M24 meeting MP-Paedigree Amsterdam, 23 February, 2015 Neurological and Neuromuscular Diseases WP6 – WP11.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You can use this presentation to: Gain an overall understanding of the purpose of the revised tool Learn about the changes that have been made Find advice.
Advertisements

NMAHP – Readiness for eHealth Heather Strachan NMAHP eHealth Lead eHealth Directorate Scottish Government.
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
Making a Difference: Measuring Your Outcomes Montgomery County Volunteer Center February 4, 2014 Pam Saussy and Barry Seltser, Consultants.
Michelle O’Reilly. Quantitative research is outcomes driven Qualitative research is process driven Please offer up your definitions.
Key Considerations for Report Generation & Customization Richard Wzorek Director, Production IT Confidential © Almac Group 2012.
2005 All Hands Meeting Multi-Site Alzheimer’s Disease Project a.k.a. “MAD” Project Leaders: C. Fennema-Notestine, R. Gollub, B. Dickerson.
Clinical Assessment of Locomotion GaitTrak Gait Analysis - Why ? Gait Analysis - Why ? Applications for Gait Analysis Applications for Gait Analysis Gait.
Integrated Studies Applied Neuroscience Seminar Evan Fletcher, Mario Ortega Dr. Charles DeCarli, IDeA Lab Director.
WP11: Modelling and simulation for NND WP Leader: Motek Medical Peter Martens, Frans Steenbrink Amsterdam – February 2015.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT FORMS OF ASSESSMENT.
Musculoskeletal Modeling Colin Smith. A method for Studying Movement Things we can measure in movement: – Kinematics (using motion capture) – Output Forces.
ISB Notice and preparing for the implementation of the new IAPT Data Standard Shaun Crowe Mental Health, Employment and IAPT Mental Health Collaborative.
UGDIE PROJECT MEETING Bled September WP6 – Assessment and Evaluation Evaluation Planning  Draft Evaluation plan.
System-of-Systems Cost Modeling: COSOSIMO July 2005 Workshop Results Jo Ann Lane University of Southern California Center for Software Engineering.
Proposed Approach for OPAL Workflow Sept Workflow Overview.
NND Status Siemens AG Dr. Maria J. Costa NND Internal Review/Siemens/February 2015.
DISCUSSION Alex Sutton Centre for Biostatistics & Genetic Epidemiology, University of Leicester.
Trauma Data Use: A Trauma Physician’s Point of View Frederick A. Foss, Jr. M.D. F.A.C.S Trauma Medical Director Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center.
1 Telba Irony, Ph.D. Mathematical Statistician Division of Biostatistics Statistical Analysis of InFUSE  Bone Graft/LT-Cage Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device.
DICOM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & SEMINAR Oct 9-11, 2010 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DICOM in Surgery - Recent activities and new DICOM Supplements Dr.-Ing.
The Nice Project Start –up meeting Santiago November 10 th - 11 th 2010.
WP11: Modelling and simulation for NND Thomas Geijtenbeek, Frans van der Helm Delft University of Technology Amsterdam – February 2015.
Torrington, Hall & Taylor, Human Resource Management 6e, © Pearson Education Limited 2005 Slide 7.1 Importance of Selection The search for the perfect.
Including a detailed description of the Colorado Growth Model 1.
Large-Scale Integrating Project SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME 1: HEALTH Optimization of Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Europe General.
Imaging Workspace An Overview and Roadmap Eliot L. Siegel, MD Imaging Workspace Lead SME January 23, 2008.
Coding data Trudy Bekkering SR course 27 May
Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS): State of Play AMIS First Meeting of the Rapid Response Forum 11 April 2012 Mexico City Abdolreza Abbassian,
Panel Discussion Part I Methodology Ideas from adult MR brain segmentation are used in neonatal MR brain segmentation. However, additional challenges.
Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Team Progress Presentation State Name: OREGON Practice Name: Doernbecher General Pediatrics Team Members:
WP6: Data acquisition and processing for NND WP Leader: VUmc Amsterdam Amsterdam – February 2015.
Introduction Surgical training environments as well as pre- and intra-operative planning environments require physics-based simulation systems to achieve.
Imaging Core Laboratory Fall Meeting, 2011 Imaging Challenges for ACRIN sites Compliance and set-up Anthony M. Levering Assistant Director, Core lab.
USFD activity in WP11 NND Internal Review/USFD-CISTIB/February 2015 Method developed for DXA and delivered in D11.1. Volumetric mesh shape and intensity.
Software Project Planning Defining the Project Writing the Software Specification Planning the Development Stages Testing the Software.
The New Flagship. New v9.1.2 Free Patch Releasing: May 5, 2014 To be delivered though True Update.
BIRN Advantages in Morphometry  Standards for Data Management / Curation File Formats, Database Interfaces, User Interfaces  Uniform Acquisition and.
Amsterdam – February 2015 Technical Quality Assurance of GA The aim of Technical Quality Assurance (TQA) was to assess the quality of the measurements.
Morphometry BIRN: Imaging Calibration Analysis Tools Data Sharing.
All Hands Meeting 2005 AVI Update Morphometry BIRN Analysis, Visualization, and Interpretation.
1 Updates on Regulatory Requirements for Missing Data Ferran Torres, MD, PhD Hospital Clinic Barcelona Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Digital Imaging in Pathology Bruce E. Dunn, M.D. Milwaukee VA Medical Center
Enabling Longitudinal Assessment of Ankle-foot Orthosis Efficacy for Children with Cerebral Palsy Shanshan Chen, Christopher L. Cunningham, John Lach Charles.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Advanced Software Engineering Lecture 4: Process & Project Metrics.
Project Planning Defining the project Software specification Development stages Software testing.
Michael J. Bell, MD Stephen R. Wisniewski, PhD University Of Pittsburgh National Institute Of Health National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke.
Elements for a discussion on the development of a course on microsimulation of health Philippe Finès July 2010.
Developing outcome prediction models for acute intracerebral hemorrhage patients: evaluation of a Support Vector Machine based method A. Jakab 1, L. Lánczi.
Population of 4D Computational Phantoms for CT Imaging Research and Dosimetry W. Paul Segars, PhD Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs Duke University.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks SA2 Networking support for EGEE III Xavier.
MEA Document Overview Slides 26 February About these slides This slide pack is designed to provide market participants with an introduction to.
Imaging Workspace An Overview and Roadmap Eliot L. Siegel, MD Imaging Workspace Lead SME January 23, 2008.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
WP 6: KU Leuven Prof. Dr. Kaat Desloovere Prof. Dr. Nathalie Goemans Marije Goudriaan, MSc, PT Amsterdam – February 2015.
Summary of Scientific Goals & Features Needed to Achieve Them
BENCH-CAN Internal evaluation 2nd semester
Breast MRI – How we got Here
AVI Update Morphometry BIRN
Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™
4D eXtended CArdiac-Torso (XCAT) Phantoms
Semiannual Report, March 2015
Imaging-Based 3-Dimensional Printing for Improved Maxillofacial Presurgical Planning: A Single Center Case Series  Will Guest, MD, PhD, Diana Forbes,
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL
Impact of approaches for clinical and radiological monitoring on predicting of short-term and long-term disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis Brian.
Shengcong Chen, Changxing Ding, Minfeng Liu 2018
Presentation transcript:

M24 meeting MP-Paedigree Amsterdam, 23 February, 2015 Neurological and Neuromuscular Diseases WP6 – WP11

MD Paedigree for NND NND M24 meeting / February 2015 MODEL DRIVEN, 2 tracks 1. Individualized musculoskeletal models to enhance gait analysis as an etiological focused diagnostic tool 2. To employ pattern recognition statistical tools, on large datasets, to enable prediction of treatment outcome

Main tasks after 1 st year review by EU NND M24 meeting / February WP6 : speed up data collection 2.WP 11: clarify role of DXA 3.Suggest adaptation of DOW 4.Update self assessment After M12 self-evalution: 5.Intensify contact infrastructure group

T6.1 – QA on data collection and clinical protocols D6.1 : CGA clinical protocols at M18 Status at M18: Task T6.1.1 Technical Quality Assurance (TQA) on clinical protocols and on data collection TQA and data collection protocols agreed TQ assessed accordingly in all 3 centres (processing finalized by M24 > D6.2) Task T6.1.2 Definition of standard clinical protocol for CGA Standard and extended protocols agreed D6.1 M18

T6.1 – QA on data collection and clinical protocols D6.2 : sharing CGA clinical protocols at M24 Status at M18: Ready for sharing at ESMAC 2014 in Rome Status at M24 : to be reported today

T6.2 – Gait analysis collection CP D6.3 : report on collected data at M36 Status at M18: Task T6.2.1 Retrospective data for CP OPBG : 200/200 identified 50 ready for upload Leuven: 100*/400 identified 25* ready for upload (20 / month to go) *) mixed pre & post treatment DOW changes: minor Status at M24 : to be reported today

T6.2 – Gait analysis collection CP D6.3 : report on collected data at M36 Status at M18: Task T6.2.1 Retrospective data for CP OPBG : 200/200 identified 50 ready for upload Leuven: 100*/400 identified 25* ready for upload (20 / month to go) *) mixed pre & post treatment DOW changes: minor Status at M24 : to be reported today

T6.2 – Gait analysis collection - CP D6.3 : report on collected data at M36 Status at M18: Task T6.2.2 Prospective data for CP Protocols agreed Ethical approval reached Age range extended First patients measured (OPBG) KUL and Vumc to start (1 per 1,5 month) DOW changes none Status at M24 : to be reported today

T6.3 – Gait analysis collection – DMD/CMT D6.3 : report on collected data at M36 Status at M18: Task T6.3 Prospective data for DMD & CMT Protocols agreed Ethical approval pending or reached Age range extended, first DMD patients measured DOW changes: 10 DMD, 10 CMT, 2 times CGA per centre (KUL OPBG) 1 time an MRI Status at M24 : to be reported today

T6.4 – Image acquisition D6.4 : report on collected data at M44 Status at M18: Protocols agreed Ethical approval reached in all centres Age range extended, CMT1 replaces SMA OPBG : 14 MRI sets healthy children, 11 patients: 7 DMD, 1 CMT1A, 3 CP VUmc : 1 healthy adult (test scan) KULeuven : starting DOW adjustments: no DXA scans (abandoned, see WP11) Status at M24: to be reported today

NND - WP11 DOW adjustments and next steps MD-P M24meeting - Amsterdam

Developments in WP11 Analysis after meeting July 2014 No more DXA scans and analysis  Too little evidence for added value DXA  Problems with ethical approval Less emphasis on mass distribution model  Not sensitive to model output  Mass and inertia tensor still calculated using subject-specific bone/muscle/fat volumes; but no bone mass distribution (as could be based on DXA) Steps from MRI to model more complex than expected (see red circles scheme next slide)

Main changes needed in WP11 More emphasis on sensitive parameters  Based on sensitivity study  I.e. joint centers and axes; muscle attachments; muscle/tendon lengths  more effort is needed to make this happen USFD can play a role in this instead of DXA image processing

Details of WP11 changes needed (see next sheet) Wr.t. Joint centers / axes  Comparison:  Based on bone meshes and MRI markers (USFD)  Based on gait data (MM)  Based on combination of both (USFD)  Advanced methods explored to create subject- specific joint models (not necessarily hinge/ball) using bone surface meshes (USFD)

W.r.t. muscle attachments  Not easily identifyable from MRI  New methods explored to follow muscle belly midline to bone mesh (USFD)  + Can possibly be morphed using atlas data? (Siemens) Details of WP11 changes needed (2) (see previous sheet)

W.r.t. muscle fiber / tendon slack lengths  Idea to use ultrasound measurements for this, but seems not a (realistic) option within this project anymore Details of WP11 changes needed (3)

Next steps Siemens  Try out Leuven annotated MRI images as atlas  Use this to create annotated MRIs of our own data (incl bony landmarks and attachment points) Sheffield  Create accurate joint models based on meshes  Create methods for muscle attachment site (using mesh morphing or extrapolation of muscles)  Conversion from annotated-MRI to model parameters

Next steps TU Delft  Create patient-specific OpenSim models with USFD input  Sensitivity / effect studies of model changes  Validation against measured data  Explore predictive models Motek  Create workflow for personalization without imaging  Using functional joint centers; accurate length scaling; bone deformities; …  Apply TUD image-based models in HBM

MRI data OPBG (30) MRI data KUL (30) MRI data VUMC (10) GAIT+PE data OPBG GAIT+PE data KUL GAIT+PE data VUMC SIEMENSUSFD TUD MOTEK 1A 1B 1C 2 SYSTEM INTEGRATION OVERVIEW MD-PAEDIGREE WP11 3 4A 4B 4C 5A 5B 5C 6 Brief description of output – input data 1.MRI images (Dicom format; stacks combined to one image) 2.Segmented MRI images (… format; bones and muscles segmented; anatomical landmarks & attachment sites indicated) 3.Model parameters from MRI (… format; muscle volumes; segment mass & inertia; femur and tibia torsion; joint centers/models; attachment sitesl; in segment reference frames) 4.Gait and calibration trials (C3D/MOX format – same as 5) + (instrumented) physical exam; dynamometry; O2; anamnesis (txt/pdf format) 5.Gait and calibration trials (C3D/MOX format – same as 4) 6.Personalized OpenSim models (.osim format) 7.HBM output to repository 7