1 Nikolai Kiselev and Vera Rosenbush Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv Calibration Workshop Zurich, Switzerland,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The t Test for Two Independent Samples
Advertisements

Optics, Eugene Hecht, Chpt. 8
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse Linear Regression
Labour quality and ICT capital skill complementarity: International comparisons Mary OMahony NIESR.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop
The SPHERE/ZIMPOL polarimeter for extra-solar planetary systems Hans Martin SCHMID, ETH Zurich and many collaborators in the SPHERE consortium IPAG Grenoble,
Questionnaire survey on standard stars
What is HiCIAO ? Near-infrared high contrast imaging instrument with a linear polarimetor at the 8.2m Subaru telescope. Targets: exoplanets and proto-planetary.
Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
An Image Filtering Technique for SPIDER Visible Tomography N. Fonnesu M. Agostini, M. Brombin, R.Pasqualotto, G.Serianni 3rd PhD Event- York- 24th-26th.
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 2 1 Overview of Lecture Variability and Averages The Normal Distribution Comparing Population Variances Experimental.
Lecture 2 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE: AN INTRODUCTION
Multiple-choice question
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
SPHINX DATA ANALYSIS Magdalena Gryciuk Astronomical Institute, University of Wroclaw Space Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences I SOLARNET SPRING.
Chapter 4: Basic Estimation Techniques
Nondestructive Methods for Recovering the Spatial- Temporal Structure of Ocean Surface Waves & Seeing Through Waves Nondestructive Methods for Recovering.
Contingency Tables Prepared by Yu-Fen Li.
High Frequency Distortion in Power Grids due to Electronic Equipment Anders Larsson Luleå University of Technology.
Experimental Measurements and their Uncertainties
Comparing Two Groups’ Means or Proportions: Independent Samples t-tests.
Ms Ritcey Welcome to Physics 12. Plan: Course outline, expectations, about me, etc. Joke of the day/clip of the day Review: SF Precision Error Accuracy.
Statistical Analysis SC504/HS927 Spring Term 2008
Evaluation of precision and accuracy of a measurement
Estimation of TLD dose measurement uncertainties and thresholds at the Radiation Protection Service Du Toit Volschenk SABS.
Simple Linear Regression Analysis
Correlation and Linear Regression
Introduction into Simulation Basic Simulation Modeling.
Chapter 5 The Mathematics of Diversification
Definitions for polarimetry Frans Snik Sterrewacht Leiden.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
10 -3 versus polarimetry: what are the differences? or Systematic approaches to deal with systematic effects. Frans Snik Sterrewacht Leiden.
Preliminary Results of Laser Ranging to Un-cooperative Targets at Shanghai SLR Station Yang FuMin, Zhang ZhongPing, Chen JuPing, Chen WanZhen, Wu ZhiBo,
Polarimetry Christoph Keller. Polarimetry Requirements Polarization sensitivity: amount of fractional polarization that can be detected above a (spatially.
The Distance Scale Ladder A Nested Chain of Cumulative Uncertainty.
1 Extreme Ultraviolet Polarimetry Utilizing Laser-Generated High- Order Harmonics N. Brimhall, M. Turner, N. Herrick, D. Allred, R. S. Turley, M. Ware,
Distance observations
Shape-from-Polarimetry: Recovering Sea Surface Topography Shape-from-Polarimetry: Howard Schultz Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts.
Shape-from-Polarimetry: A New Tool for Studying the Air-Sea Interface Shape-from-Polarimetry: Howard Schultz, UMass Amherst, Dept of Computer Science Chris.
PULSE REPETITION RATE OPTMIZATION IN SLR STATIONS TO PROVIDE MINIMUM SYSTEMATIC ERROR OF RANGING M.A. Sadovnikov M.A. Sadovnikov Institute for Precision.
LIGO-G E LIGO Laboratory1 Simulating the LIGO Laser Phase Change Resulting from Gravitational Waves Simulate GW generation and detection Make.
G D Calibration of the LIGO Interferometer Using the Recoil of Photons Justice Bruursema Mentor: Daniel Sigg.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. { Chapter 33 The Nature and Propagation of Light (cont.)
Algorithm Optimization for Swept Source Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) with Galvo Scanner and Digital Signal Processor (DSP) Kevin Seekell.
Search for the Gravitational Wave Memory effect with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Jingbo Wang 1,2,3, Hobbs George 3, Dick Manchester 3, Na Wang 1,4 1.
Objectives The student will be able to: ● Distinguish between accuracy and precision ● Use significant figures in measurements and calculations.
Polarized V-band Stars for In-flight Calibration of Space-borne Solar Coronagraphs Capobianco, Gerardo; Fineschi, Silvano INAF- Osservatorio Astrofisico.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
MWO MAGNETOGRAMS L. Bertello, R.K. Ulrich, J. Boyden and T. Tran Magnetogram Workshop, UCLA, April 2-4, 2007.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
Polarization Calibration of the Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) formerly Advanced Technology Solar Telescope David Elmore Instrument Scientist.
Lecture 2 Forestry 3218 Lecture 2 Statistical Methods Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 2 Forest Mensuration II Avery and Burkhart, Chapter 2.
Uncertainty in Measurement
Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
Module 1: Measurements & Error Analysis Measurement usually takes one of the following forms especially in industries: Physical dimension of an object.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
1 Rosalia Daví 1 Václav Vavryčuk 2 Elli-Maria Charalampidou 2 Grzegorz Kwiatek 1 Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha 2 GFZ German Research.
2Lancaster University, Bailrigg Campus, Lancaster, UK. LA1 4YW.
SUR-2250 Error Theory.
Miscellaneous Measurements
Beam Measurement Characterization and Optics Tolerance Analysis of a 900 GHz HEB receiver for the ASTE telescope Alvaro Gonzalez, K. Kaneko, Y. Uzawa.
Basic Estimation Techniques
Polarization in spectral lines
02/04/17 1.
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Basic Estimation Techniques
The pointing calibration of the WFCTA tracking system
Introduction to Instrumentation Engineering
Measurements & Error Analysis
Presentation transcript:

1 Nikolai Kiselev and Vera Rosenbush Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv Calibration Workshop Zurich, Switzerland, January 2013 Experience in the use of polarization standards for determining the parameters of instrumental linear polarization for small telescopes 0.7–2.6m with photoelectric polarimeters 1

Outline of presentation Target objects and values of their polarization parameters Instruments and methodology of polarimetric observations Strategy of the instrumental calibration: Correct estimation of the polarization parameters accuracy; Instrumental linear polarization and some problems with using unpolarized standards; Efficiency of polarimeter, zero point of the instrumental position angles and problems with polarized standard Conclusions 2

CometsSatellitesAsteroidsStars Herbig Ae/Be star WW Vul V P Multi-decadal measurements of polarization. Target objects are: comets, asteroids, satellites of planets, and some types of variable stars. Eeach program object has own values of polarization degree. That is those values where the errors of instrumental polarization may distort the true polarization values of the investigated objects. 3

Telescopes the 0.7-m telescope of the Gissar Observatory (Tadjikistan) the 0.7-m telescope of the Chuguev observation Station of Kharkiv Univ. the 1.0-m RCC telescope of the Sanglok Observatory (Tadjikistan) the 2.6-m Shain telescope of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory 4

Methodology of aperture photoelectric observations The measurements are based on counting the photoelectron pulses. A high rotation frequency of the polarizer ( 33Hz) and the method of synchronous detection ensure a quasi simultaneous measurement of the polarization parameters. In the simplest type of polarimeter to determine the parameters of the linear polarization we used next expression: I( )=1/2(I 0 + Q 0 cos2 + U 0 sin2 ) = 1/2 [1 + Pcos2( - )](1) Stokes parameters I 0, Q 0, U 0 of incident light have been determined from the four counters N 1, N 2, N 3, N 4 recorded the signal in the course of quarter period (± /4) of rotation of the polaroid I 0 =1/ (N 1 +N 2 )=1/ (N 3 +N 4 ); U 0 = ½(N 1 – N 2 ); Q 0 = ½(N 3 – N 4 ) Polarimeter of the 2.6 m Shain telescope based on the use of modulation formula by Serkowski (1974) I( ) = 1/2(I 0 + 1/2Q 0 +1/2Q 0 cos4 +1/2U 0 sin4 -V 0 sin2 ) (2) where is the angle between the optical axes of the analyzer (a quarter-wave plate /4) and a fixed analyzer (Glan prism). The simultaneous measurement of all four Stokes parameters necessitates measurements for 8 orientation angles with 22.5° increments. The expressions (1) and (2) are used for determination of polarization parameters of target objects as well as instrumental polarization (standard stars). 5

Correct estimation of the errors of polarization parameters As a rule, the errors are estimated in two ways. First of all, the random error can be estimated from the statistics of the accumulated pulses using the following formula (Shakhovskoy&Efimov, 1976): N - the number of photoelectron pulses accumulated for the object - the ratio of the accumulation times for the object and the background sky R - the ratio of the average pulse rates for the object and the background sky. The greater of the two average errors serves as the final estimate of the error of polarization measurements of targets and standard stars. Another estimate: the errors are defined as the standard of random variables for separate measurements of Stokes parameters q i and u i

Errors found on dispersion parameters u i and q i individual measurements vs errors based on statistics of pulses For a sufficient number of measurements (n>20), two errors are close to each other. The final errors of the polarization parameters of the object take into account the random and systematic (instrumental) components. Therefore it is important that the instrumental errors were less than the random ones. Therefore it is important that the instrumental errors were less than the random ones. 7

Use of standard stars for determining the parameters of instrumental polarization HD u_obs sigu q_obs sigg P_cat sigP_cat PA_cat sig PA_cat Mean / / As a rule observations of nearby unpolarized stars are carried out to measure the instrumental polarization. 1.Because the standards with zero polarization is not much need to use the standards with a small degree of polarization, preferably with different angles of polarization. 2.Parameters of instrumental polarization must be determined independently for each period of observation of target objects. 8

Determination of the instrumental parameters of polarization 9

Conclusion 1.It is important to make sure that the instrumental polarization is stable and small and/or or determined with high accuracy for each period of observations of target objects. 2.Number and distribution of standards with zero degree of polarization of a highly unsatisfactory. 3.We define the degree of polarization of polarized standards not only for the determination of the zero point instrumental angles, but also to correct the observations of target objects. 4.There are no standards with a high degree of polarization in the range of 8-40 percent and more. 5.To carry out work on the characterization of the polarization of the new standards should be used spacecraft polarimeters as well as new ground-based observations. 10

Main sources of systematic errors High-quality polarimetric observations of astronomical objects must be based on a careful analysis of and correction for all systematic errors. The main sources of systematic errors are the following: instrumental polarization; instrumental depolarization; relative errors in the radiometric calibration of different channels (for differential measurement techniques); imperfections of the polarization analyzer; errors in the zero point of position angles; polarization of the background skylight; and some others.

Thanks for attention Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Hervé Lamy and Dr. Hans Martin Schmid for support to participate in the Calibration Workshop of the COST. 12