PGPop: PharmacoGenomic discovery and replication in very large patient POPulations PGPop: SUMMARY PGPop was conceived as a network resource to provide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Drug Information Services Ch.#1. An introductory course to teach the students basic principles of DI retrieval. Designed to help students.
Advertisements

Sample size estimation
UC BRAID: Co-creating and evaluating performance in a regional laboratory for conducting translational science UC BRAID Executive Committee: Steven Dubinett.
The Veterans Affairs Central Biorepository and MVP Highlights Mary T
Analysis of Electronic Medical Record Systems Jonathan S. Schildcrout.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
Reuse of Electronic Medical Records for Research Our architecture Two examples.
Learning Health System Challenge and Planning Awards Alexander K. Ommaya, DSc Sr. Dir. Clinical Effectiveness & Implementation Research Philip M. Alberti,
Overview of Biomedical Informatics Rakesh Nagarajan.
Vanderbilt’s DNA Databank:
University of Pittsburgh Department of Biomedical Informatics Healthcare institutions have established local clinical data research repositories to enable.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2007.
Rare Diseases Foundation Céline Hubert Pr Nicolas Lévy
1 Drug and Therapeutics Committee. Objectives  Discuss the use of aggregate data including defined daily dose in analyzing the consumption of medicines.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Medical Informatics Basics
IDR Snapshot: Quantitative Assessment Methodology Evaluating Size and Comprehensiveness of an Integrated Data Repository Vojtech Huser, MD, PhD a James.
The Sanford World Clinics October, Brief History 116-year history with foundations in Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Fargo, North Dakota Sanford.
PAT: Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia Therapy Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN ABSTRACT We submit here a proposal for renewal of the Pharmacogenomics.
BioVU and the Synthetic Derivative Erica Bowton, PhD Program Manager, Personalized Medicine.
Butte Lab Journal Club 16 Aug 2010 Alexander A. Morgan.
Introduction to Pharmacoinformatics
Medical Informatics Basics
Anticipated FY2016 Appropriations Agency$ Million NIH200 Cancer70 Cohort130 FDA10 Office of the Natl Coord. for Health IT (ONC) 5 TOTAL215 Mission: To.
Indiana Institute For Personalized Medicine David A Flockhart MD, PhD Professor of Medicine, Genetics and Pharmacology Indiana University.
1 Jack London, PhD Research Professor, Cancer Biology Thomas Jefferson University Informatics Shared Resource Director Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson.
100k Genomes Project In December 2012 the Prime Minister announced a programme of Whole Genome Sequencing as part of the UK Government’s Life Sciences.
Building the Electronic Data Infrastructure: Lessons from Indiana PROSPECT Paul Dexter, MD Chief Medical Information Officer, Wishard Health Services Regenstrief.
Modular Chronic Disease Registries for QI and Comparative Effectiveness Research Keith Marsolo, PhD Assistant Professor Division of Biomedical Informatics.
Information Security Research and Education Network INSuRE Dr. Melissa Dark Purdue University Award #
Smart designs Case control studies FETP India. Competency to be gained from this lecture Design a case control study.
Fiancee Lee A. Banzon RPh.RN.  P harmacists practicing today in the Philippines or other developed or developing countries will interact with technology.
Facilitate Scientific Data Sharing by Sharing Informatics Tools and Standards Belinda Seto and James Luo National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
IndianaCTSI ACCELERATING CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH Building an Indiana Biorepository Dave A Flockhart Eric Meslin April 19 th, 2010.
Send correspondence to: Bartha Maria Knoppers Chair of Interim Board Centre de recherche en Droit Public Université de Montréal.
6/4/20161 Commitment & Efforts Toward Translational Science Subtitle Placeholder.
Wisconsin Genomics Initiative W isconsin M edical R esearch T riangle Wisconsin Medical Discovery Triangle.
The Wisconsin Network for Health Research (WiNHR): Overview. An Infrastructure for Conducting Multi-Site Clinical Research across the State of Wisconsin.
While most HMORN projects involve two to five Network sites, its largest consortiums are the most widely recognized. Nearly 40% of HMORN projects and consortium.
Utility of Genotyping in Pharmaceutical Target (gene) Discovery and Drug Response Anne Westcott EST-Informatics.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Drug & Poison Control center
Prepared by Commission staff for presentation purposes only. These slides should not be considered an official summary of the order or an official Commission.
Signal identification and development I.Ralph Edwards.
Component 6 - Health Management Information Systems Unit 9-2 Administrative, Billing, and Financial Systems This material was developed by Duke University,
The Opioid Addiction Treatment Database: Using administrative health data to conduct socially accountable research in the North Joseph K. Eibl, PhD and.
Kathleen Giacomini, Mark J. Ratain, Michiaki Kubo, Naoyuki Kamatani, and Yusuke Nakamura NIH Pharmacogenomics Research Network III & RIKEN Center for Genomic.
Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
PRESENTATION TO THE NC HIT COLLABORATIVE 1/21/2010 Cindy Oakes, Executive Director Southern Piedmont Community Care Plan Keith McNeice, Chair SPBC Steering.
CLER Pathways II January 28, 2016 PARTNERS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. Presented by: Tori Hanlon, MS, CHCP GME Consultant.
Semantic Web - caBIG Abstract: 21st century biomedical research is driven by massive amounts of data: automated technologies generate hundreds of.
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Nordic Cooperation on Ethical Review Procedures Nordforsk – nordic trial alliance MIKA SCHEININ
Stony Brook University The Process for Joining TIES
National and International Efforts worth knowing about
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
Shyam Visweswaran, MD, PhD
Wisconsin Genomics Initiative
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
Shyam Visweswaran, MD, PhD
Trial Funding and Engagement: The NIH Sponsored CTSA Program
Discovery From Data Repositories H Craig Mak  Nature Biotechnology 29, 46–47 (2011) 2013 /06 /10.
Introduction to Basic Research Methods
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Using clinical trial data as real-world evidence
Robust Replication of Genotype-Phenotype Associations across Multiple Diseases in an Electronic Medical Record  Marylyn D. Ritchie, Joshua C. Denny, Dana.
REACHnet: Research Action for Health Network
Presentation transcript:

PGPop: PharmacoGenomic discovery and replication in very large patient POPulations PGPop: SUMMARY PGPop was conceived as a network resource to provide to PGRN an opportunity to identify large groups of real world patients with known drug exposures and outcomes for pharmacogenomic study in a clinical setting. Each PGPop node includes a very large collection of patient data, drug exposures, and outcomes, and they share the general characteristic that they include “all comers” rather than more narrowly defined clinical trial populations. Some consortium nodes include large DNA collections in place, while others cover millions of lives and have committed to an infrastructure to collect DNA from patients with identified phenotypes. The participating systems include BioVU, the Vanderbilt DNA databank that currently links 90,000 de-identified electronic health records (EHR) records with DNA obtained from discarded blood samples The Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP) that includes DNA from almost 20,000 individuals coupled to an EHR that extends back to the 1960s Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2), an informatics capability at Harvard supported by the National Center for Biomedical Computing. The i2b2 group will not only contribute informatics excellence, but has also developed the Crimson Project that can provide DNA linked to de-identified medical records to Harvard Partners investigators from over 800,000 patient visits annually. BioBank Japan, a resource that includes DNA and other biospecimens in >300,000 subjects. Clinical data are collected by medical coordinators at each of the 66 participating hospitals that cover 2% of all Japanese hospital beds (~25,000). The integrated pharmacoepidemiology program of 13 health plans participating in the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research in Therapeutics (CERT); these plans together cover 11,000,000 lives. The Pharmacy benefits company Medco, that currently provides services to >60 million patients and has an active program in pharmacogenomics Vanderbilt BioVU – design and current status Leadership at PGPop nodes Top: The BioVU model. BioVU uses DNA extracted from blood samples that were obtained in the course of clinical care and that are about to be discarded. Using discarded biologic material as a research resource requires that the associated clinical information be de-identified. Accordingly, the first step (top left) in creation of the BioVU resource was creation of an image, termed the Synthetic Derivative, of the Vanderbilt EMR in which identifiers have been scrubbed and the medical record number has been hashed. The medical record number in eligible blood samples is labeled with the same hashed number, and DNA extracted. Bottom: Sample access procedures. After signing a data use agreement, investigators gain access to the Synthetic Derivative. The Data Use Agreement includes further stipulations against attempts at re- identification, and mandates that genotype data be redeposited into the resource. Tools to conduct simple automated searches are in place, but investigator curation is generally required to more precisely identify cases and controls for subsequent studies. Samples are retrieved for genotyping after review of a genotyping plan. Planning for BioVU began in 2004 and the first samples were acquired in The resource currently accrues samples/week, and now holds ~90,000 samples. Samples from the Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital were included in spring BioVU (Vanderbilt University Medical Center) Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP) Crimson Project (i2b2 at Harvard) HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research in Therapeutics Biobank Japan Medco (Pharmacy benefits) Hua XuJosh Denny Yusuke Nakamura Zak Kohane Cathy McCarty Bob Davis Felix Frueh Dan Roden, PI The BioVU “demonstration project”. The first 10,000 subjects accrued were all genotyped at multiple SNP sites previously associated with disease susceptibility, and then natural language processing methods were used to identify cases and controls in the entire set. The experiment thus mimics a situation in which genotypic information is available in many subjects, and sets are then selected for genotype-phenotype analysis. The results are ordered by the number of cases estimated for replication (“number needed” column), calculated from previously-reported odds ratios, indicated by a red square. The number of cases actually identified is also shown (“number identified”). The blue diamonds indicate the point estimate of the allelic odds ratio derived from analysis of cases and controls identified. The confidence intervals for these estimates are also provided. This analysis used only cases in which European ancestry had been assigned. AF: atrial fibrillation; CD: Crohn’s Disease; MS: multiple sclerosis; RA: rheumatoid arthritis; T2D: type 2 diabetes. PGPop goals PGPop will be managed by a Steering Committee that will include representation from the participating nodes. Our initial task will be (1) organization of the resource and (2) execution of a demonstration project that will establish mechanisms for access to samples from multiple resource nodes. We anticipate that mechanisms to access PGPop will be similar to those being established for access to other PGRN resources. This will likely involve an application process to be reviewed by components of the PGRN and by PGPop. There will be costs associated with accessing the samples, which remain to be determined. PGPop goals are 1. Establish the infrastructure to enable rapid access to well- phenotyped samples across nodes Catalog resource components Facilitate access to cases and controls, and ultimately samples Coordination of methods to define phenotypes across nodes. 2. Undertake a demonstration project across nodes in Year Deploy the resource for pharmacogenomic studies proposed by PGRN sites The Steering Committee and PGRN will receive applications and decide on scientific merit. The Steering Committee will establish which PGPop node(s) can and wish to collaborate on a given project. Any single PGRN center could interact individually with any participating node. We anticipate that PGPop would support 1-2 projects/year. 4. Evaluate best practices and models for using large resources for pharmacogenomic science