Maintaining the Flow ! Testing of Nuclear Feedpumps (and other important pumps)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
Advertisements

1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Validation of W4e Hydropower Turbine Generator PI Henry W Russell Walker Wellington,
Booster System Basics: Constant Speed Systems
There is Much More to Protocols than Good M&V Steve Kromer Chair, IPMVP Inc. Paolo Bertoldi European Commission DG JRC.
Upper Wood Rivers Water Measurement District Flow Meter Workshop January 27, 2012.
Chapter 8 Estimation: Additional Topics
FSRUG Feedwater Systems Reliability Users Group (Jan 2015) San Antonio, TX Performance Testing & Commissioning Presenter: Art Washburn, P.E.
The Calibration Process
Electromagnetic Flowmeter Why use flow meters What is a magnetic flow meter – How do they work – How are the different from other meters Items that will.
IE 355: Quality and Applied Statistics I Short Run SPC
WILLBROS A Good Job On Time Hydrostatic Testing Practices Establishing Verifiable, Traceable, and Accurate Documentation August 20, 2013 Hal Ozanne Willbros.
Fermi Case Study Flow Variance ≥ 2% Obtaining NRC relief to allow for use of a 2.78% total flow reference band for Fermi RHR Service Water Pumps ISTOG.
Industrial Pump Motor VFDs: Provisional Standard Protocol Christian Douglass Regional Technical Forum 5/12/2015.
Specifying Pumps. Prepared by Martin Ryan, 2013 Training Series: Using Aspen Technology Economic Evaluation Suite.
Distribution System Control Strategies.  Tank Management/Operations  Flushing  Rerouting Water  Others  optimizing existing booster chlorination.
Guidelines for Carbon Fiber Tape Prepreg Specifictions W.T.McCarvill S.Ward August 6, 2002.
Problem Solving Methodology
Fire Pump Functions The main function of a fire pump is to increase the pressure of the water that flows through it. Inadequate or nonexistent municipal.
Tower SystemsJanuary AMS Short Course on Instrumentation 1 Installation and Use of Meteorological Tower Systems Melanie A. Wetzel Desert Research.
Process Safety Management
Process Operability Class Materials Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
Plans to bring Out-of-Compliance UES Measures back into Compliance: 1. Agricultural Irrigation Hardware UES 2. Agricultural Motors UES Regional Technical.
Chemical Engineering 3P04
Value Analysis/ Flow Analysis
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
A SUMMARY OF CDBI FINDINGS IN SERVICE TESTING OWNERS GROUP December 2010 Clearwater, Florida.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
What is your IST Organizational Culture like? by NextEra Energy Seabrook Station LLC Bob Parry, Tim Couture, and Debbie Masters Inservice Test Owner’s.
1 Human Performance in Reactor Safety George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presented at the Quality Colloquium,
LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
Your measurement technology partner for global competitiveness CSIR National Metrology Laboratory The National Metrology Laboratory of South Africa Feedback.
ISTOG Winter 2010 – Ed Cavey Fermi 2 1 ISTOG Issues - Code Inquiries / Proposed Code Cases ISTOG Issues from 2010 January meeting and subsequent telecons.
BPA M&V Protocols Overview of BPA M&V Protocols and Relationship to RTF Guidelines for Savings and Standard Savings Estimation Protocols.
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
Robert Williams Chief Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Unit UNIDO Industrial System Energy Efficiency An Overview.
Calibration PT Honeywell Chapter 7 InstrumentationELC-213Today Presentation by Clifford T. Johnson, PE, Control Systems Engineer Honeywell Primer Auxiliaries.
Sizing Variable Flow Piping – An Opportunity for Reducing Energy
Control Theory Control System Objectives  Establish a final condition  Provide safe operation  Eliminate the human element  Assure economical operation.
Network design Topic 6 Testing and documentation.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Variable Speed Applied to Pumps. Life Cycle Costs - Courtesy of Hydraulic Institute and Europump Initial cost is not the only cost associated with a pump.
ASME OM CODE CASES Presented by Jeff Neyhard for Ron Lippy Intro 101???
"... To design the control system that effectively matches the plant requires an understanding of the plant rivaling that of the plant's designers, operators,
CISSP Common Body of Knowledge Review by Alfred Ouyang is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Making careful measurements allows scientists to repeat experiments and compare results. Section 3: Measurement K What I Know W What I Want to Find Out.
1 Public Meeting with ASME to Discuss Pump Inservice Testing Issues NRC Headquarters OWFN Room 1F22 June 4, 2007.
Proposed Edits to the Air Source Heat Pump Specifications Regional Technical Forum August 20, 2013.
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
The first question is really "Why do you need a control system at all?” Consider the following: What good is an airplane if you are a pilot and you.
Hilario J. Negrón (787) ext 3223 (787) Measuring Operational Efficiency.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
"Welder Certification" Weldertraining.org The purpose of this presentation is to introduce you to the various aspects of welder certification. This is.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
Overview of Instrument Calibration Presents by NCQC, India.
Tier Certification Explained
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
APFC-03 Reactive Power Compensation Method & Settings
1 2 3 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE PROJECT REPORT 2016
(Additional materials)
In-Situ Filter Testing
Quality is a Lousy Idea-
VITALITY Large Splits Johnson Controls PowerPoint Guidelines | July 21, 2009.
Process Operability Class Materials Copyright © Thomas Marlin 2013
Quality Control Lecture 3
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
Machine Protection PLC Based System Verification and Validation Plan
Presented by Mike Zacharias
Presentation transcript:

Maintaining the Flow ! Testing of Nuclear Feedpumps (and other important pumps)

Feedwater System Reliability Improvement Meeting The subject today is feedwater pump testing ‘methodology’. Testing occurs initially in the shop following fabrication but eventually and repeatedly monitored under site conditions for many years. Bases for testing is to confirm degradation from design condition (COS), usually one point but could be over a range of conditions assuming:  Stable and repeatable conditions process conditions.  Equipment free of ‘defect’.  Stable suction/NPSH A and speed conditions. Initial pump design, shop and plant test requirements are interconnected. January 23, 2012FSRUG2

Importance of Testing Important pumps need to be tested based upon plant reliability and plant safety criteria. Applies to CNP, HDP, SGFWP/RFWP and safety-related pumps. Less important for CWP. Less still for ‘miscellaneous’ pumps. Shop testing of all the pumps precede site acceptance testing. There are rarely ‘typical’ test results. ‘Full assembly’ testing of complete pumpset units at full speed at design process conditions. There are more deviations/errors in installed pump testing due to plant limitations.. January 23, 2012FSRUG3

‘New Feedwater Pump Testing’ What is New? Hydraulic Institute Test Standard 14.6 –  Larger Tolerance Bands (> 3% - 5%).  Bilateral Tolerances (+/-). What Hasn’t Changed? Addressing levels of uncertainty vs. fluctuation.  Shop vs. system requirements. Need to determine the onset and degree of degradation.  Define the test point vs. COS and curve shape.  Compare degradation vs. deviation. Connection between shop and site testing. January 23, 2012FSRUG4

Determining Baseline Conditions January 23, 2012FSRUG5

EPU - Feedpump Curves January 23, 2012FSRUG6

Comparison Of Test Locations January 23, 2012FSRUG7

Testing Deviations January 23, 2012FSRUG8

Identifying FIE January 23, 2012FSRUG9

Flow -Induced Errors Measurement of pump performance with installed pumps is often a difficult process. Affected by the location of flow measuring types. Line-size impact on velocity. Type and location of upstream and downstream fittings affecting turbulence. Site installed test equipment cannot duplicate the accuracy and duplication of shop test results. Baseline testing and data evaluation is vital. A newly-tested pump is typically more accurate that permanently installed instrumentation. Speed verification is vital (design of shop speeds). January 23, 2012FSRUG10

Validating Performance Margins Monitor : Speeds on ASD (adjustable speed drive) pumps. Control valve positions (% open & ∆P) with constant speed pumps. Correcting and validating pump performance under shop conditions is always easier than at the site. When to address reduction of ‘wasted’ energy, shop vs. site. January 23, 2012FSRUG11

Testing Guidelines are Common for All Pumps Testing any pump for Nuclear Service should be based upon the same bases : Confirming mechanical assembly. Demonstrating hydraulic performance. Verifying condition following initial operation. The Shop Test Program is the last opportunity to : Confirm compliance to specification requirements. Permit changes prior to shipment and installation. Anticipate start-up and commissioning issues. Eliminate unknowns about the equipment before being exposed to installation and site conditions : OEM compliance. January 23, 2012FSRUG12

Test-Or-Not-To-Test Range of Testing: Accepting data from similar or earlier testing. Non-witnessed testing of job hardware. Witnessed testing of all job hardware. Costs of Testing: Based upon the ‘delay’ and ‘cost’ of not performing tests. Missing documentation for site use. Shop vs. Site Testing. Evaluation of Test data: Conducting adjustments. Pumps normally in operation at/near the COS are less likely to deviate or degrade. Test data is also likely repeatable. January 23, 2012FSRUG13

Site Testing of Existing Units Establishing priority of Test Parameters. Capacity  Type and location of instrument.  Correction factors. Developed Pressure (TDH)  Type and location of instrument. Power  Amps, kW. Speed Temperature Assuring fidelity/reproducibility. Uncertainty and fluctuations, shop vs. site. January 23, 2012FSRUG14

Pump & Process Allowances, Margins & Tolerances Allowance are the values added to pump capacity and TDH due to initial sizing uncertainty. Can be defined. Margins are the values added to pump capacity and TDH due to degradation. Can be defined. Tolerances are values of either capacity or TDH provided by industry standards due to degradation. Cannot be defined or guaranteed. Pumps can be made smaller, systems can’t be. January 23, 2012FSRUG15

Degradation of Pump Performance January 23, 2012FSRUG16

Testing Standards January 23, 2012FSRUG17

Project Test Criteria Define: Test Temperature. Test Speed. Time of Test. Scope of Equipment: Job vs. Shop Hardware. Instrumentation. Transient Requirements: Range of Upset Conditions. PTI: Acceptance Criteria. January 23, 2012FSRUG18

History of Hydraulic Institute Standards The Institute came into being in st Edition in Trade Standards in the Pump Industry. 3 rd Edition in Standards of the Hydraulic Society. 7 th Edition in Standards of the Hydraulic Institute. 9 th Edition in Copyrighted. 10 th Edition in th Edition in th Edition in 1983 HI 1.6/2.6 in 2000 HI 14.6 in 2011 January 23, 2012FSRUG19

Early HI Standards January 23, 2012FSRUG20

Previous Test Standards January 23, 2012FSRUG21

Current Tolerances - API January 23, 2012FSRUG22

Current Tolerances January 23, 2012FSRUG23

Current HI Tolerances January 23, 2012FSRUG24

Impact of New HI Shop Test Tolerances Design Engineering Defining minimum performance for pumps in nuclear service will require adherence to unilateral bases. Positive tolerances will affect driver required rating and discharge piping ratings. Shop Testing Acceptance criteria will require redefinition. Initial Site Baseline Testing Once the values are accepted, there should be no changes. Deviations Similar to present. January 23, 2012FSRUG25

Horizontal Pump Shop Test Setup January 23, 2012FSRUG26

Vertical Pump Shop Test Setup January 23, 2012FSRUG27

‘Edge Engineering’ The issue of precision or accuracy should be addressed to aid in understanding the impact on pump, motor, piping and valve sizing, system efficiency and reliability. Avoid the tendency to ‘over-specify pumps’ and fluid systems. Avoid the tendency to design or specify at or near the MOP (minimum operating or design point). January 23, 2012FSRUG28