CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Recent Study Section Comment for a Faculty Members NIH Application The University of Pittsburgh is an outstanding research institution with an excellent.

Advertisements

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.

How to Review a Paper How to Get your Work Published

Report of the Committee of Visitors Energy Frontier Research Centers and Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis Energy Innovation Hub Office of Basic.

How a Study Section works

How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.

How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)

Specific Aims or Selling your Science in One Page Pedro Fernandez-Funez Assistant Professor of Neurology and Neuroscience

Transformative R01 Program November 20, 2008 Betsy Wilder, PhD Deputy Director Office of Strategic Coordination Division of Program Coordination, Planning.

INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.

NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.

An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.

California State University, Fresno – Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Basics of NIH – National Institutes of Health Nancy Myers Sims, Grants.

Center for Scientific Review National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services Toni Scarpa NIH Peer Review: Continuity and Change NIDA.

How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 3 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.

MS 640: Introduction to Biomedical Information Grant Writing An Overview.

Weathering the Storm: How to Establish and Sustain an Independent Research Career in an Era of Limited Funds Lawrence J. Prograis, Jr., M.D Senior Scientist,

The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.

Getting Funded: How to write a good grant

Introduction to the NIH Grants System

Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)

From Your Idea to Your First R01: Perspectives of a National Institutes of Health Extramural Scientist.

NIH OBSSR Summer Institute July 2012 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overview of the NIH Peer Review Process.

THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.

Major Non-Consensus Program and its review process design Wang Yue; Li xiaoxuan Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences Zheng yonghe.

Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.

The Center for Symptom Management The NIH review process Kathryn Lee, RN, PhD April 3, 2009 MDP.

The Review of Your NIH Grant Application Begins Here Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. Director NIH Center for Scientific Review.

Overview of NIDA Funding Opportunities and Grant Funding Tips Bethany Griffin Deeds, Ph.D., M.A. Deputy Chief, Epidemiology Research Branch Division of.

The NIH Grant Review Process Hiram Gilbert, Ph.D. Dept. of Biochemistry, Baylor College of Medicine Xander Wehrens, M.D. Ph.D. Dept. of Molecular Physiology.

 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.

AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.

NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal

How to Obtain National Institutes of Health Awards: The Basics A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards.

Richard Nakamura, Ph.D. October 2014 CSR Goals and Philosophy.

NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.

Building Sustainable Community-Linked Infrastructure to Enable Health Science Research (RC4) RFA OD Pre-application workshop October 23, 2009.

Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.

12/11/2009 Writing a NIH Grant Application Ellen Puré, PhD, Professor and Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs, Wistar Institute Mitchell Schnall.

Marguerite Littleton Kearney, PhD, RN, FAAN Director, Division of Extramural Science, NINR NIH/NINR Funding Opportunities in Family Health Research CANS.

NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.

1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.

NIH is divided into two sections 1) Center for Scientific Review (CSR) 2) Institutes (eg., NIDDK, NCI, NHLBI) What is the difference? CSR organizes the.

Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.

Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.

How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University

Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:

An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.

Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.

2 Who Are the Peer Reviewers? Senior Researchers Well-funded by NIH or Other Agencies Well-published, recognized in the field Associate Professor or higher.

Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.

National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m.

Peer Review of OBP Research Division of Monoclonal Antibodies

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.

Foundations in Writing Competitive NIH Proposals Joseph G. Grzywacz, Ph.D. Chair & Norejane Hendrickson Professor Department of Family and Child Sciences.

Grantsmanship: The Art and Science of Getting Funded Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Molecular Endocrinology National Institute of Diabetes and.

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.

Internal and External Peer Review Focused Group Discussion PAASE 06/15/2011.

Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.

University of Virginia Innovation – How to Make Your Grant New and Unique Grant Writing Workshop American Association for Thoracic Surgery David R. Jones.

Office of Extramural Programs GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Rebekah S. Rasooly, Ph.D. NIDDK/NIH.

How to get funded from the National Institutes of Health Minda R. Lynch, Ph.D., Chief Behavioral and Cognitive Science Research NIDA.

Grant Writing for Success

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

Funding Clinical Research A Superficial Guide for the Neophyte

Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS

How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018

Presentation transcript:

CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division of AIDS National Institutes of Health Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia July 2, 2013

Fundamental Principles of NIH Mission is to support the most meritorious research Peer-review – Breadth and depth of the research community provide a sufficient pool of talent for research directions, and review of applications Parsimony – Limit support to only the most outstanding proposals

Center for Scientific Review and Program Over 80,000 applications received by CSR Grants are assigned to study sections and reviewed by three scientists in a group setting In review grants receive a score and summary statement are produced After review funding decisions are made within each institute based on scores and priorities (Program Officers are involved and handle interactions with principal investigators)

Video – Peer Review Revealed While you prepare your application, keep fundamental concepts of peer review in mind: “fair, without influence, best research, scholarly merit, science, innovation – great science to make giant strides in medical research” Significance Innovation Investigator Approach Environment

Video – Peer Review Revealed While you prepare your application, keep fundamental concepts of peer review in mind: “fair, without influence, best research, scholarly merit, science, innovation – great science to make giant strides in medical research” Significance Innovation Investigator Approach Environment SUBTLETIES?

Video – Tips for Applicants Clarity of presentation Importance of question Innovation and potential impact Occasionally one jumps out at you – lucid style, compelling and creative idea that will significantly advance the field (key is presentation, quality of the idea, and innovation)

Video – Tips for Applicants Convey essence of your idea clearly (Grantsmanship – tell a good story about what you want to do, why you want to do it how it will advance the field) Focus on an IMPORTANT question (seek advice)

11 Finding Help: Web Site Links Links to Applicant & Grantee Resources – NIH Grants Web site: – Center for Scientific Review:

CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division of AIDS National Institutes of Health Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia July 2, 2013