1 Presented to: Clean Air Trough Energy Efficiency CATEE Conference San Antonio December 18, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SteeringCoordinating Data / Research Logistics Community Engagement Community Health Planning Committee Structure Austin / Travis County CHA CHIP.
Advertisements

Collaborative Planning as an Effective Tool for Program Management and Sustainability … beyond UASI funding … Sandra Davis Sandra Davis Denise Barrett.
Regional Service Planning for East Texas Texas Department of Transportation Tyler District Thursday, October 6, :30 PM.
ADVANCING REGIONAL TOD: CORRIDORS & CLASSIFICATIONS Partnership for Regional Opportunity TOD Work Group June 4, 2014 Mariia Zimmerman, MZ Strategies, LLC.
Southwest Rail Conference Joseph Black – Rail Director February 25, 2013.
December 3, 2014| Nadine Navarro Manager, Smart Commute, Metrolinx NEW DIRECTIONS FOR SMART COMMUTE, METROLINX.
What is the Lane Livability Consortium? Participating Agencies  City of Eugene  City of Springfield  Lane County  Lane Transit.
1 CNAP Community Navigation and Access Program July 30, 2012.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
City of Schertz Presentation Joe Black – Lone Star Rail District Joe Lessard – Knudson, LP December 9, 2014.
SAN DIEGO I-15 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROJECT Alex Estrella, SANDAG.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Workshop on Transportation Corridor Evaluation With a focus on Economic and Community Development.
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
City of Schertz Presentation Joe Black – Lone Star Rail District November 25, 2014.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
MTF Rail Development Forum
TEMPO – Project Update Joseph Black — Rail Operations Manager February 12, 2011.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
RapidRide Briefing Growing Transit Communities East Corridor Task Force January 31 th, 2012 Ron Posthuma, Assistant Director King County Dept. of Transportation.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
8/25/20151 Implementation of Adopted Transportation Vision for the Metropolitan Washington Region: Development of Circulation Systems and Green Space Preliminary.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Meeting Rick Clarke, Assistant GM – Capital Programs June 20, 2012.
Transportation/Land-Use Connections Program Program Evaluation Proposal for FY 2009 Program September 5, 2008 Darren Smith, Sarah Crawford Transportation.
Update on MOITS Strategic Plan Development Andrew J. Meese, AICP COG/TPB Staff MOITS Technical Subcommittee September 9, 2008 Item # 5.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Be Involved: Correcting Issues & Advocating for Improvements Michael J. Walk Director of Service Development Maryland Transit Administration 2015 Mobility.
Date Coordinator Name(s) Other Leadership Name(s) ABC Coalition Clean Cities Re-designation.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Montgomery County Maryland I-270 Integrated Corridor Management Project Tom Jacobs, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology.
AUSTIN STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN
Dkl D. Kerry Laycock, CMC  Organizational Consultant  dklaycock.com Kent County, Michigan Citizens Committee Meeting November 14, 2011 Multi-Jurisdictional.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
Every student. every classroom. every day. Re-establishing Community and Stakeholder Relationships After State Receivership Jody London, Director, Board.
Fifty Percent Plus One (or, in our case, 136) Planning for Local Ballot Initiatives.
Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.
College Connection Luling Independent School District September 12, 2006.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
ACPS & City of Alexandria 1.  Long Range Educational Facilities Plan to improve facilities planning, accommodate the growing student population, and.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
CATS CONSORTIUM & THE SUSTAINABLE PLACES PROJECT CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Local Governance & Sectors Subcommittee Regions recommendation.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
San Francisco Long Range Transportation Planning Program Finance Committee Agenda Item 3 January 12, 2016.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts National Forum on Performance-Based.
T H E P O R T L A N D P L A N A Comprehensive Plan for Portland in 2040 September 2007.
Consortia and Public-Private Partnerships: Informing the GENI Transition Ilya Baldin RENCI Director for Network Research.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Our Mission... “To facilitate collaboration and partnerships through a comprehensive master plan which promotes economic growth, community development.
Public Transportation Coordination – Barriers, Constraints & Opportunities Texas Transportation Commission November 16, 2006.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Account Management Overview
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update
Regional Smart Mobility Assessment
Presentation transcript:

1 Presented to: Clean Air Trough Energy Efficiency CATEE Conference San Antonio December 18, 2013

2 Capital Metro jurisdiction, and prior planning efforts, did not encompass entire region Community feedback on transit projects: “How does this fit in with big picture?” Growing recognition that region requires multimodal system, including transit, to meet future needs Need for agency coordination

3 A partnership between Central Texas transportation agencies A regional, long-range high- capacity system plan for Central Texas The first regional transit system plan in Central Texas history

4 Transportation Needs and Opportunities Project Details System: Corridors and Gaps System Optimization Funding Organization

5 Staff level- formed core team and weekly meetings – Mid to senior and exec. level staff – Intermittent participation by transit CEO and Asst. City Manager levels Interlocal Agreement developed to guide decision-making and funding actions Consultant team hired for project Substantial public outreach effort

6 CAMPO subcommittee Primary stakeholder group in the Project Connect process 26 meetings over past 18 months! Role: Evaluate and provide input on a regional high-capacity transit plan for Central Texas

7

8 “Congestion resistant/proof” Has one or both of the following: Dedicated lane/right-of way for at least a portion Transit priority Fewer stops, higher speeds, more frequent service, carries more people

9

10 25 Centers & ABIA 4 Counties/13 Cities Bastrop: Elgin Hays: Buda, Kyle, San Marcos Travis: Austin, Manor, Pflugerville Williamson: Cedar Park, Georgetown, Hutto, Leander, Round Rock, Taylor

11

12 Integrated System Mgt. Rail Operations BRT & Express Bus Operations System Planning & Business Ops. Business Ops. Other Capital Investment Ops. * Relationship will need to accommodate LSRD inter-regional service delivery and internal governance structure. Regional Service Committee Other Investor -Owners Lone Star Rail District* City of Austin Capital Metro 1. Regional services focus 1. Regional services focus 2. Non-political governance 2. Non-political governance 3. Scalable and adaptable 3. Scalable and adaptable 4. Urban and commuter services included 4. Urban and commuter services included 5. Seamless functionality – “single system” 5. Seamless functionality – “single system” 6. Planning for all modes 6. Planning for all modes

13 Transportation Needs and Opportunities Project Details System: Corridors and Gaps System Optimization Funding Organization All answered…at the system level

14 Lessons Learned: -Recognition that partnerships are only way to realize vision of regional transit system -‘Leap of faith’ to actively study/plan beyond jurisdictional boundary -Compromise and trade-offs required, but not always welcomed -Funding remains as a major challenge Lessons Learned: -Recognition that partnerships are only way to realize vision of regional transit system -‘Leap of faith’ to actively study/plan beyond jurisdictional boundary -Compromise and trade-offs required, but not always welcomed -Funding remains as a major challenge

15 Lessons Learned: Citizens do not understand who is responsible for services Public Agencies must continuously work on their relationships and develop mechanisms to resolve conflicts City shaping or serving current riders Lessons Learned: Citizens do not understand who is responsible for services Public Agencies must continuously work on their relationships and develop mechanisms to resolve conflicts City shaping or serving current riders

16 CAMPO subcommittee Primary stakeholder group in the Project Connect process 26 meetings over past 18 months! Role: Evaluate and provide input on a regional high-capacity transit plan for Central Texas Lessons Learned: -Engage key elected and stakeholders early and often -People support what they help create -Simplifying complexity is hard work- needs to be done carefully -Be mindful not to let ‘the tail wag the dog’ Lessons Learned: -Engage key elected and stakeholders early and often -People support what they help create -Simplifying complexity is hard work- needs to be done carefully -Be mindful not to let ‘the tail wag the dog’

17 Lessons Learned: -Partnerships are hard work -Coordination meetings essential, despite the pain -Personalities, not just inter-jurisdictional differences, can be the make or break element -Open dialogue is critical…but not always what happened -Maintaining momentum post-study essential for long- term success Lessons Learned: -Partnerships are hard work -Coordination meetings essential, despite the pain -Personalities, not just inter-jurisdictional differences, can be the make or break element -Open dialogue is critical…but not always what happened -Maintaining momentum post-study essential for long- term success

18 Questions and Discussion Rob Spiller, P.E. Director City of Austin Transportation Department Javier A. Argüello, Assoc. AIA, CNU-A Director Long Range Planning Capital Metro