Jericho Aquatic Discharge Assessment Presented by: Bruce Ott, Senior Environmental Scientist, AMEC Earth & Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Water - Part I Mine Water Quality and Site Water Management Presented by: Kelly SexsmithPeter McCreath SRK ConsultingClearwater Consultants.
Advertisements

LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
Sewage and Effluent Treatment 2-4 November 2002 Seán Moran -The first few slides.
Britannia Mine: Environmental Impact Study of Treated Effluent Discharge Lee Nikl.
Environment Canada’s Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Regarding AREVA Resources Canada Inc.’s Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project NIRB.
Probes/kits used in testing the water quality 2014 Group 4 Project.
By Hung Nguyen Lime Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage at Leviathan Mine, California.
STRATUS CONSULTING The Biotic Ligand Model: Unresolved Scientific Issues and Site- and Species-specific Effects on Predicted Cu Toxicity Jeffrey Morris,
Land Treatment of Mine Water Presented by: Andre Sobolewski, Microbial Technologies.
Antamina Mine Water Management Model Alan Keizur Golder Associates Roberto Manrique Arce Compañia Minera Antamina User Conference 2006 Background The Antamina.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Indicator Species. What is an indicator species? A species whose presence, absence or abundance reflects a specific environmental condition, habitat or.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Hands-On Water Quality Assessment For Everyone! By Dr. Birgit Hagedorn University of Alaska Anchorage & Edda Mutter University of Alaska Fairbanks By Dr.
Water Quality.
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Environmental Assessment and Sustainability CIV913 CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT of RIVER WATER QUALITY.
Freshwater Aquatic Organisms and Habitat ( ) Rick Palmer Senior Fisheries Biologist Sharleen Hamm Aquatic Ecologist.
Environment Canada’s Intervention on the Doris North Gold Project Water Licence Application Savanna Levenson/ Dave Fox / Anne Wilson Environmental Protection.
ABIOTIC. The pH of a stream or lake depends on the kinds of rocks and soil that water contacts. Proper pH is an important life requirement for all aquatic.
Vulnerability of freshwater fish communities to human mediated impacts Jenni McDermid 1 and David Browne 1,2 1 Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, Peterborough,
What is Ecology?.
By Ujala,Maria and Group.  Plants and animals can’t live without freshwater, because all organisms are made up mostly by water. A tree for example is.
Tahera Environmental Monitoring Commitments Summary Use TK in monitoring; cooperate with communities Collect reliable information that will: Allow detection.
Monitoring Principles Stella Swanson, Ph.D.. Principle #1: Know Why We Are Monitoring Four basic reasons to monitor:  Compliance Monitoring: to demonstrate.
Environment Canada’s Intervention on the Mary River Project Water Licence Application Nunavut Water Board Final Hearing Pond Inlet, NU Mark Dahl / Anne.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
1 Floodplain Management Session 11 Biology Water Quality Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
- Aquatics - Presented by: Rick Pattenden Mainstream Aquatics Ltd.
Water Chemistry Notes Mr. Distasio. Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Colorless, odorless gas Source: Respiration Removal: Photosynthesis Highest Levels: at night,
W ATER Q UALITY. Water quality is a term used to describe the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of water. Factors that affect water quality.
Pollution and Monitoring
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
The Blue Planet The Blue Planet Indicators of Water Quality.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Warm Up Complete the text dependent questions for the Water Scarcity text. Do your own work. Homework: Read 16C-21C answer ?’s 1-3, 5 p22C Read 24C-31C.
Water Quality Testing. Testing of water is used to determine if water needs to be cleaned up.
Hydrology – Water Unit EOG Practice Questions. 1. Which source of water pollution includes oil and gasoline discharge from automobiles and storm sewer.
8. E and 4 Water Quality, Indicators, and Usage.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
Environmental Chemistry. Section 2: The Quantity of Chemicals in the Environment can be Monitored.
 The health of a water system is determined by the balance between physical, chemical, and biological variables.
2.1:Monitoring Water Quality GO C2Identify processes for Measuring the Quantity of Different Substances in the Environment and for Monitoring air and water.
Patricia Gillis Copper Sensitivity in Glochidia: Assessing the Effect of Water Composition on the Sensitive Larvae of Freshwater Mussels.
State Standards Hydrology
WATER QUALITY.
Topic 4.4: Water Pollution
8.E.1 Understand the hydrosphere and the impact of humans on local systems and the effects of the hydrosphere on humans. 8.E.1.3 Predict the safety and.
C.P.Martinez and L.M. Porticos
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
Point vs Nonpoint Source Pollution Water Quality Indicators notes
Water Quality.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program Using Multiple Lines of Evidence to Assess Biostimulatory.
Freshwater and Water Quality Notes
Water Quality, Indicators, and Usage
2.1 Monitoring Water Quality
Abiotic Factors Affecting Aquatic Systems
Monitoring keeps track of something for a specific purpose.
Water Pollution.
INFO FROM: HEALTHY WATER, HEALTHY PEOPLE WATER QUALITY GUIDE
Warmup QUIZ! Write three facts from the notes you took last night for homework.  Hope you did it!!!
Water Pollution.
Major Water Pollutants
Environmental Sciences 11/12
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
Topic 4.4: Water Pollution
Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits
Acceptability aspects: Taste, odour and appearance  Water should be free of tastes and odours that would be objectionable to the majority of consumers.
Presentation transcript:

Jericho Aquatic Discharge Assessment Presented by: Bruce Ott, Senior Environmental Scientist, AMEC Earth & Environmental

Water Quality Assessment Based on supplement work by: –SRK contaminant loading water balance regional and LSA climate analyses discharge concentration estimates –Greisman/Dunbar Lake C3 and Carat Lake dilution modelling Used CCME Guidelines as No Chronic Effects Level

CCME Guidelines Copper – mg/L Cadmium – mg/L Nickel – – mg/L Chromium (Cr 6+ ) – – mg/L Molybdenum – mg/L (BC 1 mg/L) Ammonia (unionized) – approx. 2 mg/L Nitrate – 15 mg/L (proposed)

Water Quality Assessment Assumptions - Operations One discharge point for all Jericho water: Water is discharged from the PKCA polishing pond into Stream C3. The sewage treatment plant discharges to the PKCA. All mine water is routed to the PKCA prior to discharge. All uncontaminated water is routed through ditches and the Stream C1 diversion.

Scenarios Examined Out of the range of scenarios that could be examined, the following were chosen as they represent the variation that could be encountered during operations: –extreme low flows; maximum contaminants –extreme low flows; average contaminants –average flows; maximum contaminants –average flows; average contaminants

Water Quality Assessment Operations Scenario 1: Extreme Low Flows and Probable Maximum PK Discharge Concentrations: Results indicate: No Health Canada guidelines are exceeded at the water intake. Some potential for chronic effects from the substances listed for the most sensitive freshwater organisms.

Continued… Mitigation during extreme low flows: –cessation of discharge –spray irrigation –addition of phosphate into the PKCA to reduce ammonia and metal concentrations (enhanced degradation)

Water Quality Assessment Operations Scenario 2: Extremely low flows and average PK discharge concentrations Protection of aquatic life guidelines predicted to be met within 100 m of mouth of Stream C3 No mitigation required

Water Quality Assessment Operations Scenario 3: Average Flows and Maximum PK Discharge Concentrations Only cadmium exceeds protection of aquatic life guidelines within 100 m of the mouth of Stream C3 Mitigation: –treatment to tie up metals in the PKCA, e.g. add PO 4 –Spray irrigation Scenario 4: Average Flows and Average PK Discharge Concentrations Cadmium exceedance ( vs mg/L)

Water Quality Assessment Assumptions - Closure The PKCA will be reclaimed to land on closure and any water flowing from Stream C3 will be essentially uncontaminated. Water from the mine area after closure discharges to the open pit. After approximately 20 years the pit will overflow through a prepared channel to sediment pond A. No active water treatment

Water Quality Assessment Closure ammonia completely oxidized prior to release metals may still be present above CCME exfiltration from Pond A if water meets health and protection of aquatic life guidelines discharge through a diffuser in Carat Lake if not to provide 36:1 dilution within 7 m diffusion of chronic not acutely toxic water

Assessment is Conservative CCME guidelines were used to indicate no chronic effects Dilution model uses conservative assumptions Sequestering of metals in the aquatic environment

General Ecotoxicology of Metals in Lakes The chemical form of the metal (e.g. complexed, chelated, adsorbed or free ionic) determines the bioavailability Bioavailability of the metal determines the toxicity of the metal Metal interaction with the components of the lake ecosystem generally reduces bioavailability Adsorption to biotic and abiotic particles suspended in the water will reduce bioavailability Increases in water hardness (i.e. calcium and magnesium levels) significantly reduce some metal toxicity

General Ecotoxicology of Metals in Lakes Adsorption to suspended algal cells, ingestion of algal cells by grazing invertebrates and transfer of metals to sediment via fecal pellets can be a major pathway of metal elimination from surface water Acclimation of fish species to elevated metal concentrations is a scientific fact with abundant support in the scientific literature Fish can physiologically adjust to higher metals concentrations in a variety of ways (e.g. increased secretion of mucus) Some metals (e.g. Cu, Zn) are physiologically necessary to maintain the health of fish populations

What are Water Quality Guidelines Water quality guidelines for metals (for the protection of aquatic life) are just that (i.e. guidelines). They are not carved in stone. They are developed by a conservative protocol that allows a very wide margin for error as the guidelines must apply to the entire range of surface waters across Canada. The water temperatures used in the studies that serve as the basis for metal water quality guidelines were not characteristic of Arctic lakes (generally these studies were conducted in the range 20-25°C). There could be major differences in the toxic responses of fish in which temperature is a significant variable

Acute Toxicity to Fish Copper – incipient lethal level: 0.33 mg/L for rainbow trout Cadmium – acute toxicity level: mg/L Nickel – acute toxicity level: 2.48 mg/L (EPA) Chromium (CR 6+ ) – acute toxicity level: mg/L early life stages Molybdenum – acute toxicity level: 100 to 1000 mg/L Unionized ammonia – acute toxicity level tied to temperature and pH Nitrate – acute toxicity to rainbow trout level 190 mg/L

Chronic Toxicity to Fish Copper – mg/L Cadmium – mg/L Nickel – mg/L soft water Chromium (Cr 6+ ) – 60 d no effects level – mg/L soft water Molybdenum – 1 – 100 mg/L Ammonia – PSL2 chronic toxicity guide 41 mg/L total ammonia Nitrate – chronic toxicity ?

Total Dissolved Solids Possible long-term (> 1 year) effect on phytoplankton and zooplankton Should not affect ecosystem function due to functional redundancy in plankton trophic levels EKATI has noted some build up of TDS downstream of Long Lake but no effects on fish observed

Summary Under average conditions discharges during mining will not be chronically toxic Options are available to mitigate if required Closure treatment can be handled passively if the open pit is allowed to fill naturally