Longitudinal Study on Rapi Jesse Prabawa Gozali WING Meeting Feb 15 th 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Looking Ahead – Information Studies in the Workplace Help Us Design For the Future Carol Tenopir University of Tennessee web.utk.edu/~tenopir/
Advertisements

User Research Findings. 1 Overview Background Study goals Methodology Participants Findings Recommendations.
Berkley Data Analysis Stack Shark, Bagel. 2 Previous Presentation Summary Mesos, Spark, Spark Streaming Infrastructure Storage Data Processing Application.
1 of 622 April 2006Melissa Dawe, CHI 2006 Workshop Designing a Remote Communication System with and for Individuals with Cognitive Disabilities and their.
C R E S S T / U C L A Paper presented at AERA New Orleans—April 2000 Using Technology to Assess Students’ Web Expertise Davina C. D. Klein CRESST/UCLA.
HCI Methods for Pathway Visualization Tools Purvi Saraiya, Chris North, Karen Duca* Virginia Tech Dept. of Computer Science, Center for Human-Computer.
Case study - usability evaluation Howell Istance.
May 11, 2004CS WPI1 CS 562 Advanced SW Engineering Lecture #5 Tuesday, May 11, 2004.
© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 digital libraries and human information behavior Tefko Saracevic, Ph.D. School of Communication, Information and.
WikiConversation Scotty Allen Phong Le. Goal Support joint document production asynchronously via localized comment capability In context of different.
Design of metadata surrogates in search result interfaces of learning object repositories: Linear versus clustered metadata design Panos Balatsoukas Anne.
Feedback from Usability Evaluation to User Interface Design: Are Usability Reports Any Good? Christian M. Nielsen 1 Michael Overgaard 2 Michael B. Pedersen.
Ch 3 Usability page 1CS 368 Usability Models the authors compare three usability models and introduce their own “the extent to which a product can be used.
Welcome! 1. SpringerLink relaunch 2. Global eBook Usage Trends Timon Oefelein Account Development Manager Marketing.
Using the O.P.A.C..
Web Design Process CMPT 281. Outline How do we know good sites from bad sites? Web design process Class design exercise.
Evaluating User Interfaces Walkthrough Analysis Joseph A. Konstan
What difference a good tool? using Endeca for a faceted catalog Emily Lynema NCSU Libraries ACRL Delaware Valley Chapter Fall Program November 3, 2006.
CPSC 594B: Software Engineering Project Lecture 1: Introduction to HTML5 Lecturer: Ayman Issa Office: ICT 555.
C R E S S T / U C L A Evaluating the Impact of the Interactive Multimedia Exercises (IMMEX) Program: Measuring the Impact of Problem-Solving Assessment.
Introducing World Scientific E-Resource 1.
Usability Evaluation The Supreme Court of Texas Sheng-Cheng Huang and Anuj A. Nanavati School of Information University of Texas at Austin November 22,
Improving the Catalogue Interface using Endeca Tito Sierra NCSU Libraries.
Browse design in digital libraries: Impact on user experience Xiangmin Zhang, Yuelin Li, Jingjing Liu & Ying Zhang SCILS, Rutgers University {xzhang,lynnlee,
Evaluation of Adaptive Web Sites 3954 Doctoral Seminar 1 Evaluation of Adaptive Web Sites Elizabeth LaRue by.
Put it to the Test: Usability Testing of Library Web Sites Nicole Campbell, Washington State University.
SiTEL LMS Focus Group Executive Summary Prepared: January 25, 2012.
1 Adapting the TileBar Interface for Visualizing Resource Usage Session 602 Adapting the TileBar Interface for Visualizing Resource Usage Session 602 Larry.
THE ONLINE CURRICULUM CENTER Introduction. What is the OCC  The Online Curriculum Center features information about all areas of the IB program. There.
Software Engineering for Business Information Systems (sebis) Department of Informatics Technische Universität München, Germany wwwmatthes.in.tum.de Design.
© 2005 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: March 15, 2005 Hiring Decisions Sample comprised of 282 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 282 response.
Gemini Project Overview Adam Safir Division of Consumer Expenditure Surveys December 2010.
What do you have to do. Select a research question or aim. Conduct your own in-depth research. Gather data. Analyse your data. Discuss your findings Provide.
Evaluating electronic textbooks: a methodology Ruth Wilson and Monica Landoni ECDL th September 2001.
NCSU Libraries Kristin Antelman NCSU Libraries June 24, 2006.
Hao Wu Nov Outline Introduction Related Work Experiment Methods Results Conclusions & Next Steps.
S511 Session 7, IU-SLIS 1 DB Implementation: MS Access Forms.
Implicit Acquisition of Context for Personalization of Information Retrieval Systems Chang Liu, Nicholas J. Belkin School of Communication and Information.
Optimizing Resource Discovery Service Interfaces in Statewide Virtual Libraries: The Library of Texas Challenge William E. Moen, Ph.D. Texas Center for.
SWE 4324 UCD - WEB A FINAL VERSION Evaluation of a feature Note about Webs – Webs are the interactive class you must participate for a satisfactory understanding.
A N AJAX INTERFACE FOR THE LINC SYSTEM By Jesse Prabawa Gozali.
0 Y! Mail Application Development Platform Open Hack day 14 th Feb 2009.
Utilizing OPAC Search Logs and Google Analytics Assessing OPAC Effectiveness and User Search Behavior VALE Users'/NJLA CUS/NJ ACRL Conference January 9,
Interactive Statistical Data Portal & Open Data for Mauritius.
MSF Design Example Conceptual Design Logical Design Physical Design.
Software Engineering User Interface Design Slide 1 User Interface Design.
An AJAX interface for the LINC system By Jesse Prabawa Gozali.
Personalized Interaction With Semantic Information Portals Eric Schwarzkopf DFKI
Midterm Review Francis Li CS160 Midterm Review October 9, 2000.
A Rich OPAC User Interface with AJAX Jesse Prabawa Gozali and Min-Yen Kan WING (Web IR / NLP Group) National University of Singapore.
May 26-28ICNEE 2003 ARCHON: BUILDING LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS THROUGH EXTENDED DIGITAL LIBRARY SERVICES Hesham Anan, Kurt Maly, Mohammad Zubair,et al. Digital.
CS5604: Final Presentation ProjOpenDSA: Log Support Victoria Suwardiman Anand Swaminathan Shiyi Wei Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech December.
ForeCite: towards a reader-centric scholarly digital library Thuy Dung Nguyen, Min-Yen Kan, Dinh- Trung Dang, Markus Hänse, Ching Hoi Andy Hong, Minh-Thang.
1 Copyright © 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved. I Course Introduction.
Rich Internet Applications: Better Practices for Financial Services Stephen Turbek, Avenue A | Razorfish.
Master thesis spring Anders Gimmestad Gule Calendars as User Context Providers in an E-learning Environment Supervisor: Rune Hjelsvold Apropos-Internett:
CTSS Version 4 User Support Documentation Mike Dwyer, Kerry Hagan, Diana Diehl.
A Faceted Interface to the Library Catalog Tito Sierra NCSU Libraries ALA Midwinter Meeting January 20, 2007.
After FactFinder: The future of data dissemination at Census Bureau December 17,
Assess usability of a Web site’s information architecture: Approximate people’s information-seeking behavior (Monte Carlo simulation) Output quantitative.
Zaap Visualization of web traffic from http server logs.
HORIZONT TWS/WebAdmin DS TWS/WebAdmin DS Tips & Tricks
Managing the Privacy of Incidental Information During Collaboration
UX Concepts How they affected our development flow.
Summon discovers contents from one search box!
Word AdHoc Network: Using Google Core Distance to extract the most relevant information Presenter : Wei-Hao Huang   Authors : Ping-I Chen, Shi-Jen.
Introduction to Smart Search
Requirements Teacher’s corner Research page
GROUP INVESTIGATION HYPOTHESIS CHOICE
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Longitudinal Study on Rapi Jesse Prabawa Gozali WING Meeting Feb 15 th 2008

Presentation Outline Overview of Rapi Longitudinal Study (Dec 07 − Jan 08) ◦ Motivation ◦ Methodology ◦ Findings ◦ Discussion Future Works

Overview of Rapi Rapi (\’r ə p ē \) ◦ From the Indonesian word meaning tidy, organized or presentable ◦ A rich Open Public Access Catalog (OPAC) Four key features: ◦ Dual pane: overview + details ◦ Customizable results table ◦ Tabs ◦ Embedded suggestion bar Available at

Overview of Rapi

Presentation Outline Overview of Rapi Longitudinal Study (Dec 07 − Jan 08) ◦ Motivation ◦ Methodology ◦ Findings ◦ Discussion Future Works

Motivation Iterative design and test cycle:

Motivation SnapshotLongitudinal Novel usage patterns Changes in search behavior Feature adoptionChange over timeDiscoverabilityLearnabilityFeature adoption First-time experiences

Methodology Two-pronged approach ◦ User study (nine students)  Interaction logs  Questionnaires (scenario-based tasks and diary entries)  Interviews ◦ UI kiosk placed in situ  Interaction logs

Findings

Findings

Findings Feature adoption ◦ Number of participants using various features in the three scenarios of the first and last tasks Novel usage patterns ◦ Multi-type, multi-combination searches ◦ Parallel searches prior to relevance assessment ◦ Multi-tasking ◦ Subtask caching Changes in search behavior ◦ Parallel searches ◦ Suggestion-prone ◦ Relevance assessment More details in the paper available from CVS

Discussion Three proposals for a rich OPAC ◦ Centralized search environment  Tabs as the control center  Search and browse  Mixed results (e.g. type, medium)  Single page environment ◦ Context-aware filters  Advanced syntax may be un(popular|usable)  Faceted metadata may be insufficient  e.g. software version in how-to books, domain-specific keywords ◦ Context-aware suggestions  Task-centric suggestions  e.g. Macromedia Flash == Adobe Flash?, Rowling != Rowing?, Foo Bar?

Presentation Outline Overview of Rapi Longitudinal Study (Dec 07 − Jan 08) ◦ Motivation ◦ Methodology ◦ Findings ◦ Discussion Future Works

Supporting quantitative data ◦ Task completion rates ◦ Average time on task ◦ Average task error counts ◦ Average task satisfaction scores

Thank you Any questions?