EEF SESSION #3 MARCH 2013 Analyzing & Documenting Progress Toward Goals Please have a seat and fill out the reflection sheet (Do Now)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Advertisements

Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
Defining and Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Evaluation May 10, 2015.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Lead Teacher Session #4 1 February 2015 Welcome! Please sit at any table Wireless network: MadPKWLAN Password: 657malcolmx.
Lead Teacher Session #3 1 December 2014 Welcome! Please sit at any table & complete the Connector Activity Sheet Wireless network: MadPkWLAN Password:
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Lead Teacher Session #5 1 April 2015 Welcome! Please sit at any table Wireless network: MadPKWLAN Password: 657malcolmx.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Tuesday, July 30
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
KSU Faculty Retreat Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Lead Teacher Session #2 1 October 2014 Welcome! Please sit at any table & complete the Do Now Wireless network: MadPkWLAN Password: 657malcolmx.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS FACILITATORS SESSION #2 JANUARY 2013 Unpacking Well-Structured Lessons.
Educator Performance Evaluation Office of Educator Effectiveness January 31, 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Wednesday, July 31 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Monomoy Educator Evaluation System Training
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 3 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
EEF SESSION #4 APRIL 2013 Reflecting on the Year and Planning for the Future Please have a seat and get started on the “I Used to Think…”
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series Formative Assessment – Assessment for Learning December 13, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 1: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, Oct 7 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Formative Assessments and Observations on EDFS
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Aspiring Principals Program
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Unpacking Effective Instruction
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Office of Educator Effectiveness
Presentation transcript:

EEF SESSION #3 MARCH 2013 Analyzing & Documenting Progress Toward Goals Please have a seat and fill out the reflection sheet (Do Now)

Today’s Agenda Welcome & Reflection Table Group Check-ins Formative Assessments “Adjustments to Practice” & Tracking Progress Toward Goals Closing

Norms & Community Agreements Start and end on time. Limit technology to break time. Include everyone in conversations. Vegas Rule: Confidentiality

Session #2 Homework Thanks for…  Summarizing & reflecting on rubric/evaluation meeting(s).  Attending All-Facilitators Meeting

Defining the Scope EEFs will: Be conduits for feedback Contribute expertise to develop resources for the district Disseminate information and best practices Lead conversations around effective instructional practice Make-up Session: Tuesday, April pm MPHS Green Tile Area

EEF Series Objective EEFs will be able to identify, discuss, and cultivate effective instructional practices within their school communities using the tools provided by the evaluation system.

Session 3 Objectives Today we will: Share questions, challenges, & best practices Continue to build expertise in the evaluation system Explore proficient practice in Adjustments to Practice Develop plans for work with colleagues

Session #3 Homework  Complete “Reflecting on Progress Toward a Team Goal”

Facilitation Moves Keep an eye on: Praxis: action with reflection & learning by doing Needs Assessment: participation of the learners in naming what is to be learned Shared facilitation

Today’s Agenda Welcome & Reflection Table Group Check-ins Formative Assessments “Adjustments to Practice” & Tracking Progress Toward Goals Closing

Notes from the field One EEF created a “Cash Cab” game show to review basics of the evaluation process. Another EEF modeled the process of identifying her own artifacts. Another EEF videotaped a teacher’s lesson & used with staff to unpack Well-Structured Lessons

Successes “at the start of the meeting teachers were feeling very overwhelmed by the process of uploading artifacts and confused about appropriate artifacts… once teachers realized that all of these ‘activities’ [they were already doing] could be used to show growth towards their goal they were so relieved”

Challenges “The team was pretty quiet when responding to questions. There was not a lot of feedback in terms of what student engagement is and how the class should look. I facilitated the meeting but also felt like I was giving them all the ideas that we wrote down during our EEF meeting. ”

Check-ins Evaluation successes & challenges? What kind of meeting(s) have you lead? How did it go?

Today’s Agenda Welcome & Reflection Table Group Check-ins Formative Assessments “Adjustments to Practice” & Tracking Progress Toward Goals Closing

Formative Assessment Role Play Scenario 1: A teacher received a Needs Improvement overall rating on her formative assessment. She states that her evaluator told her it was because she did not upload enough artifacts. The educator is coming to you, the EEF, for help. What do you say?

Formative Assessment Role Play Scenario 1: How many artifacts? OEE says:  At least 1 for each standard and goal prior to the formative  More before the summative Earlier in the year, OEE said… 3-4 artifacts per goal and per standard

Overall Ratings Progress onRatings on Overall Goals 4 Standards Rating Educators are responsible for providing evidence for all standards and goals Student Learning Professional Practice I. Curriculum, Planning and Assessment II. Teaching All Students III. Family & Community Engagement IV. Professional Culture Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory

Formative Assessment Role Play Scenario 2: A teacher received a formative assessment after 1 classroom observation. The teacher thought there should be at least 10 classroom observations. The educator is coming to you, the EEF, for help. What do you say?

Formative Assessment Role Play Scenario 2: How many observations? Best Practice: 10 Points of Contact Plan TypeAnnouncedUnannounced Self-DirectedNone required1 Directed GrowthNone required2 Improvement12 if plan is less than 6 mos. 4 if plan is 6 mos. to 1 year Developing1 required4

Formative Assessment Role Play Scenario 3: A teacher is concerned because the current data shows that he is not meeting his student learning goal. He is worried he will receive an unsatisfactory rating on his formative assessment. The educator is coming to you, the EEF, for help. What do you say?

Formative Assessment Questions What happens when a teacher does not “sign-off” on a formative assessment within the 5 school days? The signature box will read: “employee did not view within the required time”. The educator will not be able to make comments. The evaluation icon changes when the evaluation is sent.

Formative Assessment Questions What happens if an evaluator does not make any comments on the artifacts I have uploaded? There is no mandate for an evaluator to make comments on artifacts.

Formative Assessment Questions I do not agree with the ratings on my Formative Assessment, what can I do? An educator may request a meeting with his/her evaluator to discuss the formative assessment. An educator may write comments regarding the formative assessment. This must be done within 5 days of receipt of the formative assessment. An educator may file a grievance.

Formative Assessment Questions Click on Evaluations Click on Comments

Formative Assessment Questions Isn’t my evaluator supposed to meet with me once I receive the Formative Assessment? An educator may request a meeting before and/or after the formative assessment.

Formative Assessment Questions What happens if I am placed on a different plan after I receive the Formative Assessment? An evaluator may place a teacher on a different plan at the formative assessment. The evaluator will also determine the length of the new plan and depending on the type of plan, the evaluator may write goals, action steps and prescriptions for the educator to implement before the new plan ends.

Formative Assessment Questions If I am assigned a new plan after receiving the formative assessment, when does the new plan start? The new plan starts when goals are approved.

Evaluations in EDFS Formative Assessment = mid-cycle evaluation Summative Evaluation = end of cycle evaluation

Break

Today’s Agenda Welcome & Reflection Table Group Check-ins Formative Assessments “Adjustments to Practice” & Tracking Progress Toward Goals Closing

I-B-2. Adjustments to Practice “Organizes and analyzes results from a variety of assessments to determine progress toward intended outcomes and uses these findings to adjust practice and identify and/or implement appropriate differentiated interventions and enhancements for students.”

Midyear Goal Review Revisit goals to make adjustments to practice to prepare for the summative Potential Tools Unpacking I-B-2 Formative Assessment Report Form Gap Analysis Reflecting on Goals

With a partner, revisit your own goals and action plans using the “Reflecting on Progress toward Goals” sheet. How could you use this with your colleagues?

What would you ask this teacher? Read through the sample goals, action steps & artifacts How could you help this teacher examine her practice? Try using the “Gap Analysis” worksheet

Bringing this back How can you use these ideas & activities with your colleagues? How can you use the principles of adult learning?  Needs assessment  Safety  Praxis  Respect  Clear roles and role development  Teamwork  Accountability

Challenges Lack of communication from admin about their expectations Lack of trust between teachers & their evaluators Lack of time to meet People focused on just “getting it done” Teachers uncomfortable with computers

Voices from the Field How evaluation has been going at a few schools

Today’s Agenda Welcome & Reflection Table Group Check-ins Formative Assessments “Adjustments to Practice” & Tracking Progress Toward Goals Closing

Clarifying Expectations Questions to ask the school’s evaluators:  How many artifacts would be helpful for teachers to submit?  Are there specific kinds that you are looking for?  Would you prefer more or less detailed rationales?  By when would you like artifacts to be submitted?

Feedback Please complete the Exit Ticket  What was positive?  What would you like to see next time? *Coming Soon* Evaluation Survey

Session #3 Homework  Complete “Reflecting on Progress Toward a Team Goal”

Thanks! See you at our next sessions on: April 9 th OR 11 th, 3-6 the Marshall Make-up Session: Tuesday, April 30, 3-6 MPHS Green Tile Area

Resources: on the Weebly

Office of Educator Effectiveness Ross Wilson, Assistant Superintendent for Educator Effectiveness Jared Joiner, Implementation Specialist (jjoiner) Emily Kalejs Qazilbash, Implementation Specialist (eqazilbash) Angela Rubenstein, Implementation Specialist (arubenstein) Kris Taylor, Implementation Specialist (ktaylor2) Jenna Costin, EDFS On-line System Coordinator (jcostin) Chason Ishino, Consultant (cishino) Shakera Walker, Senior Manager, Teacher Leadership (swalker)

Timelines and Requirements Type of Educator Plan Self-Directed Growth Plan 1 school year* Directed Growth Plan Less than 1 school year Improvement Plan 30 calendar days to 1 school year Developing Educator Plan 1 school year Announced observations None required 1 1 Unannounced observations if plan is less than 6 months 4 if plan is between 6 months and 1 year 4 Required Dates Oct. 1: Educator submits self-assessment & proposes 2 goals Nov. 1: Evaluator completes educator plans by approving goals & action steps May 15: Evaluator completes Summative Evaluation Report June 1: Evaluator meets with educators whose overall Summative Evaluation ratings are moved from Proficient or Exemplary to Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory Dates established in educator plan. Oct. 1: Evaluator meets with 1 st year educators to assist with self-assessment and goal-setting. Other dates are same as above for 1-year Self-Directed Growth Plan.