Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICE Collaboration meeting at RAL 26 th Oct ~ 29 th Oct, 2004 Wrap up on Radiation Shielding Module Design Stephanie Yang 26 th October, 2004.
Advertisements

ITS /MFT installation concept CERN 27 September 2012 Corrado Gargiulo.
4m Undulator Design Concepts Amanda J Brummitt CCLRC RAL On behalf of the HeLiCal Collaboration.
18th March Richard Hawkings Humidity control in the ATLAS ID Richard Hawkings (CERN) JCOV meeting 18/3/04  Overview of humidity and associated gas.
Global Design Effort Detector concept # Plenary introductory talk IRENG07 Name September 17, 2007.
Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.
Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
TOTEM Collaboration Meeting, Feb. 2005, F. Haug, CERN Cooling System for TOTEM Friedrich Haug and Jihao Wu Cryogenics for Experiments CERN TOTEM Collaboration.
ATLAS Pixel Detector July 2003 ETC ‘04 E. Anderssen LBNL BPSS and Service Panels Santa Cruz, CA E Anderssen LBNL.
Fcal upgrade for sLHC: Cryogenics modifications – TE-CRG/ C.Fabre 1 ATLAS FCal Upgrade for sLHC: Modifications to the Calorimeter Cryogenic.
1 Cryostat assembly, integration and commissioning procedures M.Olcese Version: 07 May 2008.
Integration GlueX Detector Integration Mission: To ensure systems meet or exceed physics driven goals To ensure that detectors are designed in a sensible.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Tracking Integration Challenges Y. meeting 2013/9/25.
ATLAS SLHC UPGRADE ENGINEERING – LIST OF DECISIONS which will affect the design of auxiliary systems layout and routing BASIC LAYOUT FOR BARREL and WHEELS.
Assembly Scenarios Draft 1 MODEL simulation based on CXUO-CRY-AP-001.
VELO workshop, Amsterdam, april ‘00M.Ferro-Luzzi Difficulties with current mechanical design recent FEA results: to obtain sufficient stiffness of center.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube Interfaces LBNL Internal PST Review E. Anderssen, LBNL.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe tests M.OlceseJ.Thadome (with the help of beam pipe group and Michel Bosteels’ cooling group) TMB July 18th 2002.
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
Overview over international project. The task ahead Replacement of current tracker in 2023 –Now all Silicon (~200m 2 strips, ~10m 2 pixel) –Timescale.
1st Nov 2001 Nigel Hessey SCT Endcap Structures FDR1 Endcap Requirements Brief overview of SCT Endcap Requirements layout, X0, thermal, positioning, stability.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
January 25, 2005GRETINA 2004 Review1 GRETINA 2004 Annual Review Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Mechanical System.
ATLAS SCT End-Cap C Integration 1.Introduction: to the SCT within ATLAS 2.End-Cap C Reception at CERN 3.Final Assembly 4.Integration with the TRT 5.Combined.
Zian Zhu Magnet parameters Coil/Cryostat/Support design Magnetic field analysis Cryogenics Iron yoke structure Mechanical Integration Superconducting Magnet.
JCOV, 25 OCT 2001Thermal screens in ATLAS Inner Detector J.Godlewski EP/ATI  ATLAS Inner Detector layout  Specifications for thermal screens  ANSYS.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
CLAS12-RICH Mechanical Design Status-Report CLAS12 RICH Review September 5-6 th 2013 S. Tomassini, D. Orecchini1 D. Orecchini, S. Tomassini.
B-layer integration with beam-pipe and services ATLAS B-layer upgrade E. Anderssen A. Catinaccio.
Experimental Sectors Ray Veness / AT-VAC With many thanks to G.Foffano + W.Cameron TS/MME Patrick Lepeule / AT-VAC.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
TAS at IP5 Present situation and plans François BUTIN TS/LEA.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe Option: status and plans M.Olcese TMB June 6th 2002.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Services Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman, A Smith, LBNL S. Coelli,
SEPTEMBER 2002 Pixel Support Tube A. Smith LBNL 1 ATLAS Pixel Detector Heater Panel Testing Alexis Smith September 17, 2002.
End-of-stave region. 2 Space Z-dimension is critical –Keep gap small (might help getting rid of stubs) Edge of last barrel silicon (at corner) is 1277.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube and Related November 9, 2001 Pixel Day E. Anderssen, LBNL.
9/17/07IRENG071 Cryogenic System for the ILC IR Magnets QD0 and QF1 K. C. Wu - BNL.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support Tube Interfaces Pixel Support Tube PRR CERN, Geneve E. Anderssen, LBNL.
Tracker Goals o Main issue is to be able to run cold as more radiation is accumulated. o Due to “uncontrolled” humidity behavior, our present limit is.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Concept Design for LBNF Far detector (LAr single phase)
TB Peter Glässel, Heidelberg1 Preparing TPC Installation.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Beampipe Installation Status Ray Veness For the Beampipe team in AT/VAC and TS-MME.
8/29/07K. C. Wu - Brookhaven National Lab1 Major Components in ILC IR Hall Interchangeable Detectors.
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
ATLAS Pixel Detector Pixel Support tube Supports October 17, 2001 E Anderssen, LBNL.
SPL RF coupler: integration aspects
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
Design of the Injection Can
End-cap Mechanics FDR Overview of the Project
LHC Experimental Vacuum Systems Status October ‘07
LumiCal mechanical design, integration with LDC and laser alignment
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
Status of QQXF cryostat
Presentation transcript:

Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese2 Assumptions Pixel system and beam pipe integrated together on surface and installed as a “package”. Prerequisites: –beam pipe bake-out in situ with B-layer in place –access to any part of pixel detector requires removal of the whole pixel detector, to bring it to the surface; this requires: an ID installation/removal shutdown breaking of the vacuum

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese3 Outline and Definitions PST is a cylinder about 7 long, 480 mm OD, coaxial to the beam pipe, going all the way through the ID volume and closed on the beam pipe at the two ends with two end plugs PST main functions are: –allowing an independent installation and removal of pixel detector with all the rest of ID in place –supporting the Pixel detector, the services along the beam pipe and the beam pipe itself –keeping the pixel volume thermally and electrically independent from the rest of ATLAS all the pixel services have to pass through the two end plugs

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese4 PST Requirements: major categories mechanical environmental electrical service penetration installation of pixel package

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese5 PST mechanical requirements geometry and envelopes support conditions alignment assembly stability operating loads

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese6 Envelopes Radial envelopes PST-SCT defined and agreed Z-envelope in the end region still undefined: this is driven by: pixel service connections, PST end support, polymoderator geometry. envelopes account for shape errors, deflection under load: in the case of forward PST, the envelope has to account for gravity sag with no support at the ends and with the pixel system in place (VI section of beam pipe included) envelopes do not account for relative motions of different blocks and adjustments

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese7 Interface to SCT barrel Recent decision to have an independent thermal barrier for the barrel SCT this implies: –more schedule flexibility –no temporary thermal barrier for x-ray testing of SCT barrel –possible adjustment of PST in pit without opening the SCT thermal barrier –PST structurally independent from SCT thermal barrier concept and geometry of the 4 PST support penetration through the SCT thermal barrier have been defined and agreed

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese8 Support conditions: internal

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese9 Support conditions: external

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese10 Beam pipe supports There are four internal supports + 1 external all the 4 internal supports are remotely (outside the end plug) adjustable in X,Y the adjustment range is +/- 9 mm (nominal clearance B-Layer/beam pipe) however this will be mechanically limited to +/- 5 mm for the two internal supports by means of hard stops on the B-layer structure. This will avoid in any condition the risk of collision with the B-layer modules

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese11 Alignment The PST central section has to be as much as possible coaxial to the theoretical beam axis (TBA): this allows for the max adjustment flexibility of the beam pipe wrt pixel B- layer emergency X,Y adjustments of +/-3 mm of the PST after ID is in place will be allowed within the PST barrel envelope. They are going to be used only in case of macroscopic (surveyable) misalignment. However this might not be enough to accommodate all foreseeable errors. The +/-3 mm X,Y adjustments are not included in the forward PST envelope and they have to be accounted in the 9 mm gap

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese12 Assembly PST is split in three parts (one barrel and two forward) for assembly reasons assembly sequence: –A. the barrel PST is installed on surface inside the barrel SCT on nominal centre –B. if necessary,after the barrel ID is in place the barrel PST is adjusted to theoretical beam axis –C. the two forward sections of PST are connected and PST is adjusted wrt the ID rails on cryostat wall if necessary –D. the forward SCT and TRT are slid in, the PST end supports are installed and connected to the PST

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese13 Stability PST is an intermediate support structure in between SCT and Pixel detector. The support points of Pixel detector - PST are located very close to the PST-SCT supports natural stability requirement for the PST is: –to provide a link between SCT-PST-Pixel support points as stiff as possible with a stability of the same order as the one of Pixel detector. Max gravity sag Pixel wrt SCT fixed points should be about 20  m, this is equivalent to a first mode at 80 Hz –to minimize the perturbation of the pixel and SCT stability due to operating loads: thermal deformations, change of relative positions vibration of forward tube and services –the injection of such loads is function of the stiffness of the PST, of the support conditions at the end of PST and of the beam pipe support conditions

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese14 Operating loads As function of the support conditions of PST and beam pipe, 4 design load cases are identified (*) Note that these are based on assumptions from current models

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese15 PST environmental requirements Pixel volume has to be maintained: –cold (modules at 0 C) –dry (to avoid condensation) dry and clean conditions are achieved by means of a continuous N 2 flow (about 0.5 m 3 /h) entering at one side and going out from the opposite side cold conditions are maintained by the internal cooling system however the gas temperature is not controlled. The design range of the gas temperature is -10/+10 °C PST has to be designed as a thermal and gas sealed enclosure which will separate the internal pixel volume from the rest of ATLAS. The max leak rate budget is determined by the nitrogen flow and a nominal overpressure which has to be maintained in the pixel volume of 5 mbar the whole PST external surface has to be actively heated (T> 15 C) to prevent condensation: some areas during operation others during access

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese16 PST active heating scenarios

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese17 PST electrical requirements Pixel detector need to be shielded as efficiently as possible from the external sources of electromagnetic noise a Faraday cage has to be built around the detector the most natural solution is to have an built-in Faraday cage on the PST this will be implemented with a continuous thin Al layer. Special care will has to be paid in the connection areas to achieve a good electrical continuity of the shielding electrical requirements indicate a suitable thickness range  m it is not clear yet whether the Faraday cage has to be extended along the beam pipe outer surface inside the pixel volume

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese18 PST service penetration This is a very congested area with many constraints all the services need to be broken here beam pipe has to be floating wrt the end plugs and free to be adjusted to +/- 9 mm (but practically limited to +/-5 mm, see previous comment) tube feed throughs will have to be axially floating to minimize the axial loads on Pixel detector due to temperature change. External environment is in principle cavern air (dew point about 10°C), actions will have to be implemented to avoid condensation on cold tubes and surfaces

PST CDR: Oct M.Olcese19 Pixel package installation requirements The Pixel package is lowered into the pit inside an Integration & Testing Tool (ITT) the ITT has to be aligned to the PST for the insertion: same tool used for other ID parts? ITT