1 PUBLIC WORKSHOP Draft 2007 Water Use Efficiency Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP) October 30 and 31, 2006 Manucher Alemi Department of Water Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stakeholder Workshop July 27, Present updated information on the Central Groundwater Storage Plan Receive additional stakeholder input Discuss next.
Advertisements

Volunteer Monitoring Grant Application Package MiCorps First Annual Conference Ralph A. MacMullan Conference Center October 29, 2005.
Webinar: Central Valley Flood System Conservation Framework and Strategy Draft Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP) FloodSAFE Environmental Stewardship.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Tracie Billington, P.E. Chief Financial Assistance Branch Department of Water Resources.
Department of Water Resources Division of Integrated Regional Water Management Financial Assistance Branch July 17, 2012 Trevor Joseph, P.G., C.HG.
Wisconsin Technical Service Providers (TSP) Plan.
Rachel Weaver Program Manager Maryland Energy Administration
Catherine Elvert City of Palo Alto Utilities Communications Manager.
Cultural Grants 2016 Workshop June 29, 2015 Building Blocks: Applying for a Cultural Grant The Town of Oakville and the Oakville Arts Council continue.
October 6, Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002 Chapter 3 Water Security Chapter 4 Safe Drinking Water.
Watershed Council June 22,2010 BAIRWMP Update BAIRWMP Update State Funding: State Funding: Prop 50 Prop 50 Prop 1-E (Stormwater Flood Management), Prop.
2015 Technical Assistance Funding Workshop 1/23/15.
Senate Bill X7-7 Implementation CII Task Force March 1, 2011 Manucher Alemi, Ph. D., P.E. Water Use and Efficiency Program Manager.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Planning Grant Workshops August 30, 31 September 1, 2 Department of Water Resources.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – Reviewed on 8-May-12. The content was not modified. Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality.
Water Conservation, Reuse & Storage Grant Program Application Review Team Meeting November 7, 2013.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan Presentation – March 12, 2013 HLVRCD.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
NC Water Resources Congress Annual Meeting Raleigh, NC October 30, 2014 State Water Infrastructure Update: The State of NC and Water, Wastewater and Stormwater.
Workshops on Discussion Draft of Guidelines December 2014.
Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Proposition 50: Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Grant Program North Coast IRWMP: region, process,
Integrated Regional Water Management MAY 22, 2015 TRACIE BILLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 1.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
Region Acceptance Process Draft Recommendations Workshop Department of Water Resources Sept 8, Sacramento Sept 9, Los Angeles Sept 10, Fresno.
John K. Woodling CA Department of Water Resources Integrated Regional Water Management Program Update Southern California Water Dialogue May
State Perspective… Water Reliability, Conservation, Recycling Bill Bennett Department of Water Resources NBWA Conference, Napa April.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CAIS Overview for FPM Reviews and Title III Improvement Plans.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FACILITIES PROGRAM Cycle 2 Conversions.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
2014 Technical Assistance Funding Workshop 1/28/14.
STAKEHOLDER CALL/MEETING TO DISCUSS AND PROVIDE INPUT ON ZEV INCENTIVE PROGRAM GUIDELINES CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD March 7,
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
Watershed Council June 25, DWR Funding and Bay Area IRWMP Project Selection Background Regional Acceptance Process (RAP) Regional Projects North.
IRWM Grant Program Scoping Meeting Department of Water Resources January 23, Sacramento January 31, Alhambra.
11 Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Funding Guidelines for Agencies that Administer California Climate Investments September
2016 Technical Assistance Funding Workshop 10/14/15.
1 The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) California Department of Public Health Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
Innovations in Affordable Housing: Indiana’s General Set-Aside Matt Rayburn October 6, 2015.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
SBx7-7 The New Terrain Chris Brown Greening Our Water Infrastructure Petaluma April 9, 2010.
Joint Agency Energy Action Plan Meeting December 15, 2009 San Francisco, California American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Delivering Energy Savings for.
Integrated Regional Water Management Integrated Coastal Watershed Management Planning Grants Public Meeting September 23, 2005 Sacramento Department of.
Proposition 50 Chapter 8 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Round 2 Guidelines and PSP Packages Public Meetings Sacramento – May 21, 2007.
1. 2 Application Workshops Thursday November 8 South Lake Tahoe Tuesday November 13 Ventura Wednesday November 14 Clovis Friday November 16 Sacramento.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
EuropeAid/152087/DD/ACT/LB Cultural activities 2016 Information Session 13 th June 2016.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
FFY2013 EAP Annual Training
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Implementation Strategy July 2002
FY 2018 Community Capital Pre-Submittal Meeting
Shasta Valley Groundwater Basin
Grants Management 101 Part A
San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Region Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) Meeting SLO City/County Library Community.
FY 2020 Community Grants Training
SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

1 PUBLIC WORKSHOP Draft 2007 Water Use Efficiency Proposal Solicitation Package (PSP) October 30 and 31, 2006 Manucher Alemi Department of Water Resources

2 Workshop agenda Introductions Introductions Purpose of the Workshop Purpose of the Workshop Draft WUE PSP Draft WUE PSP Contents Contents Requirements Requirements Funding Funding Process Process Q/A Q/A

PSP Materials Draft 2007 WUE PSP Draft 2007 WUE PSP Draft 2007 WUE PSP Exhibits Draft 2007 WUE PSP Exhibits PSP Frequently Asked Questions PSP Frequently Asked Questions Reference 1- Targeted Benefits Reference 1- Targeted Benefits Reference 2- Monitoring Guidelines Reference 2- Monitoring Guidelines Reference 3- Accessing Census Data Reference 3- Accessing Census Data Training Manual for on-line Application by FAAST Training Manual for on-line Application by FAAST Application Attachment Templates for Steps 1&2 Application Attachment Templates for Steps 1&2 Find them on DWR Web site at:

4 Contents of the PSP Eligibility Eligible applicant Eligible project State benefit Cost share Intellectual interest, right to privacy, conflict of interest Funding Rules Project Priority Funding Programs Agreement Requirements Schedule Review, Selection, Award Process Proposal Submittal (what, where, when)

5 Eligibility Requirements Must be an eligible applicant Must be an eligible applicant Must submit an eligible project Must submit an eligible project Provide State benefit Provide State benefit Provide local cost share (Section A only) Provide local cost share (Section A only) Have no conflict of interest Have no conflict of interest Intellectual interest belongs to the State Intellectual interest belongs to the State No right to privacy-submitted application is public information No right to privacy-submitted application is public information Meet application deadline Meet application deadline Meet Urban Water Management Planning Act requirement, if applicable Meet Urban Water Management Planning Act requirement, if applicable

6 Urban Water Management Planning Act If you intend to apply for the grant and are subject to UWMP Act contact DWR’s Dave Todd. (916) If you intend to apply for the grant and are subject to UWMP Act contact DWR’s Dave Todd. (916) Your Plan review will be given high priority. Your Plan review will be given high priority.

7 Eligible applicants Entities involved with water management including: cities, counties, cities and counties, joint power authorities, public water districts Non Profit Organizations Tribes Universities, Colleges, State and Federal Agencies (Section B Projects Only) Investor owned utilities and incorporated mutual water companies (subject to conditions)

8 Eligible project categories Section A: Local and Regional Agricultural and Urban Water Use Efficiency Implementation Projects Section B: Research and Development, Feasibility Studies, Pilot or Demonstration Projects, Training, Education or Public Information, Technical Assistance

9 Eligible projects Eligible projects: Eligible projects: Urban BMPs Urban BMPs Landscape Task Force Recommendations Landscape Task Force Recommendations Agricultural EWMPs Agricultural EWMPs Projects linked to Targeted Benefits Projects linked to Targeted Benefits See Exhibit I of the PSP for details

10 Ineligible Projects- Sections A and B Wellhead rehabilitation New storage tanks providing expanded capacity Water supply development Water treatment Wastewater treatment Flood control Conjunctive use Recycled water Groundwater banking

11 Ineligible Projects- Sections A and B Replace existing funding sources for on-going projects Political advocacy Purchase of water Establishment of a reserve fund Applicant’s litigation costs Projects that do not achieve water savings, improve in- stream flow and timing, improved water quantity, or water quality and energy conservation benefits to the State Projects required by regulation, law, or contract Visitor centers

12 Ineligible projects- Section A Projects with life span of less than 7 years Projects with life span of less than 7 years New construction weather-based evapotranspiration controller projects, other irrigation system devices, or software New construction weather-based evapotranspiration controller projects, other irrigation system devices, or software Water meter replacement, water meter for new construction (existing non-metered buildings are eligible), new landscape, and new irrigation systems Water meter replacement, water meter for new construction (existing non-metered buildings are eligible), new landscape, and new irrigation systems

13 Eligibility-State benefits Section A project must provide State Benefit Section A project must provide State Benefit Section B projects must have potential to create State Benefit Section B projects must have potential to create State Benefit State Benefit is defined as State Benefit is defined as Water saving and/or in-stream flow improvements, water quality improvement and energy conservation (that leads to water conservation) Water saving and/or in-stream flow improvements, water quality improvement and energy conservation (that leads to water conservation)

14 Project Priority First Priority: First Priority: Projects that result in a greater water quantity being available to the Bay Delta Watershed through a reduction in either current or future diversions Projects that result in a greater water quantity being available to the Bay Delta Watershed through a reduction in either current or future diversions Projects that address high priority stream-flow TBs (see Reference 1) Projects that address high priority stream-flow TBs (see Reference 1)

15 Project Priority-continued Second Priority Second Priority Projects that address medium or low priority stream-flow TBs Projects that address medium or low priority stream-flow TBs Projects that address one or more of the water quality TBs Projects that address one or more of the water quality TBs Urban projects that expedite or improve landscape-related BMPs recommended by the Landscape Task Force Report, Water Smart Landscape for California Urban projects that expedite or improve landscape-related BMPs recommended by the Landscape Task Force Report, Water Smart Landscape for California

16 Project Priority- continued Third Priority Third Priority Projects not in the Bay-Delta Watershed that will result in improved local water supply reliability Projects not in the Bay-Delta Watershed that will result in improved local water supply reliability Water conservation practices and projects that will conserve energy Water conservation practices and projects that will conserve energy

17 Eligibility- Cost share Section A applicants must provide local cost share Section A applicants must provide local cost share Section B applicants are not required but encouraged to provide cost share Section B applicants are not required but encouraged to provide cost share Cost share is proportionate to the split between applicant benefits and State Benefits Cost share is proportionate to the split between applicant benefits and State Benefits

18 Eligibility-Cost share Locally NOT cost effective projects: Locally NOT cost effective projects: Maximum State Share of project costs Maximum State Share of project costs =[project costs] – [local monetary benefits] + [ 0.10]x[costs] Locally cost effective projects are eligible for up to 10% of project costs as State share if they meet additional criteria. Locally cost effective projects are eligible for up to 10% of project costs as State share if they meet additional criteria.

19 -continued Cost Share Example- Cost Share Example- A project demonstrates state benefit by saving water A project demonstrates state benefit by saving water Project costs $100,000 Project costs $100,000 Present value of local monetary benefits is $30,000 Present value of local monetary benefits is $30,000 Maximum State Share= (100,000-30,000)+ (0.1)(100,000) =$80,000 =$80,000 Minimum Local Share= $20,000

20 Cost share-disadvantaged community Disadvantaged Community may provide less local cost share: Disadvantaged Community may provide less local cost share: The population served by the water from the proposed project must meet the Medium Household Income of less than ($38,000) The population served by the water from the proposed project must meet the Medium Household Income of less than ($38,000) Successful Step 1 applicants will be asked to provide documentation in Step 2 Successful Step 1 applicants will be asked to provide documentation in Step 2

21 Disadvantaged Com.-continued Not locally cost effective: Not locally cost effective: Maximum State share = cost –project local monetary benefits+ 25% of project costs Maximum State share = cost –project local monetary benefits+ 25% of project costs Minimum local share =cost – State share Minimum local share =cost – State share Locally cost effective: Locally cost effective: Maximum State share = 25% of project cost Maximum State share = 25% of project cost Minimum local share = cost – State share Minimum local share = cost – State share

22 Cost share- modification Applicants may offer greater than calculated minimum local cost share Applicants may offer greater than calculated minimum local cost share

23 Other requirements Geographic scope (eligibility) Geographic scope (eligibility) No conflict of interest (eligibility) No conflict of interest (eligibility) Labor code (Agreement) Labor code (Agreement) Intellectual interest (eligibility) Intellectual interest (eligibility) Right to privacy (eligibility) Right to privacy (eligibility)

24 Geographic Scope & Duration of Projects Geographic Scope Projects from Statewide contributing to water use efficiency goals Duration Expended within 2 years of contract execution

25 Conflict of Interest & Confidentiality Conflict of Interest All applicants and reviewers are subject to State and Federal conflict of interest laws Confidentiality Applicant waives any right to privacy and confidentiality once the application is signed and submitted to DWR Project’s intellectual property belongs to the State

26 Labor Code Compliance Entities awarded grants must ensure compliance with Labor Code Compliance programs for public works projects and limitations on use of volunteer labor Entities awarded grants must ensure compliance with Labor Code Compliance programs for public works projects and limitations on use of volunteer labor

27 Agreement requirements Standard terms and conditions Standard terms and conditions Report requirements Report requirements Cost share commitment letter Cost share commitment letter Resolution Resolution

28 Fund Programs The WUE grant is structured into four Funding Programs: Urban grants- $ M Urban grants- $ M 1. Section A: Urban Water Use Efficiency Implementation $12.81 M (85%) 2. Section B: Urban Water Use Efficiency R&D $2.26 M (15%) Agricultural grants- $20.26 M ($5.193 M from last cycle) Agricultural grants- $20.26 M ($5.193 M from last cycle) 3. Section A: Agricultural Water Use Efficiency Implementation $18.0 M 4. Section B: Agricultural Water Use Efficiency R&D $2.26 M

29 Funding Cap $3.0 million per project for Section A projects $3.0 million per project for Section A projects $100,000 to $200,000 for Section B projects depending on the project category $100,000 to $200,000 for Section B projects depending on the project category Total fund: $35 million Total fund: $35 million 85% Section A Projects 85% Section A Projects 15% Section B Projects 15% Section B Projects

30 Funding rules Limit administration costs to 5 to 10% Limit administration costs to 5 to 10% Vehicles are not eligible Vehicles are not eligible Buildings are not eligible for Section B Buildings are not eligible for Section B Capital outlay must be exclusively tied to project benefits Capital outlay must be exclusively tied to project benefits For more information see the PSP For more information see the PSP

31 PSP Process Two-step process Two-step process Step 1- Concept proposal Step 1- Concept proposal Step 2- Full proposal Step 2- Full proposal

32 Step 1 Concept Proposal Selection Criteria CriteriaScore Benefits50 Costs45 Innovation5 Non-compliance with water management planning Interact with DWR Compliance with AWMC

33 Step 2 Full Proposal Selection Criteria CriteriaScore Benefits55 Costs40 Innovation5 Non-compliance with water management planning Interacting with DWR Compliance with AWMC

34 Review and Selection Process (*- Step 2 only) Applications Received Administrative Eligibility Review (Legal and DWR Staff) Conduct Eligibility Threshold Review Deadline Requirement- Water Use Efficiency Review Panel (agency members, stakeholders*, subject matter experts) Score Proposals DWR Ranks and produces Draft Recommendations

35 Review and Selection Process (continued) DWR Management Conduct Public Workshop* Comments received on Draft Recommendations* Approval on Draft Recommendations List Approved by DWR Posted to DWR Website Reviews Draft Recommendations Water Use Efficiency Agency Team

36 Anticipated Schedule November 6, 2006 Public comments due November 21, 2006Final PSP released November 2006Public Workshops December 15, 2006Step 1 Proposals due February 2, 2007Selected proposals invited back March 16, 2007Step 2 Full Proposals due May 21, 2007DWR makes funding decision

37 Contents of Step 1 Concept Proposals On-line Application using FAAST Attachment 1- Project Description Attachment 2- Project costs

38 Application submittal Amy Young DWR

39 Step 1 Concept Proposal Submittal You may submit applications for each of the four Funding Programs on FAAST You may submit applications for each of the four Funding Programs on FAAST Separate applications are required for each project on each Funding Program Separate applications are required for each project on each Funding Program

40 Step 1 Concept Proposal Submittal Complete FAAST Application online Complete FAAST Application online Attach two files using DWR templates Attach two files using DWR templates Attachment 1-Project Description Attachment 1-Project Description Attachment 2- Project costs Attachment 2- Project costs For FAAST Application Instructions visit DWR Web site: cfm

41 FAAST Training Manual Introduction to FAAST Introduction to FAAST How to start a FAAST application How to start a FAAST application FAAST Application Instructions FAAST Application Instructions Application Questions (one per funding program) Application Questions (one per funding program)

42 Contents of Step 2 Proposals required of applicants invited in Step 2 Updated FAAST Application online Attachment 1- Signature Page Attachment 2- ROD Consistency and Priority Attachment 3- Technical/Scientific Merit Attachment 4- Project Description Attachment 5- Monitoring Plan Attachment 6 and 7-Costs and Benefits Attachment 8- Disadvantaged Community reduction of local cost share Attachment 8- Disadvantaged Community reduction of local cost share Attachment 9- Qualification of Applicants & Cooperators Attachment 9- Qualification of Applicants & Cooperators Attachment 10- Outreach, Community Involvement & Acceptance Attachment 10- Outreach, Community Involvement & Acceptance Attachment 11- Innovation

43 Hint Follow instructions in the PSP Follow instructions in the PSP For each attachment, read the respective section of the PSP to provide complete and concise answer For each attachment, read the respective section of the PSP to provide complete and concise answer Find attachment templates at:

44 Comments must be received by: 5 PM on November 6, 2006 Office of Water Use Efficiency & Transfers DWR 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA Attention: Baryohay Davidoff (916) 651 – 9666