What’s New?. Planning for Child Evaluator Training First Steps is using Survey Monkey to support planning in the coming year The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment/

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EARLY CHILDHOOD Early Childhood Whats new? All early childhood evaluations will be completed at the local school. This includes Child.
Advertisements

Simplifying Reporting of Communication Development Outcomes for Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss Karen Anderson, PhD Florida EHDI Audiology Consultant.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
IDEA Advisory Special Education Roland-Grise Middle School Auditorium August 21, 2009.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Updated Guidance on Use of BDI-2 Screening Test for Child Outcomes Measurement System August 26 th & 31 st, 2010 – State Leadership Team Calls - Indicators.
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Early Intervention and Child Abuse & Prevention Act (CAPTA) Marina L. Merrill (ODE) Stephanie Stafford (DHS)
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Early Childhood Education Dr. Bill Bauer William L. Heward Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 8e Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education,
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
The Multidisciplinary Team Testing Considerations, and Parental Participation in the Assessment Process Chapter Seven.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
Opening Doors to Success: The Status of State Transition Policies and Practices Beth Rous University of Kentucky Gloria Harbin University of North Carolina.
Assessment for Child Monitoring and Program Planning: Creating Strong Links June 11, 2007JJ June 11, 2007 Lexington, KY First Steps Biannual PLE Meeting.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
Charting the Course- Integrating the IFSP with Early Childhood Outcomes in West Virginia.
Early Childhood Inclusion at the Frank Porter Graham Child Care Program: A Collaborative and Routines-Based Approach.
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
School Readiness: We’re Better Together
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Early Intervention System Presentation for Financing Systems Workshop OSEP National Early Childhood Conference.
First Steps Update The following pages contain proposed and approved changes to the First Steps Program. Please refer to the individual.
A NEW SYSTEM OF SUPPORT FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS WITH DISABILITIES Recent Changes in the Provision of Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers with.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
About Early Intervention What is it? What is the goal? What are the benefits to my child and family? How do children get placed in the program?
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Massachusetts Part C Department of Public Health (LA) 62 programs, 38 vendor agencies 6 Regions 6 Regional Specialists.
Chapter 16 Early Childhood Assessment. Assessment of Young Children Establish family priorities Familiar environments Assessments should Provide information.
Communities Coordinating for Healthy Development Training for Clinics.
Arizona Early Intervention Program IDEA 2011 Requirements -Assessment -
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
The NC Infant Toddler Program: Together We Grow Policy information taken N.C. Infant-Toddler Program Manual.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP PROFESSOR KERI MCCORVEY M. CCC-SLP Seminar Unit 3 Identification and Early Intervention.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
Francis X. Short Individualized Education Programs chapter 5.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
1 Resources for Increasing Child Development Knowledge Virginia August 27, 2008 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
Kate Rogers Vermont Agency of Education Early Childhood Special Education Coordinator/IDEA 619 Coordinator.
Chapter 15 Early Childhood Assessment
ARC Chairperson Training
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Eligibility Determination IFSP Meetings IFSP Service Implementation
Periodic, Annual Reviews and Transition Procedures
ARC Chairperson Training
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

What’s New?

Planning for Child Evaluator Training First Steps is using Survey Monkey to support planning in the coming year The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment/ Survey can be found at: vzEklnhbQB1x_2bpK_2b7AiL5A_3d_3d vzEklnhbQB1x_2bpK_2b7AiL5A_3d_3d This address will be provided in a following the conference this evening

APR/SPP Updates

APR/SPP Reminder The indicator that looks at timely services has activities and the first one identifies that: –Allow Primary Level Evaluators to provide intervention services in areas of provider shortages to minimize the impact of provider shortages on timely service provision. Status: –There was misinformation throughout the state that primary level evaluators could not also provide early intervention services in areas of shortage, when in fact this had always been allowable.

Indicators 5 and 6 deals with Child Find: There is an Activity proposed moving from a 5 to 7 domain system: Background information: –Eligibility varies from state to state –Some states examine fine/gross motor, as well as receptive/expressive communication abilities separately: Louisiana Oregon –Other states consider either motor or communication separately: Arizona Tennessee Virginia Reminder: This information is from a brief web- review, further work needs to be completed to have more complete and detailed information.

APR/SPP Continued The Evaluation Subcommittee/Workgroup investigated and did not recommend proceeding at this time The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment has questions to gather opinions/information from PLEs in the field

Assessment Updates 7/13/2007 Due to concerns expressed by individuals trained on the E-LAP, Central Office has eliminated it from the list of approved instruments; narrowing that list to three.

Cabinet-Approved Criterion Referenced Assessment Instruments Assessment, Evaluation and Programming System (AEPS) Carolina Curriculum for Infants and Toddlers with Special Needs Hawaii Early Learning Profile (HELP)

Policy Indicates: Every child determined eligible by established risk shall have an assessment in all five (5) areas of development done by a primary level evaluator in lieu of a primary level evaluation using a cabinet-approved criterion referenced instrument (See RES-15).

Established Risk Policy Addendum to First Steps Policy & Procedure Manual Relates to: IV – Assessment – 911 KAR 2:130 ( August 3, 2007) Effective: August 1, 2007 Continues to be active from August 1, 2007

The assessment report shall include: (a) A description of the assessment activities and the information obtained; (b) Identifying information: 1. The Central Billing and Information System identification number; and 2. The child’s Date of Birth; and 3. The name of the child; and 4. The child’s age at the date of the assessment; and 5. The name of the service provider and discipline; and 6. The date of the assessment; and

7. The setting of the assessment; and 8. The state of the health of the child during the assessment; and 9. Whether the child’s response level was typical; and 10. The instruments and assessment methods used; and 11. Who was present for the assessment; and 12. The signature of the assessment;

(c) A profile of the child’s level of performance, in a narrative form and shall indicate: 1. Concerns and priorities; and 2. Child’s unique strengths and needs; and 3. Skills achieved since last report, if applicable; and 4. Emerging skills; and 5. Direction of future service delivery;

(d) Suggestions for any strategies, materials, or equipment or adaptations that shall support the child’s development; (e) Information that shall be helpful to the family and other providers in building on the team’s focus for the child and family; and

(f) For providers completing a cabinet-approved assessment instrument for progress monitoring and program planning purposes, a copy of the assessment protocol shall be submitted to the local Point of Entry (POE) office for data entry purposes within ten (10) working days if an online version of the assessment is not used or direct entry into the Kentucky Early Childhood Data System (KEDS) is not available. If an online version of the assessment is used, the provider must list Christopher Anderson as an administrator for the online account. Christopher Anderson’s e- mail is: Mr. Anderson will export data directly from the online

Each assessment protocol submitted to the POE must contain: 1) the child’s CBIS number, 2) the provider number, and 3) the provider’s National Provider Identifier (NPI), if applicable.

The initial assessment(s) report(s) shall be shared verbally with the family. The written report, not including a copy of the assessment protocol, shall be sent to the family and the written report, including a copy of the protocol (if applicable), shall be sent to the local Point of Entry within ten (10) working days of the completion of the assessment or prior to the IFSP meeting, whichever is earlier.

Betsy Kitchen brought up an “inconsistency in how PLE’s are sending in their contracts” Every PLE needs three codes: –26 for PLEs –Their individual therapy code for attending the IFSP –38 for 5 area assessments for those children with established risk

Training Opportunity In the evaluation of HELP training, many attendees suggested the need for additional scoring training on the HELP tool. To support providers a follow-up training is being specifically developed for First Steps. These trainings are available in October and November and registration continues through the TRAIN system

Question about the use of Norm-Referenced Testing as a part of Assessment Process A five area criterion referenced test must be completed Additional testing (if family desires) is possible within the system, but there is no additional payment structure for it

Save the Children, Frank Porter Graham Institute, and the Eastern KY Childcare Coalition are looking for early childhood personnel: Early Childhood Specialist Trainers Mentor Administrators Program Evaluator Contact Sarah Belanger

Brenda Mullins from the Transition Project has made a new DVD available for providers to use with families The DVD contains: –The Parent Guide: Building a Strong Foundation for School Success Birth to Three years old 3-4 years old –Fireside Chat –Sample Clips –Request free DVD through her at