Chapter 5 – Part 3 The TQM Philosophy
Mini Case: Quality Improvement LSL USL X = Amount of Toner Toner Operation: Adding Toner to Cartridge Current Process Target Mean 20% Defective Target Toner
What’s wrong with this operation? How should it be corrected? Why is this fix feasible? Mini Case: Quality Improvement
LSL USL Amount of Toner New Process – Mean Shifted to left and centered on target Target Mini Case: Quality Improvement
Benefits? Next step?
Amount of Toner Suppose the current process looked like this. Will adjusting the mean to the target improve the process? Mini Case: Quality Improvement LSLUSL Target 20% Defective Mean
Amount of Toner Mean adjusted to target Mini Case: Quality Improvement 10% Defective LSLUSL Mean =Target 10% Defective
Seven Tools of Quality Control Cause-and-Effect Diagrams Flowcharts Checklists Control Charts Scatter Diagrams Pareto Analysis Histograms
Cause-and-Effect Diagram (Fishbone Diagram) Machines Cause Effect- problem MaterialsMethods Manpower Environment Cause 4M + E
Flowcharts
Checklist Simple data check-off sheet designed to identify type of quality problems at each work station; per shift, per machine, per operator
Control Charts (Chapter 6) Control charts are tools for predicting the future performance of a process. If we can predicting performance, we can take corrective action before too many nonconforming units are produced.
Control Charts (Chapter 6) Suppose we construct a control chart for the thickness of the gold plating of an electrical connector. We take samples of connectors over time and compute the mean of each sample. After several time period, we use the sample means to estimate the mean thickness.
Control Charts (Chapter 6) We then construct two control limits: an upper control limit (UCL) and a lower control limit (LCL) We do this by adding subtracting 3 standard deviations to the estimated mean: LCL = Estimated Mean – 3(Standard Deviation) UCL =Estimated Mean + 3(Standard Deviation)
We plot the estimated mean and the control limits on the control chart. The result is called a control chart for the process mean. Control Charts (Chapter 6) Time mean Mean thickness
Control Charts (Chapter 6) If the sample means fall randomly within the control limits, the process mean is in control. “In control” means that the process mean is stable and hence predictable. If at least one sample mean fall outside of the control limits, we say the process mean is “out of control.” In this case, the process mean is unstable and not predictable. The goal is to find out why and remove the causes of instability from the process.
Scatter Diagrams A graph that shows how two variables are related to one another Optimal Speed
Pareto Diagram Pareto Principle: 80% of the problems may be attributed to 20% of the causes. Pareto Principle: 80% of the problems may be attributed to 20% of the causes. Missing Percent of defects BubblesCracks Uneven Runs 80%
Histograms
Reliability Reliability is the probability that the product, service or part will function as expected. Reliability is a probability function dependent on sub-parts or components.
Reliability Reliability of a system is the product of component reliabilities: R S = (R 1 ) (R 2 ) (R 3 )... (R n ) R S = reliability of the product or system R 1 = reliability of the first component R 2 = reliability of the second component. R n = reliability of the nth component
Example 1: Components in Series A radio has three transistors. All transistors must work in order for the radio to work properly. Probability that the first transistor will work =.80 Probability that the first transistor will work =.90 Probability that the first transistor will work =.85 What is the reliability of the radio?
Solution R S = (R 1 ) (R 2 ) (R 3 ) R S = (.80) (.90) (.85) =.51 R 1 =.80R 3 =.85R 2 =.90
Example 2: Backup Components Backup component takes over when a component fails. Suppose only one transistor is needed for the radio to work. In case the one transistor fails, a backup transistor has been installed. Probability that the original transistor will work =.92 Probability that the backup transistor will work =.87
Example 2: Backup Components The backup transistor is in parallel to the original transistor. R BU =.87 R 1 =.92
Example 2: Backup Components Parallel components allow system to operate if one or the other fails Increase reliability by placing components in parallel For system with one component and a BU component: R S = R 1 + [(R BU ) x (1 - R 1 )] 1 - R 1 = Probability of needing BU component = Probability that 1 st component fails
Solution R S = R 1 + [(R BU ) x ( 1 - R 1 )] R S =.92 + [(.87) x (1 -.92)] =.92 + [(.87) x (.08)] =.9896 R BU =.87 R 1 =.92
R 1 =.80 R BU =.75 R 2 =.88 Example 3: Series with Backup Components
BU is in parallel to first component. Convert to system in series. To this by first finding reliability (probability) of components. A = Probability that first component or its BU works B = Probability that second component works = R 2 R S = A x B
Solution A = R 1 + [(R BU ) x (1 - R 1 )] =.80 + [(.75) x (1 -.80)] =.95 B = R2 =.88 R S = A x B =.95 x.88 = Part 1Part 2
Reliability Over Time - Bathtub Curve t0t0 Time Failure Rate Maturity Constant Failure Infant Mortality t2t2 t1t1
Quality Awards and Standards Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) The Deming Prize ISO 9000 Certification
MBNQA- What Is It? Award named after the former Secretary of Commerce – Regan Administration Intended to reward and stimulate quality initiatives Given to no more that two companies in each of three categories; manufacturing, service, and small business Past winners: Motorola Corp., Xerox, FedEx, 3M, IBM, Ritz-Carlton
Baldrige Criteria Leadership (125 points) Strategic Planning (85 points) Customer and Market Focus (85 points) Information and Analysis (85 points) Human Resource Focus (85 points) Process Management (85 points) Business Results (450 points)
The Deming Prize Given by the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers since 1951 Named after W. Edwards Deming who worked to improve Japanese quality after WW II Not open to foreign companies until 1984 Florida P & L was first US company winner Based on how well a company applies Deming’s 14 points
ISO 9000 Set of international standards on quality management and quality assurance, critical to international business Data based approach to decision making Supplier relationships Continuous improvement Customer focus Leadership Employee training Process (operations) management