23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Case Study Palos Verdes Shelf Judy C. Huang, P.E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solid Phase Extraction Issues TRC September 2007.
Advertisements

Contaminants at the Estuary Interface Jon Leatherbarrow 1 Rainer Hoenicke 2 Lester McKee 1 1 San Francisco Estuary Institute 2 California Resources Agency.
Concentrations and loads of PCBs and OC pesticides in the Guadalupe River watershed Jon Leatherbarrow 1,2, Lester McKee 1, John Oram 1 1 San Francisco.
PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (POPs) IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS SAMPLED BY SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANE DEVICES (SPMDs) Per-Anders Bergqvist, *Lijana Augulytė,
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Understand Aging in Contaminant Bioavailability and Remediation
Risk e-Learning Webinar Passive sampling for the measurement of freely dissolved contaminants in water: Practical Guidance Upal Ghosh University of Maryland.
Spokane River PCB Source Assessment Washington State Department of Ecology Spokane River Forum May
Expanding NVODS to capture local municipal monitoring data in Southern California Larry Cooper SCCWRP.
Grand Calumet River/Indiana Harbor Canal Feasibility Study
The situation in Norway concerning sediments/dredging Tore Lundestad, Port of Borg, Norway.
Mark Richards Virginia Department of Environmental Quality What’s in Your Water? A Discussion of Threats to Virginia’s Water Quality William & Mary School.
General Electric – Housatonic River Project November 6, 2002 Overview of NAPL and Groundwater Programs Mike Nalipinski EPA New England Mike Nalipinski.
Robert M Burgess Office of Research and Development, NHEERL, Atlantic Ecology Division Narragansett, Rhode Island & Marc S.
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
POPs Monitoring in Japan – Fate and Behavior of POPs - Takeshi NAKANO, (Hyogo Pref. Inst. of Pub. Health & Env. Sci.) Minoru.
SRRTTF Synoptic Sampling Event August Sample scoping meeting and site reconnaissance on July , 2014 Scope revised to include vessel use,
Measuring PCBs in Lake Ontario Surface Water Using Full-Scan Congener Methods Frederick Luckey U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Simon Litten.
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF DIOXIN LIKE COMPOUNDS IN THE UNITED STATES Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America Fourth Workshop on Sources.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
A Hazardous Waste Site PCB Contamination. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Man-made class of oil-like chemicals used in the manufacture of electrical.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
Ultra-Trace PCB Sampling
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Passive Sampling Case Study: United Heckathorn Superfund Site Rachelle S. Thompson, MS, PE US EPA Region 9.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Danny Reible – University of Texas Heidi Blischke - GSI 1 Polydimethyl siloxane 2 Solid Phase Microextraction.
Organochlorine pollutants in sediments in Escambia Bay and River Johan Liebens Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences Carl Mohrherr (ret.) Center for.
LA-UR PCBs in Rio Grande Watershed Surface Water and Sediment Sampling A Cooperative Study Ralph Ford-Schmid, NMED Ken Mullen, LANL October.
David Maidment & Lynn E. Katz & Imane Mrini Center for Research in Water Resources The University of Texas at Austin Total Maximum Daily Load for Zinc.
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Passive sampling methods (PSMs) for organic contaminants in sediments: State of the Science Keith Maruya Southern California.
Proposed Lake Michigan Rivers Network NMN proposed 17sites. Lake Michigan group added 3 additional sites that already conduct flow and quality monitoring.
Sheen Characterization 2009 Data and Observations July 2010 Progress Meeting McCormick & Baxter Superfund Site Portland, Oregon.
A Complex Eco-friendly Geotextile Container Used in the Dredging and Disposal of Contaminated Materials at Victoria Harbor Felix Tseng 1 Clark Chu 1 Amy.
Challenges of Conducting Analytical Chemistry in Environmental Matrices May 8 th 2006 Meg Sedlak and Don Yee San Francisco Estuary Institute Oakland, California.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Partitioning and Bioavailability Assessment for Sediments from South Wilmington Wetlands Huan Xia and Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical,
Porewater: NJDEP Site Remediation Program regulatory perspective
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
USE OF PORE WATER IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC DATASETS TO EVALUATE REMEDIAL SUCCESS IN A FRESHWATER RIVER ENVIRONMENT Hudson – Delaware.
S O U T H F L O R I D A W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T D I S T R I C T Request to Discontinue Project HGOS Prepared for the Technical Oversight Committee.
Mussel watch programme in support of the WFD monitoring : the RINBIO and MYTILOS project Louis A. ROMAÑA Ifremer - France Workshop on ‘In-situ trialing.
Project Update: Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site October 24, 2012 Mr. David King, PE – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Gary Klawinski – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Mark Surette.
Margaret Byrne, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
A Comparison of SPME Approaches for the Analysis of Alkylated PAHs in Pore Water Porewater: The Interaction between Sediment, Biota, and Water 2015 Fall.
Brian Hitchens and Sam Williams PCBs in the Urban Environment: Implications for Long-Term Sustainability Of Low-Threshold Remediation.
Dredging 2012 THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF AQUATIC DEPOSITION FOR M 3 CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS FROM OSLO HARBOR, Norway. Arne Pettersen Gijs D. Breedveld.
In Situ Sediment Treatment: State of the Practice
Draft Data - Do Not Cite, Quote, or Distribute 2006 Sport Fish Status and Trends March 18, 2008 TRC Meeting Jennifer Hunt
On September 30, 2009, EPA signed an interim Record of Decision that selected a cleanup remedy for Palos Verdes Shelf. The selected remedy has three components:
Status of Sediment and Groundwater Remedies. Or… What’s up with that O&F Determination?
Combining prediction and monitoring for reduction of toxics: the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study Glenn Warren, Russell Kreis, and Paul Horvatin U.S. EPA,
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Hexavalent Chromium MCL Regulation Guidance Eric Zuniga, PE San Bernardino District SWRCB – DDW.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Draft Work Plans West Branch of the Grand Calumet River Indiana September 2002 prepared by Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation for Grand Calumet River.
Passive soil gas sampling during natural attenuation of a site contaminated with diesel fuel (Steven Verpaele) Passive soil gas sampling during natural.
Multi-year Trends and Event Response
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
PCB Concentrations in the Ambient Waters of the Delaware Estuary and Coastal Waters: Implications for TMDLs for PCBs Thomas J. Fikslin and Gregory Cavallo.
Effect of Aging on Contaminant Bioavailability
Presentation transcript:

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Case Study Palos Verdes Shelf Judy C. Huang, P.E.

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 1 PORE WATER AND BIOAVAILABILITY COURSE

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 2 Outline  Site Location and History  Passive Sampling Activities and Results  Advantages of Passive Sampling  Lessons Learned  Site Cleanup Progress  Next Steps

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 3 Location Map

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 4 *Courtesy of Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Interim Record of Decision  Institutional Controls  Monitored Natural Recovery  Clean Sediment Cap

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 6 Passive Sampling Activities  Conducted by Dr. Loretta Fernandez through EPA Office of Research and Development  2010 Water Column Study  2011 Sediment Flux Study

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Water Column Study  Objective: Measure Water Column Contaminant Concentrations  Study Design: 12 Stations, 3 Depths (Bottom, Mid Column, and Surface)  Sampling Media: Microextraction (SPME) Fibers, and PRC Preloaded Solid Phase Polyethylene (PE) Strips  Target Contaminants: DDT Congeners, DDD, DDE, DDMU, DDNU and 43 PCB Congeners  Study Period: Deployed in September 2010 for 32 Days

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 8 Water Column Study Sampling Locations * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 11937−11947

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 9 Passive Sampling Rig Assembly 5 m from bottom Sediment Bed Anchor Buoy Line PSDs Water Surface m from surface surface

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 10 p,p’ DDE (SPME) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 11937−11947

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 11 p,p’ DDE (PE) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 11937−11947

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 12 Sum of PCB Concentrations (PE) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 11937−11947

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Sediment Flux Study Objectives  Investigate effects of pilot sand cap on the flux of DDTs and PCBs from sediment to the water column using passive sampler derived concentration gradients  Observe concentrations of dissolved DDTs and PCBs in pore water as a function of depth  Compare the performance of different types of polymeric passive samplers

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Sediment Flux Study Design  6 Stations  PRC Preloaded Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) Fibers, Polyoxymethylene (POM) and Polyethylene (PE) Strips  DDT Congeners, DDD, DDE, DDMU, and PCB Congeners  Deployed in July 2011 for 44 Days

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 15 Flux Study Sampling Locations * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3925−3934

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 16 Flux Platform Design

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 17 Flux Platform * Photo Courtesy of Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 18 Flux Platform Deployment * Photo Courtesy of Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 19 Flux Platform Deployment  * Photo Courtesy of Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 20 Flux Platform Retrieval * Photo Courtesy of Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 21 p,p’ DDE (PE Average) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3925−3934 Depth (cm) Flux Rate (ng/ cm 2 y )

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 22 p,p’ DDD (PE Average) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3925−3934 Depth (cm) Flux Rate (ng/ cm 2 y )

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 23 p,p’ DDMU (PE Average) Depth (cm) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3925−3934 Flux Rate (ng/ cm 2 y )

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 24 PCB 52 (PE Average) * Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3925−3934 Depth (cm) Flux Rate (ng/ cm 2 y )

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 25 Advantages of Passive Sampling  Does not require collection of a large quantity of water per sample  Time and Cost Saving: two deployments vs. multi- day water collection  Data represents only the dissolved and bioavailable fraction of contaminants of concern  Allows calculation of flux rate  Ability to measure water column pollutant concentrations immediately above seabed

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 26 Advantages of Passive Sampling  Allows EPA to evaluate feasibility of remedial options  Allows EPA to monitor for remedy effectiveness

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 27 Lessons Learned  Not all passive samplers are created equal  Choice of sampling media determined by Contaminant of Concern  Be aware of site conditions  Sample rig design and placement should be based on actual site conditions

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 28 Cleanup Status  Suspended cap design, since post capping IROD goals appear to have been achieved  Monitored Natural Attenuation is occurring  Appeared to reach IROD fish tissue goals for DDTs but not PCBs  Met IROD sediment goals for PCBs in Sediment but not for DDTs  Not enough information to determine water column compliance progress

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 29 Next Steps  Sediment Analysis  69 Locations  Analytes: DDT related compounds and 28 PCB congeners  Water Column Analysis  Passive sampling in 17 locations  High Resolution GC/MS Analysis Pilot Study: Sample collection at all passive sampler deployment location plus 35 sediment baseline locations

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 30 Next Steps (cont.)  Fish Tissue Analysis  White croaker and barred sand bass in multiple locations  Skin-off fillet to be analyzed and whole fish concentration to be calculated using PV Shelf specific translators.

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 31 Acknowledgement  Loretta Fernandez, Northeastern University  Robert Burgess, EPA ORD  Chi-Li Tang, Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles  Joe Gully, Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles  Keith Maruya, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project  Robert Lindfors, Gilbane

23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program 32 Questions?