Korean Competition Law and Practice in Perspective December 2007 Dr. Youngjin Jung Yulchon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coercion vs. Incentivizing: A Way Out of the Section 2 Impasse? Ken Glazer April 1, 2004 April 1, 2004.
Advertisements

McGraw-Hill/Irwin©2007 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Antitrust Law-Restraints of Trade.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Chapter 46 Antitrust Law.
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Antitrust Law.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
16. Antitrust Regulation Regulation Antitrust Law & Cases Regulation Antitrust Law & Cases.
Introduction to Antitrust Law n Always two questions in any antitrust case: –What is prohibited according to the antitrust statutes? –Will the actions.
Chapter 15 Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 18 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Recent Developments in Competition Law in Australia ABA Spring Meeting, Global Antitrust Panel (The East) Washington DC, April 2009 Elizabeth M. Avery.
Case Study : Refusals to deal (Korea) 13 October 2006 By Sun, Joong-Kyu Korean Fair Trade Commission.
1 Antitrust and Regulation Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary Summary ©2005 South-Western College Publishing.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
19 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.. Antitrust Policy and Regulation.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
Antitrust Why important to telecommunications? –Suits regarding abuses of monopoly power Led to break up of Bell System and restructuring of the industry.
Chapter Key Points Identify the goals of antitrust laws Understand the analysis of monopolization Identify both the potential benefits and harms of mergers.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
MERGERS Clayton 7 as amended by the Celler-Kefauver Act:
The Antitrust Masters Course V ABA Section of Antitrust Law Plenary Session Slides Day 3, Session 2 October 2, 2010 Principal Lecturers Professor Andrew.
ECONOMICS AND THE COMPETITION RULES John Vickers Oxford University British Institute of International and Comparative Law 12 September 2007.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
© 2008 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 BUSINESS LAW TODAY Essentials 8 th Ed. Roger LeRoy Miller - Institute for University.
Chapter 15Copyright ©2009 by South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved 1 ECON Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd. McEachern.
1 Regulating the Competitive Environment Chapter 22 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
Russell Pittman “Economics at Community Colleges” October 5, 2012 The views expressed are not purported to reflect the views of the U.S. Department of.
Erlinda M. Medalla April 27-28, 2006 Hanoi Understanding Competition Policy.
7 - 1 Legal Issues in Marketing Channels* ©McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc Ch. 10 of Coughlan book** and my own materials.
Trade Practices Common law –Covenant not to compete –Must be reasonable –Society demands laws against predatory business practices Legislation –Laws are.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
Antitrust Law 1. Learning Objectives: 1.The three major pieces of federal antitrust legislation 2.Monopoly power vs. monopolization 3.Horizontal vs. Vertical.
Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. Its Legal, Ethical & Global Environment 6 th Ed. B U S I N E S S MARIANNE M. JENNINGS Copyright ©2003.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
Chapter 24 Antitrust Policy and Regulation. Antitrust History Post Civil War “trusts” were formed (oil, railroads) to monopolize. Regulatory agencies.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Laws and Unfair Trade Practices
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 ANTITRUST LAW AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall.
1 Economic Regulation and Antitrust Policy Chapter 15 © 2006 Thomson/South-Western.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Ch THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS A Critical Thinking Approach Fourth Edition Nancy K. Kubasek Bartley A. Brennan M. Neil Browne Nancy K. Kubasek.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices Twomey Jennings.
1 Chapter 13 Practice Quiz Tutorial Antitrust and Regulation ©2000 South-Western College Publishing.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW 1 2 EXTANT COMPETITION LAW OF INDIA MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 BROUGHT INTO FORCE IN 1970.
12.1 Chapter 12 Antitrust © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT
CHAPTER 42: ANTITRUST LAW
The Legal Environment of Business
Chapter 15 Professor Yuna Chen
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Legal Issues in Marketing Channels*
Chapter 27: Antitrust and Monopoly
PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND ONLINE COMMERCE LAW 1st Edition by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 21 Antitrust Law Slides developed.
© 1999 Michigan State University. All rights reserved.
Competition and Consumer Act issues affecting franchises
Review Slides – Unit 3 Chapter # Questions
The strategic plans of the Competition Commission
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices
Enforcing Competition: the United States Antitrust Laws
Presentation transcript:

Korean Competition Law and Practice in Perspective December 2007 Dr. Youngjin Jung Yulchon

2 Origin of US/Korean Competition Law A.US  Populist View  Chicago School’s View B. Korea  Fair and Free Competition  Regulation of Economic Concentration

3 Enforcement Mechanism A.US  Multiple Stakeholders (private litigation)  Judicial Decision-Making (common law system) B. Korea  KFTC  Limited Role of Courts

4 Cartel Regulation (I) A.US  Section 1 of Sherman Act * Horizontal & Vertical Restraints B. Korea  Article 19(1) of MRFTA: Horizontal Restrains only? * Article 19(5): statutory presumption

5 Cartel Regulation (II): Rule of Reason vs. Per se Illegal  US Rule of Reason vs. Per Se Illegal  Korea Rule of Reason vs. Per Se Illegal

6 Cartel Regulation (III): Conscious Parallelism A. US * Oligopolistic Interdependence * Plus Factors B. Korea * Plus Factors * Amendment

7 Cartel Regulation (III): re regulated industry A.US Trinko / Credit Suisse (implied immunity) A.Korea Statutory Exemption Administrative Guidance

8 Cartel Regulation (IV): Leniency A.US Individual & Corporate Leniency * (i) Implication of discovery, (ii) Paperless application * (iii) marker system A.Korea Corporate Leniency

9 Vertical Restraints A. US * (Minimum) Resale Price Maintenance * Tying * Tying vs. Exclusive Dealing B. Korea * Unfair Trade Practices * Abuse of Market Dominance

10 A. US Leverage Theory Attempt to Monopolize B. Korea Abuse of Market Dominance Monopolization (I)

11 Monopolization (II): Microsoft A. US * the concept of monopoly maintenance * Separate Product - backward looking vs. forward-looking B. Korea * Statutory foundation * dynamic leverage theory vs. two-sided market * predatory pricing

12 Monopolization (III): essential facility doctrine A. US * Aspen Skiing * Trinko B. Korea * Statutory foundation N.B. Competition Agency as a Regulator

13 Merger Control (I) A. US Substantial Lessening Competition (SLC) B. Korea Substantial Lessening Competition (SLC) * CR1/CR3 vs. HHI * Unilateral Effect vs. Coordinated Effect

14 A.US Philadelphia National Bank case General Dynamics case B. Korea Statutory Presumption of SLC Merger Control (II): Market Share

15  A. US H-S-R Pre-merger Notification  B. Korea Post-merger notification Pre-merger notification Foreign-to-foreign merger notification * Fund Merger Control (III): Notification

16  Thank you.