Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative (BPI) $8.6 million over 3 years (2005- 2008) 45 grantees; 78 schools throughout Colorado Independent evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures: Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling up Barbara J. Smith, U. of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Policy.
Family Interventions: Will What We Know Now Change What We Do in the Future? Susan M. Sheridan University of Nebraska-Lincoln Discussant.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Illinois Summer Leadership Conference: District Issues in Sustainability Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Maximizing Effectiveness Using Positive Behavior Support Methods in the Classroom: Monitor and Evaluation.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Post Secondary Conference Overview & Feedback College Readiness: Translating Aspirations into Actions January 12 – 14, 2011 LaShae Merrell Bogan H.S. –
Rethinking School Safety: Schools and Communities Working Together Briefing, Rayburn House Office Building December 11, 2013 David Osher, Ph.D.
Bullying Prevention Catherine Bradshaw, Ph.D., M.Ed. Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence (CDC) Johns Hopkins Center for Prevention.
School-wide Bullying Prevention A Guidance Services Presentation.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Concordia University Tellina Alvord June Introduction Classroom interactions have an impact on how students relate to each other. Too often, especially.
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Closing the Achievement Gap in Minnesota: Making a Difference through Leadership April 24, 2013.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
International Perspective: Laotians and Canadians Learning Together to Understand the Sustainability of Tourism in Laos.
Closing the Achievement Gap Leadership Academy Quarterly Meeting- January 17, 2012.
Focusing on Diverse Young Learners in State Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Dan Haggard & Alejandra Rebolledo Rea New Mexico Department of Children,
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Positive Behavior Intervention Support (PBIS) VCUSD August 16, 2012.
Investing in Change: Funding Collective Impact
Survey Results February We have become obsessed with the use of test data alone to drive school improvement and transformation efforts. “Culture.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Let’s Talk About Great Valley School District 2011.
Failure Is Not An Option. So You Want To Be A Teacher Why did I become a teacher? What do I stand for as an educator? What are the gifts that I bring.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
BULLYING IN SCHOOL BASED SETTINGS National Crime Prevention Centre What Have We Learned? March 23, 2006.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Olweus Parent Information Haine Elementary
School Improvement Planning Process OSPI PSESD
Corinne Graffunder, DrPH, MPH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control October 2009 Laying the Foundation: The Strategic Vision for RPE.
State Personnel Development Grant SPDG. Project Goals Improve outcomes for students by: − Increasing skill of educators using research/evidence-based.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
 Improving Parent Engagement in the Nashville Promise Neighborhood Joanna Geller October 29, 2012.
Aligning Multiple Initiatives Justyn Poulos, Wisconsin, PBIS Network Sheree Garvey, Appleton Area School District, Wisconsin Rob Horner, University of.
: The National Center at EDC
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Olweus Parent Information Haine Middle School
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Olweus Bullying Prevention Overview Basic Principles Program Content Evidence of Effectiveness What is Bullying? Denver Public Schools Prevention & Intervention.
OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS
Family, School & Community Partnerships (FSCP) “…parents are a child’s first teachers…” Adams, et al (2003)
Sustaining and Improving Implementation of SWPBS Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on Positive Behavior Support
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
A Policy-oriented Board of Trustees A Review of Selected Research.
Evidence-Based and Promising Practices to Increase Graduation and Improve Outcomes Dr. Loujeania Bost Dr. Catherine Fowler Dr. Matthew Klare.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
The Missouri—Show Me Outcomes Story. Missouri Integrated Model (2007 SPDG)
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
Seattle Public Schools 26 October CARE Agenda  Defining & Evaluating CARE  District Climate Survey Trends 2008 – 2010  Bullying at TOPS  2010.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
ACHIEVING ACCESS TO HEALTH FOR ALL COLORADANS BUILD TRUST, END BULLYING, IMPROVE LEARNING Highlights from the Evaluation of The Colorado Trust’s
Laying the Foundation A Discussion on Moving Fidelity of Implementation from Compliance to Capacity Building Carol K. McElvain American Institutes for.
Systematic Support for Students
Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri
Colorado Comprehensive Health Education Standards
Collective Impact Fall 2017.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative (BPI) $8.6 million over 3 years ( ) 45 grantees; 78 schools throughout Colorado Independent evaluation included  surveys of ~ 6,000 students, (pre & post x 3) and 1,500 adults (72% teachers, rest support staff, custodial, cafeteria, bus drivers)  Focus groups with students  In-depth interviews with grantees The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative1

Underlying assumptions of the Bullying Prevention Initiative:  Bullying is social in nature and occurs where people know each other;  interventions must move beyond individual change and toward the social context We believe…. if we can change the context (nature of interpersonal relationships)…. if we can change the culture (normative beliefs about bullying and willingness to help out in bullying situations)… Then we can reduce negative bystander behavior and increase willingness to intervene in bullying situations The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative2

3- year grants made to schools or school districts for evidence-based or “promising practice” programs Olweus and BPYS most popular programs implemented All schools had to accept TA on integrating cultural competency into their programming All schools had to participate in evaluation – Facilitate the consent form process – Provide class time for survey administration – Participate in local evaluation with coach The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative3

School level Impact evaluation – a few key findings of interest (there are many more) 50%  in one or more indicators of positive school culture 36%  on one or more indicators of positive school context 49% schools reported  in bullying perpetration, victimization or negative bystander behavior 63% reported  in positive school climate, sig association with  rates of bullying and negative bystander behavior Improvements in context and culture are significantly linked to reductions in bullying and negative bystander behavior The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative4

In the final analysis…… Improvements in school culture  In bullying and negative bystander behavior Higher academic achievement as measured by CSAP The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative5

Overall process lessons learned for funders  Must be integrated with other efforts and infused into daily school life; foster alignment with other school programs, not competition  Most difficult to implement in HS, may be too late by then anyway  HS & MS prevalence of verbal and cyber bullying very high  Start small and build – schools need to test and make adjustments, all classes at once overwhelming  Coordination is essential FTE management critical – and sustainable (while FTE is not)  Engaging families was challenging (almost impossible)  Leadership at all levels was key – principal, teachers, school board  Bullying occurs at teacher/staff level as well and influences outcome of work with youth The Colorado Trust Bullying Prevention Initiative6

7 Nancy B. Csuti, DrPH, MPH Director of Research, Evaluation & Strategic Learning The Colorado Trust 1600 Sherman Street Denver, CO Phone Toll free Fax