McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 1 SOCIOLOGY Richard T. Schaefer Government and Politics 17

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide Government and Politics Power and Authority Types of Government Political Behavior in the United States Models of Power Structure in the United StatesModels of Power Structure in the United States War and Peace Political Activism on the Internet Social Policy and the Government

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 3 Power and Authority Politics –Who gets what, when and how (Lasswell)

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 4 Power and Authority –Ability to exercise one’s will over others –Sources of power in political systems include: Force: actual or threatened use of coercion to impose one’s political dissidents Influence: exercise of power through a process of persuasion Authority Power

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 5 Power and Authority –Authority: institutionalized power recognized by people over whom it is exercised –Traditional Authority: legitimate power conferred by custom and accepted practice Types of Authority

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 6 Power and Authority –Charismatic Authority: power is made legitimate by leader’s exceptional personal or emotional appeal to his or her followers Types of Authority –Legal-Rational Authority: power is made legitimate by law

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 7 Types of Government –Form of government headed by a single member of a royal family Oligarchy –Form of government in which a few individuals rule Monarchy

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 8 Types of Government –Dictatorship: Government in which one person has nearly total power to make and enforce laws –Totalitarianism: involves virtually complete government control and surveillance over all aspects of a society’s social and political live Dictatorship and Totalitarianism

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 9 Types of Government –Government by the people –Representative democracy: Elected members of legislatures make laws Democracy

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 10 Political Behavior in the United States Participation and Apathy –Most citizens do not participate in political organizations on local or national levels 8% in U.S. belong to political club or organization No more than 20% ever contacted elected official regarding an issue or problem

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 11 Political Behavior in the United States Women in Politics –In U.S., women dramatically underrepresented in government Sexism most serious barrier to women interested in holding office Gender gap still evident in 2004 presidential election

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 12 Political Behavior in the United States Table Political Preferences in the United States Source: J. Davis et al. 2003

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 13 Political Behavior in the United States Figure Women in National Legislatures, Selected Countries, 2005 Source: Inter-Parliamentary Union 2005

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 14 Models of Power Structure in the United States Power Elite Models –Mills’s Model Power Elite: small ruling elite of military, industrial, and governmental leaders –Power rested in the hands of a few, inside and outside of government –Mostly male, white, and upper class.

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 15 Models of Power Structure in the United States Power Elite Models –Domhoff’s Model Stresses roles played by elites of corporate community and leaders of policy-formation organizations such as: –Chambers of Commerce –Labor unions

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 16 Models of Power Structure in the United States Figure Power Elite Models Source: Domhoff 2001:96

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 17 Models of Power Structure in the United States Pluralist Model –Competing groups within the community have access to government, so no single group can dominate Variety of groups play significant roles in decision making

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 18 Models of Power Structure in the United States Figure U.S. Public Opinion on the Necessity of War, 1971—2004 Source: Arora 2004

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 19 War and Peace War –Global view studies how and why nations become engaged in military conflict –Nation-state view stresses the interaction of internal political, socioeconomic, and cultural forces –Micro view focuses on the social impact of war on individuals and the groups to which they belong

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 20 War and Peace War –Public opinion plays significant role in a war’s execution

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 21 War and Peace Peace Since September 11, 2001, governments around the world renewed their efforts to fight terrorism –Absence of war and proactive effort to develop cooperative relations among nations Terrorism –Use or threat of violence against random or symbolic targets in pursuit of political aims

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 22 War and Peace Figure 17-4 The Global Reach of Terrorism Source: National Geographic 2005:17

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 23 Political Activism on the Internet Internet is changing the way people get their news and think about politics –Political activity not limited to traditional party politics Organizers use Web to circumvent restrictive controls of authoritarian regimes

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 24 Social Policy and the Government Campaign Financing –The Issue Many politicians leave office bemoaning time they spent raising money for campaigns Attempts to regulate campaign financing are not new

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 25 Social Policy and the Government Campaign Financing –The Setting The Federal Campaign Act of 1974 placed restrictions on donations made to specific candidates for national office –Loopholes allowed soft money contributions to political parties, leadership committees, and political action committees by corporations and special interest groups

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 26 Social Policy and the Government Campaign Financing –The Setting In 2002, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Accts limited soft money –In 2004, the Democratic and Republican parties each raised 10 times shat they raised in 1992 –New innovations in spending will emerge along with new cries for reform

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 27 Social Policy and the Government Campaign Financing –Sociological Perspective Functionalists say that political contributions keep the public involved in the democratic process Conflict theorists counter that money brings influence, and material wealth allows donors to influence government policymakers Interactionists note symbolic significance of the public perception that big money drives elections in the U.S.

McGraw-Hill © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Slide 28 Social Policy and the Government Campaign Financing –Policy Initiatives Majority of U.S. voters want campaign finance reform On the national level, traditional reform groups continue to call for tighter limits on contributions Other interest groups claim limiting anyone’s involvement in the political process is unfair