Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Groundwater Modeling - 1
Advertisements

Getahun Wendmkun Adane March 13,2014 Groundwater Modeling and Optimization of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency to sustain Irrigation in Kobo Valley, Ethiopia.
Aquifer Tests in Unconfined Aquifers Lauren Cameron Spring 2014.
Chapter 6: Bounded Aquifers Stephanie Fulton January 24, 2014.
Chapter 4- Leaky Aquifers
The Distribution of Permeable Zones Within the Ogallala in the Southwest Kansas Groundwater Management District 3 PRESENTED BY P. ALLEN MACFARLANE and.
A water budget perspective of leaky aquifer response to pumping David Scott 1 and Bruce Hunt 2 1 Environment Canterbury 2 University of Canterbury (Retired)
Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten.
Seismic Refraction. Some uses of seismic refraction Mapping bedrock topography Determining the depth of gravel, sand or clay deposits Delineating perched.
Analysis of Tomographic Pumping Tests with Regularized Inversion Geoffrey C. Bohling Kansas Geological Survey SIAM Geosciences Conference Santa Fe, NM,
Today’s Lecture: Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection. Thursday’s Lecture: Uncertainty analysis and Model Validation.
Theory of Groundwater Flow
Subsurface Hydrology Unsaturated Zone Hydrology Groundwater Hydrology (Hydrogeology )
Hydrologic Characterization of Fractured Rocks for DFN Models.
Watershed Hydrology, a Hawaiian Prospective; Groundwater Ali Fares, PhD Evaluation of Natural Resource Management, NREM 600 UHM-CTAHR-NREM.
Lecture Leaky aquifers. Review problem At time t=0 well A started pumping QA= 2 cfs. Well B started one day later with the same Q. Estimate the time at.
An example moving boundary problem Dry porous media Saturated porous media x = 0 x = s(t) h(0) = L Fixed Head If water head remains at fixed value L at.
1 Pumping Test Analyses in an Aquifer with Fresh Water/Salt Water Interface SWIM 2008 Liliana Cecan, Gregory Nelson, Charles McLane, and Maura Metheny.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
ESS 454 Hydrogeology Instructor: Michael Brown Module 4 Flow to Wells Preliminaries, Radial Flow and Well Function Non-dimensional.
Evaluation of a bedrock aquitard for regional- and local-scale groundwater flow Kenneth R. Bradbury, Madeline B. Gotkowitz, and David J. Hart Wisconsin.
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: –Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Radial Flow at a well Removal of groundwater faster than it can flow back lowers the water table near the well. The GWT becomes a radially symmetrical.
Review of Subsurface Seawater Intakes DEIR, Monterey Desal Project DRAFT Presentation to Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority 23 June 2015.
We greatly appreciate the support from the for this project Interpreting Mechanical Displacements During Hydromechanical Well Tests in Fractured Rock Hydromechanical.
Groundwater Flow and Transport over Larger Volumes of Rock: Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14.
Problem Set 2 is based on a problem in the MT3D manual; also discussed in Z&B, p D steady state flow in a confined aquifer We want to predict.
Groundwater Pollution Remediation NOTE 5 Aquifer Evaluation & Pumping Test Methods.
Garey A. Fox, Ph.D., P.E., Derek M. Heeren, Michael A. Kizer, Ph.D. Oklahoma State University Evaluation of Alluvial Well Depletion Analytical Solutions.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Approaches to Groundwater Modeling Conceptual Model.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Groundwater Modeling Study case : Central Plain of Thailand
Multi-Layered Aquifer Systems Chapter Nine Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data Revised Second Edition.
Storage Coefficients/Specific Yield. Storage Coefficient/Storativity S: storage coefficient or storativity: The amount of water stored or released per.
Theory of Groundwater Flow
Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection USGS publication (on course website): Guidelines for Evaluating Ground-Water Flow Models Scientific.
Modflow, GWVistas MODular three-dimensional finite- difference ground-water FLOW model
Boundary Layer Velocity Profile z ū Viscous sublayer Buffer zone Logarithmic turbulent zone Ekman Layer, or Outer region (velocity defect layer)
Darcy’s Law and Flow CIVE Darcy allows an estimate of: the velocity or flow rate moving within the aquifer the average time of travel from the head.
Study on scaling property of Topindex and the aquifer rating-curve in Illinois with the application of TopModel CE394K Term Project Presentation CE394K.
Aquifer Storage Properties CVEG 5243 Ground Water Hydrology T. Soerens.
Pump & Treat Experience at the NECCO Park Landfill Niagara Falls, New York Paul F. Mazierski, PG Senior Project Leader.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
Groundwater Flow to Wells
Involves study of subsurface flow in saturated soil media (pressure greater than atmospheric); Groundwater (GW) constitutes ~30% of global total freshwater,
Tracers for Flow and Mass Transport
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology Lecture 21: Groundwater Hydrology Concepts – Part 1 1.
Regularised Inversion and Model Predictive Uncertainty Analysis.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department EENV 5326 Groundwater Modeling.
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow & transport model) Adjust parameter values Design conceptual model Assess uncertainty.
A Saltwater Upconing Model to Evaluate Wellfield Feasibility Gregory W. Council Christopher J. Richards June 2008 Salt Water Intrusion Meeting (SWIM) Naples,
Groundwater Systems D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M8L3 Water Resources System Modeling.
Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2.
A Framework and Methods for Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Maps Donald A. Keefer Illinois State Geological Survey.
Flow to Wells - 1 Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney.
Objective: conceptual model definition and steady state simulation of groundwater flow.
AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY DESIGN CONCEPTS- KEYS TO SUCCESS Thomas M. Missimer, Ph.D. Missimer Groundwater Science, A Schlumberger Company Fort Myers,
Chapter 5 Well Testing (III)
Groundwater Learning objectives
Advance Seismic Interpretation Project
Free vs. Forced Convection
Uses of Modeling A model is designed to represent reality in such a way that the modeler can do one of several things: Quickly estimate certain aspects.
Layer Thickness and Map Width
Deflated Conjugate Gradient Method
Dewatering Solutions using MODFLOW
3-3 Optimization with Linear Programming
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Approaches to Groundwater Modeling Conceptual Model.
Final Review.
Transient Models See Anderson and Woessner Chapter 7
What is the function of the graph? {applet}
Presentation transcript:

Well Tests to Characterize Idealized Lateral Heterogeneities by Vasi Passinos and Larry Murdoch Clemson University K 1,S 1 K 2,S 2

Faults Steeply Dipping Beds

Igneous Rocks Facies Change Reef Marine Clay Batholith Country rock Dike Channel sand Floodplain deposits

Conceptual Models LocalNeighboring T1 S1T1 S1 T 2 S 2 =S 1 LL 2-Domain Model3-Domain Model Region 1Region 3 Strip T 1 S 1 T 3 = T 1 S 3 = S 1 LLw T 2 S 2 =S 1

Methods 2-Domain Model –Transient analytical solution using Method of Images (Fenske, 1984) 3-Domain Model –Transient numerical model using MODFLOW –T r and w of the strip were varied. –Grid optimized for small mass balance errors

2-Domain Model T Contrast T r =10 T r = 1 T r =0.1

3-Domain Model T Contrast T r = 10 T r = 1 T r = 0.1

2-Domain T Contrast – 0.125L

2-Domain T Contrast – 0.5L

3-Domain T Contrast L

3-Domain T Contrast - 0.5L

Strip Transmissivness & Conductance Hydraulic properties of the strip depend on strip conductivity and width Strip is a higher K than matrix Strip is a lower K than matrix

Strip Transmissivness & Conductance

Graphical Evaluation Boundary Type and Location Well High T to Low T Low T to High T

Graphical Evaluation Estimate Aquifer Properties t o =0.029 S=0.017  s=2.3 T=1 t o =0.42 S=0.35  s=4.1 T = 0.55

Graphical Evaluation Estimate Aquifer Properties t o = 2.7 S=0.136  s = 4.1 T=0.55

T E =1 S E = T L =0.55 S L =0.25 T E =1 S E = T L =0.55 S L =0.136 T L =0.55 S L =0.06 T L =0.55 S L =0.27 T L =0.55 S L =0.021 T L =0.55 S L =0.068 T L =0.55 S L =0.029 T L =0.55 S L =0.021 L LL

Graphical Evaluation Estimate Aquifer Properties t o =0.09 S =  s = 2.3 T = 1 t o =0.028 S =  s = 2.3 T = 1

Determine Properties of Strip SSL analysis on the first line will give T and S of the area near the well. Take the derivative of time and determine the maximum or minimum slope. Using equations from curve fitting determine T sd or C d of the layer. Solve for T s or C

Field Case K.G. Fault

Field Case - Site Map BW-109 BW2 L

Drawdown from Piezometers

Drawdown from Pumping Well

Using Semi-Log Straight-Line Analysis : Minimum slope using the derivative curve is 0.5 T sd =33.99=K s w/K a L Determining Hydraulic Properties L = 280 ft Distance to fault b = 21.5 ft screened thickness T = ft 2 /min S = 2x10 -4 ??? T s = ft 2 /min T s /T a = 450

Conclusions 2-Domain Model Semi-Log Straight-line Method Piezometers r<0.3L gives T, S of local region. Piezometers r>0.3L gives average T of both regions. Piezometers r>0.3L unable to predict S Piezometers in neighboring region also give average T of both regions. Analyzing piezometers individually poor approach to characterizing heterogeneities.

Conclusions 3-Domain Model Drawdown for low conductivity vertical layer controlled by conductance. C=K s /w Drawdown for high conductivity vertical layer controlled by strip transmissivness. T s =K s *w Feasible to determine properties of a vertical layer from drawdown curves. Drawdown curves non-unique. Require geological assessment.