Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting February 18, Agenda Update from Southern Pacific Area MTEOR Enhancements Full Implementation.
Advertisements

® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting January 28, Agenda  Inventory Roll-up Reports  MTEOR Launch in Southern Pacific Area  Mailer Implementation Plan.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Appointment & Corporate Rating Process.
Global Systems Management Surface Visibility Presented by USPS at July 10 Packages Subgroup Meeting.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Mailer Rating Review.
® MTEOR Overview. 2 Agenda  MTEOR Overview  MTEOR History  MTEOR Applications and Users  MTEOR Success  Tools and Resources.
States and Cities SOL US II 2c A state is an example of a political region. States may be grouped as part of different regions, depending upon the criteria.
Maps of the USA AlaskaHawaii. Alabama Birmingham Montgomery.
Vancouver June 5, /9/2015. TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque* Denver Hawaii* Los Angeles Palm Springs Phoenix Portland Reno Sacramento Salt.
Vancouver May 22, /9/2015. TAP CVB Clients Western Zone Albuquerque Calgary* Denver Hawaii* Los Angeles Palm Springs Phoenix Portland Sacramento.
AGA 2013 Sectional Leadership Meeting Los Angeles, California April 18 –
MTAC Workgroup 114 Periodicals Subgroup Update May 15, 2007.
FAST for Periodicals MTAC Workgroup 95 Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.
1 Postal Automation: Initiatives, Transitions & Best Practices Postal Automation: Initiatives, Transitions & Best Practices Part II.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
Washington DC May 18 th, 2005 MTAC Workgroup #87 Status Improving the Drop Shipment Process.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup #87 Washington, D.C. January 30, 2008.
Status of NDC Activations MTAC Briefing August 12, 2009.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
AGA 2012 Sectional Leadership Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada May , 2012.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher May 18, 2005 Washington DC.
® MTAC 131 Workgroup Update. 2 MTAC 131 Charter Recap MTAC charter:  This workgroup will focus on the issues regarding communicating what separations.
1 ISAT Module III: Building Energy Efficiency Topic 8: Thermal Performance Monitoring  Degree Days  Example of Degree days  Thermal Energy Consumption.
U.S. Postal Service Areas By Customer Service Districts Western Great Lakes Northeast New York Metro Capital Metro Eastern Southeast Southwest Pacific.
MTAC Meeting February 23, 2005 Integrated Mail Management.
The United States 4 Key Regions Of the Country. The 48 connected states are called the CONTINENTAL states.
Flats Sequencing System Update Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC May 16, 2007 Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC May 16, 2007.
Flats Sequencing System Update Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC February 21, 2007 Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC February 21, 2007.
Standard Mail Sub Group MTAC WG #114 May 7, 2007.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 2, 2006.
MTAC Workgroup # 83 First-Class Business Mail Measurement February 4, 2004.
USPS Product Information MTAC Jim Cochrane Vice President, Product Information February 17, 2011.
Restricted Information Copyright 2009 USPS MTAC USPS Demand Chain Bob Bernstock USPS President Mailing & Shipping Services April 29, 2009.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher Feb 22, 2006 Washington DC.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup 87 Update Washington, D.C. August 2, 2007.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Mailer Rating Reports.
® FSS Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS MTAC General Session November 18, 2009.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
Confirm/PLANET Codes  MTAC Summary Confirm Program Office
Facilities Data Base (FDB) Phase II MTAC Meeting November 6, 2003.
August 3, 2006 MTAC Workgroup #95 FAST for Periodicals Update.
Presentation IV A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement, and Policy Decisions.
® FSS Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS MTAC May 20, 2010.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
MTAC #107 Update November 1, 2006 Washington DC. MTAC #107 2 © 2006 Accenture. All rights reserved. Progress Goal  To provide key visibility points for.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
1 USPS/MTAC Work Group #75 MOVE Update Initiative Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Mail Quality Sub-committee MOVE Update Initiative Overview November.
® MTEOR User Group 007 October 28, Agenda  Fall Mailing Season Update  MTEOR Local Mailer Launch Update  MTESC Mailer Inventory Report Compliance.
Streamlining Verification MTAC Workgroup Mission Statement: –Collectively determine how the USPS and the Industry can leverage existing, or guide.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Introduction. FAST 2 Agenda Mailer Rating Overview Mailer Reminders Mailer Rating Resources.
PostalOne! ® Workgroup #84 1 MTAC February PostalOne! ® Workgroup #84 2 Scheduled for April 3rd  Supporting Mail.dat 05-1  Testing server available.
MTAC #95 Update FAST for Periodicals November 2, 2006 Washington DC.
® Network Distribution Center (NDC) Update Frank Neri Manager, Processing Operations.
ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION WATCH (ePUBWATCH) November 6, 2002 MTAC Meeting.
Business Mail Measurement MTAC Workgroup Issue 60 May 7-8, 2003.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation May 8, 2003.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update MTAC Workgroup #87 Washington DC – August 18.
February 23, 2006 MTAC Workgroup #87 Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update.
MTAC Workgroup 107 eVS/FAST/SV Integration Washington, D.C. August 2, 2007.
Maps of the USA. Birmingham Montgomery Anchorage Fairbanks Juneau.
1 First Class MTAC Workgroup 102 November 1, 2006.
1 MTAC WG #175 Update for Northeast Area Focus Group May 4 th,
Local Associations and Collegiate Chapters
An Example of Analyses of a Distance Matrix
FASOM and Agricultural Regions
Palatine Cardiss Collins Boston Manchester Mid Island South Hackensack
MTAC User Group 007 Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007

MTAC Workgroup #87 2 National Deployment USPS deployed Mailer Rating nationally following a 10 week pilot at 5 facilities Mailer Rating National Deployment was based on a phased approach by area  Deployment included FAST/Surface Visibility (SV) enabled facilities with 80% SV Drop Ship Compliance or higher Mailer Rating National Deployment Activation  A facility must reach 80% SV Drop Ship Compliance for 2 consecutive weeks before being activated  Activated facilities falling below 80% SV Drop Ship Compliance for 2 consecutive weeks are deactivated  In order to be reactivated, a facility must reach 80% SV Drop Ship Compliance for 2 weeks –Customers are notified as facilities are activated for Mailer Rating –Despite the notification, customers should operate as if all USPS facilities are activated at this time to encourage better performance Mailer Rating National Deployment Plan  Phase I: 1 Area; Western  Phase II: 3 Areas; Great Lakes, Southwest, Eastern  Phase III: 5 Areas; NY Metro, Capital Metro, Pacific, Northeast, Southeast

MTAC Workgroup #87 3 Deployment Status Phase I: 67% of Phase I facilities are activated  14 out of 21 facilities activated in the Western Area Phase II: 64% of Phase II facilities are activated  12 out of 18 facilities activated in the Great Lakes Area  9 out of 12 facilities activated in the Southwest Area  9 out of 17 facilities activated in the Eastern Area Phase III: 54% of Phase III facilities are activated  7 out of 12 facilities activated in the NY Metro Area  8 out of 14 facilities activated in the Northeast Area  5 out of 14 facilities activated in the Capital Metro Area  10 out of 14 facilities activated in the Southeast Area  7 out of 14 facilities activated in the Pacific Area NOTE: Although formal deployment has concluded, FAST will continue to track and monitor SV Drop Shipment Compliance and activate or deactivate facilities as required according to data compliance

MTAC Workgroup #87 4 Activated Facilities

MTAC Workgroup #87 5 Mailer Rating – Summary Deployment execution activities included increased communications, data analysis and weekly teleconferences held with customers and facilities Both facilities and customers demonstrated changed behavior from the start of the pilot to the conclusion of national deployment SV utilization and compliance has improved through increased communication A small percentage of USPS customers contribute significantly to lowering average mailer rating scores at facilities Enhancements were made to slot allocation functionality to better align mailer performance to facility slot allocation

MTAC Workgroup #87 6 Slot Allocation New York Metro Area – New York PLANT (100) Percentage of Corporations in each Tier Percentage of Total Appointments Scheduled for each Tier Percentage of Allocated Slots TIER 117%2%0% TIER 211%18%16% TIER 38%7%6% TIER 464%73%78% Appointment data from 9/1- 9/28 activity is included in the calculations for Tiers beginning 10/20 Percentage of Corporations in each Tier Percentage of Total Appointments Scheduled for each Tier Percentage of Allocated Slots TIER 124%4%3% TIER 26%17%13% TIER 35%2%10% TIER 465%77%74% Appointment data from 9/15- 10/12 activity is included in the calculations for Tiers beginning 11/3

MTAC Workgroup #87 7 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Western  Western – Phase I  Total number of possible facilities: 21  Total number of facilities activated: 14 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 800DENVER PDCPlant 550SAINT PAULPlant 970PORTLANDPlant 640KANSAS CITYPlant 66ZKANSAS CITYBMC 554MATWIN CITIES METRO HUBPlant 80ZDENVERBMC 570SIOUX FALLSPlant 85HPHOENIX STCPlant 890LAS VEGASPlant 852PHOENIX SCFPlant 660KANSAS CITYPlant 680OMAHAPlant 553MINNEAPOLISPlant 980SEATTLEPlant 500DES MOINESPlant 612QUAD CITIESPlant 55ZMINNEAPOLIS/SAINT PAULBMC 50ZDES MOINES (Pilot Facility)BMC 98ZSEATTLEBMC 522CEDAR RAPIDS (Pilot Facility)Plant

MTAC Workgroup #87 8 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Great Lakes  Great Lakes – Phase II  Total number of possible facilities: 18  Total number of facilities activated: 12 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 48ZDETROIT BMCBMC 615PEORIAPlant 535MADISONPlant 600PALATINEPlant 488LANSINGPlant 493GRAND RAPIDSPlant 480ROYAL OAKPlant 610ROCKFORDPlant 605FOX VALLEYPlant 604SOUTH SUBURBANPlant 606CHICAGOPlant 63ZSAINT LOUIS BMCBMC 630SAINT LOUISPlant 60ZCHICAGOBMC 541GREEN BAYPlant 460INDIANAPOLISPlant 601CAROL STREAMPlant 617BLOOMINGTONPlant

MTAC Workgroup #87 9 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Southwest  Southwest – Phase II  Total number of possible facilities: 12  Total number of facilities activated: 9 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 707BATON ROUGEPlant 720LITTLE ROCK P&DCPlant 750NORTH TEXASPlant 760FORT WORTHPlant 740TULSA P & DCPlant 707P APORT ALLENAnnex 773NORTH HOUSTONPlant 786AUSTINPlant 770HOUSTONPlant 75Z DALLAS BULK MAIL CENTERBMC 752DALLASPlant 780SAN ANTONIOPlant

MTAC Workgroup #87 10 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Eastern  Eastern – Phase II  Total number of possible facilities: 17  Total number of facilities activated: 9 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant

MTAC Workgroup #87 11 Mailer Rating National Deployment – New York Metro  New York Metro – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 12  Total number of facilities activated: 7 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 076NORTHERN NJ METROPlant 085TRENTONPlant 105WESTCHESTERPlant 07ZNEW JERSEY BMCBMC 077MONMOUTHPlant 07099DOMINICK V DANIELSPlant 115WESTERN NASSAUPlant 117MID ISLANDPlant 112BROOKLYNPlant 100NEW YORKPlant 110QUEENSPlant 088KILMERPlant

MTAC Workgroup #87 12 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Capital Metro  Capital Metro – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 5 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 212BALTIMOREPlant 217FREDERICKPlant 275RALEIGHPlant 230RICHMONDPlant 233NORFOLKPlant 280CHARLOTTEPlant 296GREENVILLEPlant 201DULLESPlant 220NORTHERN VAPlant 290COLUMBIAPlant 200WASHINGTONPlant 20ZWASHINGTON BULK MAIL CTRBMC 270GREENSBOROPlant 27ZGREENSBOROBMC

MTAC Workgroup #87 13 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Pacific  Pacific – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 7 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant Two Weeks Non -Compliant

MTAC Workgroup #87 14 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Northeast  Northeast – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 8 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 120ALBANYPlant 060HARTFORDPlant 040SOUTHERN MAINEPlant 018MIDDLESEX ESSEXPlant 010 SPRINGFIELD P & D CTRPlant 015CENTRAL MAPlant 140BUFFALOPlant 023BROCKTONPlant 144ROCHESTERPlant 01ZSPRINGFIELD BMCBMC 130SYRACUSEPlant 064SOUTHERN CTPlant 021BOSTONPlant 028PROVIDENCEPlant

MTAC Workgroup #87 15 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Southeast  Southeast – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 10 Activated Facilities One Week Compliant Two Weeks Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 333FORT LAUDERDALEPlant 32ZJACKSONVILLE BMCBMC 328PMORLANDO L&DCAnnex 38ZMEMPHIS BMCBMC MCOORLANDOPlant 350BIRMINGHAMPlant TPATAMPA P&DCPlant 301NORTH METROPlant 380MEMPHIS P&DCPlant 335DCTAMPA L&DCAnnex 390JACKSONPlant 337SAINT PETERSBURGPlant 303ATLANTAPlant 30ZATLANTABMC

MTAC Workgroup #87 16 National No Show Tends There was a 2.7% decrease in total No Shows from the start of deployment to today (21.7 to 19) There was a 3.7% decrease in Recurring Appointment No Shows from the start of deployment to today (22.1 to 18.4)

MTAC Workgroup #87 17 Next Steps Raising the bar for SV Drop Shipment Compliance from 80% Increase the FAST finalization period from 5 days to 12 days Address customer/facility concerns on operational issues at USPS facilities  Please direct operational and policy issues to Debby Cataldi at or (W) (202)  Please direct Mailer Rating functionality questions to November 15 th meeting to determine whether to sunset workgroup. A new workgroup might be needed to focus on operational issues.