M.Nakahata Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Kavli IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo for Super-K collaboration Recent results from Super-Kamiokande Neutrinos and Dark Matter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oscillation formalism
Advertisements

Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande on Atmospheric Neutrino Measurements Choji Saji ICRR,Univ. of Tokyo for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration ICHEP 2004,
Solar Neutrinos in Super-Kamiokande July
Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
Neutrino oscillations/mixing
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo Nufact05, Frascati, June 2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
1 Evidence of Neutrino Oscillation from Super-Kamiokande and K2K Neutrino physics at Super-Kamiokande –Detector overview –Atmospheric neutrinos –Solar.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Super-Kamiokande – Neutrinos from MeV to TeV Mark Vagins University of California, Irvine EPS/HEP Lisbon July 22, 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR) for Super-Kamiokande Collaboration December 9, RCCN International Workshop Effect of solar terms to  23 determination in.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
H.Sekiya, Jul 30 th 2008, Philadelphia, ICHEP2008 Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR, University of Tokyo on behalf of the Super-Kamiokande.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Present and Future of Super-Kamiokande Experiment Chen Shaomin Center for High Energy Physics Tsinghua University.
Michael Smy UC Irvine Solar and Atmospheric Neutrinos 8 th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams & Betabeams Irvine, California, August.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
M.Nakahata Kamioka observatory, ICRR, Kavli IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo for Super-K collaboration Recent results from Super-Kamiokande XVI International Workshop.
K2K NC  0 production Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for the K2K Collaboration July 28, NuFact04.
Sterile Neutrino Oscillations and CP-Violation Implications for MiniBooNE NuFact’07 Okayama, Japan Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University August 10, 2007.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Bruno Pontecorvo Pontecorvo Prize is very special for us: All the important works done by Super- Kamiokande point back to Bruno Pontecorvo – 1957 First.
Results from Super-Kamiokande Inside of SK detector (April 2006) Super-Kamiokande detector Atmospheric neutrino results Solar neutrino results Yasuo Takeuchi.
TAUP Searches for nucleon decay and n-n oscillation in Super-Kamiokande Jun Kameda (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration Sep.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
GADZOOKS! project at Super-Kamiokande M.Ikeda (Kamioka ICRR, U.of Tokyo) for Super-K collaboration 1 Contents GADZOOKS! project Supernova.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Atmospheric neutrinos
Solar neutrino results from Super-Kamiokande Satoru Yamada for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration Institute of cosmic ray research, University of Tokyo.
Study of solar neutrino energy spectrum above 4.5 MeV in Super-Kamiokande-I 1, Solar Neutrino Oscillation 2, Super-Kamiokande detector 3, Data set for.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo NOW2004, Sep 2004.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Takaaki Kajita (ICRR, U.of Tokyo) Production of atmospheric neutrinos Some early history (Discovery of atmospheric neutrinos, Atmospheric neutrino anomaly)
Takaaki Kajita (ICRR, U.of Tokyo) Production of atmospheric neutrinos Some early history (Discovery of atmospheric neutrinos, Atmospheric neutrino anomaly)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Spring school “Bruno Touschek” (19 th May 2005) C. Mariani (INFN Rome) May 19 th, LNF Spring School “ Bruno Touschek ”
Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN) are a diffuse neutrino signal from all past supernovae that has never been detected. Motivation SRN measurement enables.
Jul. 24, 2010Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Atmospheric Neutrino from SuperK2  Imaging Water Cherenkov detector  50kt Pure Water  32kt Inner Detector viewed by.
Takaaki Kajita ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo KIAS, Seoul, Nov Fig: Senda NP-4.
Review of experimental results on atmospheric neutrinos Introduction Super-Kamiokande MACRO Soudan 2 Summary Univ. of Tokyo, Kamioka Observatory.
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Constraint on  13 from the Super- Kamiokande atmospheric neutrino data Kimihiro Okumura (ICRR) for the Super-Kamiokande collaboration December 9, 2004.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Presentation transcript:

M.Nakahata Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Kavli IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo for Super-K collaboration Recent results from Super-Kamiokande Neutrinos and Dark Matter in Nuclear Physics 2015, June 1st,

2 Recent results from Super-Kamiokande M.Nakahata Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Kavli IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo for Super-K collaboration

Contents Atmospheric Neutrinos Oscillation results Sterile neutrino search Indirect Dark matter search Search for high energy neutrinos from the Sun Solar Neutrinos Time variation (yearly, day/night) Energy spectrum Oscillation results R&D for future detector improvement R&D status for GADZOOKS! project 3

1 Kamioka Observatory, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan 2 RCCN, ICRResearch, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan 3 University Autonoma Madrid, Spain 4 University of British Columbia, Canada 5 Boston University, USA 6 Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA 7 University of California, Irvine, USA 8 California State University, USA 9 Chonnam National University, Korea 10 Duke University, USA 11 Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan 12 Gifu University, Japan 13 GIST College, Korea 14 University of Hawaii, USA 15 KEK, Japan 16 Kobe University, Japan 17 Kyoto University, Japan 18 Miyagi University of Education, Japan 19 STE, Nagoya University, Japan 20 SUNY, Stony Brook, USA 21 Okayama University, Japan 22 Osaka University, Japan 23 University of Regina, Canada 24 Seoul National University, Korea 25 Shizuoka University of Welfare, Japan 26 Sungkyunkwan University, Korea 27 Tokai University, Japan 28 University of Tokyo, Japan 29 Kavli IPMU (WPI), University of Tokyo, Japan 30 Dep. of Phys., University of Toronto, Canada 31 TRIUMF, Canada 32 Tsinghua University, China 33 University of Washington, USA 34 National Centre For Nuclear Research, Poland ~120 collaborators 34 institutions 7 countries NASA Super-Kamiokande Collaboration 4

Super-Kamiokande detector 50kton water ~2m OD viewed by 8-inch PMTs 32kt ID viewed by 20-inch PMTs 22.5kt fid. vol. (2m from wall) SK-I: April 1996~ SK-IV is running Trigger efficiency kin kin Electronics hutLINAC Control room Water and air purification system SK 2km3km 1km (2700 mwe ) 39.3m 41.4m Atotsu entrance Atotsu Mozumi Ikeno-yama Kamioka-cho, Gifu Japan Inner Detector (ID) PMT: ~11100 (SK-I,III,IV), ~5200 (SK-II) Outer Detector (OD) PMT: 1885 ID OD 5

 Cosmic rays interact with air nuclei and the decay of pions and kaons produce neutrinos P + A  N +  ± + X  s travel 10 – 10,000 km before detection  Both  and e (  / e = 2 at low energy)  Both neutrinos and anti-neutrinos  ~ 30% of final analysis samples are antineutrinos  Flux spans many decades in energy ~100 MeV – 100TeV  Excellent tool for broad studies of neutrino oscillations Atmospheric Neutrinos  ± +  e ± + e +  (–) (–)(–) – ( ) 6 Honda 2011 Honda et al., Phys. Rev. D83, (2011).

4581 days of atmospheric neutrino data (till Feb.2014) 47,509 events in total (37,708 FC, 2,885 PC, and 6,949 UP-  ) 19 analysis samples: Sub-divided by event topology (FC/PC,UP-  ), energy range, e/  –like, and # of rings. Multi-GeV e-like samples are divided into -like and -like samples in order to improve sensitivity for mass hierarchy. Fully Contained (FC) Upward-going Muons (Up-  ) Partially Contained (PC) Atmospheric Analysis Samples 7 No osc.    osc.

Fitted Excess Atm BKG MC This corresponds to the observed number of ± 44.3 (stat) (sys) events, 3.8  excess SK-I+II+III : 2806 days ResultBackground DIS(  ) Signal SK-I+II+III 0.94    0.35 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, (2013) Search for events consistent with hadronic decay of  lepton Multi-ring e-like events with visible energy above 1.3GeV. Negligible primary  flux so  must be oscillation-induced: upward-going Event selection performed by Neural Network Total efficiency ~60% Fit 2D data on cos  and NN variable with “background” and signal Evidence for  Appearance 8 Data =  (  ) x bkg +  (  ) x signal  : expectations of “background” and signal which depends on DIS normalization factor  Published at PRL 110, (2013) DIS: Deep Inelastic Scattering

“Multi-GeV” “Sub-GeV” P(   e ) P(     ) ~10,000 km ~100 km 9 Oscillation parameters used here are sin 2  12 =0.31, sin 2  23 =0.5, sin 2  13 =0.025  m 2 12 =7.6x10 -5 eV 2  m 2 23 =2.5x10 -3 eV 2 Normal Hierarchy (NH)  CP=0.0 Oscillation probability maps resonant oscillation due to finite  13 due to solar term

“Multi-GeV” P(  )  cp = 3  /2  cp =  /2 “Sub-GeV” sin 2  23 = 0.6 sin 2  23 = 0.5 sin 2  23 = 0.4 ~10,000 km ~100 km Appearance effects are roughly halved for the inverted hierarchy Ratio to two-flavor    oscillation (sin 2 (  23 )=0.5, no solar term). sin 2  23 = 0.6 sin 2  23 = 0.5 sin 2  23 = 0.4 sin 2  23 = 0.6 sin 2  23 = 0.5 sin 2  23 = 0.4 Effects of  23 and  CP Sub-GeV  -like 0-dcy e Sub-GeV e-like 0-dcy e Multi-Ring  -like Multi-GeV e-like e cosine zenith

 13 fixed to PDG average, but its uncertainty is included as a systematic error Offset in these curves shows the difference in the hierarchies Fit (517 dof) 22 sin 2  13  cp sin 2  23  m 2 23 (eV 2 ) SK (NH) x10 -3 SK (IH) x10 -3 SK Inverted Hierarchy SK Normal Hierarchy Preliminary Normal hierarchy favored at:  2 IH –  2 NH = 0.9  13 Fixed Analysis (NH+IH) SK Only 11 68% 90% 99% 95% 68% 90% 99% 95% 68% 90% 99% 95%  CPsin 2  23 |  m 2 32 |, |  m 2 13 | eV days

They are consistent to each other. SK's sensitivity in Mass Hierarchy and  CP can be improved by incorporating constraints from these measurements. Super-K Atm. T2K  Run1-4 MINOS Beam+ Atm 3f Normal HierarchyInverted Hierarchy Preliminary Comparison with T2K and MINOS 12 sin 2  23 |  m 2 32 | (eV 2 ) 4581 days

SK Atm SK+T2K   e Constraint Preliminary T2K   e Constraint Fit (543 dof) 22 sin 2    cp sin 2  23  m 2 23 (eV 2 ) SK + T2K (NH) x10 -3 SK + T2K (IH) x10 -3  13 Fixed SK + T2K (external constraint) Normal Hierarchy Normal hierarchy favored at:  2 IH –  2 NH = 1.2 (0.9 SK only) Some fraction of CP phase is excluded at 90% C.L. CP Conservation (sin  cp = 0 ) allowed at (at least) 90% C.L. for both hierarchies 13 68% 90% 99% 68% 90% 99% 68% 90% 99%  CPsin 2  23 |  m 2 32 |, |  m 2 13 | eV 2  days

SK Atm SK+T2K   e Constraint Preliminary T2K   e Constraint Fit (543 dof) 22 sin 2    cp sin 2  23  m 2 23 (eV 2 ) SK + T2K (NH) x10 -3 SK + T2K (IH) x  13 Fixed SK + T2K (external constraint) Normal hierarchy favored at:  2 IH –  2 NH = 1.2 (0.9 SK only) Some fraction of CP phase is excluded at 90% C.L. CP Conservation (sin  cp = 0 ) allowed at (at least) 90% C.L. for both hierarchies Inverted Hierarchy 68% 90% 99% 68% 90% 99% 68% 90% 99%  CPsin 2  23 |  m 2 32 |, |  m 2 13 | eV 2  days

|U  4 | 2 Induces a decrease in event rate of  -like data of all energies and zenith angles |U  4 | 2 Shape distortion of angular distribution of higher energy  -like data PMNSSterile Sterile Neutrino Oscillations in Atmospheric Neutrinos NC matter effects PC through-going Large |U τ4 | 2 No sterile 15  survival probability |U  4 | 2 = |U  4 | 2 =0.33

Limits on Sterile Neutrino Oscillations Minos CHDS+MB SK Solar Recent Global Fit Excluded Unitarity Bound All comparisons from: JHEP 1305 (2013) 050 |U τ4 | 2 < 0.23 at 99% C.L. Lack of sterile matter effects places a strong constraint. (    )+(   s ) oscillation is not favored. 99% C.L. limit 90% C.L. limit 16 MiniBooNE +SciBooNE SK SK Excluded ν e appearance + ν e disappearance |U µ4 | 2 < at 90% C.L. |U µ4 | 2 < at 99% C.L. 90% C.L. Phys. Rev. D91, (2015) G. Cheng et al., PRD86, (2012) J. Kopp et al., JHEP 1305 (2013) 050

17 Indirect WIMP search using the Sun SK Fit SK data with atmospheric neutrino MC + WIMP neutrino MC, to search for neutrinos from WIMP annihilation in the sun. All SK I-IV data (all category, energy, flavors) are used. (cos Ɵ sun =1: direction from the Sun) Angular and reconstructed momentum distributions black dots: SK I-IV Data Blue lines: Atmospheric neutrino MC Dashed lines: WIMP neutrino signal for the 6-GeV bb channel(magenta) 200-GeV  +  - channel (cyan) with arbitrary magnitude Recently published at Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, (2015)

Indirect WIMP search limits Spin Dependent(SD) limit Spin Independent(SI) limit SD: SK places the most stringent constraint to date for WIMP masses below 200 GeV. SI: Set new limit for very light WIMP (< 6 GeV). With  +  - channel, SK excludes DAMA signal and most of the CDMS region. 18 Bands: solar model and velocity distribution uncertainties Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, (2015) PICO-2L

Day-Night flux asymmetry Expected (day-night)/((day+night)/2) Regenerate ν e by earth matter effect 5 Spectrum distortion Super-K can search for the spectrum “upturn” expected by neutrino oscillation MSW effect Super-K Vacuum oscillation dominant Matter oscillation dominant -1% -2% -3% -4% 8 B solar neutrino measurement  High statistics (~20events/day) measurement of 8 B solar neutrinos  Possible time variation of the flux  Energy spectrum distortion due to solar matter effect  Day-night flux asymmetry due to earth mattect 19 P( e  e ) sin 2 (  12 )  m 2 21 (eV 2 )

SK I ~ IV combined 4504 days : Data : Best fit : Background ~70k signal events are observed Fluxes from all SK phases are consistent to each other within their errors. SK I-IV combined flux: DATA/MC = ± (stat.+sys.) (MC 8 B flux: 5.25x10 6 /cm 2 /s) Observed effective 8 B flux : ± (stat.+sys.) [10 6 /cm 2 /s] SK-ISK-IISK-IIISK-IV preliminary 8 B solar neutrino flux 20

8 B solar neutrino flux yearly plot 21 Sun spot number from  2 =13.53 / 17 D.O.F.  prob. = 70% No significant correlation with the solar activity is seen. preliminary

A DN SK-I-2.0±1.8±1.0% SK-II-4.4±3.8±1.0% SK-III-4.2±2.7±0.7% SK-IV-3.6±1.6±0.6% combined-3.3±1.0±0.5% non-zero significance 3.0σ expected Assuming the expected time variation as a function of cosθ z like below, amplitude of A DN was fitted. Rate/Rate average Δm 2 21 =4.84x10 -5 eV 2 sin 2 θ 12 =0.311 Day/Night asymmetry(A DN ) 22 sin 2 θ 12 =0.311, sin 2 θ 13 =0.025 KamLAND(1  ) Solar SK-I,II,III,IV combined 1  range expected preliminary  m 2 21 (10 -5 eV 2 ) Day/Night asymmetry (%) Earth θzθz Sun 22 Δm 2 21 =4.84x10 -5 eV 2 sin 2 θ 12 =0.311 For solar global parameter:

Data/MC(unoscillated) preliminary Recoil electron spectrum of each phase (MC: 5.25x10 6 /cm 2 /s) MeV days 791 days 846 days 1669 days 3.5MeV kin threshold

(statistic error only) (total # of bins of SKI - IV is 83) χ2χ2 Solar+KamLAND osc. para Solar Global osc. para quadratic fit67.67 exponential fit66.54 All SK phase are combined without regard to energy resolution or systematics in this figure preliminary Expectations for best fit parameters are slightly disfavored. Solar+KamLAND best fit parameters: ~1.7σ level Solar Global best fit parameters: ~1.0σ level. SK I-IV combined Recoil electron spectrum 24 Δm 2 21 =4.85x10 -5 eV 2, sin 2 θ 12 =0.311 Δm 2 21 =7.50x10 -5 eV 2, sin 2 θ 12 =0.308 More data is necessary.

SK KamLAND SK+KamLAND ✓ SK favors LMA solution > 3σ ✓ ~2σ tension with KamLAND in Δm 2 21 Constrained with sin 2 θ 13 =0.0242± (from short baseline reactor) 8 B flux by SNO NC data The unit of Δm 2 21 is eV 2 preliminary PRD88, 3, (2013)  12 and  m 2 21 from SK vs. KamLAND 25 sin 2 (  12 )  m 2 21 (eV 2 )

✓ Same ~2σ tension with KamLAND in Δm 2 21 KamLAND Solar+KamLAND Solar Global preliminary The unit of Δm 2 21 is eV 2 Constrained with sin 2 θ 13 =0.0242± (from short baseline reactor) sin 2 (  12 )  m 2 21 (eV 2 ) 26  12 and  m 2 21 from Solar Global vs. KamLAND

Identify e p events by neutron tagging with Gadolinium. Gadolinium has large neutron capture cross section and emit 8MeV gamma cascade. p n Gd e + 8 MeV  cascade ΔT~30μs Vertices within 50cm e GADZOOKS! project Captures on Gd Gd in Water 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% % 0.001%0.01%0.1%1% 0.1% Gd gives ~90% efficiency for n capture In Super-K this means ~100 tons of water soluble Gd 2 (SO 4 ) 3 27

Physics with GADZOOKS! SRN prediction ( e fluxes) Supernova Relic Neutrinos (SRN)  Open widow for SRN at 10-30MeV  Expected event rate events/year/22.5kt(10-30MeV)  Study supernova rate from the beginning of universe.  Averaged energy spectrum. e +p +e e +p +e Improve pointing accuracy for supernova bursts, e.g. 4~5°  3°(90%C.L.) for 10kpc Precise measurement of  12 and  m 2 21 by reactor neutrinos. Discriminate proton decay (essentially no neutron) and atmospheric neutrino background(with neutrons). Neutrino/anti-neutrino identification. 28

EGADS Evaluating Gadolinium’s Action on Detector Systems 200 m 3 test tank with 240 PMTs 15m 3 tank to dissolve Gd Gd water circulation system (purify water with Gd) Gd water circulation system (purify water with Gd) Transparency measurement (UDEAL) Transparency measurement (UDEAL) 29

240 PMTs were mounted in the 200 m 3 tank in The detector fully mimic Super-K detector. Gd dissolving test has been performed since Oct (see next page) 30

Transparency of Gd-loaded water (after mounting PMTs) Dissolving test has been going well. The water transparency is SK pure water level even with 0.2% Gd 2 (SO 4 ) 3 (target concentration). 31

Summary  Atmospheric neutrinos  Tau neutrino appearance with 3.8  level.  Normal hierarchy favored at:  2 IH –  2 NH = 0.9 by SK only, and 1.2 by SK+T2K.  Indirect dark matter search  SK places the most stringent constraint for SD below 200GeV.  Set new limit for light WIMPs (<6GeV) for SI.  Solar neutrinos  No significant correlation with solar activity.  Day/night asymmetry observed with 3  level.  In energy spectrum, MSW is slightly disfavored by 1~1.7σ.  About 2  tension in  m 2 21 between SK(Solar Global) and KamLAND.  R&D for GADZOOKS! project (EGADS) is going well. 32