Midcourse Assessment of Healthy People 2010 Goal II Suzanne P. Hallquist, MSPH Kenneth G. Keppel, PhD National Center for Health Statistics Centers for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
*Includes American Indian and Alaska Native alone, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, and Two or More Races **Hispanic origin based on Spanish.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Division of Vital Statistics.
Diversity Demographics United States and University of Washington Compiled by UW Department of Anthropology Diversity Committee.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 12: Heart Disease and Stroke
Changing Demographics and Enrollment Trends Ken Esbenshade Associate Dean and Director of Academic Programs College of Agriculture and Life Sciences North.
Focus Area 23: Public Health Infrastructure Progress Review May 19, 2004.
Healthy People 2020: A Methodological Approach 2010 National Conference on Health Statistics Leda Gurley, MPH NCHS/ Office of Analysis and Epidemiology.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 7.0: Community Health Indicators Chart 7.1: U.S. Population Trends and Projections by Age, Chart 7.2: U.S. Population.
Focus Area 18: Mental Health and Mental Disorders Progress Review December 17, 2003.
Using Data to Move Toward Health Equity in Michigan Michigan Department of Community Health Health Disparities Reduction/Minority Health Section Division.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 7.0: Community Health Indicators Chart 7.1: U.S. Population Trends and Projections by Age, 1980 – 2050 Chart 7.2: U.S. Population.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1 Access to Quality Health Services Progress Review June 4, 2002.
Focus Area 23: Public Health Infrastructure Progress Review Richard J. Klein National Center for Health Statistics April 16, 2008.
Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in African-American Population, United States Kenneth G. Castro, M.D. Assistant Surgeon General, USPHS Director,
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Is There Progress Toward Eliminating Racial/Ethnic.
Healthy People 2010 Mid-Decade Assessment of Progress: Methods and Results Richard J. Klein, MPH Erin B. Reidy, MA Suzanne P. Hallquist, MSPH Asel Ryskulova,
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 2 Arthritis, Osteoporosis, and Chronic Back Conditions Progress Review September 18, 2002.
Defining and measuring disparities, inequities, and inequalities in the Healthy People initiative Richard Klein MPH, David Huang, Ph.D. National Center.
Focus Area 25 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Progress Review July 21, 2004.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 1: Access to Quality Health Services Progress Review June 15, 2006.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 3: Cancer Progress Review August 17, 2006.
Faculty Demographics Faculty Demographics Table 8 Faculty Demographics Prof. Ed. Faculty in Initial Teacher Preparation Programs*
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 5: Diabetes Progress Review October 20, 2006.
Healthy People 2010 Focus Area 2 Arthritis, Osteoporosis, and Chronic Back Conditions Progress Review July 20, 2006.
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
How Closely Do Illinois’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general.
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general.
Engagement Survey Results: Demographics
Community Health Indicators
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general.
How Closely Do Oregon’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
How Closely Do Pennsylvania’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Pennsylvania’s general.
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Virginia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Total Faculty by Race and Ethnicity,
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do Illinois’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Massachusetts’ RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Massachusetts’ general.
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Florida’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Ohio’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Michigan’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Michigan’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Georgia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Washington’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Washington’s general population.
How Closely Do Oregon’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Rhode Island’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of Rhode Island’s general.
How Closely Do Florida’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Virginia’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do California’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of California’s general population.
How Closely Do New Mexico’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of New Mexico’s general population.
How Closely Do Maine’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Alaska’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do Florida’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
How Closely Do New York’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity?
Measuring Health Disparities in Healthy People 2010
Presentation transcript:

Midcourse Assessment of Healthy People 2010 Goal II Suzanne P. Hallquist, MSPH Kenneth G. Keppel, PhD National Center for Health Statistics Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NCHS Data Users Conference July 12, 2006

Healthy People 2010 Goal II “… to eliminate health disparities among segments of the population, including differences that occur by gender, race or ethnicity, education or income, disability, geographic location, or sexual orientation.” - Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000.

Population Data Template Race and ethnicity Gender Family income level Education level Geographic location* Disability status* Female Male Less than high school High school graduate At least some college Poor Near poor Middle/high income Urban/metropolitan Rural/non-metropolitan Persons with disabilities Persons without disabilities American Indian/ Alaska Native Asian/Pacific Islander Asian Native Hawaiian/ other Pacific Islander Two or more races Hispanic or Latino Black not Hispanic White not Hispanic * Optional

Measuring Health Disparities: Key Issues Choice of reference point Another group rate Average population rate Total population rate 2010 target “Best” group Absolute vs. relative statistics

Midcourse Review (MCR) Disparity Assessment

Purpose of Assessment Assess the availability of data for population groups and characteristics Quantify the size of disparities at the most recent data point Quantify the size and direction of changes in disparity between the baseline and the most recent data point Summarize findings by population group and characteristic

Scope of Assessment 27 of 28 focus areas 498 population-based objectives Five characteristics: Race/ethnicity Gender Education or income level Geographic location Disability

Data Availability Race and ethnicity (498): Gender (412): Family income level (285): Education level (244): Geographic location* (68): Disability status* (183): Female Male Less than high school High school graduate At least some college Poor Near poor Middle/high income Urban/metropolitan Rural/non-metropolitan Persons with disabilities Persons without disabilities American Indian/ Alaska Native Asian/Pacific Islander Asian Native Hawaiian/ other Pacific Islander Two or more races Hispanic or Latino Black not Hispanic White not Hispanic * Optional

DRAFT

Percent Difference Measures disparity between two groups R B is the “best” group rate R i is the comparison group rate R i - R B x 100 R B

Less than 10% or not statistically significant 10-49% 50-99% 100% or more Decoding the Disparity Table “B” identifies the “best” group Colors indicate the size of the disparity between the individual group and the “best” group rate at the most recent data point: Percent difference:

DRAFT

Decoding the Disparity Table Arrows indicate the size and direction of the change in disparity between the baseline and MR data points < 10 or not statistically significant Disparity Increasing Disparity Decreasing Magnitude of Change in Percentage Points

DRAFT

Summary Index PD i is the percent difference from the “best” group rate for each comparison group rate (i) n-1 is the number of groups minus 1 Measures disparity among several groups ∑ i PD i n – 1

DRAFT

Summary by Size of Disparity

DRAFT

Race and Ethnicity Percent of objectives Percent difference from the “best” group rate: or Alaska Native other Pacific Islander DRAFT

Education Level Percent of objectives DRAFT Percent difference from the “best” group rate:

Race/ethnicityAsian or Pacific Islander GenderFemale Education At least some college education IncomeMiddle/high income Geographic locationUrban or metropolitan Disability status Persons without disabilities Groups that have the “Best” Rate for the Greatest Proportion of Objectives DRAFT

Groups with the Greatest Proportion of Disparities that are > 100 Percent CharacteristicGroup Percent (no.) of objectives Race/ethnicityAmerican Indian/ Alaska Native24% (37) GenderMale8% (24) EducationLess than high school25% (40) IncomePoor12% (12) Geographic locationUrban or metropolitan8% (4) Disability statusPersons with disabilities6% (4) DRAFT

Summary by Change in Disparity

Number of Objectives with No Change* in Disparity by Population Characteristic DRAFT Characteristic Total N Number (%) with No Change Race/ethnicity (81%) Gender (83%) Education10992 (84%) Income5352 (98%) Geog. location3835 (92%) Disability status4845 (94%) * Changes in disparity are measured from baseline to most recent data point.

Number of Objectives with Changes* in Disparity by Race and Ethnicity * Changes in disparity are measured from baseline to most recent data point. DRAFT Decreasing More the Increasing More the No Change Percentage points

Number of Objectives with Changes* in Disparity by Education Level * Changes in disparity are measured from baseline to most recent data point. DRAFT Decreasing 13 Increasing Percentage points No Change

Summary of Findings Substantial disparities between population groups are evident for many objectives Few changes in disparity since the baseline Overall, no consistent pattern of change in disparity for any population group (except males)

Limitations Short time period of analysis Number of years available for assessment varied by population characteristic Lack of data for: - Specific characteristics - Specific groups Lack of estimates of variability for some objectives

Limitations Disparity analysis focuses on differences between groups, regardless of whether or not the rates for specific groups are moving towards or away from the target Summary counts and charts, while helpful, mask the objective-specific successes and failures

New Cases of Hepatitis A, United States, New cases per 100,000 population Source: STD Surveillance System, NCHSTP,CDC 2010 target (4.3) Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native Black, not Hispanic White, not Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander Objective 14-06

Conclusions Healthy People 2010 has developed a consistent framework for measuring disparities Healthy People 2010 Midcourse Review First comprehensive assessment of disparity for Healthy People Document to be published in Fall 2006

Contact Information Suzanne Proctor Hallquist CDC/National Center for Health Statistics 3311 Toledo Road, Room 6315 Hyattsville, MD