CPIC Training Session: Enterprise Architecture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conducting your own Data Life Cycle Audit
Advertisements

Business Alignment Using Enterprise Architecture
June 27, 2005 Preparing your Implementation Plan.
Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)
1 The IT Service Management Performance Challenge IT Service Management in the Federal Sector – A Case Study.
Chapter 1: The Database Environment
Multimission Ground Systems & Services MOS 2.0: A View of the Next Generation in Mission Operations Systems Duane L. Bindschadler, Carole A. Boyles, Carlos.
Data Architecture at CIA Dave Roberts Chief Technical Officer Application Services, CIO CIA
0 United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
An Overview of the Federal Segment Architecture Methodology
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Copyright The Info-Tech Research Group Inc. All Rights Reserved. D1-1 by James M. Dutcher Strategic IT Planning & Governance Creation H I G H.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
Software change management
Management Plans: A Roadmap to Successful Implementation
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
1 Dr. Ashraf El-Farghly SECC. 2 Level 3 focus on the organization - Best practices are gathered across the organization. - Processes are tailored depending.
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) Stage Gate Reviews
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
YES New Mexico Enterprise Eligibility System
Privacy Reporting and Investment Certification TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
400 7 th Street, SW | Washington | DC w w w. d o t. g o v MARAD EA Philosophy Donna Seymour, MARAD CIO Jason Kruse, Stanley Associates.
LMI Enterprise Architecture and Information Assurance Integration Approach A Case Study.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Products being integrated to create Home Base OpenClass Collaboration Schoolnet Instructional Tools and Assessment PowerSchool Student Information Core.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
CTS Strategic Roadmap Walkthrough, v1.2 Dan Mercer.
Creative Commons Sustainable IT Architecture year plan 1 / 18 Sustainable IT Architecture Sustainable IT Architecture.
DRAFT Reporting Department of Defense Programs to OMB Improving PEO and Local Program Manager Use of Exhibit 300s to Show Business Value / Architecture.
<<Date>><<SDLC Phase>>
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
Overarching Roles of Critical Partners In A Project 9:30 – 10:00 Rob Curlee, FMO Joseph Dominque, OCISO Mike Perry, EA.
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
0 United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program December 2007 EA Working Group Session.
Embedding Records Management into Agency Processes The FEA Records Management Profile Laurence Brewer, CRM National Archives and Records Administration.
Proposed EA Assessment Framework 2.0 Chief Architect’s Forum (CAF) Dick Burk Chief Architect and Director of Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB.
0 Un ited States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
Advising Strategic Plan University of Cincinnati August 10,2015.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
0 Un ited States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Enterprise Architecture Working Group.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program April 14, 2003 eGovernment Working Group Investment Year 2006 Planning/Budgeting Activities U.S. Department.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Federal Enterprise BOF Rick Murphy Chief Architect, Blueprint Technologies June 7, 2004.
1 Sobah Abbas Petersen Adjunct Associate Professor TDT4252 Modelling of Information Systems Advanced Course TDT4252, Spring 2011 Lecture.
© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved EA in the Federal Enterprise Life Cycle September 2006 Steve Decker MITRE Corporation Center for Enterprise.
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Architecture Plus Meeting December 4, 2007 Kshemendra Paul (Acting) Chief Architect.
New Paradigms for Capital Planning in IT Security Sandy Washington Federal Railroad Administration July 22, 2008.
Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office April 2003 Draft Performance Reference Model: Overview for Federal Agencies.
Managing Enterprise Architecture
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
Forest Service Geospatial Enterprise Architecture
Enterprise Architecture Methods
Agency SFY IT Strategic Plans: Training
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice
Vijay Rachamadugu and David Snyder September 7, 2006
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Presentation transcript:

CPIC Training Session: Enterprise Architecture 2007

Enterprise Architecture and CPIC What’s Important? CPIC and EA are mutually supportive processes which, when integrated, create the ideal environment for effective IT governance. Enterprise View of Agency IT Portfolio What is your investment business alignment? What technologies are you using? What enterprise services are you using? Moving toward the Target Architecture Are DMEs updating milestones documented in the Transition Strategy & Sequencing Plan?

FY07 Proposed EA Compliance Certification Criteria for majors in DME and selected Lites

Basic Solution EA Requirements for CPIC Integration Coordinated with READ Population

Complete READ Record Who: Program architects Step 01. Complete READ Record. Who: Program architects What: All CPIC Majors and Lites When: June 20, 2007 All CPIC Major and CPIC Lite applications need to be accurately captured within the READ system. The EA requirement for this step is to complete basic descriptive data and key EA-related information about your application. This data entry into READ allows the Agency two key understandings: 1) clear inventory of Agency applications; and 2) relationship of it’s applications to Agency business objectives. Required READ record information: General, Organization, Point of Contact, Interfaces to other Resources, Strategic Plans, Federal and EPA BRM, Federal SRM, Federal TRM, Life Cycle.

CPIC Lites, Complete the Investment Proposal Form Step 02: Complete business justification and BRM in CPIC Lite Investment Proposal Form Who: Program Project Managers and architects What: All CPIC Lites When: August 1, 2007 The requirement for this step is to complete the CPIC Lite Investment Proposal Form. This information allows the Agency to understand: 1) the justification of the application; and 2) alignment of the application to the business reference model (BRM). Much of the information captured in the CPIC Lite Investment Proposal form can be derived from the completed READ record. In this step, the EA team will verify critical EA information in the CPIC Lite Investment Proposal form against the information collected through READ and advise the Program architects on how to resolve any discrepancies. Required information includes: Part I: Background and Budget Information, Part II: Justification (BRM mapping)

Complete EA-related information in E300 Step 03: Complete business justification and reference models in OMB Exhibit 300. Who: Program Project Managers, and architects What: All CPIC Majors When: July 18, 2007 The EA requirement for this step is to complete the E-300 EA section. This information allows the Agency to understand: 1) the justification of the application; and 2) alignment of the application to the FEA reference models. Much of the information captured in the CPIC Business Case/E-300 can be obtained from the completed READ record (Step 1). In this step, the EA team will verify critical EA information in the E-300 form against the information collected through READ. The EA team will identify any discrepancies and will resolve these in coordination with the architects.

Part I.F: Enterprise Architecture 1. Is this investment included in your agency’s target enterprise architecture? Yes___No___ a. If “no,” please explain why? 2. Is this investment included in the agency’s EA Transition Strategy? Yes___ No___ a. If “yes,” provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency’s most recent annual EA Assessment. b. If “no,” please explain why? 3. Identify the service components……(SRM mapping) 4. How the investment aligns with the TRM….(TRM mapping) 5. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)? Yes____ No____ a. If “yes,” please describe. 6. Does this investment provide the public with access to a government automated information system? Yes___ No___ a. If “yes,” does customer access require specific software (e.g., a specific web browser version)? Yes___ No___ b. If “yes,” provide the specific product name(s) and version number(s) of the required software and the date when the public will be able to access this investment by any software (i.e. to ensure equitable and timely access of government information and services). YES YES …describe the reason adequately, referencing retirement and/or migration dates.* There must be at least one entry in the TRM table for each Component listed in the SRM. All columns are completed including the service specification field. If yes, identify what existing components or applications within EPA, or across the Government, that the investment is currently using. Please include EPA enterprise services as well as external components/services.

Detailed Solution Architecture Requirements Additional EA Requirements For E300’s in DME (and specifically identified additional investments)

Aligning the Performance Measures Step 01: Align Performance Information. Who: Program Solution Architects What: All CPIC Majors and selected CPIC Lites in Planning/DME When: July 18, 2007 New Federal emphasis on “Connecting the Dots” centers on aligning performance measures throughout the enterprise. This enables system owners to better justify their systems in relation to larger Agency objectives, but also for the enterprise to ensure that system development efforts and investment dollars are contributing to the overall progress of the organization. The EA requirement is to align system performance measures to external goals and objectives (specifically GPRA, PAR, and other key Agency objectives). This expands upon the alignment of performance measures to EPA strategic goals and objectives achieved in basic solution inventory activities. The “Connecting the Dots” information should complement the PRM information submitted in the E300.

Connecting the Dots Sample Objective 1: Improve effectiveness Performance goal 1: Increase X by 10% Connecting the Dots Sample PART Deficiencies Agency Strategic Plan Enterprise Architecture Exhibit 300 Exhibit 53 OMB Budget

Completed High-Level Business Model Step 02: Model the Business. Who: Program Solution Architects What: All CPIC Majors and selected CPIC Lites in Planning/DME When: July 31, 2007 All CPIC Major and selected CPIC Lite applications currently in Planning or Development need to model the high-level solution business process. Use of Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) in modeling/mapping this process is preferred. The intention of this criterion is not to require extensive process mapping or modeling. Rather, it focuses on the importance of capturing how the system aligns with Program/Agency services, and specifically how it is used/involved with core business service delivery.

Business Process Model Sample

Completed Conceptual Data Model Step 03: Describe the Core Data. Who: Program Solution Architects What: All CPIC Majors and selected CPIC Lites in Planning/DME When: July 31, 2007  An understanding of data is critical to any application. While we recommend maintaining a data model for all applications and data stores, the EA requirement for 2007 is that only CPIC Majors and selected CPIC Lites in Planning or Development complete a conceptual data model. Integrating the conceptual data models across the Agency will enable EPA to take enhance its data class model and ensure a clear understanding of the information that it maintains and manages as a critical asset.

Conceptual Data Model Samples

System Interface Model Step 04: Diagram Solution Interfaces. Who: Program Solution Architects What: All CPIC Majors and selected CPIC Lites in Planning/DME When: July 31, 2007 All CPIC Major and selected CPIC Lite applications currently in Planning or Development need to provide a diagram of the solution’s interface(s) with other Agency or Partner Organization solutions AND with all EPA enterprise tools. The interface information is important to gain an enterprise view of the applications’ dependencies on each other and the utilization of the core enterprise tools. The application dependency knowledge helps build complete transition and sequencing plans. The utilization of core enterprise tools will help ensure changes to the enterprise tools are well coordinated across all interfacing applications.

Solution Interface Diagram Sample #1

Solution Interface Diagram Sample #2