SID Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Jan.30-2013 CLIC Workshop, CERN Toward the TDR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SiD Surface assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC) MDI-CFS Meeting Sep. 4-6, 2014, Ichinoseki (Japan)
Advertisements

Assembly Hall in Hybrid-A’ and ILD 2014/9/6 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Global Design Effort Goals and Introduction Andrei Seryi, SLAC, September 17, 2007.
SiD assembly Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May. 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Infrastructures & Timeline for Hybrid Access.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
10 June 2005SiD Cost Estimate M. Breidenbach1 SiD Cost Estimating M. Breidenbach 2 June June 2005 – Rev 1* Issues Numbers *Included suggestions.
Vertex Detector Mechanics Bill Cooper Fermilab VXD.
DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto ILD MDI/Integration 1.
Push Pull Considerations
Global Design Effort Detector concept Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Kurt Krempetz September 17, 2007.
SiD Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC KILC’12, Taegu, Korea 24 April 2012.
August 2012SiD DBD SLAC1 SiD DBD Costs M. Breidenbach.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
3 March 2009M. Breidenbach1 SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach.
Towards a Physical SiD Steps towards a project completing in the 2020’s.
1 ILD/CMS Engineering Meeting M. Joré – ILD integration philosophy Integration philosophy of ILD Matthieu Joré – January 21st Integration of the subdetectors.
CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group.
Experimental hall in Japanese mountain site Y. Sugimoto 1.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
Global Design Effort Beam Delivery System => EDR LCWS07 June 2, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi Yamamoto.
Beam Commissioning Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May 14, 2014 ALCW 2014, Fermilab Engineering Issues.
Philip Burrows SiD Meeting, Paris 11/02/081 Machine Detector Interface Issues Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Tom Markiewicz.
September 18, 2007H. J. Krebs1 SiD Collaboration One Piece End Door Design Concept plus Forward Equipment Interfaces H. James Krebs SLAC September 18,
SiD Engineering: Iron and Solenoid Design Kurt Krempetz (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
Preparing for the SiD LoI SiD Parallel Session TILC08 March 5, 2008 John Jaros.
SID MDI & Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), May 28, 2013 ECFA Linear Collider Workshop 2013, DESY Toward the TDR.
LOI Planning The Very Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Takashi Maruyama/SLAC Uriel Nauenberg/UCB SiD Collaboration Meeting, Boulder, CO 19 September.
SiD IR & MDI Engineering Progress Prelude to a Discussion of Integration with ILD and Based on Marco Oriunno’s Jan 2008 Talk at SiD CM Tom Markiewicz/SLAC.
SiD Engineering Design for the LOI Kurt Krempetz (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
MDI DBD Editors Report Tom Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Collaboration Meeting, SLAC 22 August 2012.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
1 SiD Push-pull Plans Marco Oriunno, SLAC International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva, October 2010 M.Oriunno, IWLC10 – Geneva, Oct.2010.
ILD requirement for assembly space and time 2015/11/3 Yasuhiro 1.
SiD R&D Priorities Andy White University of Texas at Arlington SiD Workshop at SLAC March 2009.
CLIC Machine-Detector Interface Working Group (MDI) Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CLIC-ACE of 3 September 2008.
SiD Detector Baseline (A brief review) Andy White University of Texas at Arlington.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
EMCal Sensor Status (* M. Breidenbach*,
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Detector Cooperation with CLIC PAC Pohang meeting November 3, 2009 F. Richard LAL/Orsay 11/03/20091.
Philip Burrows MDI Panel Meeting 15/08/06 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University SiD and IR/MDI Issues.
SiD MDI Issues Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Beijing ACFA/GDE Meeting 05 February 2007.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
MEA Machine and Experiment Assembly Norbert Meyners, MEA 12. July 2007ILC IRENG07 WG-A1 LDC Engineering Design (Status) Introduction General Design Detector.
12 July 2007IRENG07 WG-A M. Breidenbach1 SiD Concept SiD is relatively modest in scale compared to the LHC detectors, and comparable to SLD: Tracker Radius.
F. Kircher CLIC concept meeting 12/15/08 1 Some points about the superconducting magnet for a CLIC detector F. Kircher (CEA Saclay/DSM/Irfu/SACM) December.
An idea of ILD general assembly plan 2015/10/8 Yasuhiro Integration Meeting 1.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
M.Oriunno, SLAC 1 SiD installation with horizontal access shafts Marco Oriunno, SLAC SiD/ILD Engineering Meeting SLAC, December 2011.
EUDET HCAL prototype; mechanics Felix Sefkow Work by K.Gadow, K.Kschioneck CALIC collaboration meeting Daegu, Korea, February 20, 2009.
SiD R&D Plan and Opportunities for New Collaborators
SiD Collaboration Meeting SLAC, December 2011
2016/9/30 Yasuhiro Infra/CFS mini-ws
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Update of experimental hall in Japanese mountain site
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
CLIC detector at SiD meeting 28/3/2010
Changes to SiD since the DBD
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015
MACHINE DETECTOR INTERFACE WORKING GROUP STATUS
ILC Detector Technology
RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
A 12-min Introduction to The ILC Machine Detector Interface and SiD
Presentation transcript:

SID Engineering Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Jan CLIC Workshop, CERN Toward the TDR

2 Detailed Baseline Document 7 Engineering, Integration and the Machine Detector Interface 7.1 Introduction 7.2 IR Hall Layout Requirements and SiD Assembly Concepts Vertical Access (RDR style) Horizontal Access (Japan style) Detector Access for Repairs 7.3 Detector Exchange Via a Sliding Platform Introduction Platform Vibration analysis and Luminosity Preservation Push Pull Detector Exchange Process and Time Estimate 7.4 Beampipe and Forward Region Design Introduction to the Near Beamline Design Beampipe LumiCal, BeamCal, Mask and QD0 Support and Alignment QD0-QF1 interface Vacuum System and Performance Feedback and BPMs Wakefield and Higher Order Mode Analysis Frequency Scanning Interferometric (FSI) Alignment of QD0 and QF Routing of Detector Services 7.5 Impact on the Adjacent Detector While SiD is Operational Radiation Calculations Fringe Fields and Magnetics

Steps toward a real SiD Some national body (ies) (Japan and collaborators?) commits to linear collider 2013 Value engineering : lower costs and preserve performance Prepare serious TDR with technical prototypes and serious cost estimate. 3 years: 2016 Requires a fully reviewed TDR. Assume the review process, with minor iterations, takes 1 year Ready for Construction…Adding time for collaboration formation… 3

From here to Commitment At least the calorimeters need optimization: thicknesses, layer structure, and aspect ratio. A Technical Design Report should include: Clear baseline choices for all subsystems Final subsystem dimensions & clearances Reasonably complete mechanical designs including tooling Prototypes and Testbeam In the intensive TDR stage, Mechanical Engineering needs to ramp up to ~10 FTE’s + similar number of designers. System Engineering (Interfaces) needs serious effort, particularly cryogenics interfaces. Japanese codes (e.g. radiation, B fields, seismic, transport, etc) need to be studied. Need to encourage US-Japan collaboration proposal. 4

Critical Issues for Mechanical Engineering (1) The Magnet : Iron structure and supercoil – have a pre-conceptual design. R&D is required on interesting aspects such as better superconductors and stabilizers. Japanese mountain sites require iron engineering & optimization study of segmentation for: Transport Assembly including handling fixtures Lean Assembly of muon system on surface The integrated dipole seems difficult. ILC should confirm there is no beamline optics solution. The design can not progress beyond this until the inner radius and length of the solenoid is settled. This requires optimization of the solenoid. This is not an engineering choice, but a physics and cost issue. The Exoskeleton should be revisited. 5

Critical Issues for Mechanical Engineering (2) Machine – Detector Interface There is ~1.5 m radial difference between SiD and ILD. The SiD platform is 3.8 m thick. The platforms appear to add a year to the construction schedule. Support and vibration issues need continued work. It is believed – within the engineering group – that while there are plenty of other difficult problems to work on, they do not have the impact or logjam effect of optimization. There is an enhanced effort on MDI issues at SLAC 6

Engineering – Detector Subsystems Beamline: Adequate conceptual design. Impedance issues that can generate wakefields and heating have been checked. Synchrotron radiation issues seem ok. Vacuum design seems ok. Vertex Detector: Minimal conceptual design for modeling. Little ongoing work on support structures, power and cooling, which may make the modeling of multiple scattering and dead regions somewhat optimistic. Tracker: Adequate conceptual design for modeling. Conceptual design for support mechanics. Need to understand Lorentz force issues from pulsed power and cable design. EMCal: Adequate conceptual design for modeling. (But may not be optimized) Mechanical prototyping of structure using relatively small tungsten sheets. First trials indicate some problems bump bonding KPiX. (Work active for beamtest) Need work on assembly strategy. Current estimate is extremely labor intensive. Robotics? 7

HCal: No settled conceptual design. Active efforts in PFA work. Critically need outer dimensions of barrel and endcap for solenoid and iron engineering. Radial cracks between modules are apparently accepted, documentation may be weak. The actual detector choice is secondary to the mechanical engineering issues as long as it fits in the allocated space. Solenoid: In principle CMS approach is ok. Might be significant cost improvements with advanced conductor R&D. Muon System: SiD has changed baseline to scintillator. Conceptual design probably waiting iron segmentation design. Need conceptual design for SiPM readout. BeamCal: Minor mechanical engineering issues. Needs sensor development! 8 Engineering – Detector Subsystems

Installation – Japanese Site 215 tons Crane

Push-Pull : Engineering Concept Detector Hall, Japanese Mountain Site e-e- LHe refrigerator and LHe2 for the QD0’s above level on metallic structure.

Questions ?

12 EXTRA SLIDES

13 SID key design features Compact design with 5 T Solenoid Single Ring Barrel ~ 4’000 tons Self Shielded: Stray Fields & Radiation Short L* with QD0’s supported from the doors Barrel Ecal60 Barrel Hcal450 Coil192 Barrel Iron3287 Total Barrel3990 Endcap Ecal10 Endcap Hcal38 Endcap Iron2100 Pacman100 Feet60 BDS5 Total Door (x1)2313 Total SiD8615

1.Assembly on Site (surface) 2.Test with low current DID Ring 1 Ring 2 Solenoid Cross section Total Mass = 180 Tons

15 SiD has been developing KPiX, a 1024 channel “System on Chip” to optimize low multiple scattering for the Si strip tracker and for highly pixellated, dense readout for the electromagnetic calorimeter. A key feature is its low average power… ILC: 1 ms 5 Hz SiD currently uses power up 1 ms before train; 1 ms train; 10 μs fall, or 1% effective duty factor. SLC power cycling worked ~ok at 120 Hz. Estimated Tracker power consumption is <600 watts : gas cooling of the VXD and Si Tracker. Estimated EMCal power is 2 kW. This is coupled to W plates and water cooled at the ends. ΔT ~4C. 100 x power will require direct cooling, SiD concept will not work. Cooling and Power Consumption