October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library. October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Wisconsin Ohio Reference Evaluation Program Presented by Heather.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting In Focus a focus group primer for libraries by Jan Figurski for OLA Superconference 2005.
Advertisements

Rubric Design Denise White Office of Instruction WVDE.
Rina Hemedez Diaron Director of Libraries Office of the Director of Libraries Msgr. Charles Vath Building Saint Louis University 2600 Baguio City, Philippines.
Measuring Information Literacy from Third Grader to College Senior Carolyn Radcliff, M.L.S., SAILS Project Director Julie Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment.
1 Distance Learning College Action Project UPDATE – September 22, 2011 Presented by: Eric Kunnen, M.A. Director, Distance Learning and Instructional Technologies.
Kay Hutchfield, Senior Lecturer Department of Health, Wellbeing and the Family Canterbury Christ Church University Canterbury, Kent.
1 Research Questions & Hypotheses. 2 Research questions/hypotheses Viewed within the context of logical structure and objectives.
The Horizon Report In Action: Emerging Technologies Today and Tomorrow Malcolm Brown Veronica Diaz EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.
NCknows Evaluation Overview Jeffrey Pomerantz, Lili Luo School of Information & Library Science UNC Chapel Tapping the vast reservoir of.
Changes in Library Usage, Usability, & User Support Denise A. Troll Distinguished Fellow, Digital Library Federation Associate University Librarian, Carnegie.
Case Study Team 9. 2 Mission Statement The aim is to support teaching and researching of all students and faculty through the provision of relevant information,
WASHBURNWASHBURN Friends of Mabee Library October 28, 2004 Standardized Assessment of Information Literacy Skills Presented by Judy Druse Martha Imparato.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program.
Qualitative Methods Lisa Harrison: Chapter 5. Qualitative and Quantitative (74) Quantitative: Focuses on the analysis of numerical data (statistics, polling),
Royal Agricultural College How do we compare? the experience of benchmarking a smaller University College Library in the UK Higher Education sector Theano.
October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Analysis of WOREP Results for Mabee Library.
Barbara F. Schloman Libraries & Media Services Profiling Students’ Understanding: Using TRAILS to Assess 9 th Grade Information.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program: Summary Report.
Libstats History Developed by the Engineering Library at the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Libstats is an online reference tracking system. Libstats.
C USTOMER S ERVICE In Academic Libraries. S ERVICE Definitions Purpose Planning, Policy, and Process Evaluation and Outcomes 2.
PACINA Online A Mini-Tutorial on Reading and Interpreting a Published Information Needs Analysis facilitated by Andrew Booth, ScHARR, University of Sheffield.
TEACHING EVALUATION CAN BE A ONE DISH MEAL Heather Campbell Brescia University College London, Ontario, Canada
Planning and Staffing for Collection Development LIBR 580.
A PRESENTATION BY MARC CONNER, STEVE DESJARDINS, AND WHOEVER ELSE WANTS TO CHIME IN DECEMBER 2009 Embedded Assessment in Spring Term Courses.
Library User Studies Hsin-liang Chen SLIS, Indiana University.
Approaches to Board Development Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor Institute for Nonprofit Organizations University of Georgia Athens, Ga
OCTEO Fall Conference Insights from Ohio’s edTPA Field Test ( ) October 25, 2012 Donna Hanby, PhD.
Integrating Information Literacy Into the Classroom TLM Institute Technology & Information Literacy Mount Mary College May 30, 2002.
If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.
Collaborative Assessment: Using Balanced Scorecard to Measure Performance and Show Value Liz Mengel, Johns Hopkins University Vivian Lewis, McMaster University.
Learning Skills Unit, RMIT Vietnam The perceptions of academic language and learning support among staff and students at a transnational university ‘So,
The Reference Interview Ione Hooper LIS 503 Fall 2003.
Scientific Inquiry Mr. Wai-Pan Chan Scientific Inquiry Research & Exploratory Investigation Scientific inquiry is a way to investigate things, events.
Users’ Impressions of LibGuides: Feedback from a Student Focus Group Rebecca Payne, University of Wisconsin Madison LOEX Conference, 5/9/14 University.
Different approaches and experiences at the University of Parma (Italy) Embedding information literacy into subject learning Fabrizia Bevilacqua Monica.
Robert Martin Jane Overmoe Linda Thompson Spring 2009.
Information literacy in action: Florida academic libraries Share their stories and Best practices Nancy Cunningham (University of South Florida) Stephanie.
Ringing the Changes Reflections on delivering an information literacy module Ann Craig
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
With a little help from our friends: peer support in literature searching Sarah Lewis, Clinical Librarian, Hampshire Partnership NHS Trust & Nia Roberts,
AHS Zoo School Focus and Development Interdisciplinary Training Image Credit:
Marcel D’Eon College of Medicine September 26, 2011.
Barbara F. Schloman, Ph.D., TRAILS Project Director Julie A. Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment Coordinator Kent State University Libraries and Media Services.
Jennifer Peters Content Management and Discovery Services Librarian Rockhurst University Dan Brower Branch Manager Parkville Branch Mid-Continent Public.
Assessment: Research in Context Allison Sivak University of Alberta Libraries June 13, 2008.
Some samples of inquiry and arts ed lessons. Combining these two elements Outcome: CH3.2: Demonstrate an awareness of traditional and evolving arts expressions.
Le New Measures Initiative de l’American Library Association (ARL) A CREPUQ 1 février 2005 Montreal, Canada Martha Kyrillidou Director, ARL.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Jennifer Schwelik, MEd, TRAILS Project Manager, KSU Paula Baco, MLS, Trumbull Career and Technical Center Using TRAILS: (Tools for Real-Time Assessment.
Measurement and Assessment of Library Programs and Services Eileen E. Hitchingham Dean, University Libraries Virginia Tech The Changing.
Using Journals to Build Information Literacy Skills Violet H. Harada University of Hawaii ACEI Annual International Conference April.
Information Literacy Module for FYI Available to any FYI Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Research & Library Instruction Services We support.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Printed by Making the Connection: Assessing the Information Literacy Skills of First-Year Students Enrolled in a Doctor of Dental.
Mark Vargas, Library Director Anne Buchanan, Assistant Librarian Saint Xavier University Library Building and Strengthening Upper Level Research Skills.
Marketing Strategies for the Use of Research4Life Resources.
Finding solid information in a networked world Information Skills at Malone University.
Assessment, Standardisation and Moderation Ensuring consistency in teacher assessment 2015 – 2016
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
Technical Services Assessment in Pennsylvania Academic Libraries Rebecca L. Mugridge Pennsylvania State University Pennsylvania Library Association September.
Jennifer Schwelik, MEd, TRAILS Project Manager, KSU Jennifer Flaherty, MLS, Beachwood High School Librarian Paula Baco, MLS, Trumbull County Career Center.
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Interpreting, Editing, and Communicating MISO Survey Results
WOREP: What we learned at CSUF?
Program Review Presentation 4/18/12
Building and Strengthening Upper Level
A New Perspective on Reference: Crossing the Line between Research and Writing Barbara Alvarez River Campus Libraries University of Rochester.
Scott Mandernack Marquette University
Lisa Harrison: Chapter 5
Benchmarking Reference Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Wisconsin Ohio Reference Evaluation Program Presented by Heather Smith-Collins & Dean Corwin

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Purpose Service Evaluation Tool Assess the outcome of reference transactions Identify factors related to the success or lack of success Analyze the success of a transaction, NOT just patron satisfaction Contrast patron responses and librarian responses for the same transactions

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Value to Libraries Benchmarking Profiles Patron and Library Services Compares academic libraries of similar sizes and all academic libraries Provides “numeric snapshots” for reflection, discussion and adaptation

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Description Ohio State University THE UNIVERSITY of WISCONSIN Madison KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library WOREP’s History 1983 Prototyped nationally in 18 libraries ARL Statistics & Measurement Program Over 230 Library Studies

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Administering WOREP at WU (Methodology) 1)Information about WU and Mabee Library was sent to Kent State (WOREP) to create a profile 2) Reference Staff Orientation

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Participation Asking Patrons Double Staffing Reference Desk

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library LIBRARIAN Level of difficulty Found, not found, partly found Topic Communication Technical Aspects Which Resources? Time Level of Assistance Type of Question Etc... PATRON Service Found, not found, partly found Topic Librarian “understood” Did you learn something about reference sources? Etc...

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Examples of Questions for Patrons Did you locate what you asked about at the reference desk?  Yes, just what I wanted  Yes, with limitations  Yes, not what I asked for, but other materials that will be helpful  Yes, but not really what I wanted  Only Partly  No

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Were you satisfied with the information or materials found or suggested?  Yes  Partly  No

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Did the librarian understand what you wanted?  Yes  Partly  No

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Did you learn something about reference sources or use of the library as a result of the reference librarian?  Yes  Partly  No

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Examples of Questions for Librarians Results (Mark One)  Found  Partly Found  Not Found  Don’t Know

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Response (Mark One)  Directed or suggested only  Helped with or made search  Deferred  Referred

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Aspects of the Transaction  Something, anything, everything  Must be about certain time period, currentness, place, country, language, etc.  Must be cert. Type of reference source  Focus on aspect (bio, hist, other)  Requests factual information  Criticisms, reviews, interpretations, etc.  Analysis, trends, pro/con, cause effect, how-to- do-it, how it works, other  Requests that you compile a list of references on the subject

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library WOREP in Action Mabee Library’s Strategic Plan The Mission of the WU Libraries is to provide user-centered support for teaching and learning within the context of the University academic plan.

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Mabee Library Strategic Plan Goal 2: Services Develop and deliver services that support teaching, learning, discovery and exploration of ideas

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Mabee Library Strategic Plan Goal 3: Assessment Action 2 Assess the effectiveness of services.

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Penn State University GENERALIZED 1 st Year Results 47% overall satisfaction rate 45% of transactions < 3 minutes Shelf decline 3X greater than peer institutions Patrons reported 47% success rate while staff reported 72%

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Penn State’s WOREP Training Program WOREP Data Staff Reflection Interpretation & Research Socratic Change New Perspectives Open Discussions

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library WOREP Applied PENN STATE at

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library Future Development of WOREP 2006 at Mabee Communication with Penn State U. and other participating universities Extension and Application of WOREP data

October 28, 2004 Friends of Mabee Library References *Eric Novotny (personal communication, 1 Oct. 2004) *Kent State University. (n.d.) WOREP Homepage. Retrieved 15 Oct from *Washburn University. (September 2004). WOREP Results. * Barnes, B. & Ambaum, G. (n.d.) Unshelved. Overdue Media LLC.