An Analysis of City Marketing of Beijing Olympic Games Liyi Ding 1, Li Chen 2, Hao Cai Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai China, 2 Jishou University, Jishou China ResultsResults Conclusions Conclusions PurposePurpose MethodsMethodsIntroductionIntroductionDiscussion/AnalysisDiscussion/Analysis The Olympic Games have been studied in various aspects such as event organization, governing structure, and economic impacts of the Games (e.g., Ren, 2006). However, research endeavors to the hosting city of Olympics have been often directed to city development (Essex et al., 1999), city competitiveness (Yu, 2007), and city image (Smith, 2005). Do the Olympic Games really have the effects on city marketing? An investigation seems to be necessary. Therefore, the factors of tourism, financial investment, and oversea talents become necessary to analyze. The purpose of this study was to explore the changes in tourism, oversea talent, and financial investment of Beijing by hosting 2008 Olympic Games. Beijing Olympic Games was used as a typical case to test the effects of Olympic city marketing. Data of time series concerning related marketing variables were collected from the Beijing Statistical Yearbook (2009) over the years during 1994 to A comparative analysis was made based on the average annual growth rate in Total Tourism Income, Foreign Direct Investment and Oversea Talent before and after the bids to evaluate the specific effects of city marketing of Beijing Olympics. The descriptive statistics of SPSS 17.0 were applied to analyze effects of the Beijing Olympic city marketing, and explore geometric means of average annual growth rates before the Olympic bid and after the Olympic bid in the calendar years. Time series analysis was utilized to analyze the changes in the variables of Tourism (Total Tourism Revenue), Investment (Foreign Direct Investment) and Oversea talents (Non-Sport talents) before and after the bid. The results showed that Beijing City had a remarkable increment in both financial investment and oversea talents to host the international events, from 9.26% and 3.88% annual average growth rates before the bid to 19.93% and % annual average growth after the bid respectively. While the increase of tourism volume was unable to observe, the annual average total income of Beijing tourism only changed slightly from 12.28% to 13.25% before and after the bid. As for the non significant effect of tourism from Beijing Olympics, one reason was due to SARS in 2003, which produced a greater negative impact on Beijing's tourism; and the other is the effects of Olympic extrusion and confined visitors’ number out of security measures. Beijing invested 89% of the total investment in municipal infrastructure and environmental improvement. As a result, Beijing Olympics increased FDI rapidly, rising from $ 1.4 billion U.S. dollars in 1994 to 6.08 billion U.S. dollars in 2008, increased about 330%. Beijing's foreign, Hong Kong, Macao & Taiwan employees are defined as non-sport talents. Because of more job opportunities provided by the multinational corporations, the enhancement of Beijing's global influence and the improvement of urban infrastructure and environment, more non-sport talents chose to work and live in Beijing. The study demonstrates that Olympic city marketing of Beijing had an overall positive outcome, but did not maximize the benefits by the opportunity of hosing Olympic Games. The findings provide the city administrators with investigative reference when they make strategic decisions in event selection and arrangement.