raftopoulos.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 17, 2007 T. Brown.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and Schedule, Staffing, and Metrology Utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
11/2/2005Mike Viola1 November Lehman Review November 2, 2005 NCSX VVSA NCSX Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Major Tool and Machine – S F 3 120° segments.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
LAV construction: Status and overview Matthew Moulson (Frascati) for the LAV Working Group NA62 Photon-Veto Working Group Meeting Brussels, 8 September.
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
1 NCSX WBS HANDLING/SUPPORT UPDATE PLG 7/23/03 STATUS Study is for 120 degree VVSA field period assembly. Vessel Installation Support Concept.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and schedule, staffing, and metrology utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
1 Field Period Assembly Office of Science Project Review Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ November 2, 2005 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Field Period Assembly Mike Viola NCSX Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Project Review April 8-10, 2008.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
1 Stellarator Core Metrology issues NCSX WBS-1 Meeting April 2, 2003 What are we measuring? When? How do we take the measurements? How do we correlate.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
AWB Dimensional Control Requirements for the Modular Coils and TF coils Field Period Assembly Peer Review October 11-12, 2006 Art Brooks.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Final Design Review November 17, 2005 Man Access Port /Lateral Supports NCSX.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Accelerator Systems Installation F. Willeke, ASD Director 6 th ASAC October 22-23, 2009.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
1 Modular Coil Assembly Fixture (MCAF) Information Meeting February 23, 2005.
DRAFT Cost and schedule, staffing, metrology utilization 10 AM October 12, 2006 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
10/31/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = October 31, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
SEPT 20, 2006 T. Brown, M. Cole, P. Fogarty, P. Goranson, K. Freudenberg, D. Williamson NCSX STAGE 2 COIL TO COIL ASSY.
8/15/2007Mike Viola1 NCSX Field Period Assembly + + = August 15, 2007 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
12/19/2006Mike Viola1 December Lehman Review December 19, 2006 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX Field Period Assembly + + =
375, 375XL 1¼” -2”. Modification Overview  Production of the 1¼” -2” 375 began in 2004 and is current.  The lead free version 375XL was introduced in.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
1 FPA Stage 2 MC Flange Assembly Issues and Design Proposals June 20, 2006 T. Brown.
1 VV Support Fixture FPA Stage 1 PDR Review August 10, 2005 T. Brown.
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC Michigan State.
1 NCSX VV Assembly Joint Issue B. Nelson 17 Mar 2005.
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
Radiation Shutter Re-Purposing Roy Preece STFC RAL 18 th December 2014.
SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ATLAS pixel module assembly flow
ProtoDUNE – DSS Installation, Alignment and QA
On the accuracy of port assembly at Wendelstein 7-X
NC and CNC machines and Control Programming
Presentation transcript:

1 Stage 3 Peer Review October 26, 2006 T. Brown

2 Field Period Assembly (FPA) 1.Make sure the requirements for the tooling is well defined (including dimensional control requirements) 2.Make sure we have a design which functionally meets those requirements (including a credible metrology approach) 3.Make sure that the tooling meets structural design criteria 4.Make sure that all chits from the Station 2 tooling have been addressed and relevant chits from the FPA Peer Review have been dispositioned and are being addressed Charge:

3 MCHP installation over VV period – Stage 3  Provide a stable VV support system.  Provide a method for rotating a MCHP over the VV without interferences.  Provide for temporary support for each MCHP to set Type-A flange and VV interfacing components.  The goal for the final tolerance for the completed assembled MC period is ± 0.020”. BASIC REQUIREMENTS:

4 The design intent for Stage 2 is pass two modular coil half period assemblies over the VV and accurately position mating flanges…without hitting the VV. Vacuum Vessel Period Module Coil Half Period

5 The MCHP must follow a prescribed path The 24,000 lb MCHP must move over the VV field period within a prescribed assembly path. An assembly path has been established that maximizes the VV/MCHP distance. Assume a 1” stand-off to vessel surface components

6 A 0.45” minimum clearance exists between wing region of Type A’s as the two half period MC shells comes together. MC to MC Clearance Wing region

7 Type B distance to shell off-normal points is 1.53” at the 60% step 1.528”

8 R&D activities were used to help developed the Stage 3 assembly approach. Crane Supported – hand assisted assembly

9 25,000 lb concrete block 120” long, 40” wide and 60” high MC crane assisted assembly simulation was set up using a concrete block with three lasers mounted to it. The concrete block motion was controlled by using a combination of the D-site test cell crane and three chain-fall supports mounted to the crane hook. MC Installation Development Activity

10 The path traveled by each laser was plotted on sheets of velum and mounted to the screens, aligning pre-marked crosshairs located on the screen with marks on the printed paper One-quarter inch circles were used to define the required laser positions along the curve path. The block was manipulated to follow the sequential points with an occasional maximum deviation of about ¾” to 1”, all within our allowed assembly tolerances. Improvements will be made using motor driven mechanical screws with in-line encoder.

11 To improve the accuracy of moving the MCHP we will be replacing the chain falls with mechanized screw systems with inline encoders. Crane system updated with mechanized screws

12 Laser system is used to follow the assembly path

13 Pre-fit flange shim installation at Type-A interface Metrology measurements taken to establish left MCHP position The right MCHP position set to spherical seats using the crane/mechanized screw system All shims are installed once alignment is set. Will this be done in the horizontal position?

14 Final Stage 3 fixture details and assembly sequence. Vacuum Vessel supported and in position to receive left MCWF Take metrology measurements Define VV position

15 3.5” VV weight with ports shown is 3629 lbs.

16 Stage 3 fixture details and assembly sequence (cont). Left MCWF moved into position by overhead crane Left support cart moved into position. Load supported and crane removed The left side is rotated over the VV and placed ¾” from its final position and supported from the roller system below.

17 Stage 3 fixture details and assembly sequence (cont). Right MCWF moved into position by overhead crane Right support cart moved into position. Load supported and crane removed. Metrology measurements taken. The right side is rotated to within ¾” of its final position and held by the crane. The left side is then moved to its final position via rollers and the right side mates with the spring loaded spherical seats via the crane system.

18

19 Hilman Roller Guide Roller A roller system is used to guide support cart

20 A high load leveler system supports the MCHP AirLoc Wedgemount bolt on spherical seat precision leveler

21 The FPA tooling design is in progress –Stage 1 is complete and assembly activities are in progress –The Stage 2 fixture is out for bids –The Stage 3 fixture design is nearing completion and a final design review has been scheduled –Stages 4 and 5 fixture design are in progress Additional small scale tooling and handling fixtures will be developed as they are identified. The assembly design and fixture details will continue to be updated through our prototyping process Summary