IMTC Forum 20051 From anywhere, anytime communications to personalized communication Henning Schulzrinne (with Ron Shacham, Xiaotao Wu, Jonathan Lennox.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP, Presence and Instant Messaging
Advertisements

Fall IM 2000 Evfolution of Presence Based Networks Evolution of Presence Based Networks Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
SIP and Instant Messaging. SIP Summit SIP and Instant Messaging What Does Presence Have to Do With SIP? How to Deliver.
Fall IM 2000 Introduction to SIP Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
IM May 23-25, 2000 Evolution of IP Based Presence Services Evolution of IP-Based Presence Services Jonathan Rosenberg Chief.
IM May 24, 2000 Introduction to SIP Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
VON Europe /19/00 SIP and the Future of VON Protocols SIP and the Future of VON Protocols: Presence and IM Jonathan Rosenberg.
Fall VoN 2000 SIP for IP Communications Jonathan Rosenberg Chief Scientist.
Feature Interaction Handling in LESS Xiaotao Wu and Henning Schulzrinne Internet Real Time Laboratory.
SIMPLE Presence Traffic Optimization and Server Scalability Vishal Kumar Singh Henning Schulzrinne Markus Isomaki Piotr Boni IETF 67, San Diego.
Vodacom Microsoft Hosted Lync
July 20, 2000H.323/SIP1 Interworking Between SIP/SDP and H.323 Agenda Compare SIP/H.323 Problems in interworking Possible solutions Conclusion Q/A Kundan.
IP Communications Services Redefining Communications Teresa Hastings Director WorldCom SIP Services Conference – April 18-20, 2001.
SIP Simplified August 2010 By Dale Anderson. SIP Simplified Session Initiation Protocol Core of SIP specifications is documented in IETF RFC 3261 Many.
Using Presence Information to Develop Converged Telecom Services Standards and Challenges Parijat Garg Computer Science, IIT Bombay.
VoIP intro Henning Schulzrinne. Name confusion Commonly used interchangeably: – Voice-over-IP (VoIP) – but includes video – Internet telephony – but may.
SIP interoperability and extensions Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University, New York NGN (Boston, MA) November 2004.
A Generic Event Notification System Using XML and SIP Knarig Arabshian and Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science Columbia University
The SIMPLE Presence and Event Architecture Henning Schulzrinne (*) Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University (*) The SIMPLE architecture is a collaboration.
From data delivery to control: rich presence and multimedia Henning Schulzrinne, Ron Shacham, Xiaotao Wu Columbia University, New York Wolfgang Kellerer,
 3G is the third generation of tele standards and technology for mobile networking, superseding 2.5G. It is based on the International Telecommunication.
May 23, 2005Alcatel1 Advanced Multimedia and Presence Services using Classical and P2P SIP Henning Schulzrinne (with Kundan Singh, Ron Shacham, Xiaotao.
U Twente1 Advanced Multimedia and Presence Services using Classical and P2P SIP Henning Schulzrinne (with Kundan Singh, Ron Shacham, Xiaotao Wu, Jonathan.
SIMPLEStone – A presence server performance benchmarking standard SIMPLEStone – A presence server performance benchmarking standard Presented by Vishal.
Collaboration in the Enterprise1 SIP and Beyond Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science Columbia University Collaboration.
ORBIT NSF site visit - July 14, Location-based Services & data propagation in ORBIT Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science.
XCON architecture and protocol musings Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.
Jan. 2005Rich presence1 Rich Presence and Privacy Henning Schulzrinne (with Xiaotao Wu and Ron Shacham) Columbia University SIP 2005 (Paris) January 26,
Using SIP for Ubiquitous and Location-Based Communications Henning Schulzrinne (with Stefan Berger, Jonathan Lennox, Maria Papadopouli, Stelios Sidiroglou,
CFP 2005 (Seattle) -- April 2005 Location-based services – an IETF perspective Henning Schulzrinne (+ Xiaotao Wu, Ron Shacham) Dept. of Computer Science.
Microsoft ® Lync ™ 2010 Review IM/Presence Basics.
XCON Framework Overview & Issues Editors: Mary Barnes Chris Boulton
©Kwan Sai Kit, All Rights Reserved Windows Small Business Server 2003 Features.
Packetizer ® Copyright © 2008 H.325 Beyond Today’s Second Generation Systems Paul E. Jones Rapporteur, ITU-T Q12/16 1.
1 Kommunikatsiooniteenuste arendus IRT0080 Loeng 8 Avo Ots telekommunikatsiooni õppetool, TTÜ raadio- ja sidetehnika inst.
IP telephony overview and demonstration
RPIDS - Rich Presence Information Data Format for Presence Based on the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Henning Schulzrinne (ed.) Vijay Gurbani Krisztian.
SIP and VoIP State of the Nation Internet2 Sip.EDU Workshop Minneapolis, Minnesota Feb 2007 Walt Magnussen, Ph.D Texas A&M University Director TAMU ITEC.
03/09/2003Helsinki University of Technology1 Overview of Thesis Topic Presented By: Zhao Xuetao.
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). What is SIP? An application-layer protocol A control (signaling) protocol.
Internet2 spring meeting1 Making the phone not ring Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science Columbia University Internet2.
11/6/20061 Presence By, Ram Vaithilingam. 11/6/20062 Philosophy transition One computer, many users One computer, one user Many computers, one user anywhere,
1 TAC2000/ LABORATORY 117 SIP Peering in APAN Quincy Wu July 5, 2004.
Computer and Information Science Ch1.3 Computer Networking Ch1.3 Computer Networking Chapter 1.
Directions for VoIP IRT Research Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science Columbia University September 16, 2004.
SIP in wireless applications Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University.
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. SIP 标准进展.
VoN September ‘98 1 9/17/98 VoN Standards Update Jonathan Rosenberg Bell Laboratories September 17, 1998.
Omar A. Abouabdalla Network Research Group (USM) SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol SIP – Functionality and Structure of the Protocol By.
IP Columbia Prof. Henning Schulzrinne Internet Real-Time Laboratory Department of Computer Science Columbia University.
Project Objectives A multi-function programmable SIP user agent for multimedia communications, such as audio, video, white board, desktop sharing, shared.
The mandate of this working group is to facilitate effective service interoperability utilizing SIP in heterogeneous network environments as noted below.
Core VoIP and 911 issues and alternatives Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University August 2003.
ORBIT: Location- based services Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Copyright © 2006 Heathkit Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Presentation 1 – Introduction to VoIP.
SIPPING Drafts Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft. Conferencing Package Issues Only one – scope Depends on broader work in conferencing May include –Participant.
IP Columbia Internet Real-Time Laboratory Department of Computer Science Columbia University.
April 13, 2006Jiao Tong University, Shanghai1 Advanced Multimedia and Presence Services using Classical and P2P SIP Henning Schulzrinne (with Kundan Singh,
Postech DP&NM Lab Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Date: Seongcheol Hong DP&NM Lab., Dept. of CSE, POSTECH Date: Seongcheol.
How to develop a VoIP softphone in C# that enables SIP Instant Messaging (IM) This presentation describes how to create a softphone in C# that allows you.
SIPc, a Multi-function SIP User Agent Xiaotao Wu and Henning Schulzrinne.
VoIP ALLPPT.com _ Free PowerPoint Templates, Diagrams and Charts.
IP Telephony (VoIP).
Deploying IP Telephony
Chapter 2 Introduction Application Requirements VS. Transport Services
Where should services reside in Internet Telephony Systems?
Ron Shacham Henning Schulzrinne Srisakul Thakolsri Wolfgang Kellerer
Prof. Henning Schulzrinne Internet Real-Time Laboratory
Making the phone not ring Henning Schulzrinne Department of Computer Science Columbia University Internet2 spring meeting May 3, 2005.
Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University
Presentation transcript:

IMTC Forum From anywhere, anytime communications to personalized communication Henning Schulzrinne (with Ron Shacham, Xiaotao Wu, Jonathan Lennox and others) Department of Computer Science Columbia University IMTC Forum May 11, 2005 (Eibsee, Germany)

IMTC Forum Overview Basic multimedia communication ready … but implementation lags Ring-and-hope  presence-mediated communications Uses for presence: Old: “I’m on-line” Location-based services Presence-derived call handling Presence-derived trust Presence and privacy Other open issues in conferencing

IMTC Forum Collaboration in transition intra-organization; small number of systems (meeting rooms) inter-organization multiple technology generations diverse end points proprietary (single- vendor) systems standards-based solutions

IMTC Forum SIP is PBX/Centrex ready call waiting/multiple calls RFC 3261 holdRFC 3264 transferRFC 3515/Replaces conferenceRFC 3261/callee caps message waitingmessage summary package call forwardRFC 3261 call parkRFC 3515/Replaces call pickupReplaces do not disturbRFC 3261 call coverageRFC 3261 from Rohan Mahy’s VON Fall 2003 talk simultaneous ringing RFC 3261 basic shared linesdialog/reg. package barge-inJoin “Take”Replaces Shared-line “privacy” dialog package divert to adminRFC 3261 intercomURI convention auto attendantRFC 3261/2833 attendant consoledialog package night serviceRFC 3261 centrex-style features boss/admin features attendant features

IMTC Forum An eco system, not just a protocol SIP XCAP (config) RTSP SIMPLE policy RPID …. SDP XCON (conferencing) STUN TURN RTP configures initiatescarries controls provide addresses

IMTC Forum SIP, SIPPING & SIMPLE –00 drafts includes draft-ietf-*-00 and draft-personal-*-00

IMTC Forum SIP – a bi-cultural protocol overlap dialing DTMF carriage key systems notion of lines per-minute billing early media ISUP & BICC interoperation trusted service providers multimedia IM and presence location-based service user-created services decentralized operation everyone equally suspect

IMTC Forum Does it have to be that complicated? highly technical parameters, with differing names inconsistent conventions for user and realm made worse by limited end systems (configure by multi-tap) usually fails with some cryptic error message and no indication which parameter out-of-box experience not good

IMTC Forum Aside: Why is Skype successful? All the advantages of a proprietary protocol Peer-to-peer coincidental only need 6 servers to support 10 million users Good out-of-box experience  it just works Software vendor = service provider Didn’t know that you couldn’t do voice quality beyond PSTN others too focused on PSTN interoperability – why do better voice than PSTN? Simpler solutions for NAT traversal use TCP if necessary use port 80 Did encryption from the very beginning Kazaa marketing vehicle

IMTC Forum Context-aware communication context = “the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs” anything known about the participants in the (potential) communication relationship both at caller and callee timeCPL capabilitiescaller preferences locationlocation-based call routing location events activity/availabilitypresence sensor data (mood, bio)privacy issues similar to location data

IMTC Forum Evolution of VoIP “amazing – the phone rings” “does it do call transfer?” “how can I make it stop ringing?” catching up with the digital PBX long-distance calling, ca going beyond the black phone

IMTC Forum The role of presence Guess-and-ring high probability of failure: “telephone tag” inappropriate time (call during meeting) inappropriate media (audio in public place) current solutions: voice mail  tedious, doesn’t scale, hard to search and catalogue, no indication of when call might be returned automated call back  rarely used, too inflexible  most successful calls are now scheduled by Presence-based facilitates unscheduled communications provide recipient-specific information only contact in real-time if destination is willing and able appropriately use synchronous vs. asynchronous communication guide media use (text vs. audio) predict availability in the near future (timed presence) Prediction: almost all (professional) communication will be presence-initiated or pre-scheduled

IMTC Forum Basic presence Role of presence initially: “can I send an instant message and expect a response?” now: “should I use voice or IM? is my call going to interrupt a meeting? is the callee awake?” Yahoo, MSN, Skype presence services: on-line & off-line useful in modem days – but many people are (technically) on-line 24x7 thus, need to provide more context + simple status (“not at my desk”) entered manually  rarely correct does not provide enough context for directing interactive communications

IMTC Forum Rich presence More information automatically derived from sensors: physical presence, movement electronic activity: calendars Rich information: multiple contacts per presentity device (cell, PDA, phone, …) service (“audio”) activities, current and planned surroundings (noise, privacy, vehicle, …) contact information composing (typing, recording audio/video IM, …)

IMTC Forum RPID: rich presence

IMTC Forum Presence data model “calendar”“cell”“manual” audio, video, text video person (presentity) (views) services devices

IMTC Forum RPID = rich presence Provide watchers with better information about the what, where, how of presentities facilitate appropriate communications: “wait until end of meeting” “use text messaging instead of phone call” “make quick call before flight takes off” designed to be derivable from calendar information or provided by sensors in the environment allow filtering by “sphere” – the parts of our life don’t show recreation details to colleagues

IMTC Forum The role of presence for call routing Two modes: watcher uses presence information to select suitable contacts advisory – caller may not adhere to suggestions and still call when you’re in a meeting user call routing policy informed by presence likely less flexible – machine intelligence “if activities indicate meeting, route to tuple indicating assistant” “try most-recently-active contact first” (seq. forking) LESS translate RPID CPL PA PUBLISH NOTIFY INVITE

IMTC Forum Presence and privacy All presence data, particularly location, is highly sensitive Basic location object (PIDF-LO) describes distribution (binary) retention duration Policy rules for more detailed access control who can subscribe to my presence who can see what when <gml:Point gml:id="point1“ srsName="epsg:4326"> 37:46:30N 122:25:10W no T04:57:29Z T20:57:29Z

IMTC Forum Location-based services Finding services based on location physical services (stores, restaurants, ATMs, …) electronic services (media I/O, printer, display, …) not covered here Using location to improve (network) services communication incoming communications changes based on where I am configuration devices in room adapt to their current users awareness others are (selectively) made aware of my location security proximity grants temporary access to local resources

IMTC Forum Program location-based services

IMTC Forum Presence for spam prevention VoIP spam (“spit”) and IM spam (“spim”) likely to be more annoying than spam Subscription to another person is indication of mutual trust other person allows me to see their status  trusts me Thus, use watcher list (who is watching me) as trust vector

IMTC Forum Open issues for conferencing standardization Multi-device systems and session mobility Conference floor control  BFCP simple RPC-like protocol Centralized conference control (XCON WG) still struggling with control model set + get variables (~SNMP) RPC-like model (  SOAP, XML-RPC, NETCONF) send descriptions? forms (XForms?)?

IMTC Forum Internet Correspondent Node (CN) SIP UA SLP UA SIP SM Local Devices SLP SA SLP UA SIP SM SIP UA SLP DA Mobile Node (MN) SLP SIP RTP SIP UA Transcoder Session mobility

IMTC Forum The conference tree Tree  inheritance Each level can be addressed via a URL Each layer links to parents and children Lowest layer information wins Parent can designate variables that cannot be overridden (“forced global”) Easily supports (corporate) policies recurring events with exceptions modifying the active conference only Probably also supports side bars and other multi-policy configurations permanent text chat rooms Each node can reference scheduling information but may not all Acme Widget conferences weekly eng. mtg. instance 1

IMTC Forum XCON System Logical XCON Server Floor Control Client TEMPLATE Of the SYSTEM: Pre-configured Initial/Default values Conf Event Notification Server Focus CPCP Client CCCP Client CPCP Server CCCP Server Call Signaling Client TEMPLATE Policy: Of TYPE RULES RESERVATION Policy: Of TYPE RULES CURRENT Policy: Of TYPE RULES RESERVATION Of the INSTANCE: Of TYPE CONFERENCE-INFO STATE Of the CURRENT INSTANCE: Of TYPE CONFERENCE-INFO Notification Client Floor Control Server SIP/ PSTN/ H.323 T.120/ Etc. CCCP CPCP SIP NOTIFY/ Etc. BFCP Logical XCON Client

IMTC Forum Open issues: application sharing Current: T.120 doesn’t integrate well with other conference control mechanisms hard to make work across platforms (fonts) ill-defined security mechanisms Current: web-based sharing hard to integrate with other media, control and record generally only works for Windows mostly limited to shared PowerPoint Current: vnc whole-screen sharing only can be coerced into conferencing, but doesn’t integrate well with control protocols

IMTC Forum IETF effort: standardized application sharing Remote access = application sharing Four components: window drawing ops  PNG keyboard input mouse input window operations (raise, lower, move) Uses RTP as transport synchronization with continuous media but typically, TCP allow multicast  large group sessions

IMTC Forum Conclusion Basic multimedia communication solutions available scalable, secure, good quality Media delivery  controlled interaction Binary presence  rich presence Presence as enabler of loosely-coupled advanced services location-based services serve as service script inputs trust indicator for spit/spim prevention Application sharing as missing link Harder to maintain focus in the IETF exhaustion, moving on to other things

IMTC Forum Backup slides

IMTC Forum Presence data architecture raw presence document create view (compose) privacy filtering draft-ietf-simple-presence-data-model composition policy privacy policy presence sources XCAP (not defined yet) depends on watcher select best source resolve contradictions PUBLISH

IMTC Forum Presence data architecture candidate presence document watcher filter raw presence document post-processing composition (merging) final presence document difference to previous notification SUBSCRIBE NOTIFY remove data not of interest watcher

IMTC Forum RPID: rich presence