9 th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services Charles B. Lowry, Ph.D. Executive Director,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
 A pattern of basic assumptions that are considered valid and that are taught to new members as the way to perceive, think, and feel in the organization.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Assessing Organizational Culture: Moving Towards Organizational Change and Renewal Carol ShepstoneLyn Currie Head, Access ServicesHead, Education Library.
IN THE FUTURE ORIENTED PUBLIC LIBRARY Experiences from Canada
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Employee Attitudes … Job Satisfaction
Chapter 6 Groups and Teams. Copyright © 2006 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Purpose and Overview Purpose –To understand effective.
© 2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.18–1 Institutionalization: A Forerunner of Culture.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N.
ClimateQUAL Survey at University of Illinois Library Library Faculty Meeting November 19, 2014.
© 2006 Prentice Hall Leadership in Organizations 12-1 Chapter 12 Strategic Leadership by Executives.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Report Introduction OIRA administered the Employee Satisfaction Survey (ESS) in November-December 2003 to all AUB employees,
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
ACA and Youth Development M. Deborah Bialeschki, Ph.D., ACA Marge Scanlin, Ed.D., ACA Michelle Gambone, Ph.D., YDSI Funded by Lilly Endowment Inc.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Group 4: Corporate Culture. Abstract In this presentation, we will discuss corporate culture In this presentation, we will discuss corporate culture We.
By STEPHEN P. ROBBINS MARY COULTER
CMM Level 3 KPA’s CS4320 Fall Organizational Process Focus (Goals) Software process development and improvement activities are coordinated across.
The Training Needs of University Sustainability Managers David DuBois, PhD The Social Design Group Cathy DuBois, PhD Kent State University Presented at.
Change, boundaries, skills and people value: a provocation Stephen Town Director of Information University of York.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
of Research Libraries Assessing Library Performance: New Measures, Methods, and Models 24 th IATUL Conference 2-5 June 2003 Ankara,
2009 Grants Update. Mission To strengthen rural Minnesota communities, especially the Grand Rapids area.
The Assessment Environment in North American Research Libraries Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia 7th Northumbria.
DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:
 Center for Innovative Leadership Development  Leadership Group of the Carolinas  Leadership Conferences  Expanding Graduate Programs  Doctoral Cohorts.
Types of Assessment Satisfaction of the customer. Satisfaction of the worker. Workflow effectiveness and speed. Service delivery effectiveness and speed.
Pullman Regional Hospital June 30, 2010 Culture Trumps Strategy The Impact of Leadership on Patient Safety.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Successful and Not Successful Implementation THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE FACTORS Funding for this project is made possible through a Cooperative.
1 TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT Human Resource Management College of Public and Community Service University of Massachusetts at Boston ©2008 William Holmes.
Competing Values Framework © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.
Efforts to Develop Staff Who’s Doing What. OCCR: Partnering with Brandman University Personal Leadership Self-Management How Leaders Build Trust Resilient.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey.
United Way of Delaware Agency Report Education Presented by Paulette Robinson-Wilkerson.
Organizational Climate and Culture LD 1-1. Training Objective Task: Create a positive organizational climate and culture Condition: Given a block of instruction.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR S T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S W W W. P R E N H A L L. C O M / R O B B I N S T E N T H E D I T I O N © 2003 Prentice Hall Inc.
© Farhan Mir 2012 IMS Current Issues in Management M Phil Managing Diversity 2 Some Further Research Findings Course Lecturer: Farhan Mir.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
March 14, 2009 ACRL 14 th National Conference Seattle, WA ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Presented by Martha Kyrillidou,
ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Sue Baughman Texas Library Association April 2009.
ClimateQual Employee Climate Survey Measures staff perceptions Assess the health of a library Comparison to other like libraries Track changes over time.
Assessing Organizational Culture: Moving Towards Organizational Change and Renewal.
Impacting Communities, Organizations, VISTAs and You.
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-36. Summary of Lecture-35.
September 26, 2006 From Organizational Assessment to Organizational Change: The University of Maryland Library Experience M. Sue Baughman Johnnie Love.
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Importance of Training & Development MEANING OF TRAINING –  A framework for helping employees to develop their personal and organizational skills, knowledge,
The Study of Organizations
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
9th Northumbria International Conference on
Change Management DEFINATION:
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
Assessing Library Performance:
CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND DIVERSITY
Organizational Behavior
Organization Development and Change
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
February 21-22, 2018.
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Organization Development and Change
Presentation transcript:

9 th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services Charles B. Lowry, Ph.D. Executive Director, Association of Research Libraries Subcultures and Values in Academic Libraries – What Does ClimateQUAL ® Research Tell Us?

ARL Tools for Library Assessment ARL Statistics™ Since LibQUAL+ ® Since 2000 MINES for Libraries ® Since 2003 DigiQUAL ® Since 2003 ClimateQUAL ® Since 2007

Survey of Staff Attitudes/Perceptions Assessment of Staff Perception Library’s commitment to the principles of diversity Shape Culture of the Organization Library’s organizational practices policies and procedures Healthy Organization

Goals of the Research Healthy Organizations are More Effective Establish Scales to Measure Health Develop Strategies for Improvement

Climate for Justice Climate for Leadership Climate for Deep Diversity Climate for Demographic Diversity Climate for Innovation Climate for Continual Learning Climate for Teamwork Climate for Customer Service Climate for Psychological Safety Organizational Climate Scales

Job Satisfaction Organizational Commitment Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Organizational Withdrawal Task Engagement Team Psychological Empowerment Work Unit Conflict Organizational Attitudes Scales

Early Research Healthy organization is better able to fulfill its service mission. Conflict within an organization can have a direct negative impact on customers. Climate for diversity improves the way an organization operates. Survey results can be turned into strategies for change that will improve the organization’s climate and ultimately the experience of the customer.

CVF Framework Clan Orientation Market Orientation Adhocracy Orientation Other Orientation Internal Focus External Focus Stability/ Control Flexibility/Di scretion

Standard Divisional Units Administrative Services Public Service and Instruction Technical Services Collection Development Special Collections/Archives Technology Research

Working Hypotheses The smaller the library staff size, the less likely that there will be differences among the standardized units in % agreement on the climate scales. There will be significant differences among the standardized units in % agreement on the climate scales; The standardized units will demonstrate the same rank order position in % agreement on different climate scales.

Staff Size – A Determinant? Total library sample 39 libraries Small size library—staff n<100 Medium size library—staff 100 <n <200 Large size library—n>200

Divisional Differences Percentage Agreement Total Sample Small Staff n<100 Medium Staff 100 <n<200 Large Staff n>200 Climate for Deep Diversity Standardization of Procedures Valuing Diversity Climate for Justice Distributive Procedural Interpersonal Informational Climate for Innovation Climate for Continual Learning Climate for Psychological Safety 0.01N/A

Divisional Differences Percentage Agreement Total Sample Small Staff n<100 Medium Staff 100 <n<200 Large Staff n>200 Climate for Team- work Benefit of Teams Structural Facilitation of Teams Climate for Demo- graphic Diversity Racial Gender Rank Sexual Orientation Climate for Leader- ship Leader-Member Relationship Quality Authentic Leadership

Divisional Differences Percentage Agreement Total Sample Small Staff n<100 Medium Staff 100 <n<200 Large Staff n>200 Climate for Customer Service Job Satisfaction Task Engagement Organizational Commitment Organizational Citizenship Behavior Organizational Withdrawal Team Psychological Empowerment Work Unit Conflict Task Conflict Interpersonal Conflict TOTAL scales with significant differences N = 11N = 16N = 8N = 7

Dimension 1 Climate for Organizational Engagement/Citizenship Scales Percent Agreement: Organizational Commitment Percent Agreement: Climate for Customer Service Percent Agreement: Climate for Teamwork, Structural Facilitation of Teamwork Percent Agreement: Climate for Continual Learning Percent Agreement: Job Satisfaction Percent Agreement: Climate for Psychological Safety Divisional Unit Rank Order Collection Development-.56Low Score Technical Services-.14 Public Services and Instruction.03 Special Collections/Archives.04 Administrative Services.17 Technology.20 Research.21High Score

Dimension 2 Climate for Demographic Diversity Scales Percent Agreement: Climate for Gender Diversity Percent Agreement: Climate for Racial Diversity Percent Agreement: Climate for Sexual Orientation Diversity Percent Agreement: Climate for Diversity of Ranks Divisional Unit Rank Order Special Collections/Archives-.07Low Score Public Services and Instruction-.01 Collection Development.01 Technical Services.08 Administrative Services.11 Research.23 Technology.23High Score

Justice Scales Distributive Justice Procedural Justice Interpersonal Justice Informational Justice

Low Means Percent Agreement on Justice Scales Total Sample Justice Scale/Division Technical Services Collection Development Special Collections Distributive JusticeSignificantly lower Procedural JusticeSignificantly lower Interpersonal JusticeSignificantly lower Informational JusticeSignificantly lower

Conclusions