EPAs New Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Model: Applying technology to support the Presidents climate change initiative 2010 Environmental Information Symposium.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Greenhouse Gases: Federal Regulatory Experience Spring Environmental Law & Texas Regulatory Symposium Austin, Texas April 15, 2010 James W. Yarbrough U.S.

Advertisements

The Future of the Automobile Industry By: Danny Levine.

What does REMI say? sm Tools for Evaluating Climate Change Policies with REMI PI+

1 April 2006 Collaborative Labeling and Appliance Standards Program (CLASP) The Rationale for Energy Efficiency Standards and Labels.

U.S. Russia Energy Efficiency Workshop November 17, 2010 Public Sector Energy Efficiency Financing Presenter – Amy Chiang, VP Global Energy Government.

European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 The Second European Climate Change Programme Working Group III Carbon Capture and Geological.

Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards A Global Review Public Hearing: Reducing CO 2 from Passenger Cars and Light Commercial Trucks.

The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) California Council on Science and.

Building a Better Future Stretch Building Code October 15, 2009.

The One Tonne Challenge Government of Canada. One Tonne Challenge - Overview A challenge to Canadians to reduce their GHG emissions by one tonne or by.

©Alston & Bird LLP 2009 Cap and Trade New bills and trends EEI and US CAP views Geir Vollsaeter Special Advisor Energy and Climate Change.

U.S. EPA Actions to Address Climate Change

The EPA Train Wreck Scott Manley Director of Environmental & Energy Policy Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce Contact: PO Box 352, Madison, WI Tel:

Producing energy does not have to threaten the environment. In fact, its very production can reap major environmental benefits. The United States biomass.

Air Pollution: CAFE Standards and Gas Taxes Mario Samano Department of Economics.

Takahiko Kiso August 6, 2012 An Evaluation of Footprint-Based Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards.

AB32: CAs Global Warming Solutions Act of first ever statewide cap of GHG pollution -CA is 12 th largest source of GHG pollution in world -law designed.

Ethanol & Petroleum: Substitute Goods or Complementary Goods

Linking PEVs with Sustainability & Building Benchmarking Goals.

1000 El Camino Real Menlo Park, CA Phone Fax An Economic Evaluation of the 2005 IEPR Michael C. Keeley,

Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle CAFE and GHG Standards Joint Briefing for WP29 June 2010 Informal document No. WP ,

How can we reduce our oil consumption ? Drive less and transport fewer goods less far design more energy efficient vehicle switch to non-fossil fuel based.

Transportation Issues. US Cars and Drivers US Population: 300 million Licensed drivers 190 million Cars and light trucks. 210 million.

The Road Ahead for Light Duty Vehicle Fuel Demand Joanne Shore Energy Information Administration July 7, 2005.

Moving Efficiently: Improving How We Transport Goods in America Glen P. Kedzie Vice President, Energy & Environmental Counsel American Trucking Associations.

Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.

1 MET 12 Global Warming: Lecture 12 Transportation Shaun Tanner Outline:   Energy use   Petroleum   Hybrid   Electric   Fuel Cell   Biofuels.

Transportation 1. Learning Objectives Understand that gasoline combustion moves the vehicle as well as emit greenhouse gases. Understand that carbon emissions.

1 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Rulemaking National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Informal Document No. WP th session, June.

Setting a GHG Emission Reduction Target Asher Burns-Burg ICF International.

Climate Change... Risks and Opportunities Taylor Davis John Deere Public Affairs Worldwide October 16, 2007.

Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Facilities May 13, 2010 Richard Kidd Program.

California’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Law and Nuclear Power California State Assemblyman Chuck DeVore January 26, 2009 Presented in the California.

11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.

How to Conduct a Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Broward County Pollution Prevention, Remediation and.

Office of Air and Radiation Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities July 2006.

The President’s “Twenty In Ten” Energy Security Plan Allan B. Hubbard Assistant to the President for Economic Policy & Director, National Economic Council.

The Case for Nationwide Standards Fuel Economy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation for Motor Vehicles 1.

1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.

EPA Activities - Tires Lois Platte September 19, 2002.

HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.

Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.

Driving Down GHG Emissions, Driving Up Fuel Efficiency: Coordinating a Groundbreaking National Vehicle Policy Kathryn Thomson Counselor to the Secretary.

Efficiency of Cars CREATE A PRESENTATION ABOUT HOW INCREASING THE EFFICIENCY OF CAR ENGINES WILL CHANGE AMERICA.

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Chapter 16.

1 “Using Carbon Markets to Encourage the Uptake of Low Carbon Vehicles” Meeting the Low Carbon Challenge The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership Third Annual.

TIGGER Program Public Webinar April 8, 2009 The American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Part Five, Issue 12 Motor Vehicles and the Environment.

Energy Solutions: Conservation and Efficiency  Read Pages 555 – 557  Describe two main approaches to energy conservation and give a specific example.

1 October 22, 2009 NESCAUM Low Carbon Fuel Standards Stakeholder Meeting Transportation Fuels Panel Boston, Massachusetts Watson Collins Manager, Business.

Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 24 Increasing Transportation Efficiency.

Global Warming By: Ryan Collins and Nguyet Luong.

Washington State: Climate Initiative

June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.

Unintended Consequences: Why U.S. AFV Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption & GHG Emissions under Federal CAFE/GHG Policy Jeremy J. Michalek Professor.

Towards A Unified North American Automobile GHG Standard Group 6 Elena Mager Riley O’Brien Sid Tetz.

U.S. Climate Policy Prospects in Wake of COP15 Henry Lee Princeton University February 9, 2010.

1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.

The Environment Ms. Dennis & Mr. Patten Participation in Government.

1 Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change Smart Growth America, The Urban Land Institute.

Energy Efficiency and Conservation

 Transportation choices and CO 2 emissions By: Dayanara Veliz & Abel Adam.

Energy Information Administration 25th Anniversary of the 1973 Oil Embargo 25th Anniversary of the 1973 Oil Embargo Energy Trends Since the First Major.

Tracking and Reporting Electronics Stewardship If You Can’t Count It, It Doesn’t Count Jeff Eagan Office of Environmental Policy and Assistance U.S. Department.

Likely Outcomes in the National Debate over Greenhouse Gas Emissions -a public policy analysis Maureen Coyle, University of Rhode Island Faculty Sponsor:

Tim Maker, Senior Program Director Biomass Energy Resource Center ENSURING FOREST SUSTAINABILITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF WOOD BIOENERGY IN THE US Pocantico.

How Alternative Vehicle Sales Trigger Higher-Emitting Fleets

Clean Cities Washington Day 2004 Fuel Economy Opportunities

Harvard Energy Journal Club 10/4/18 Felix Barber

GLOBAL EFFECTS.

Presentation transcript:

EPAs New Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Model: Applying technology to support the Presidents climate change initiative 2010 Environmental Information Symposium Steve Ziegler May 12, 2010

2 Agenda Challenge Model Results Oil crisis CAFE standard 1970s EPA CAA Tier 1 CA Low Emission Vehicle 1990s EPA CAA Tier 2 CA sues EPA 2000s EPA estimated mileage Phase out leaded gasoline 1980s

3 Challenge Different standards Fuel economy vs. emissions State vs. Federal Pollutant Emissions GHG Emissions Corporate Average Fuel Economy CA & Others: Pollutant Emissions GHG Emissions

4 Presidential Initiative May 2009 – President Obama announces tighter fuel efficiency standards Priority public policy initiative Push for new national standard Fuel economy & GHG emissions 31% Mobile Sources U.S. GHG Emissions In 2007

5 Team Office of Transportation and Air Quality Policy Subject matter expertise Model approach Inputs and post processing ICF Expertise in CAFE and fuel consumption modeling Model approach Model development

6 Model Overview OMEGA.NET Desktop Model Optimization Model for reducing Emissions of Greenhouse gases from Automobiles (OMEGA) ScenarioMarketTechnologyFuelsReference Various output files and formats txt

7 Manufacturer #1 Model Approach – Technology Selection 295 Manufacturer #2 CO2 (g/mi) 347 CO2 (g/mi) Technologies 1 FLAT 2 Pumping 3 Hybrid 4 Plug-in … $ $ $$ $$$

8 Model Approach – Changes In Fuel Manufacturer #1 295 Manufacturer #2 CO2 (g/mi) 347 CO2 (g/mi) Gasoline Diesel Electricity GGGGGGGDGDDDDGG +

9 Model – Selection Logic TARF – Technology Application Rating Factor Choose the least expensive technology Choose the most cost effective (most CO2 reduction for the least expense) based on the consumers estimated actual mileage Choose the most cost effective (most CO2 reduction for the least expense) based on EPA mileage estimates

10 Results National program Average 250 CO2 (g/mi) / 35.5 MPG by 2016 Automakers have clear, standardized targets Estimated $1,100 increase in vehicle price Estimated $3,000 in fuel savings during the vehicle lifetime A supposedly unsolvable problem was solved by unprecedented partnerships. – Lisa P. Jackson, EPA "At the end of the day, what's most important is that we have a single, national standard that is achievable, but that is aggressive and cost-effective." - Charles Territo, Auto Alliance This program lessons our dependence on oil and is good for America and good for the planet. – Ray LaHood, DOT

11 Results Forecasted benefits ( ) 960M metric tons of CO2 1.8B barrels of oil EPA was able to play leadership role in driving a priority public policy initiative Saving annual electricity for 117M homes Preserving 9M acres of forest from deforestation Removing annual emissions from 249 coal power plants