PA Non-composite Adjacent Box Beam Bridges PennDOT June 2006 A presentation adapted from the AASHTO T-18 Bridge Inspection Technical Committee Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M-25 over Harbor Beach Creek
Advertisements

Agenda – Day 1 8:00 am – 8:15 am Introductions and House Keeping
ODOT Structure Project Manager Seminar Concrete Decks
Actions and Retrofit of Post Earthquake-Damaged Bridges
Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems
Findings from On-site Inspection (Rt 202/US Rt 23 BRIDGE)
Bridge Engineering (6) Superstructure – Concrete Bridges
MNM Fatal Falling Material Accident Falling Material Accident August 17, 2012 (Florida) August 17, 2012 (Florida) Victim Recovered September 4,
State Project No /195 Rehabilitation of Bridge Nos and I-84 over Marion Ave Southington, Connecticut Rehabilitation of Bridge Nos.
Reinforced Concrete Design
Spliced Precast Girders
Lecture Goals Slab design reinforcement.
Section 3 design of post-tensioned components for flexure Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: trey Hamilton, University of.
Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF December 2, 2014 Stakeholder’s Meeting.
Chapter 5 Fatigue.
PGSuper2AASHTOWare Bridge Data Translator
Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Girder at Simple Support Virtis/Opis User Group Conference Nashville, TN, August 3-4, 2010 George Huang, PhD, PE California.
Damage Illustrations. Potential Bridge Damage Bridge Component / DamagePossible Cause Approach Slab or Pavement  Raised, lowered, cracked, or buckled.
Schematic Design of an Accelerated Bridge Construction Project Michael P. Culmo, P.E. Vice President of Transportation and Structures CME Associates, Inc.,
ODOT Policy for Deck/Slab Closure Pours Sean Meddles, P.E. Assistant Administrator ODOT Office of Structural Engineering.
EXAMPLE 9.2– Part VI PCI Bridge Design Manual
Public Information Meeting Rehabilitation of Bridge No Flat Rock Hill Road over I-95 Old Lyme, Connecticut Rehabilitation of Bridge No Flat.
WS Atkins Bridge Engineering Research Activities Mike Chubb.
Office of Highway Safety Bridge Inspections Dan Walsh.
CIA Biennial Conference Melbourne October 2005 High Performance Concrete in Bridge Decks Opportunities for Innovation.
Shear Repair of P/C Box Beams using CFRP Fabric KYDOT July 27, 2011 Salt Lake City, Utah Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Kentucky Transportation Center.
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Alternatives Presentation.
GDOT Maintenance Overview Eric C. Pitts, P.E. State Maintenance Engineer June 28, 2013.
Samuel M. P. Jannotti Structural April 14, 2008 American Eagle Outfitters Quantum III: South Side Works.
1of 27 GUSSET PLATE EVALUATION Tom Macioce, P.E. Chief Bridge Engineer April 2009 PennDOT Load Rating of Gusset Plates.
Hoan Bridge Failure Analysis Hoan Bridge Failure Analysis Wisconsin Department of Transportation City of Milwaukee, WI December 13, 2001 City of Milwaukee,
Repair of Traffic-Impacted Box Beam Bridge Hawkins Road Crossing Interstate 94 in Michigan.
Bridge Design to AS 5100 Sydney May 25th 2005 Using High Strength Concrete with AS 5100 opportunities and restrictions.
©Teaching Resource in Design of Steel Structures IIT Madras, SERC Madras, Anna Univ., INSDAG 1 COMPOSITE FLOORS - II.
C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center
Enosburg BRO 1448(40) Bridge 48 on TH 2 Over the Tyler Branch Public Information Meeting.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Posting and Utilities Technical Standards Branch Class.
Bridge Girder Alternatives for Extremely Aggressive Environments Project Manager: Will Potter, P.E. - FDOT Research Team: Jeff R. Brown, PhD, Assoc. Professor.
SESSION 6 Thickness Design
The Point Pleasant Bridge Disaster The Collapse of “Silver Bridge”
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
Bridge Load Tests involve test trucks, data acquisition and computer models. Field inspection Bridge load test Data acquisition system FEM computer model.
Group 19 Stephen Cunningham Jake Kinsella Lisa O’Reilly Tristan Kovero Anne Lise Taine Point Pleasant Bridge Collapse.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Bridge Structural Considerations BASIC STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS.
Stenton Avenue Masonry Arch Rehabilitation Approaches to Historic Bridge Rehabilitation Case Study #1 Michael J. Cuddy, P.E. Principal Kara Russell Cultural.
1 PennDOT Truss Gusset Plate Analysis and Ratings Spreadsheet Overview Karim Naji Assistant Structural Engineer FHWA PA Division
Load carrying capacity based on load testing Joan R. Casas Technical University of Catalunya (UPC) Barcelona, Spain.
Design Project #1 Replacement of Vehicle Bridge over Spring Creek Centre County, PA Introduction to Engineering Design EDGSN 100 Section 002 G4 Design.
Condition of Prestressing of the Ft. Lauderdale- Hollywood Airport Deconstructed Segmental Bridges Luis M. Vargas Beiswenger Hoch and Associates.
Design of Gantry Girders
Level II Inspection.
CIVI 6061-Strengthening of bridges using FRP
Investigation of the Effects of End Region Deterioration in Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders Royce Floyd, Cameron Murray, Darion Mayhorn DONALD.
Posting Bridges for Specialized Single-Unit Trucks
High Bridge Re-Deck Project
Replacement of Vehicle Bridge over Spring Creek
Replacement of Vehicle Bridge over Spring Creek
Introduction Signing for Interchanges Naming Convention
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
Seismic Design Impact to
Reinforced Concrete Design
A New Precast, Pre-stressed Bridge Deck System
Chapter-2 Parts of Steel Bridges.
Reinforced Concrete Design. Compressive Strength of Concrete f cr is the average cylinder strength f’ c compressive strength for design f’ c ~2500 psi.
Replacement of Vechicle Bridge over Spring Creek Centre County, PA
Post Installation Inspection & RCP Evaluation Tools
Board of Commissioners Meeting
Are We Abandoning Bridges with Remaining Life?
Replacement of Vehicle Bridge over Spring Creek
Presentation transcript:

PA Non-composite Adjacent Box Beam Bridges PennDOT June 2006 A presentation adapted from the AASHTO T-18 Bridge Inspection Technical Committee Meeting

KEY TOPICS SR 1014 Failure on 12/27/05, PennDOT ’ s Non-composite Adjacent Box Beam Action Items, Bridge Inventory Impacts, Preliminary Research Findings, Lessons learned.

Washington County, PA SR 1014 over I-70 December 28, 2006

SR 1014 over I-70 Built 1960 (ADT = 500) Spans of 54’, 89’, 89’, 42’ AASHTO Skew 51 ° Vertical Clearance over I ’ -5 ” Failed Beam 14’-5” I-70 EB

SR 1014 Bridge Cross Section 8 4’-0” + 7 ½” min. = 32’-31/2” Span 2 & 3 Span 1 & 4

SR 1014 FASCIA DETAILS 60 3/8” PS strands 250 ksi strand 5,900 psi concrete Cover ~ 1”+ Bituminous overlay without membrane

SR 1014 BEAM COLLAPSE Factors contributing to failure: Visible and hidden strand corrosion, Open Barrier Deflection joint, No load transfer through shear key, Original fabrication quality control, Collision damage, Salt spray, Deck drainage leaking thru parapet joint.

SR 1014 STRAND LOSSES The extent of non-detectable strand loss was revealed as beam dissection progressed: Visual Inspection Strands Lost Visual Assessment Post-Collapse 28 Strands Lost (+40%) Lab Assessment of Strand Failures 39 Strands Lost (+95%)

ACTION PLAN Re-inspect all adjacent box beams Structurally Deficient (SD) – By Feb 28 Remaining 700+ By August 15 Research - Test Beams New Condition Rating Guidelines New Rating Guidelines Issued moratorium on non-composite adjacent box beam bridges

1 st Generation of P/S Beams Built 1952~1962 as alternate designs. Typical Suspect Details include: Small diameter strands (1/4” & 5/16”), CaCl used for high early strength, Un-vented voids w/cardboard forms, Shear reinforcement details, Grout/shear keys (ongoing issue), Dimensionally-challenged.

Box Beam Bridge Inventory 801 total bridges, 101 SD bridges before re-inspections, 682 re-inspections completed as of 6/9/06, 213 SD bridges after re-inspections, 4 Bridges closed, 12 Bridges load posted, 17 Bridges width or lane restricted.

Research - Load Tests Two SR 1014 Beams were salvaged for full scale load tests, Load test of interior girder confirms additional non-detectable losses, Fascia Beam testing confirms open barrier joint contributions to failure, Test beam fails between exposed strands and open joint.

Lessons learned Adjacent box beams are robust, but not indestructible, Strand corrosion is very pervasive, No proven inspection method to determine deterioration, First generation beams had suspect details, Questionable quality control of 1 st beams, Open barrier joint attracts cracking, Poor load transfer = loss of redundancy, No cost effective rehab/repair schemes.

14 Thank you for your attention. Any questions?