High Level Conference European Parliament MHADIE-Policy Recommendations for Education Judith Hollenweger Work package Leader Education Zurich University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

High Level Conference European Parliament Brussels Tuesday, 16 th September 2008 EU MHADIE Project Health and Disability Policy Recommendations Somnath.
2/27/2014 The California Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Field Meetings Fall 2008 Preschool Learning Foundations for Special.
The 21st Century Context for
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Growing Success Overview
Understanding the IEP Process
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
Session 3 - Health Needs Assessment
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
Unit 5 – Planning and Integrating: Key Topic 1 1.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Growing Success-Making Connections
Principles of Assessment
Overview of the School Health Program By Dr. O.O. Sekoni A presentation given at the training workshop on Improving Child Health in Ibadan Primary Schools.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Ensuring Inclusion Defining concepts and Identifying Indicators.
REC Subject Review Phase 1: Expert Panel Report and Recommendations.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Update on Work of Great Prairie AEA Behavioral Team November, 2008.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Chapter 2 Observation and Assessment
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Issues in Selecting Assessments for Measuring Outcomes for Young Children Dale.
A Curriculum for Excellence Routes for Learning study day February 2007 Jessie Wojciechowski Professional Adviser.
Introduction Gathering Information Observation Interviewing Norm Referenced Tools Authentic Assessment Characteristics of Authentic Assessment – 7M’s Validity.
High Level Conference European Parliament Brussels Tuesday, 16 September 2008 EU MHADIE Project and its Health and Disability Policy Reccomendations Matilde.
Observation and Assessment in Early Childhood Feel free to chat with each other. We will start class at 9:00 PM ET! Seminar Two: Using Standardized Tests.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center New Tools in the Tool Box: What We Need in the Next Generation of Early Childhood Assessments Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Special Education Module #1 : Legislative Overview.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
Observing and Assessing Young Children
What do we know and what does it look like? Judith Carta & Virginia Buysse OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 8, 2008 Washington DC.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
SEN MEETING FOR PARENTS Intentions To explain current arrangements for supporting children and young people with Special Educational Needs and.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Application and Benefits of Using ICF Core Set in Vocational Rehabilitation Valentina Brecelj, University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia.
Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research The Children First Act: Synergy for Cross-Sector Policy March 31, 2016 Global Summit on Childhood.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Chapter 8: Performance-Based Strategies
Using Formative Assessment
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Progressing Disability Services for Children and Young People
Ensuring Inclusion Defining concepts and Identifying Indicators.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Presentation transcript:

High Level Conference European Parliament MHADIE-Policy Recommendations for Education Judith Hollenweger Work package Leader Education Zurich University of Applied Sciences and Arts School of Education

Policies in regular education low achievement bad teaching male Which schools are eligible for additional resources? excellent teaching high achievement

Policies in special education mental retardation low achievement male Which children are eligible for additional resources? giftedness high achievement

Integrated policy approach mental retardation low achievement bad teaching male

Recommendation 1 MHADIE researchers recommend the ICF framework as a useful structure for collecting data relevant to developing eligibility criteria for educational services for children and youth.

Children with Disabilities OECD 2005

Blind and partially sighted students

Italy

Blind and partially sighted students Czech Republic

Percentage of students in special schools: Finland

Percentage of students in special schools: France

Recommendation 2 Across the education sector, we recommend that the consistent and valid understanding of disability provided by the ICF be used to understand the embeddedness of disability categories and the process by which disability categories of special needs are created and applied.

Different application of traditional disability categories Problem 1: Application of same category for different purposes: Clinical description based on formal assessment Problem-based analysis of child in educational context Needs-based analysis of child in educational context Eligibility criteria Label of a child attending a specific programme or school Statistical information guiding policy decisions Analysis of levels of education system Problem 2: Circular application of disability categories: Label need programme label Analysis of process of education

Linking process to level Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

Learning Disability: what information to rely for policy decisions? Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

On clinical diagnosis of individual? Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

On educational assessment of teacher? Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

On achievement information? Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

On educational programmes attended by students? Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

MAP-EP allows systematic analysis of information used for policy Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective Levels of Education System Process of Education

Recommendation 3 MHADIE has shown that MAP-EP© (Matrix for Analysis of Problems in Educational Planning), developed by MHADIE researchers, is a useful and valid protocol for linking clinical, administrative and survey data to components in the education sector, and we recommend to use it as a guide to identify the information that needs to be collected for educational planning.

Information fit for purpose Systems have to discuss and decide what information is relevant and meaningful for which purpose: Adequate to represent disability in educational context with information on impairment? Adequate to plan childrens school life and learning based on their disability, difficulty or disadvantage?

Early Childhood What information to use for policy development? diagnosis often unavailable or misleading often a more general developmental delay rather than clear impairments ideologically-based decisions on what should be done because meaningful longitudinal data is not available

Common framework to link data relevant at different ages Neutral factors, protective factors and risks Engagement in Life Situations Health Problems Impairments A priori decisions on what factors to concentrate on make comparisons across time difficult.

Recommendation 4 MHADIE research highlights the importance of including the 0-6 year children subgroups in population surveys for prevention policies. Given this, MHADIE researchers recommend that the ICF-CY (ICF Children and Youth version) be used to collect these data.

Instruments to describe functioning and disability Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective

Instruments to describe changes functioning and disability Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective

Procedures for interdisciplinary planning and decision making Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective

Establishing eligibility Problem Assess- ment Assign- ment Inter- vention Evalua- tion Policy perspective Organisational perspective Educational perspective Clinical perspective

Recommendation 5 We recommend that new instruments and tools, that more reliably capture the childs participation and complexities of educational participation in school, be developed.

Coherent policy development requires linking SEN to education Children, Youth (and their Families) Goals and Contents of Education Services, Schools and Professionals Need for / Right to Education Need for / Right to Instruction and Support Need for / Right to Adaptation

…and linking disability to education School Environments Means of Education Curriculum Goals of Education Opportunities

Recommendation 6 MHADIE researchers recommend that the social impact, resulting from outcome evaluation of education policies, be collected along with educations outcome indicators for children with disabilities.