Compressive Data Gathering for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Chong Luo Feng Wu Jun Sun Chang Wen Chen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Capacity of Wireless Networks Danss Course, Sunday, 23/11/03.
Advertisements

The Capacity of Wireless Networks
Compressive Data Gathering for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks
Routing and Congestion Problems in General Networks Presented by Jun Zou CAS 744.
A Centralized Scheduling Algorithm based on Multi-path Routing in WiMax Mesh Network Yang Cao, Zhimin Liu and Yi Yang International Conference on Wireless.
TDMA Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks
Minimum Energy Mobile Wireless Networks IEEE JSAC 2001/10/18.
Online Performance Guarantees for Sparse Recovery Raja Giryes ICASSP 2011 Volkan Cevher.
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Mikhail Nesterenko Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory Tufts University School Of Engineering Energy-Efficient Structuralized Clustering for Sensor-based Cyber Physical Systems Jierui.
Presented By- Sayandeep Mitra TH SEMESTER Sensor Networks(CS 704D) Assignment.
Beyond Trilateration: On the Localizability of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Reported by: 莫斌.
Broadcasting Protocol for an Amorphous Computer Lukáš Petrů MFF UK, Prague Jiří Wiedermann ICS AS CR.
CPSC 689: Discrete Algorithms for Mobile and Wireless Systems Spring 2009 Prof. Jennifer Welch.
Compressive Oversampling for Robust Data Transmission in Sensor Networks Infocom 2010.
Volkan Cevher, Marco F. Duarte, and Richard G. Baraniuk European Signal Processing Conference 2008.
Compressive Data Gathering for Large- Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Chong Luo Feng Wu Shanghai Jiao Tong University Microsoft Research Asia Jun Sun Chang.
1 Maximizing Lifetime of Sensor Surveillance Systems IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING Authors: Hai Liu, Xiaohua Jia, Peng-Jun Wan, Chih- Wei Yi, S.
Distributed Regression: an Efficient Framework for Modeling Sensor Network Data Carlos Guestrin Peter Bodik Romain Thibaux Mark Paskin Samuel Madden.
1 Delay-efficient Data Gathering in Sensor Networks Bin Tang, Xianjin Zhu and Deng Pan.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Theory of Data Flow and Random Placement.
Globecom 2004 Energy-Efficient Self-Organization for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Fully Distributed approach Liang Zhao, Xiang Hong, Qilian Liang Department.
Slide Set 15: IP Multicast. In this set What is multicasting ? Issues related to IP Multicast Section 4.4.
A Hierarchical Energy-Efficient Framework for Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 55, NO. 3, MAY.
Introduction to Compressive Sensing
On the interdependence of routing and data compression in multi-hop sensor networks Anna Scaglione, Sergio D. Servetto.
Online Data Gathering for Maximizing Network Lifetime in Sensor Networks IEEE transactions on Mobile Computing Weifa Liang, YuZhen Liu.
CS Dept, City Univ.1 The Complexity of Connectivity in Wireless Networks Presented by LUO Hongbo.
Efficient and Robust Query Processing in Dynamic Environments Using Random Walk Techniques Chen Avin Carlos Brito.
Broadcast & Convergecast Downcast & Upcast
Fundamental Lower Bound for Node Buffer Size in Intermittently Connected Wireless Networks Yuanzhong Xu, Xinbing Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.
Steady and Fair Rate Allocation for Rechargeable Sensors in Perpetual Sensor Networks Zizhan Zheng Authors: Kai-Wei Fan, Zizhan Zheng and Prasun Sinha.
CuMPE : CLUSTER-MANAGEMENT AND POWER EFFICIENT PROTOCOL FOR WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS ITRE’05 Information Technology: Research and Education Shen Ben Ho.
LPT for Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks Marc Lee and Vincent W.S. Wong Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British.
Efficient Gathering of Correlated Data in Sensor Networks
Computing and Communicating Functions over Sensor Networks A.Giridhar and P. R. Kumar Presented by Srikanth Hariharan.
Improving Capacity and Flexibility of Wireless Mesh Networks by Interface Switching Yunxia Feng, Minglu Li and Min-You Wu Presented by: Yunxia Feng Dept.
Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Prolonging Network Lifetime and Ensuring Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Yong-hwan Kim Korea.
Channel Capacity.
Benjamin AraiUniversity of California, Riverside Reliable Hierarchical Data Storage in Sensor Networks Song Lin – Benjamin.
VAPR: Void Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks
EBAS: An Energy-Efficient Event Boundary Approximated Suppression Algorithm in Wireless Sensor Networks Longjiang Guo Heilongjiang University
Salah A. Aly,Moustafa Youssef, Hager S. Darwish,Mahmoud Zidan Distributed Flooding-based Storage Algorithms for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Communications,
Load-Balancing Routing in Multichannel Hybrid Wireless Networks With Single Network Interface So, J.; Vaidya, N. H.; Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions.
Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks Sensor Networks Sensor Networks Directed Diffusion Directed Diffusion SPIN SPIN Ishan Banerjee
Communication System A communication system can be represented as in Figure. A message W, drawn from the index set {1, 2,..., M}, results in the signal.
REECH ME: Regional Energy Efficient Cluster Heads based on Maximum Energy Routing Protocol Prepared by: Arslan Haider. 1.
A Dead-End Free Topology Maintenance Protocol for Geographic Forwarding in Wireless Sensor Networks IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 60, no. 11, November.
Dr. Sudharman K. Jayaweera and Amila Kariyapperuma ECE Department University of New Mexico Ankur Sharma Department of ECE Indian Institute of Technology,
Copyright © 2011, Scalable and Energy-Efficient Broadcasting in Multi-hop Cluster-Based Wireless Sensor Networks Long Cheng ∗ †, Sajal K. Das†,
Multi-channel Wireless Sensor Network MAC protocol based on dynamic route.
Collaborative Broadcasting and Compression in Cluster-based Wireless Sensor Networks Anh Tuan Hoang and Mehul Motani National University of Singapore Wireless.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
4 Introduction Network Partition Network Model Snapshot Data Collection Continuous Data Collection 6 Simulation 2 Conclusion 7.
Energy-Efficient Randomized Switching for Maximizing Lifetime in Tree- Based Wireless Sensor Networks Sk Kajal Arefin Imon, Adnan Khan, Mario Di Francesco,
A Bandwidth Scheduling Algorithm Based on Minimum Interference Traffic in Mesh Mode Xu-Yajing, Li-ZhiTao, Zhong-XiuFang and Xu-HuiMin International Conference.
DRAND: Distributed Randomized TDMA Scheduling for Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks Injong Rhee (with Ajit Warrier, Jeongki Min, Lisong Xu) Department of Computer.
TreeCast: A Stateless Addressing and Routing Architecture for Sensor Networks Santashil PalChaudhuri, Shu Du, Ami K. Saha, and David B. Johnson Department.
1 Routing on a Logical Grid Mohamed Gouda, Anish Arora, Young-ri Choi, Vinayak Naik The University of Texas at Austin The Ohio-State University January.
Aggregation and Secure Aggregation. [Aggre_1] Section 12 Why do we need Aggregation? Sensor networks – Event-based Systems Example Query: –What is the.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Joint Routing and Scheduling Optimization in Wireless Mesh Networks with Directional Antennas A. Capone, I. Filippini, F. Martignon IEEE international.
Network Topology Single-level Diversity Coding System (DCS) An information source is encoded by a number of encoders. There are a number of decoders, each.
Computing and Compressive Sensing in Wireless Sensor Networks
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Hidden Terminal Decoding and Mesh Network Capacity
Throughput-Optimal Broadcast in Dynamic Wireless Networks
Capacity of Ad Hoc Networks
Aggregation.
Watermarking with Side Information
Presentation transcript:

Compressive Data Gathering for Large-Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Chong Luo Feng Wu Jun Sun Chang Wen Chen

Data gathering sensor network

Data gathering in typical routing tree

when a node chooses a parent node, it sends a ”subscribe notification” to that node; when a node changes parent, it send an ”unsubscribe notification” to the old parent.

Assume that there are N nodes in a particular tree, and the sink intends to collect M measurements. Then all nodes send the same number of O(M) messages regardless of their hop distance to the sink. The overall message complexity is O(NM). When M N, CDG transmits less messages than the baseline data collection whose worst case message complexity is O(N2).

In order to avoid transmitting this random matrix from sensors to the sink, we can adopt a simple strategy: before data transmission, the sink broadcasts a random seed to the entire network. Then each sensor generates its own seed using this global seed and its unique identification.

Data recovery In a densely deployed sensor networks, sensors have spatial correlations in their readings. Let N sensor readings form a vector d = [d1 d2... dN], then d is a K-sparse signal in a particular domain Ψ. Denote Ψ = [ψ1 ψ2...ψN] as the representation basis with vectors {ψi} as columns, and x = [x1, x2,...xN] are the corresponding coefficients.

Data recovery In addition, for sparse signals whose random projections are contaminated with noise, reconstruction can be achieved through solving a relaxed l1-minimization problem, where is a predefined error threshold:

Data recovery

Network Capacity Analysis Definition 1 (Network Capacity). We shall define that a rate λ is achievable in a data gathering sensor network, if there exists a time instance t0 and duration T such that during [t0, t0+T) the sink receives λT bits of data generated by each of the sensors si, i = 1, 2,...N. Then, network capacity C is defined as the supremum of the achievable rate, or C = sup{λ}.

W as the amount of data a node transmits in one time slot, and restrict that a node cannot transmit and receive at the same time.

Definition 2 (Protocol Model). Transmission from node Xi to Xj is successful under protocol model if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

average transmission rate Then consider the one-hop neighbors of the sink. They are contained in a disk centered at the sink and with a radius of r. The area of the disk is AR2 = πr2. According to Lemma 1, the number of nodes in this region, denoted by n2, can be bounded with high probability:

We shall adopt an appropriate routing protocol such that all subtrees are roughly of equal size. For simplicity, we consider the size of each subtree is Np = N n2. Since the sensor data from the entire network is K-sparse, when N →∞, we can consider that each subset of the nodes are proportionally sparse, i.e. K/n2-sparse. The number of random measurements needed to reconstruct data is M/n2 per subtree. To achieve the rate λ, the transmission rate of the subtree root should be Mλ/n2.

NS-2 Simulation Chain Topology

NS-2 Simulation grid

There are 498 sensors in total. The data are measured every 30 seconds and transmitted to a sink through baseline scheme.