Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) System for the Government of Cape Verde Synergy International Systems, Inc. www.synisys.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

The Commissions Expectations on Reporting Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Strengthening statistical capacity in support of progress towards the Internationally Agreed Development Goals in countries of South Asia United Nations.
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Programmatic Public Expenditure Review Monitoring and Evaluation The MOF/Donor Workshop on PPER Bishkek, September 26, 2005.
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Stuart Baker, Deputy Director of National Rail Projects Department for Transport, UK Zagreb, November 10,
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
M&E Issues: RAFIP and REP Kaushik Barua Accra, 12 Dec
Seminar on IT Project Management for the Social Welfare Sector LF Applications in Respect of IT Projects Mr KOK Che-leung Chief Social Work Officer (IST)
Comprehensive M&E Systems
POLICY AND PLANNING BRANCH (PPB) Proposed M&E action plan Charles Mvula IAC WAGENINGEN UR February 9 –
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Manager Orientation Budgeting & Forecasting. 2 UFundamentals Today’s Agenda New Budget Model Principles Overview of budgeting and forecasting Timelines.
REFLECTIONS ON THE EVOLUTION OF M&E IN UGANDA Uganda’s Location and Profile Pre-NIMES NIMES 2004 Revised NIMES Conclusion.
Developing the Logical Frame Work …………….
MAF’s M & E System Development Achievements and Ways Forward SWG-ARD, September 30, 2014 DoPC, MAF By: Somphathay Liengsone Deputy Director of Project.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Audit of Public Procurement
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
IPC Global Strategic Programme ( ) IPC Global Partners: IPC REGIONAL Strategic Programme IPC Regional Steering Committee Meeting – March.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Financial reporting Elise Oukka, Head of Finance, FMO Riga.
Chapter 5 Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
Lessons from Programme Evaluation in Romania First Annual Conference on Evaluation Bucharest 18 February 2008.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Proposal on Revised Mechanism of Selecting Applications for Approval Presentation by Secretariat of Council for the AIDS Trust Fund in Sharing Session.
11 PUBLIC HEARINGS ON CONDITIONAL GRANTS AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2008/2009 PARLIAMENT 27 AUGUST 2008.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Report Performance Monitor & Control Risk Administer Procurement MONITORING & CONTROLLING PROCESS.
QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE OF THE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT (MIG) – 2005/06 AND 2006/07 FINANCIAL YEARS Presentation to the Select Committee On Finance.
Page 1 Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs 14 July 2009.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Inter-American Development Bank BIMILACI 2007 QUALITY PROCUREMENT Third Party Review May 2007 Project Procurement Division.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Dr. Anubha Rajesh, Early Education Services, ICF January 13, 2016 Invest in Young Children: National Conference on Mother- tongue Based Multilingual Early.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
Building an ENI CBC project
The Hope Foundation Presentation on Pre-Funding Appraisal For Partners and New Applicant Organisations.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
the Public Procurement Audit Practical Guide
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) System for the Government of Cape Verde Synergy International Systems, Inc.

Objectives The Monitoring and Evaluation System will address the information needs of the Government of Cape Verde related to project progress monitoring and impact analysis. The system will address the questions: What? Where? How? Why? and support the information flows through the governmental hierarchy (both vertically and horizontally). In order to perform this task M&E will allow users: To input project data at the level of implementation and route it from bottom to top through the relevant hierarchy To regularly monitor the implementation progress by project milestones To define, plan, input, and monitor project outputs, including financial and time indicators To provide a set of reporting and analytical tools to conduct comparative analysis of project indicators in order to identify delays, problems and potential risks, as well as their impact on project implementation. To define and capture outcome and impact indicators To evaluate the overall impact of any particular project by making assumptions and defining proxy indicators

Project Key Phases The M&E MIS has been financed by the Millennium Challenge Foundation/Cape Verde and is implemented in technical cooperation with the Department General of Planning/ Ministry of Finance and the national IT Agency (NOSI). October 2008 – Feasibility Study November Approval of the first model of M&E MIS November 2008 – January 2009 Development of M&E MIS January 2009 – February Visit of 3 NOSI IT experts to Synergy/Armenia March 2009 – April 2009 – Client review of M&E MIS May 2009 – Approval of the second model of M&E MIS June 2009 – July Development of M&E MIS August 2009 – September Client review of M&E MIS November Integration with SIGOF December 2009 – User Training / Project finalization

At the time we started… The Government of Cape Verde had been implementing performance-based project execution since 2004, which assures that payment to implementers/contractors is made only upon successful completion of an activity. Programs and sub-programs are incorporated into the national framework (DERCP). They have one or several impact and outcome indicators associated with them. All the government operations are implemented as projects (investment or functional). The formulation of these projects is done in relation to national programs and sub-programs. One project should be linked only to one sub-program, and several projects might be implemented to fulfill a single goal. Depending on the scale of the project, it may be divided into one or several contracts or activities. Each contract, in turn, is divided into several milestones. Milestones are listed in the project document along with a set of predefined outputs. There is some diversity among the number of outputs per project. The nature of output indicators varies among the Ministries.

At the time we started … The Government of Cape Verde had established a process for the collection of project outputs (both physical and financial). The project financial indicators were being captured through SIGOF The project outputs were being submitted and kept mostly in non-electronic format. The physical progress of the project was reported by project managers and/or contractors at each milestone. The reported progress was verified by audits conducted at project completion. There was no precise strategy for implementing corrective actions for projects facing problems.

M&E MIS First review The pilot execution of the system identified two main shortcomings: Limitations of human capacity, e.g. lack of the experts in each sector who are able to define the chain of proxy indicators and draw conclusions Additional costs for collecting proxy indicators As result, the model was changed to a simpler one.

National Framework The National Framework is the hierarchy of national goals and priorities defined during budget planning. At the current stage it is implemented as a three level hierarchy. Each level is characterized by: Name Strategy Description Validity period (start and end dates) Ranking of Priority Responsible Unit Impact Statement The success of a particular framework element is measured through the set of related outcome indicators. The national programs/sub-programs and sub-sub-programs are implemented through a set of related projects and activities.

Projects All the government activities related to development and functional budgets are defined as projects. During the budget preparation cycle projects requests are registered in SIGOF. Once the budget is approved, projects become a subject for monitoring and evaluation. The project object consists of the following: General Information Organizations & Contacts Financial Information Monitoring & Results Notes & Attachments The financial data is collected through SIGOF during budget execution. Physical progress data is captured directly through the data entry facilities of the M&E MIS.

Indicators The proposed model operates with outcome and output indicators. The output indicators are used to measure the project outputs and do not require development of a complex profile. The outcome indicator, which is used to measure the outcomes of the implementation of the national framework requires definition of a proper methodology for data collection and evaluation. The Indicator object of the M&E MIS has the following properties: Name Description Responsible Organization Methodology for data collection and evaluation Cost of data collection Sets of progress data Means of verification

Reporting The information flows within the Government follow a strong bottom-to-top concept. There is no precise procedure for performing a post implementation analysis of the project impact. There is no well defined and standardized reporting institution implemented in the line ministries. Most of the reports are generated on request and contain only financial data. Project outcomes are used only for payment release authorization, which significantly limits their utilization in terms of analysis. The standard list of sector-wise impact and outcome indicators is being developed by DGP at MOF but has not yet been approved. The national indicators are reported on an annual basis. NSI maintains a list of national output and outcome indicators and is trying to develop a database on the indicator metadata.

Project Monitoring In addition to planned values, the M&E MIS captures data on actual achievements. This allows users to monitor projects’ progress among all three dimensions: Outputs Cost Time Per each dimension, the project is ranked according to a comparison of the original estimates and actual values. The reporting engine of the M&E system allows users to search and sort the projects according to this ranking. This allows project managers and decision makers to identify the projects requiring immediate attention and corrective actions. The same information on project outputs and timeframes should be used for the performance based funds release.

Project Monitoring

Progress Evaluation The evaluation of budget implementation is done on the level of individual projects as well as on the level of programs, sub-programs and sub-sub- programs. On the level of the project, evaluation is done based on the results of an audit. All identified outcomes are registered in the Project Outcomes, Success Story, and Factors Contributing to Project Sustainability fields. It is assumed that Program success is defined as a combination of the successful implementation of the related projects and “hitting the target” for the associated impact indicators.

Integration with SIGOF Logical Objects Project structure & data including financial, physical and time indicators Classifier system Metadata on indicators The data for outcome and impact indicators Registered users list GIS data Attachments/External files

Integration with SIGOF System Level Utilizes NOSI’s SAN and backup networks MS Exchange server is used for notification delivery purposes DBMS Level The analytical part of the system is nested on the SIGOF database scheme through materialized views The Data Entry retrieves data by using SIGOF Oracle-based functions Uses the local workstation cookie and Session ID to resolve the User ID and retrieve user permissions User Interface Level Shared working space while keeping page header. Frame based IU URL based call with passing Session ID Defines the place for Help and Language selection

Thank You!