METAL FOIL DETECTORS FOR THE RADIATION AND BEAM POSITION MONITORING ABSTRACT To monitor charge particle fluences distribution various methods have been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
1 Pion beam tracker for HADES Jerzy Pietraszko CBM Collaboration Meeting, March 9-13, 2009, GSI, Darmstadt.
Introduction This project used cosmic rays to test a prototype Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillator (MBTS) that will be used in the ATLAS experiment at CERN.
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
METAL FOIL DETECTORS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS ABSTRACT To monitor charge particle fluence distribution, various methods have been developed. We report here.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
11 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Results with thin and standard p-type detectors after heavy neutron irradiation G. Casse.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Radiation Damage in the CMS Strips Tracker Christian Barth on behalf of the CMS Tracker Collaboration.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Simulations of the double funnel construction for LET. Comparison with a single funnel The aim was to optimise the double funnel configuration to give.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar
METAL DETECTORS: PERFORMANCES AND APPLICATIONS Oleksandr Okhrimenko Institute for Nuclear Research NAS of Ukraine, Kiev.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
Cascade production – preliminary results Cascades  and  are reconstructed in decay chain   and  K, respectively. Plots in the first row show mass.
Metal micro-detector TimePix imaging synchrotron radiation beams at the ESRF Bio-Medical Beamline ID17 Andrii Chaus Institute for Nuclear Research National.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
Detecting shielded nuclear contraband using muon tomography Judson Locke, William Bittner, Leonard Grasso, Dr. Kondo Gnanvo; Adviser: Dr. Marcus Hohlmann.
Alex Howard PH-SFT LCG-PV 10 th May 2006 Neutron Benchmark for Geant4 using TARC – initial status 1)TARC – experimental set-up and aims 2)Geant4 Simulation.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
07/05/20041 Pentaquark search at HERA-B A. Sbrizzi - NIKHEF Motivation Pentaquark:  + (1540)  pK 0 Conclusion.
MICRO-STRIP METAL DETECTOR FOR BEAM DIAGNOSTICS PRINCIPLE OF OPERATION Passing through metal strips a beam of charged particles or synchrotron radiation.
V.Aulchenko 1,2, L.Shekhtman 1,2, B.Tolochko 3,2, V.Zhulanov 1,2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, , Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University,
Quarkonia production with the HERA-B experiment J. Spengler, MPI Heidelberg.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope ACD Final Performance
Luminosity Monitor Status
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
The LHC collider in Geneva
Scintillator tile- SiPM systems R&D
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
CLAS Simulations for the E5 Data Set
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

METAL FOIL DETECTORS FOR THE RADIATION AND BEAM POSITION MONITORING ABSTRACT To monitor charge particle fluences distribution various methods have been developed. We report here on the approach based on the so called Metal Foil Detectors (MFD). MFD is a device which measures a flux of charged particles by means of the charge integration originated in the thin metal foil due to the Secondary Electron Emission initiated by the incident particles. The radiation profile is reconstructed from the charge distribution in a set of metal foils covering the area under the study. Their size has to be optimized to provide a reasonable profiling, collection of a charge which should be big enough to trigger the read-out charge integrators. The foils have to be thin to provide no deterioration of the tracks, and, on the other hand, thick enough for mechanical stability. Conclusions The reliable results on the beam profiling were obtained with the help of the MFD BPIT at two different proton beam energies of 21 MeV and 920 GeV. The achieved sensitivity of the BPIT allows for an on-line beam-profile measurements for beam currents exceeding 1 pA. The developed MFD proved to be a reliable new tool for the charged particle radiation monitoring in a wide range of applications. The advantages of the MFD are extremely low mass of the detecting material, low cost, simple structure, low operating voltage (20 V), simple read- out electronics (charge integrators and scalers) and very high radiation tolerance. V. Pugatch, Yu. Vassiliev, V. Aushev, N. Tkatch Introduction The first monitor based on Secondary Electron Emission (SEE) initiated by the incident particles has been build in the old Since then various types of the SEE beam profile monitors were build, yet, to our knowledge the principle has not been explored for the radiation monitoring with a comparatively large area sensors, placed in the atmosphere. Concerning radiation hardness and thermal features of the SEE monitors stable operation was established under the impact of the average beam density of 150  A/cm 2 and fluence of protons/cm 2 as well as low temperature dependence has been observed. It was established that the yield of the SEE exceeds by factor of 10 directly produced  -electrons. The above mentioned features of SEE served us a basis for the designing Metal Foil Detectors (MFD) for the charge particle fluxes monitoring. Several MFD were build and successfully tested at KINR (Kiev), DESY (Hamburg), MPIfK (Heidelberg) and CERN (Geneva) during the last years. MFD BPIT at 21 Mev proton beam For the purpose of the silicon strip-detectors irradiation hardness study we have built and tested the MFD Beam-Profile-Imaging-Target (MFD BPIT) at MPIfK (Heidelberg). To simulate a non-uniform radiation load at experiments HERA-B and LHCb 21 MeV protons scattered by the 50  m thick Au- target are used. To exclude the uncertainties in the accumulated fluence due to the beam instabilities it was decided to equip the setup by a monitor which should measure the distribution of the irradiation load alongside the detector area (50 x 70 mm 2 ). Different target materials and BPIT prototypes were studied. It was established that a sensitivity of the system could be improved if a separating foil was inserted between two read-out foils and a low positive voltage was applied. The charge distribution in the BPIT grid made out of thin foils and introduced directly into the 21 MeV proton beam being read-out by sensitive charge integrators from every X- and Y-foils of the grid should reflect the incident beam profile. We assume that this charge emerges mainly due to SEE- and  -electrons. Thus, the method developed by us is applicable for beams of any type charged particles with energies higher than few MeV/nucleon. The output frequency of the charge integrators reaches a value of 500 Hz per 1 pA of the 21 MeV proton beam which should be also sufficient for the feedback purposes aimed at the positioning or focusing of the low intensity radioactive beams. The test experiment with a 12.5  m thick Ni-foil (2x15 mm 2 ) positioned at very forward scattering angles has confirmed that the rate of a charge integrator (100 Hz per 1 pA calibrating current) connected to the foil perfectly followed the expected Rutherford scattering behaviour. The obtained values of the proton fluences agreed well with calculations. The BPIT with sizes large enough to cover nearly the whole silicon detector area has been made out of 10 Ni-foils (12.5  m thick, 4 mm wide, 50 mm long) placed on a PCB with a pitch of 5mm. Figure 1. Left part: BPIT (50 x 50 mm 2 ). Proton beam axis is perpendicular to the BPIT plane. Right part: 21 MeV proton beam profile measured by the BPIT. Beam axis is between strips #5 and #6 MFD at 920 GeV proton beam Another way to reconstruct the beam profile was realized by us for the HERA-B experiment, which operates a set of 8 target ribbons (wires) surrounding the 920 GeV proton beam in two planes with a typical dimension of  m (Fig. 2), along the beam axis and 50  m, in the radial direction to provide the Interaction Rate (IR) of 5-40 MHz. In addition to the data from charge integrators connected to the targets we used the Silicon Vertex Detector (SVD) data to get the beam profile in a plane perpendicular to the beam axis. At nominal target position of 4 beam , (  = 350  m) the IR is very sensitive to the beam shape and its fluctuations (Fig.3), and the knowledge of the beam profile is of a paramount importance for the target steering. The feedback data for steering are derived from Scintillator Hodoscopes (overall IR) and CIs (partial contribution into the IR) As an example Fig.5 shows the distribution of the vertices over 4 inserted targets. Number of vertices at each target is in a good agreement with the IR distribution provided by CIs. Figure 5. Vertices distribution over 4 targets surrounding the 920 GeV proton beam (IR = 30 MHz). X and Y are the coordinates of the targets in the SVD coordinate system: the beam axis is shifted down by 1 mm and closer by 3.2 mm to the inner target from the SVD axis. WireCharge Integrators %Vertices % Above   0.7 Below   0.7 Inner   0.7 Outer   0.7 Table 1. Relative rate sharing among wires obtained with the Charge Integrators and Primary vertices counting The relative sharing of the IR among the inserted targets is illustrated by Table 1 for the case of the overall IR = 30 MHz. There is a perfect linear relation between the number of the reconstructed vertices and CIs values for IR per individual target up to 10 MHz (till multiple interactions per bunch crossing make an impact on the vertices reconstruction efficiency). Y (cm) Z (cm) X (cm) C Pd C*C* C Ti W Al Target size [  m] a1 Al 50*500 b1 C 100*500 i1 W d = 50 o1 Ti d = 50 a2 Pd d = 50 b2 Ti d = 50 i2 C 100*500 o2 C 100*500 P - beam HERA-B Target Setup Figure 2. Reconstructed vertices from 8 targets Figure 3. Correlations IR, ChI, beam and target position, Primary vertices. Another essential feature of the Luminosity monitoring by the MFD is that this is nearly background free method. Indeed, due to small size of the targets the response of the corresponding ChI to any MIP flux is small in comparison with a signal obtained by the beam-target interactions. The Fig. 3 illustrates the evolution of the rates in Hodoscopes (black line), ChI-Inner2 (pink) and background counters (red line). The upper plot shows: red – Inner2 target position, blue – X beam position and green dots – Primary vertices reconstructed off-line in the Inner2 target. The unusual behavior of beam movement was perfectly compensated by the Target steering program and nicely seen by the MFD online. Rate sharing Right part of the Figure 1 shows the beam profile measured by the BPIT positioned at the beam axis 250 mm downstream of the 50  m thick Au-target. Soild line - Gaussian fit; green circles - GEANT simulation. Integrating the incident proton beam current we have evaluated number of SEE- and  -electrons emitted by individual foils (Y-scale of the Fig.1. On average, every proton kicks out one electron. Luminosity Monitoring An application of the MFD Luminosity Monitor for the HERA-B Minimum Bias runs are shown on the Fig. 4. The red dots are the ratio of Luminosity measured by the MFD #1 (upper) and #2 (lower) to the ones measured by Hodoscopes. X-axes are the physics run #. Green lines are expected values. The typical fluctuations of the ratio is few percent. As far as MFD have the order of magnitude higher acceptance (50%) then Hodoscopes (1%) they are more sensitive to any changes of the beam position and/or material like different VDS pots position on the beam way. Most of the MB runs show perfect (within 2%) stability of the delivered luminosity measured by the MFD, Hodoscopes, Lumi-counters and another parts of the HERA-B detector like ECAL and RICH. Figure 4. Luminosity Monitoring of MB runs by MFD EPS2003