Longitudinal Study on Rapi Jesse Prabawa Gozali WING Meeting Feb 15 th 2008
Presentation Outline Overview of Rapi Longitudinal Study (Dec 07 − Jan 08) ◦ Motivation ◦ Methodology ◦ Findings ◦ Discussion Future Works
Overview of Rapi Rapi (\’r ə p ē \) ◦ From the Indonesian word meaning tidy, organized or presentable ◦ A rich Open Public Access Catalog (OPAC) Four key features: ◦ Dual pane: overview + details ◦ Customizable results table ◦ Tabs ◦ Embedded suggestion bar Available at
Overview of Rapi
Presentation Outline Overview of Rapi Longitudinal Study (Dec 07 − Jan 08) ◦ Motivation ◦ Methodology ◦ Findings ◦ Discussion Future Works
Motivation Iterative design and test cycle:
Motivation SnapshotLongitudinal Novel usage patterns Changes in search behavior Feature adoptionChange over timeDiscoverabilityLearnabilityFeature adoption First-time experiences
Methodology Two-pronged approach ◦ User study (nine students) Interaction logs Questionnaires (scenario-based tasks and diary entries) Interviews ◦ UI kiosk placed in situ Interaction logs
Findings
Findings
Findings Feature adoption ◦ Number of participants using various features in the three scenarios of the first and last tasks Novel usage patterns ◦ Multi-type, multi-combination searches ◦ Parallel searches prior to relevance assessment ◦ Multi-tasking ◦ Subtask caching Changes in search behavior ◦ Parallel searches ◦ Suggestion-prone ◦ Relevance assessment More details in the paper available from CVS
Discussion Three proposals for a rich OPAC ◦ Centralized search environment Tabs as the control center Search and browse Mixed results (e.g. type, medium) Single page environment ◦ Context-aware filters Advanced syntax may be un(popular|usable) Faceted metadata may be insufficient e.g. software version in how-to books, domain-specific keywords ◦ Context-aware suggestions Task-centric suggestions e.g. Macromedia Flash == Adobe Flash?, Rowling != Rowing?, Foo Bar?
Presentation Outline Overview of Rapi Longitudinal Study (Dec 07 − Jan 08) ◦ Motivation ◦ Methodology ◦ Findings ◦ Discussion Future Works
Supporting quantitative data ◦ Task completion rates ◦ Average time on task ◦ Average task error counts ◦ Average task satisfaction scores
Thank you Any questions?