Report on Conformity to Type (CTT): CIML Item 10.4 Presented to: 46 th CIML Meeting Prague 13 Oct 2011 Presented by: Stephen O’Brien – CIML Member Manager,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft Definition: OIML Conformity to Type (CTT) Presented to: Follow-up OIML Seminar on Conformity to Type (CTT- II) Prague 10 Oct 2011 Presented by: Stephen.
Advertisements

OIML Update | 2014 NCWM Interim Meeting Dr. Charles Ehrlich International Legal Metrology Program NIST Office of Weights and Measures U.S. CIML Member.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.
Development of ISO standards for AD syringes SIGN Meeting Cambodia, October 2002 Injection technologies G Gerald Verollet.
15 October th INTOSAI KSC Steering Committee Meeting in Cairo.
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) & International Accreditation Forum (IAF) 13 th International Legal Metrology Conference Sydney,
Swiss Federal Office of Metrology METAS New SI Possible consequences for “practical metrology” Philippe Richard 46 th CIML, Prague.
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
Joint Committee on co-ordination of technical assistance to Developing Countries in Metrology, Accreditation and Standardization (JCDCMAS) Building corresponding.
AVS Repair, Alteration and Fabrication Team (RAFT) Results
ISO/IEC A review of the new standard for laboratory accreditation
Revision of ISSAI 30 INTOSAI Code of Ethics
Prague (Czech Republic) October 2011 Basis for our discussion Report on the Utrecht CTT Seminar The informal recommendations included
SC 17A SC 17A Discussion - Need and Process IEEE, Document Need, Dual Logo Maintenance Process New Delhi, India /17 L. Farr and D.
CIML 2011 CECIP Report. October 2011 CECIP Activity Report for CIML 2011 Veronika Martens, President CECIP LMG Page 2 Topics: CECIP figures and objectives.
Quote for today “Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple” - ?? ????? “Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers.
WELMEC European cooperation in legal metrology
Per DöfnäsWTO IT Symposium October How can the Existing and Potential Technical Barriers to Trade be Removed or Reduced? Per Döfnäs Director,
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 2.6 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO – UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX 2.6 How does Codex elaborate.
1 ICPHSO February, Toy Safety Certification Program SM.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
EMS Today: Emerging Issues Energy & Environmental Division National Conference San Antonio, Texas September 20, 2005.
Willem KOOL BIML Assistant Director
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 8 Bob DeLisi Chair
Length Mass Prepackages Health Environment Safety Trade Volumes Flow Energy Pressure Concentration Enforcement C. Ehrlich, 46. CIML Approval of.
Rolling Resistance Standards Work at ISO (TC31 WG6) Prepared for GRB Review 19 Sep 2011 Angela Wolynski WG6 Convenor Informal document GRB (54th.
1 The GCC Metrology Group GULFMET Mohammad Al Mulla GSO - Building for Integration
EACO SEMINAR FOR CHAIRPERSONS OF BOARDS OF NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AND SPECIAL EXCOM MEETING The Legal and Constitutional Affairs.
SADCMEL SADCMEL REPORT TO RLMO MEETING 20 September 2010 PRESENTED BY: D Tau SADCMEL Chairperson.
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
TSG-S OMA (Open Mobile Alliance) Ad-Hoc Report Richard Robinson Chair - 3GPP2 TSG-S SC B_Eshwar Pittampalli’s (Lucent) comments/concerns embedded.
Length Mass Prepackages Health Environment Safety Trade Volumes Flow Energy Pressure Concentration Enforcement R. Schwartz, 46. CIML Acceptance.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
1 Organisation Internationale de Métrologie Légale International Organization of Legal Metrology OIML 18/11/2004 UN-ECE WP.6 meeting 22 – 24 November 2004.
CONFERENCE IMPLEMENTATION OF MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DIRECTIVE -MiFID- Split, June 2007 OPENING SPEECH Ante Samodol President of the Board.
ISO 9001 Quality Management System implementation experience in the Agency on Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan (ASRK) Zhasser Jarkinbayev, ASRK.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Introduction of OIML R59 Moisture Meters for Cereal Grains and Oilseeds (1984) 1 Dr. Tsuyoshi Matsumoto Chair of APLMF WG on Quality Measurements of Agricultural.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision CERTIFICATION PROCESS  Peter Stastny,
1 First Nations Economic Development Readiness Questionnaire Presented By: Ontario First Nations Economic Developers Association and Ministry Of Economic.
Workshop on “EU Enlargement: Regulatory Convergence in Non-acceding Countries” Athens 7 – 8 November 2003 Regulatory Convergence and Technical Standards.
Legal Metrology in Europe: Harmonising requirements trough directives and the cooperation of authorities trough WELMEC by Knut Lindløv Director Legal.
OIML International Recognition Schemes for Legal Measuring Instruments Ian Dunmill Assistant Director Bureau International de Métrologie Légale.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
1Johannesburg South Africa SMA May International Organization for Standardization.
Workshop on conformity assessment procedures and certification of medical devices INT MARKT Kyiv, November 2011 Conformity assessment of medical.
SADCMEL Mutual Acceptance in legal metrology within SADC PRESENTED BY: SH Carstens, Regional Coordinator SADCMEL Conformity Assessment for sustainable.
Chairman’s 2009 Report APLMF Working Group on Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRAs) Chairman: Charles D. Ehrlich NIST, U.S.A. CIML Member Assisted by.
TSG-S OMA (Open Mobile Alliance) Ad-Hoc Report Richard Robinson Chair - 3GPP2 TSG-S SC B.
Implementing SMS in Civil Aviation: the Canadian Perspective
Report on OIML Seminar on Conformity to Type (CTT): Utrecht June 2011
TG Chair: Mark Brinsden Shell
Outcome TFCS-11// February Washington DC
Goods Packed by Measure
Certification system for prepackages
WG Chair: Charles Ehrlich, NIST, U.S.A. CIML Member
Developed by the Secretariat of OIML TC 6 Presented by SH Carstens
Peter Mason, CEEMS AG Vice-Chair Guo Su, CEEMS AG Secretariat
ETSI work with EY for HENs under M/536
ANSI REFRESHER COURSE 2018 CHANGES TO THE ISO DIRECTIVES
Christchurch, New Zealand
Update on Working Group Transitions
OIML Certification System (OIML-CS)
Status report from UNECE Task Force on Cyber Security &
ETSI work with EY for HENs under M/536
Changes in INTOSAI Standard Setting Process.
Introduction to CBS-16
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
IFRS Database Moderator
Presentation transcript:

Report on Conformity to Type (CTT): CIML Item 10.4 Presented to: 46 th CIML Meeting Prague 13 Oct 2011 Presented by: Stephen O’Brien – CIML Member Manager, Measurement and Product Safety Service Ministry of Consumer Affairs New Zealand

CTT - Background Conformity to Type (CTT) issues and concerns considered within OIML for sometime 45 th CIML resolved to organise CTT Seminar These Seminars were an opportunity to discuss and identify potential way forward for CIML consideration at today’s meeting: – CTT(I) – Utrecht 29,30 June 2011 – CTT(II) – Prague 10 October 2011 Thank seminar organisers, speakers and participants

Utrecht CTT Seminar: CTT(I) Held in Utrecht, the Netherlands, 29th and 30th of June 2011 Attended by 43 delegates. Good cross section of representation Day 1 – Seminar speakers with a variety of perspectives Day 2 – Panel discussion, identification and analysis of critical issues

Utrecht CTT(I) – Key Points From global perspective CTT has many complexities CTT important for on-going confidence in OIML certification systems Regulators need assurance that production instruments are consistent with OIML type Manufacturers need ‘level playing field’ Pre-market CTT needed to incentivise compliance by introducing potential to get caught Prevent ‘dumping’ non-compliant instruments

Prague CTT(II) – Key Points Follow-up CTT Seminar held on the 10 Oct 2011 Attended by approximately 70 participants The seminar was recorded and will be transcribed Presentations and comments of participants during seminar used to inform future work

Prague CTT(II) – Key Points Considered Utrecht Seminar report Reviewed IEC Conformity Assessment and the UNECE International Model Identified how the content and quality of OIML certificates and documentation could be improved (to support CTT) A draft definition of OIML CTT was discussed and refined into a scope for CTT activity – incorporated into CIML resolution

Action for Consideration: 1 CIML resolution is drafted to formally assign responsibility for CTT to the work programme of an OIML Technical Committee. (Consideration and clear direction need to be given to where this work is assigned)

Action for Consideration: 2 CIML resolution is drafted to formally request this Technical Committee to develop a guidance document on Conformity to Type Document intended to: – to reference current CTT programmes in the US and EU – identify ‘best practice’ – inform future global development work in this area.

Where to Assign CTT? It remains for the CIML to consider and decide where this work is assigned and completed CTT has overarching implications for all instrument categories and for both the MAA and Basic certificate systems US and Australia have previously indicated a willingness to take on secretariat responsibility to complete this work

Where to Assign CTT? 1.Current Technical Committee: – TC 3/SC 1: Pattern Approval and Verification Secretariat – United States – TC 3/SC 5: Conformity assessment Secretariat –United States 2.New Technical Committee – TC 3/SC 6: Conformity to Type Secretariat - BIML and / or other economy to be confirmed

Where to Assign CTT? Discussions at the Prague Seminar - unable to unanimously decide on a TC recommendation The Seminar participants were asked for an informal indication of their preferences Not a representative sample of CIML Members Results are only for your information

Where to Assign CTT? 1.New TC or Existing TC: 20 to 9 in favour of Existing TC 2.TC 3/SC 1 Pattern Approval and Verification or TC 3/SC 5 Conformity Assessment: 11 to 9 in favour of TC 3/ SC 1

In Conclusion It still remains for the CIML to consider and decide on the proposed draft resolutions and where this work should be assigned. I appreciate the CIML’s attention and consideration of these matters. Thank you for your attention (Discussion and Review of Draft resolutions)