Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services.

Advertisements

Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems Charles E. Fisher New York City, June 2009 National Park Service, Technical.

U.S. Department of the Interior ESF #11 Protection of Natural and Cultural Resources and Historic Properties Gregory Hogue.

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.

The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews

Wilderness and Cultural Resources: Symbiotic Management Pei-Lin Yu Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit March 6, 2013.

The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.

NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.

Cultural Heritage and its Management Chaco Culture National Historical Park Larry J. Zimmerman.

NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.

DRIs After 360. Transportation Methodology § (7) PREAPPLICATION PROCEDURES.— The levels of service required in the transportation methodology shall.

IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.

Coastal Zone Federal Consistency The most powerful permitting program you’ve probably never heard of…

Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.

NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.

Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.

Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.

Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.

Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Jane Yagley Program Manager ANG/A7CVP (301) Cultural.

COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.

Community Development Department GRAHAM SWAMP AREA FUTURE LAND USE & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2623 & 2624.

© 2013 All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Municipal Agencies1 New York Real Estate for Salespersons, 5 th e By Marcia Darvin Spada Cengage Learning.

Field Survey Introduction. What is a survey? Survey means a process of identifying and gathering data on a community's historic resources. It includes.

Cultural Resource Management in the Department of Defense September 29, 2005 Maureen Sullivan Federal Preservation Officer.

Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.

Is there a future for the past? Chaco Culture National Historical Park Larry J. Zimmerman.

INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.

Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.

Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.

#oldhousefair Old v/s Historic What is historic anyway? Melissa Wyllie.

Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.

Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.

3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.

©2011 Cengage Learning. Chapter 15 ©2011 Cengage Learning REQUIRED GOVERNMENT REPORTS.

National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.

By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.

Historic Preservation in Washington, DC. Purposes of the D.C. Historic Preservation Law Protect, enhance and perpetuate the distinctive elements of the.

1/11/12CCC-12-CD-01 & CCC-12-RO-011 Consent Cease and Desist Order CCC-12-CD-01 and Consent Restoration Order CCC-12-RO-01 Goodell Family Trust Unincorporated.

Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.

Hazard Mitigation Planning III Session Name: Hazard Mitigation Planning III Coastal Hazards Management Course 3.1 Review the various local departments,

Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.

Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,

INTRODUCTION TO STATE AND FEDERAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION LAWS Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 6E National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106.

NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.

The Federal Bureaucracy

The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.

South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.

CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.

The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.

BOR Real Property Conveyances and Restrictions Anita Bain, Director Natural Resource Management Division August 18, 2006 Anita Bain, Director Natural.

Recommended Criteria for Determining Which Projects Require Environmental Assessments (EAs) Chatham County Environmental Review Board (ERB) 20 August 2007.

Architectural Survey and National Register Nominations City of Hampton Project Update January 23, 2008.

Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,

National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.

Landscape Preservation and Archaeology

101 New London Road Newark, Delaware

Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.

Preservation of Historically Significant Buildings

The Federal Bureaucracy

The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist

Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor

Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011

National Historic Preservation Act

Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19

National Historic Preservation Act

Presentation transcript:

Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director

What are Cultural Resource? Anything human made or manipulated that is 50 years or older

Florida Archaeological Sites

Are all cultural resources eligible for the National Register of Historic Places? Criterion A: Properties associated with events that have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of our history; Criterion B: Properties that are associated with lives of persons significant in our past; Criterion C: Properties that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; and Criterion D: Properties that have yielded, or may likely yield, important information in prehistory or history.

Survey requests in response to permit compliance may include:  Reconnaissance Surveys  Cultural Resource Assessment Surveys  Site Evaluations  Data Recovery/Mitigation  Underwater Archaeology  Architectural Analysis/APE Archaeological and Architectural Investigations

Project Type Agency Legal Authority Transportation FHWA; FDOT; FTA; US Coast Guard NHPA; 36 CFR 800; NEPA; Chapters 267 and 373 FL Sta. Housing HUD; FEMA NHPA; 36 CFR 800; Chapter 267 Fl Sta. TelecommunicationFCC NHPA; NEPA; 36 CFR 800; Chapter 267 Fl Sta. Military US Air Force; Navy; Marines; and Fl National Guard NHPA; NEPA; 36 CFR 800; Chapter 267 Fl Sta. Educational Facilities Fl Department of Education NHPA; NEPA; 36 CFR 800; Chapters 235 and 267 Fl Sta. Commercial Redevelopment USDA; FEMA; HUD; FDIC; OCC NHPA; 36 CFR 800; NEPA; Chapter 267 Fl Sta. EnergyFERC

Project Type Agency Legal Authority Industrial Fla. Department of Regulation NHPA; 36 CFR 800; NEPA; Chapters 373 and 404 Fl Sta.; FCMP Coastal Impacts USACE NHPA; 36 CFR 800; NEPA; Coastal Zone; Chapter 267 MiningDEP Chapters 373 and 267 Fl Sta. DRI; FQD Florida Department of Community Affairs Chapters and 267; FCMP Water Management Districts DEP; Five WMD Chapters 373 and 267; FCMP State Lands DEP Chapters 253, 258, and 267 FL Sta.; FCMP County/City Ordinances Various local governments Locally triggering chapter 267

Architectural Mitigation

What is a conservation easement? Why do you need a conservation easement? Types of easements Historic Preservation Easements Open Space/Scenic Easements What should they include? Tax Incentives for Easements Where to go from here?

Cemetery

Unmarked Burial

Review process normally occurs after permit application is submitted to review agency. DHR (SHPO) generally takes 30 days to review application and make a determination as to whether or not to recommend some level of cultural resource investigation. DHR generally takes 30 days to review reports. DHR will make a determination prior to application submittal “in anticipation of compiling with state or federal permit action.” Delays caused by the occurrence of cultural resources include: scheduling, re-planning for avoidance, and additional work. However, innovated approaches to cultural resource management and early archaeological/historical involvement could have cost and time savings.

2005:1, :1, : : :526