Baseline Water Quality Data From Streams Along The Rocky Mountain Front, Montana and The Implications for Native Trout. Photo By: Taylor Johnson Triston.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resident Fish Stock Status in the Palouse River and upper Crab Creek watersheds, Washington. Jason McLellan Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Advertisements

Fluvial Bull Trout Migration and Life History Investigations, Upper Salmon River Subbasin New Project Proposal, No Sponsored by: Shoshone-Bannock.
LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Chemical Analysis of Water
MONTANA UPDATE Mark Lere, Habitat Bureau Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
Part II: Biotic Indicators Photo: R.B. Elder. Photo: M.B. Elder.
Biological Response of Two North Central PA Streams After Flood of September 2011 Fred Rogers CWI, Supervisor Dr. Mel Zimmerman Introduction: Within Pennsylvania,
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
The Hydrosphere Part II- Ocean & Freshwater Resources.
TEAM ORGANIZATION Education and Water Monitoring Action Group ( EWAG)
HOOD RIVER TRIBUTARIES DRAFT AREA WEIGHTED SUITABILITY Presented by: Thomas Gast, Normandeau Associates Presented to: Hood River Water Planning Group Instream.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
Volunteer Training Group Meeting –Project Orientation –Project Requirements –Paperwork –Safety Training Field Session –Site Orientation –Project Training.
Water were does it come from and why do we need it!
Physical & Chemical Parameters of the Turnbow Pond Cody Clark Dylan Weir Jeffery Johnson.
US EPA Region IV Surface Coal Mining Field Activities Adventures in Mountain Top Mining / Valley Fill Chris Decker.
Use Attainability Analysis City of Conrad Ann Harrie and Bob Bukantis WQS Section, MT DEQ June 28, 2007.
Integrated inquiry-based investigations on the Mad River, Greene County: Chemistry, Earth Science, and a new Evaluation tool for Pre-Service Teachers Suzanne.
Name of presenter Date of presentation.  To help preserve and protect Wisconsin’s over 15,000 lakes and 86,000 miles of rivers.
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
To determine how a manmade structure, an overpass, effects aspects of stream water quality and discharge.
Homework Questions?. Section 9.3 Tests about a Population Mean.
Alexander J. Smith, Barry P. Baldigo, Mike R. McHale New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Part 2: Biotic Indicators Fresh Water Studies: Water Quality & Living Organisms.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Scioto Bokes Watershed By: Akanksha, Annalese, and Madison.
CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Napa Plant Site Central Unit.
What’s in Your Creek? Results of the 2009 Clackamas Basin Volunteer Monitoring Effort.
Upper Wabash River Basin Commission 319 Grant for Phase 2 161,079 acres along the tributaries of the Headwater of the Wabash River.
Type Your Poster Title Here School name and Watershed name (e.g. Sand Hill River Watershed) Date Insert school logo up here Picture of team? Natural Resource.
Kuskokwim Watershed Council Key Parameters for Baseline Water Quality Assessment © David Griso.
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Stream Pollution Assessment of Beaver Creek By Joe Wendtland and Loyal Wergedal.
Case Study Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout North Absaroka Wilderness Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone River Reduced to a fraction of their historic distribution.
Effects of Unsafe Levels. pH Safe levels: Safe levels: Between 6.5 and 9 Sources: Sources: decaying matter causes acidic conditions Effects of Unsafe.
Water May 2-8, 2010: National Drinking Water Week!
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
For this part you need to focus on three topics: The reading for last week discussed indicators of the health of our river.
green plants change light energy from the sun into chemical energy.  Photosynthesis – The process by which green plants change light energy from the.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
There are several different physical parameters, or measurable factors, that affect water quality. The first is temperature. In general, the cooler the.
The Bear Creek Watershed Association protects & restores water & environmental quality within the Bear Creek Watershed from the effects of land use. Bear.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Monitoring Water Quality for ecosystem health. Why Monitor? Under the Clean Water Act, EPA asks VA to enforce laws improving the quality of our streams,
Foldable You will create a foldable or brochure You will include information for each You will include a picture of each You will include an example.
Michael Sorge Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Fresh Water Systems: Evaluating Water System’s Health You will be able to determine the health of a fresh water system using bio and physical indicators.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Water Quality of Rush Creek Spring (2012) Morgan F. Cara Lantz Rebecca H. & Ruth Lee.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Warm up: Describe the features of a river basin.
Water Quality Testing.
EVALUATING WATER SYSTEM HEALTH
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Abiotic and Biotic Factors Influencing the Distribution of Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout West of the Continental Divide in Glacier National.
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
A Look Back at Groundwater Geochemistry as an Exploration Tool for Lead and Zinc Deposits in Sinking Valley 82 Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists.
Physical Characteristics of streams
Assessing PA’s Lake Erie Tributaries
Water Quality By Mrs. Darden.
Freshwater Lesson 1-4.
Stream Connectivity in the Clark Fork Watershed
Monitoring Muskoka’s Water
The Blackfoot Community Project
Acknowledgements Dr. Peter Tschaplinski, MOE
Water quality.
Pearce Creek DMCF Baseline Exterior Monitoring Spring 2017 Results
DETERMINING STREAM QUALITY
Core Lab 1: Water Health Test
Presentation transcript:

Baseline Water Quality Data From Streams Along The Rocky Mountain Front, Montana and The Implications for Native Trout. Photo By: Taylor Johnson Triston Isakson and Wyatt Ostberg Fairfield High School Fairfield, MT

Cutthroat Trout Photo By: Dave Yerk

Grizzly Bears Photo By: Lisa Flowers

Location Map of Study Area

StreamCounty Dearborn RiverLewis and Clark Elk CreekLewis and Clark Sun RiverLewis and Clark Deep CreekTeton Teton RiverTeton Muddy CreekTeton Dupuyer CreekPondera Sheep CreekPondera Birch CreekPondera Badger CreekGlacier Two Medicine RiverGlacier

Field Sampling Physical and Chemical Photo By: R Hahn

Physical Parameters MeterUnitsDrinking Water/Trout Dissolved OxygenYSI 55mg/LTrout pHOakton Drinking Water/Trout TDSOaktonppmDrinking Water/Trout TurbidityHach 2100 PntuDrinking Water/Trout TemperatureOakton° CTrout

Chemical Lab Analysis Photo By: R Hahn

Chemical ParametersMeterUnitsDrinking Water/Trout CopperHach 2800ppmDrinking Water/Trout Hexavalent ChromiumHach 2800ppmDrinking Water LeadHach 2800ppmDrinking Water MolybdenumHach 2800ppmDrinking Water NitrateHach 2800ppmDrinking Water NitriteHach 2800ppmDrinking Water PhosphorusHach 2800ppmDrinking Water TSSEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram Bicarbonates HCO 3 Energy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram Carbonate CO 3 Energy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram ChlorideEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram SulfateEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram CalciumEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram IronEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram MagnesiumEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram PotassiumEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram SodiumEnergy LabppmWater Chemistry - Piper Diagram

Biological Field Sampling Macro-Invertebrate Photo By: R Hahn

Geology Overthrust Belt

Piper Diagram Plot of all Streams Water Chemistry

Dissolved Oxygen mg/L pHTemperature ° C Turbidity ntu PTI EPT Trout >17>18.5

Dissolved Oxygen mg/L pHTemperature ° C Turbidity ntu PTI EPT Trout >17>18.5

Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Dearborn River Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Elk Creek Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Sun River Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Deep Creek (Permissive = Green Not Permissive = Red) Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Teton River

Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Sheep Creek Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Dupuyer Creek Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull Muddy Creek (Permissive = Green Not Permissive = Red)

Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIETP Cutthroat Grayling Bull Two Medicine River Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIETP Cutthroat Grayling Bull Badger Creek Native FishpHTemperature Dissolved Oxygen TurbidityPTIETP Cutthroat Grayling Bull Birch Creek (Permissive = Green Not Permissive = Red)

Native Fish Dearborn River Elk Creek Sun River Deep Creek Teton River Muddy Creek Dupuyer Creek Sheep Creek Birch Creek Badger Creek Two Medicine Bull Cutthroat Grayling Native Fish Dearborn River Elk Creek Sun River Deep Creek Teton River Muddy Creek Dupuyer Creek Sheep Creek Birch Creek Badger Creek Two Medicine Bull Cutthroat Grayling Eliminate EPT Index Streams With One or More Non Permissive Indicators (Permissive = Green Not Permissive = Red)

Teton River has an established Cutthroat Population Checked old data from Brock Allen, 2007 Upper TetonpH Dissolved OxygenTemperature 11/21/2007 Native FishpHTemperatureDissolved OxygenTurbidityPTIEPT Cutthroat Grayling Bull

Conclusions Each stream had at least one non permissive indicator. Temperature is the leading limitation to re-establishing native fish along the Rocky Mountain Front. The waters are too warm for Bull Trout. None of the stream evaluated has potential to re-introduce Bull, Cutthroat, or Grayling below the sample sites. The upper sections of the Teton River has a native Cutthroat population.

Next Step Based on high EPT values, and Brock Allen’s sampling from 2007 Evaluate Upper Reaches and Tributaries Teton River Detailed Macro-invertebrate survey Fish Inventory Intention to re-introduce/expand Cutthroat Trout

Next Step Based on the results for the Dearborn River Evaluate Upper Reaches and Tributaries Detailed Macro-invertebrate survey Fish Inventory Intention to re-introduce/expand Cutthroat Trout

Photo By: R Hahn Questions?