Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Advertisements

Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
The Out of School Time System. CBASS-City of Racine Partnership Purpose: Advise on the development of a comprehensive out-of-school time strategy that.
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
PNW Strategic Plan: Developing a Blueprint for Future Direction Research for Resources.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
John Mankowski, Coordinator Mary Mahaffy, Science Coordinator Karen Jenni, Insight Decisions - Facilitator Conservation Goals & the NPLCC Steering Committee.
Landscape functions and people Bangkok, October 2010 Ten principles for a Adaptive Landscape Approach.
KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports lessons learned,
Californialcc.org Climate Smart Conservation and Tools for Adaptive Management 1 Debra Schlafmann, Coordinator May 16, 2013.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Transboundary Conservation Governance: Key Principles & Concepts Governance of Transboundary Conservation Areas WPC, Sydney, 17 November 2014 Matthew McKinney.
The Southern Rockies LCC John Rice Science Coordinator December 18, 2013.
Pacific Islands Development Forum A Presentation.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
Lower Mississippi Valley Joint Venture Management Board Meeting the Expectations and Challenges of Joint Venture Implementation Buras, Louisiana June.
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Extension Advisory Leadership Systems A Partnership for Extension Programming Laurie Cantrell, MS Program Development Specialist Family and Consumer Sciences.
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter
Theme 2 Developing MPA networks Particular thanks to: Theme 2 Concurrent Session Rapporteurs, Dan Laffoley, Gilly Llewellyn G E E L O N G A U S T R A L.
Update on work of IUCN Council Private Sector Task Force Diana Shand Regional Councillor and Chair of Private Sector Task Force The International Union.
Strategic Direction Janice Melnychuk Russ Dahms If you don’t know where you are going Any path will get you there.
Words Matter Seeking agreement on terminology. Defining terms for PFLCC O There are many terms of art and jargon being used to describe resource priorities.
Linking SEA and City Development Strategy (CDS) in Vietnam Maria Rosário Partidário, Michael Paddon, Markus Eggenberger, Minh Chau, and Nguyen Van Duyen.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Deerin Babb-Brott, Director National Ocean Council Office National Boating Federation 2013 Annual Meeting.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Problem Definition Exercise Summary & Discussion.
TRTFN - BC Framework Agreement Planning Process Fred Oliemans, ILMB Bryan Evans, TRTFN Presentation to Public Workshop, Atlin, BC June 13, 2008.
USAID and National Adaptation Plans John Furlow Jonathan Cook E3/GCC Office 1.
11 Setting Direction Broad Scanning Intellectual Flexibility Seizing the Future Political Astuteness Drive for Results Self Belief Self Awareness Self.
Criteria and Indicators as Framework for Sustainable Forest Management Ruth McWilliams USDA – Forest Service Workshop on Sustainable Forest Management.
Toward multi-partner landscape conservation design Cays and Islets in the US Caribbean.
Progress Under Guidance Documents Northeast Conservation Framework LCC Conservation Science Strategic Plan USFWS Science Investment and Accountability.
Supporting measurement & improvement of primary health care (PHC) at the facility and community levels Dr. Jennifer Adams, Deputy Assistant Administrator,
April 4, 2011 Princesa VanBuren Hansen Environmental Quality Board.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Planning for Restoration at the Landscape Scale: Desert LCC Case Study National Forest Foundation Collaborative Restoration Workshop April 26-27, 2016.
Landscape Conservation Design: Conserving Sustainable Landscapes in a Time of Rapid Change Rob Campellone, USFWS Landscape Conservation Design Policy Advisor.
LCC NETWORK STRATEGIC PLANNING Orientation Webinar for Strategic Planning Training and Workshop Participants July 21, 2014 Presenter: Michael Gale, LCC.
Progress Relative to the Northeast Conservation Framework and Strategic Plan Setting the Stage for Conservation Design and Delivery Andrew Milliken North.
Assessments ASSESSMENTS. Assessments The Rationale and Purpose for Assessments.
Landscape Conservation Design:
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
Adult College and Career Education Leadership
LCC Role in Conservation Science and Science Delivery
Pacific Northwest Conservation Blueprint
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
Landscape Conservation Cooperatives
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Community of Interest Conference 2018
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
Presentation transcript:

Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop

Vision Landscapes capable of sustaining natural and cultural resources for current and future generations.

Partners ARE the Cooperative the decision-makers the data providers the implementers CLCC is a new way of doing conserv a bridging entity a convening forum a place for social learning a place to foster synergism A place to ask… how can we help each other succeed? What are our common goals? What is the CLCC? The CLCC is NOT a cash-cow

A movement from isolated efforts and random acts of conservation…. To intentional and collaborative conservation toward common goals What are our common goals? FS PLN DNER FWS-ES NOAA Research Community

CLCC Science: Where We’re At Science strategy: Mission Alignment– Articulating a common set of shared priorities, building partnerships, common knowledge, and a framework for specific objectives. Science strategy– Identifying surrogate resources and ecological, social, and economic indicators, developing spatially-explicit representation of priority resources, drivers, vulnerabilities, and capacities in current and future scenarios, and developing targets for indicator resources. Science strategy– A roadmap for collaboratively linking conservation action with spatially-explicit conservation and adaptation strategies, and for monitoring outcomes and adapting our collective response.

CLCC Science: Where We’re At Science Plan: Mission Alignment – Articulating a common set of shared priorities, building partnerships, common knowledge, and a framework for specific objectives. Science Plan – Identifying surrogate resources and ecological, social, and economic indicators, developing spatially-explicit representation of priority resources, drivers, vulnerabilities, and capacities in current and future scenarios, and developing targets for indicator resources. Science Plan – A roadmap for collaboratively linking conservation action with spatially-explicit conservation and adaptation strategies, and for monitoring outcomes and adapting our collective response.

Structured Design Making (SDM) Approach for Shaping CLCC Conservation Planning SDM approach provides a framework for developing resource indicators and actions to reach targets within landscape design SDM will facilitate and promote the purposeful collaborative co-production of conservation Transparent and defensible – the “whys” are all clearly defined All stakeholders *especially managers* included in process = co-production and better assures applicable science and use

Value-driven Landscape Design Digs deep to evaluate the “why” to provide context for conservation design Transcend organizational boundaries and limitations – finds commonality Allow / facilitate partners to see their roles in the larger scheme

Landscape Conservation Design (LCD) -- is a partnership driven adaptive learning process that integrates societal values and multi-sector interests with the best available science to assess spatial and temporal patterns, risks, and opportunities; resulting in spatially explicit products and coordinated strategies that protect biodiversity and ecosystem services, and increase the resilience and sustainability of social ecological systems for future generations (Campellone et al. in prep). 1.Agreement on common goals 2.Multi-disciplinary design team consisting of scientists, managers, policy-makers from all relevant sectors 3.Partners committed to implementation and delivery

Today’s Landscape Conservation Design Recognizes that modern threats and vulnerabilities too large to tackle locally – Require a landscape scale perspective Recognizes that individual conservation efforts are no longer sufficient – Need to develop synergies based on complementary strengths Recognizes that decisions and actions must be based on multi- organizational shared visions and objectives – Must be coordinated to avoid “random acts of conservation” Recognizes the importance of cultural and socio-economic needs and engagement in landscape-scale conservation

Land and Seascape Conservation: Creating our Legacy Who? What? Where? Why? When? How? How much? Who? What? Where? Why? When? How? How much?

Scenario Assessments Conservation objective (1) Conservation objective (2) Conservation objective (3) Conservation objective (n) Indicator(s) & targets Support layers Science needs & conservation actions 1 Science needs & conservation actions Science needs & conservation actions Science needs & conservation actions 2 3 n Conservation Strategy el CAMPO SC via SDM process CATs

Resource Management/Conservation USFWSObj1Activity1Activity2Obj2NOAAObj1Obj2PR DNRObj1Obj2Activity1TNCObj1Obj2Activity1 Slide from E. Bean and J. Collazo, 2011

1. Can a new model for conservation be developed such that these activities as a whole provide more accountability, efficiency and added value? USFWSObj1Activity1Activity2Obj2NOAAObj1Obj2PR DNRObj1Obj2Activity1TNCObj1Obj2Activity1 Slide from E. Bean and J. Collazo, 2011

LCCObj 1Obj 2Obj 3Obj 4 USFWSObj1Obj2NOAAObj1Obj3PR DNRObj2Obj4TNCObj2Obj5 LCC Structure Slide modified from E. Bean and J. Collazo, 2011

Objective X. Define what needs done and by who FS PLN DNER FWS-ES NOAA Research Community

Participation iCAPP framework for LCD Campellone et al. in prep.

Participation PrOACT as a tool to achieve LCD SC CATs

Workshop Expectations We “get on the same page” in terms of the problem we’re jointly addressing – SC members influence one another guided by coaches to agree on problem Develop a set of actionable objectives based on shared values and priorities – Define the work the staff with coordinate and CATs will undertake We discuss some alternative strategies to address our objectives

Workshop Expectations This will not be your typical workshop – The agenda is tentative = prepare to be flexible – We need to accomplish “A” before moving onto “B” Decision coaches not facilitators Staff available to clarify and provide support Daily closing: what’s your connection to what we achieved today?

Comments / Questions?