Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2004 Target Formula Re-evaluation Area Transportation Partnership (ATP) Interviews.
Advertisements

STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
Complete & Connected: Tools for Planning a Balanced Transportation System Technical Workshop.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
CALTRANS’ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS CTP 2040 PAC 1 Kris Kuhl Assistant Division Chief, Division of Traffic Operations 4/15/2014 CREATING.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
California Freight Advisory Committee May 14, 2014.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Capital Planning Update 1 Senate Fiscal Committee/COPE Presentation January 3, 2012.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
MISSION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SFRTA) MISSION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Patrick Weidemann Ryan Wilson, P.E., AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference March 5, 2013.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
Practical Design in ODOT Roadway Conference April 13, 2010 Cathy Nelson, PE Technical Services Manager/ Chief Engineer.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Local Transport Plan 3 Vision and Issues. The Local Transport Plan Will replace LTP2, which expires 31 March must have LTP3 approved and operative.
Manage by Measure: Just Do It AASHTO SCOPM Annual Meeting October 23, 2009 Steve Simmons TxDOT Deputy Executive Director.
Envisioning the Future of Minnesota Transportation Finance Advisory Committee April 20, 2012.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
Consulting with Idaho Tribes in Planning Transportation Development 14 th Annual NW Tribal Transportation Symposium Patti Raino, ITD.
Transportation Asset Management PM Peer Exchange Section 3 Overview: Additional Asset Management Classes Connie Sorrell Chief of System Operations.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA NATIONAL FORUM ON PERFORMANCE- BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Overview on Performance Management National Forum on Performance-Based.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Presentation to Membership. A Recap of Our Process February 2009: Decision to renew strategic plan March 2009: Engagement of Berlin, Eaton.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Presented to presented by New Mexico Transportation Planning Partners 2040 New Mexico Statewide Long-Range Multi-Modal Transportation Plan New Mexico Department.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
97 th Annual Purdue Road School Presented by: Katie Zimmerman, P.E. Applied Pavement Technology Transportation Asset Management.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES, RANKING AND PRIORITIZATION CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLANS INCORPORATION INTO STIP & TIP STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION MONITOR.
Investing in Infrastructure: Moving Massachusetts Forward Harvard 2015.
AASHTO – SCOPM Palm Desert, California October 23, 2009 Mn/DOT Performance Management - Setting our Direction.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
 SCDOT has over 41,000 miles of pavements and over 8,400 bridges.  4 th largest state maintained system in the country.  Started working on the TAMP.
Project Overview – Phase 1
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
MPO Board Presentation
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director

MAP-21 Performance-Based Planning Umbrella Asset Management Plan Performance-Based Long Range Plan STIP tied to goals, targets Highway Safety Improvement Plan Highway Safety Plan Congestion, Air Quality Plan Freight Plan Performance Focused

New Mexico 2040 Transportation Plan

Purpose of the plan Provide a visionary, transparent, predictable, performance-based, and strategic framework to guide decision- making for future transportation investments in New Mexico. Note: This plan meets the requirements of federal law (23 USC 135) for each state to develop a long range plan that is based on wide and diverse stakeholder input; addresses multiple modes of transportation (including bicycles and pedestrians); is statewide in scope; and has a 20-year minimum horizon.

Phased Development PHASE 1: Existing Conditions − “Where Are We Now?” Data and Information Needs Assessment Existing Conditions and Trends Analysis PHASE 4: Implementation − “What Will It Take?” Plan Writing, Graphic Design, & Document Management Plan Approval and Implementation PHASE 2: Strategic Direction − “Where Do We Want To Go?” Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures Scenario Analysis Target Setting PHASE 3: Resource Allocation − “How Will We Get There?” Plan Alternatives Analysis Completed Summer 2014 Completed Fall 2014 Completed Winter 2015 Public Review of Draft Currently Underway

Alternative ways of moving forward

Regional Working Groups Stakeholder Engagement Top Down – reviewed by committees with decision making authority Bottom up – developed by working groups with broad expertise from all regions of New Mexico Statewide Working Groups 1. Public health, safety & security 2. State of good repair 3. Access, mobility, & connectivity 4. Economic vitality—freight movement 5. Economic vitality—regional development 6. Visitor travel, recreation & tourism 7. State, federal and tribal lands 8. Cultural, historic, natural resources 9. Plan implementation NMDOT Coordinating Committee All divisions & districts NMDOT Coordinating Committee All divisions & districts Metropolitan/Regional Coordinating Committee MPO and RTPO staff Metropolitan/Regional Coordinating Committee MPO and RTPO staff Tribal Coordinating Committee All 22 tribes Tribal Coordinating Committee All 22 tribes New Mexico Citizens and Visitors Other Groups Interagency Coordinating Committee State & federal agencies Interagency Coordinating Committee State & federal agencies

The stakeholders told us: 1.Identify sustainable revenue sources / use resources efficiently 2.Preserve and maintain what we already have 3.Improve public transportation 4.Support economic development 5.Address public health and safety needs 6.Provide access and mobility for everyone 7.Support freight movement 8.Protect and preserve what makes New Mexico special 9.Coordinate across jurisdictional / regulatory boundaries 10.Improve data collection, management and sharing

2040 Plan Vision and Goals

Goals and Strategies Transparency and Accountability » Outstanding, customer-focused employees  recruit, reward, retain » Public trust + support  form partnerships and retain 2040 Plan coordinating committees to leverage external resources » Data + information  improve quality to support project and program evaluation » Project evaluation  develop and implement evaluation criteria and statewide project prioritization process based on 2040 Plan Goals and Strategies Safety for All System Users » Data-driven, proactive processes  implement Strategic Highway Safety Plan » Partnerships with other agencies  identify and pursue opportunities

Goals and Strategies Preservation and Maintenance » Preservation-first asset management strategy  develop and implement the Transportation Asset Management Plan (TAMP) » Life-cycle cost analysis  use to evaluate and prioritize all types of projects (including capacity expansion) » Prioritization by tier  prioritize investment of funds by modal “tier” to achieve minimum standards for design, maintenance, and efficient operations

Goals and Strategies Access and Connectivity » Operations and Demand Management First  proactively implement all reasonable operations and demand management strategies before committing scarce capital funds to expand capacity » Strategic Investment in Key Corridors  focus NMDOT resources (considering full life-cycle cost) to support movement of people and goods along a limited number of key corridors (i.e., corridors with regional, statewide, interstate, or international significance) » Land use – transportation coordination  prioritize projects, programs, and activities that help minimize transportation infrastructure and service costs through coordination of transportation and land use planning (including site selection for public facilities) » Changing Demographics  align transportation system to be responsive to changing demographic trends (aging population, Millennials, etc.)

Goals and Strategies Respect Cultures, Environment, History, Quality of Life » Context sensitive solutions: find a “best fit” transportation solution that meets expectations of both NMDOT and community stakeholders » Require and respect local plans Target funds to support communities that develop 2040 Plan-consistent transportation plans and demonstrate financial and administrative capacity to implement them successfully » Environmentally friendly practices Minimize or avoid negative impacts on the natural environment where possible » Recreation and tourism Work proactively with public and private-sector partners to advance state, regional, and tribal tourism and recreational goals while minimizing adverse impacts to cultural resources

Implementation Priorities FFY » Develop Project Evaluation Criteria » Identify and Acquire Data » Develop Socio-Economic Forecasts

NMDOT Transportation Asset Management Plan

TAM Mission NMDOT uses data-driven asset management to maximize use of limited public resources and maintain the state’s transportation infrastructure in the best possible condition. Do what you can, with what you have, where you are. Theodore Roosevelt 26th president of US ( )

Manage Assets Effectively Tradeoff Analysis Policy Goals & Objectives Budgets Expectations Resource Allocations Improvement Programs & Delivery Performance Monitoring Goals & Investments Are Aligned With Performance Data

Draft Guiding Principles Condition and Performance » Maintain current condition (5% Structurally Deficient) or show slight improvement for the NHS » Maintain no better than 10% Structurally Deficient for the non-NHS » When offered an alternative, maintain what we have before adding capacity » Determine thresholds for Good, Fair, and Poor using Pavement Condition Rating (PCR), with recognition to MAP-21 requirements (pavement)

Draft Guiding Principles Funding and Resource Allocation » Reserve a % of budget for statewide prioritization » A % of the model recommendation can be overridden by engineering judgment » Delineate funding decisions between Interstate, non- Interstate NHS, non-NHS, and Off System Management Systems » Bridge » Pavement » Other Assets (Future TBD)

10 Year Asset Targets Sound Data Programming Material Performance Political Actions Construction Costs Model Accuracy Funding Our plans face uncertainty We need to acknowledge that uncertainty Our plans face uncertainty We need to acknowledge that uncertainty Risks

10 Year Asset Targets Material Performance Programming Construction Costs Political Actions Model Accuracy Sound Data Funding Our plans face uncertainty We need to acknowledge that uncertainty Our plans face uncertainty We need to acknowledge that uncertainty Risks

Asset Condition Current $0$25$50$75$100$125 NHS 3.4%26.5%17.5%8.4%3.1%.7%.4% Non-NHS 6.5%34.2%28.7%15.1%4.7%.9%.3% All 5.1%30.6%23.5%12.0%3.9%.8%.4% at various 10-Year annual funding levels 23 Bridge % Structurally Deficient Pavement Condition Current $110$165$220$275$330$385 Interstate Non-I NHS Non-NHS All

Data-Mature DOT Planning STIP Design Roadway Traffic Structures Design Roadway Traffic Structures Construction As-Builts Maintenance Traffic & Safety Data Management Data Management Financial Data Financial Data Analysis Business systems Analysis Business systems 2040 Plan Data Warehouse Governance Integration Data Warehouse Governance Integration Project Delivery Operations Revenue Forecasting Data Governance

Budget State FY 16 Revenues State: $456,061,500 Federal: $408,602,800 Total: $864,664,300 Revenues State: $456,061,500 Federal: $408,602,800 Total: $864,664,300 Expenses Salary: $157,071,400 Debt: $143,489,200 Operational: $122,227,000 Restricted: $103,956,573 Betterments: $89,048,000 $248,872,127 Total:$864,664,300 Expenses Salary: $157,071,400 Debt: $143,489,200 Operational: $122,227,000 Restricted: $103,956,573 Betterments: $89,048,000 $248,872,127 Total:$864,664,300 Funds District Field Supplies and Contract Maintenance, Snow Removal, etc. Funds Asset Management & Capacity Projects,

NMDOT Planning Process NMDOT Strategic Plan Vision: Set the standard for a safe, reliable and efficient transportation system New Mexico 2040Transportation Plan Transportation Asset Management Plan State Transportation Improvement Program Policy DirectionPlanning Capital Programs Implementation Construction Modal Programs Maintenance and Operations Monitoring, Reporting Adjustments (Annual Performance Report)

Designing the future of New Mexico DOT Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director