Tacoma School District - 1 updated:12/4/2007 Student Achievement Board Study Session December 6, 2007 (Supplement) Dr. Michael Power Assist. Superintendent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Advertisements

AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
Tacoma School District - 1 Student Achievement Board Study December 6, 2007 Michael Power Assist. Superintendent Program and Learning Support Tel
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
The Austin Blueprint After One Year A report to the AISD Board of Trustees The Austin Blueprint Initiative Dr. Darlene Westbrook, Chief Academic Officer.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Bob Mattila.  No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is an act that was passed in 2002 with the goal of - "An act to close the achievement gap with accountability,
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY Pam Farr, Director of Teaching & Learning Gail Straus, Director of ECE & Federal Programs.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
HSA, Dropouts, Graduation and AYP Report to the Board of Education October 25, 2011.
1 Tacoma School District - Research and Evaluation 1 Tacoma Summary Data Regarding Gap Issues March 2, 2009 Prepared for Leanna Albrecht Pat Cummings Director.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
FCAT? FCAT? FSA EOC? FAA? AYP? AMO?.
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Evergreen Elementary School
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11
AYP and Report Card.
State Test Results & AYP Status Shelton School District SY 10-11
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Presentation transcript:

Tacoma School District - 1 updated:12/4/2007 Student Achievement Board Study Session December 6, 2007 (Supplement) Dr. Michael Power Assist. Superintendent Program and Learning Support Tel Pat Cummings Director of Research and Evaluation Tel Karyn Clarke Director of District and School Improvement Tel This presentation includes some information presented to the Board of Directors on 12/6/07 and additional Information which was not presented due to time limitations.

Tacoma School District - 2 Graduation Rate Data On-Time Graduation For example, students would have started grade 9 in the fall of are expected to graduate “on- time” (in four years) in spring Extended Time This rate includes students who graduated after their expected graduation year. Annual Dropout Rate Students who leave school without a regular high school diploma and do not transfer to another school. Includes “unknowns” and those completing with a GED,

Tacoma School District - 3 Where rates are reported: Annual Dropout Rate On-Time Graduation Rate Extended Graduation Rate

Tacoma School District - 4 Four Cohorts of 9th Graders ( ) Percent of Students Graduating in 4 year (U of W Research)

Tacoma School District - 5 Cohort Class of Tacoma and Washington State On-Time Graduation Rates

Tacoma School District - 6 Distribution of On-Time Graduation Rates All Students Tacoma 68% Each dot on the chart represents one of 207 districts in Washington state, distributed from low to high * Districts with less than 100 students in grades 9-12 were excluded from this data set 48 out of rd percentile rank

Tacoma School District - 7 Distribution of Extended Graduation Rates All Students Tacoma 75% Each dot on the chart represents one of 206 districts in Washington state, distributed from low to high * Districts with less than 100 students in grades 9-12 were excluded from this data set 56 out of rd percentile rank

Tacoma School District - 8 Cohort Class of Tacoma High Schools On-Time Graduation Rates (minus continuing)

Tacoma School District - 9 GAP Data Definition The gap refers to the observed achievement disparity on a number of educational measures between the performance of groups of students, especially groups defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. By type of group Gender, race/ethnicity, Spec. Ed, ESL, SES. By outcome Test scores (e.g., WASL, District Tests, ACT, SAT) Other measures (e.g., grades, grad/dropout rates, discipline referrals, TV viewing, homework)

Tacoma School District GAP = 16 points 2007 GAP = 25 points Trends in Average Percent Meeting Standard and Score Gaps for Black Students and White Students – WASL Grade 4 Mathematics

Tacoma School District GAP = 13 points 2007 GAP = 31 points Trends in Average Percent Meeting Standard and Score Gaps for Black Students and White Students – WASL Grade 7 Mathematics

Tacoma School District GAP = 25 points 2007 GAP = 30 points Trends in Average Percent Meeting Standard and Score Gaps for Black Students and White Students – WASL Grade 10 Mathematics

Tacoma School District GAP = 22 points 2007 GAP = 12 points Trends in Average Percent Meeting Standard and Score Gaps for Black Students and White Students – WASL Grade 4 Reading

Tacoma School District GAP = 19 points 2007 GAP = 19 points Trends in Average Percent Meeting Standard and Score Gaps for Black Students and White Students – WASL Grade 7 Reading

Tacoma School District GAP = 25 points Trends in Average Percent Meeting Standard and Score Gaps for Black Students and White Students – WASL Grade 10 Reading 2007 GAP = 20 points

Tacoma School District - 16 Grade 6 GPA White = 3.02 Hispanic = 2.70 Black = 2.62 Trends in Average Grade Point Average (GPA) By Ethnic Group (Grades 6 through 12) Grade 12 GPA White = 2.93 Hispanic = 2.77 Black = 2.58

Tacoma School District - 17 Grade 10 Reading WASL - 9 Year Trend By Ethnic Group (Including “No Score” and “Previously Passed”)

Tacoma School District - 18 Grade 10 Math WASL - 9 Year Trend By Ethnic Group (Including “No Score” and “Previously Passed”)

Tacoma School District - 19 Grade 10 Writing WASL - 9 Year Trend By Ethnic Group (Including “No Score” and “Previously Passed”)

Tacoma School District - 20 Percent of "No Score" WASL Reading - 8 Year Ethnic Trends

Tacoma School District - 21 Percent of "No Score" WASL Math - 8 Year Ethnic Trends

Tacoma School District - 22 Percent of "No Score" WASL Reading - 8 Year District Trends

Tacoma School District - 23 AYP Data Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) The cornerstones of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) signed into law January 2002, as the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. AYP is a measure of year-to-year student achievement on the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) in reading and mathematics.

Tacoma School District - 24 School Improvement Plan Continue: Public School Choice Continue: Public School Choice Supplemental Continue: Public School Choice Supplemental Services Public School Choice Supplemental Services Corrective Action Plan for Alternative Governance AYP Step Implement Plan For Alternative Governance Step 5 12 AYP AYP TIMELINE FOR SCHOOLS (Consequences apply only to schools receiving Title I funds) Sanctions are a District Responsibility Identified for School Improvement WASL Results WASL Results

Tacoma School District - 25 Met AYP?AYP STEP ArlingtonYES BirneyYES BlixYES1 BozeYES1 Browns PtYES BryantYES Crescent HgtsYES DeLongYES DowningYES EdisonYES FawcettYES Fern HillYES FranklinYES GeigerYES GrantYES H. StaffordYES JeffersonYES LarchmontYES ListerNO Met AYP?AYP STEP LowellYES LyonYES Manitou ParkYES MannYES McCarverYES1 McKinleyYES1 NE TacomaYES Pt DefianceYES ReedYES RooseveltYES SheridanYES1 ShermanYES SkylineYES StanleyYES WainwrightYES WA/HoytYES WhitmanYES WhittierYES ELEMENTARY:

Tacoma School District - 26 Met AYP?AYP STEP A. GiaudroneNO BakerNO *GaultNO4 GrayNO1 HuntNO *Jason LeeNO4 MasonNO *McIlvaighNO4 MeekerNO StewartNO TrumanNO MIDDLE SCHOOL:

Tacoma School District - 27 HIGH SCHOOL: Met AYP? FossNO LincolnNO Mt. TahomaNO StadiumNO WilsonNO Oakland AltNO SOTAYES Fresh StartYES

Tacoma School District - 28 Gault Grade 7 Total Reading Ten Year Trend Summary from 1998 to 2007

Tacoma School District - 29 Gault Grade 7 Total Mathematics Ten Year Trend Summary from 1998 to 2007

Tacoma School District - 30 McIlvaigh Grade 7 Total Reading Ten Year Trend Summary from 1998 to 2007

Tacoma School District - 31 McIlvaigh Grade 7 Total Mathematics Ten Year Trend Summary from 1998 to 2007

Tacoma School District - 32 Jason Lee Grade 7 Total Reading Ten Year Trend Summary from 1998 to 2007

Tacoma School District - 33 Jason Lee Grade 7 Total Mathematics Ten Year Trend Summary from 1998 to 2007