David P. Lindeman, Ph.D., and Phoebe Rinkel, M.S. University of Kansas Guiding Documents  DEC Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
PORTFOLIO.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Special Education Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Personnel Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Activity. Lunch Time Activity Discuss at your table: –How is information about your district Special Education Services provided to parents? –Does your.
Collaborating for Families and Young Children: Part C and CAPTA in South Carolina OSEP National Early Childhood Meeting February 9, 2005 Kristie Musick.
Departments of Education and Public Welfare Office of Child Development and Early Learning Executive Budget
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
What’s New? Kansas Child Outcomes Training and TA Materials Measuring and Improving Child and Family Outcomes Conference September 18, 2011 New Orleans,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
Promoting Inclusive Opportunities for Young Children with Disabilities: A Cross Agency Initiative OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 12,
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
National Head Start Association Leadership Institute January 29, 2009 Presentation by Joan Lombardi, Ph.D. Early Childhood Development: At the dawn of.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
EC Personnel: Status, Challenges, Preservice and Inservice Training, and Resources in Kansas David P. Lindeman, Ph.D. Presented at: Kansas Interagency.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Early Intervention Support for Children and Families.
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
Building State Capacity: Tools for Analyzing Transition- Related Policies Paula D. Kohler, Ph.D., Western Michigan University National Secondary Transition.
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Early Intervention System Presentation for Financing Systems Workshop OSEP National Early Childhood Conference.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
+ How Do We Get There From Here? The Role of the Early Childhood Advisory Council in System Building Helene Stebbins NH Early Childhood Advisory Council.
V Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention (TACSEI)
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
Implementation of Interventions to Promote Young Children’s Social and Behavioral Outcomes.
Using Individual Project and Program Evaluations to Improve the Part D Programs Dr. Herbert M. Baum.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
Parents as Teachers © (PAT)  Vision All children will learn, grow and develop to realize their full potential.  Mission To provide the information,
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What’s New? Kansas Child Outcomes Training and TA Materials Measuring and Improving Child and Family Outcomes Conference September 18, 2011 New Orleans,
A WORK IN PROGRESS Kansas Department of Health and Environment Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 Early Childhood Assessment and Accountability: Creating a Meaningful System.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Vermont Agency of Education 4 December 2015
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
1 Resources for Increasing Child Development Knowledge Virginia August 27, 2008 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia.
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
State Advisory Panel & Interagency Coordinating Council Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)Significant Disproportionality & Overview of SAP/ICC Website.
1 This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Camille Catlett and Megan Vinh
Using Formative Assessment
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Camille Catlett and Megan Vinh
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Regional Meetings for Teachers of the Deaf Spring 2014
Bureau of Family Health: Infant Toddler Services
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
NC Preschool Pyramid Model Leadership Team Summit January 9-10, 2019
Presentation transcript:

David P. Lindeman, Ph.D., and Phoebe Rinkel, M.S. University of Kansas Guiding Documents  DEC Recommended Practices in Early Intervention/Early Childhood Special Education  Agreed Upon Mission and Key Principles for Providing Early Intervention Services in Natural Environments  IDEA – Part C  Kansas Infant-Toddler Services Procedure Manual Overview of Training Notebook and Modules Module Topics:  Overview of Statewide Program  Family Service Coordination  Child Find  Referral/Screening  Evaluation/Assessment  Individual Family Service Plan  Local Interagency Coordinating Council  Service Delivery  Transition  Finance and Quality Practices  Policy, Procedures & Staff Management Core Expectation Areas:  Leadership  Policies and procedures  Resources  Professional development  Monitoring, evaluation, and accountability Session Structure:  12 monthly, day-long meetings with state agency and state technical assistance staff  Sessions had a dual focus: 1)Focus on key principles for providing early intervention services in natural environments, and 2)Policies and procedures that support the key principles. Community of Practice:  Each cohort invited to Community of Practice  Yearly cohort of coordinates/administrators  Peer to peer support  Coordinator Connections (Four times per year)  Regular coordinator meetings (Four times per year)  New coordinator mentorship  Year two individualized TA plans (focus on growth & sustainability) Outcome: Each new coordinator/administrator designed a strategic plan for building both their own leadership skills and the competence of their staff prior the end of the training. Impact of Initiative on New Coordinators: Year One*  90% of the new coordinators found the new coordinator handbook to be useful.  100% of the new coordinators found the materials organized and meaningful.  70% of the new coordinators thought the mission and key principles were covered throughout the training.  Some individuals would have liked additional information on incorporation of the early childhood outcomes in home visits.  Respondents would have liked a combination of online and in-person training to decrease travel expenses.  Respondents liked having the opportunity to talk with other coordinators and thought it was critical to the training.  The training helped new coordinators understand Part C policies and procedures. *Based on completed evaluations. The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression and genetic information in the University’s programs and activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the non-discrimination policies: Director of the Office of Institutional Opportunity and Access, 1246 W. Campus Road, Room 153A, Lawrence, KS, 66045, (785) , 711 TTY. KITS is supported through grants from the Kansas State Department of Education – Early Childhood, Special Education, and Title Programs (Grant #21013) as a part of the Kansas Technical Assistance Network (TASN) and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment – Infant Toddler Services. References Fixsen, D., Blasé, K., Naoom, S., & Duda, M. (2013). Implementation drivers: Assessing best practices. National Implementation Science Network (NIRN) v. 4/2013, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Infant-Toddler Services. (2013). Kansas Infant-Toddler Services Procedure Manual. Retrieved from Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education Retrieved from Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments, OSEP TA Community of Practice: Part C Settings. (2008, March). Agreed upon mission and key principles for providing early intervention services in natural environments. Retrieved from Kansas Inservice Training System © Introduction This poster presents a model for preparing new early intervention program coordinators/administrators and those with little experience to become effective leaders. This state initiative, as part of the broader comprehensive professional development system, was designed to support new program coordinators to understand their role, responsibilities, and to become a leader in their early intervention program. This initiative was based on the understanding that capable leadership ultimately impacts child and family outcomes, and was a collaborative effort between the Kansas Department of Health and Environment Infant- Toddler Services and Kansas Inservice Training System (KITS), the professional development provider for the state’s early intervention programs. Purpose of Initiative New coordinators are often skilled practitioners who are promoted into an administrative role. Many have little or no background or training for this new role. This initiative is designed to develop the knowledge and skills needed as an early intervention program leader. Relationship of DEC Recommended Practices to Initiative The DEC Recommended Practices identify 14 key leadership responsibilities associated with implementation of the Recommended Practices. A leader is defined by DEC as one in position of program leadership and authority in providing services to young children who have or are at risk for developmental delays or disabilities and their families. The DEC Recommended Practices are best implemented within a supportive leadership structure. This initiative was aligned with all 14 leadership practices as defined by DEC; but in particular, with the training curriculum reflected in the following nine practices: L1. Leaders create a culture and a climate in which practitioners feel a sense of belonging and want to support the organization's mission and goals. L2. Leaders promote adherence to and model the DEC code of Ethics, DEC Position Statements and Papers, and the DEC Recommended Practices. L3. Leaders develop and implement policies, structures, and practices that promote shared decision making with practitioners and families. L7. Leaders develop, refine and implement policies and procedures that create the conditions for practitioners to implement DEC Recommended Practices. L9. Leaders develop and implement an evidence-based professional development system or approach that provides practitioners a variety of supports to ensure they have knowledge and skills needed to implement the DEC Recommended practices. L10. Leaders ensure practitioners know and follow professional standards and all applicable laws and regulations governing service provision. L12. Leaders collaborate with stakeholders to collect and use data for program management and continuous program improvement and to examine the effectiveness of services and supports in improving child and family outcomes. L13. Leaders promote efficient and coordinated service delivery for children and families by creating the conditions for practitioners from multiple disciplines and the family to work together as a team. L14. Leaders collaborate with other agencies and programs to develop and implement ongoing community-wide screening procedures to identify and refer children who may need additional evaluation and services. Leadership is one of the drivers critical to implementation of any practice or program (Fixsen, Blasé, Naoom, & Duda, 2013).