Intellectual Property – Advanced Competitive Issues regarding PSI Insights from the analysis of some European cases Muenster, January 27 th, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Name / Date 1 Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Competition.
Advertisements

DEVELOPING A GLOBAL VISION
Differential Pricing: Reconciling R&D, IP and Access Patricia M. Danzon PhD The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania.
The notion of public task LAPSI Thematic Seminar: PSI and competition law Katleen Janssen ICRI – K.U.Leuven.
PSI Charging Policy: Some open issues Budapest, March 23 rd, 2012.
Which Charging Policies for Encouraging PSI Re-Use? Turin, July 9 th, 2012.
LAPSI 4th Thematic Seminar Muenster, January 27, 2011 Should the information held by research institutions be included in the EU Directive on PSI Re-use?
Competitive Aspects of PSI Re-use Bruxelles, January 24 th, 2012.
Policy Recommendation on Competitive Issues of PSI Re-use First draft … and beyond … Warsaw, October 20 th, 2011.
IMPACT ESTIMATION PROJECT h o r i z o n s c a n n i n g Anti-trust issues in on-line retailing Ed Smith Director Office of Fair Trading The views expressed.
Economics: Principles in Action
Environmental Legal TeamEnvironment and Beyond Advanced European Union Law The European Internal Market: Free movement of goods (I) 6 th Lecture,
Public Goods and Tax Policy
How to make your money go further Lorraine Lee Scottish Government - State Aid Unit Eileen Threlfall Scottish Government – Legal Division.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
UK market study on the Commercial Use of Public Information (CUPI) Tony Donaldson, Director of Economics & Antoinette Graves, Team Leader.
GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development SIXTH ANNUAL AFRICAN CONSUMER PROTECTION DIALOQUE CONFERENCE.
Commercial re-use of meteorological basic data in The Netherlands ePSIplus meeting Utrecht 27 Sept Ton Donker KNMI License Office.
Fair Trading Commission Overview of Competition Law The Experience of Barbados Competition law and Policy Training Workshop March 30-31, 2011 The Savannah.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 7: The Legal Environment of International Trade.
3 Business in the Global Economy 3-1 International Business Basics
The prime aim Make you acquainted to the contractual approach to agency problems.
Case C-446/03 Marks & Spencer
Economics: Principles in Action
CHAPTER 8: SECTION 1 A Perfectly Competitive Market
Monopolies & Regulation Chapter 24 & 26. Monopoly  A firm that produces the entire market supply of a particular good or service. Chapter 24 & 26 2.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 12 Economic Efficiency and Public Policy.
Adriaan DIERX International workshop on "Opportunities for growth, trade and investments after the crisis" 9 – 10 November 2012, Cluj-Napoca The contribution.
Regulatory Administrative Institutions MPA 517 Lecture-8 1.
Economics Chapter 7 Market Structures
The Four Conditions for Perfect Competition
Re – use of PSI in Slovenia Kristina Kotnik Šumah Deputy of the Information Commisoner.
Business-Government Trade Relations. © Prentice Hall, 2006International Business 3e Chapter Chapter Preview Describe the political, economic and.
Chapter 11 Pushing Exports.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Principles of Business, 8e C H A P T E R 3 SLIDE International Business Basics The Global.
1 What is antitrust/competition law? What is its purpose?
Developed by Cool Pictures & MultiMedia PresentationsCopyright © 2004 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. The International,
Recommendation of the OECD Council for enhanced access and more effective use of public sector information 11 th Meeting of the PSI Group European Commission.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
1 Chapter 3 Economic Decision Makers These slides supplement the textbook, but should not replace reading the textbook.
Capital Markets Authority September 20, 2013 Turkish-Arab Capital Markets Forum 1.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
Fines: A Contextual Approach The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do no necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission.
How to assess vertical mergers cast your vote! Miguel de la Mano* Member of the Chief Economist Team DG COMP, European Commission *The views expressed.
Pricing and Strategies
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
 Federal gov may regulate business for any reason as long as advances gov economic need  States may regulate business as long as the laws do not interfere.
The Future Under Open Data? ICSEED November 2015 Bucharest Willie McCairns Chief Executive, ECOMET ECOMET is an Economic Interest Grouping of the National.
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
The Swedish Experience: A Fair and Level Playing Field? PSI Alliance 2009 Annual Conference, 25 June 2009 Pia Bergdahl
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
Pure competition is a theoretical market structure that has a very large numbers of sellers, identical products, and freedom to enter into, conduct, and.
Anti-Competitive Behavior Monopolies (Ch. 15) & Oligopolies (Ch.17)
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2012/01/14.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Market Failure and the Role of Government: Public Policy to Promote Competition AP MICROECONOMICS MR. BORDELON.
competition rules in inland transport
Commercial Organizations
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Market Failure: Public Policy to Promote Competition
Pure Competition Pure competition is a theoretical market structure that has a very large numbers of sellers, identical products, and freedom to enter.
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Business in the Global Economy
CHAPTER 38 Antitrust.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
Competition law Class 8-9
Eastern Mediterranean University
THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ECONOMY
Economics: Principles in Action
Chapter 6 Business-Government Trade Relations
Presentation transcript:

Intellectual Property – Advanced Competitive Issues regarding PSI Insights from the analysis of some European cases Muenster, January 27 th, 2011

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ THE DATA (1/2) Regarding –Meteorological data (5) –Roadmap data (3) –Financial/Business data (3) –Marine information (2) –Environment data (2) –Property data (2) Occurring –in United Kingdom (4) –in Italy (4) –in Belgium (3) –in Netherlands (3) –in France (2) –in Sweden (1) Difficult access to legal data! Competitive issues arose in 17 case studies, 10 of which are legal cases … – During the 1990 (4) – After the year 2000 (13)

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ THE DATA (2/2) Alleging Wrong policy choices (6) Antitrust offences (11) –Violation of article 101 TFEU (1) –Violation of article 102 TFEU(10) The 11 antitrust ended with: No prohibition decisions (7) –No violation (1) –No formal proceeding (2) –Inapplicability (1) –Not enough evidence (2) –Wrong footed (1) Prohibition decisions (4) –Injunctive relief (1) –Damages (2) –Cease and desist order & fine (1) There is a great difference between the policy choices underpinning the boundaries of the playing field and the rules of the game, on the one hand, and the application of antitrust law against specific firms behaviors involving PSI, on the other hand To apply antitrust law is not as easy as one could believe … maybe because the application of antitrust law to PSI is too recent or maybe because antitrust law should be deemed as a remedy of last resort!

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ MAIN POLICY CHOICES (1/2) Does it mean to go beyond their public task? Does it mean to supply value added data? …offer their own services at higher prices (Maritime information, Lantmateriet) …compete against private sector firms … loose the money that they already invested in their datasets (Rijkswatersstaat) …spread the information that they hold free of charge Private sector firms run the risk to … Once public sector organizations are allowed to … Why higher prices? Does it mean to develop an activity for which taxpayers did not pay?

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ Predatory pricing – Dumping – Cross subsidization Period 1 P < C bm Losses Period 2 Competitors out of the market because they cannot match such a low price Period 3 P >C bm Extra-profits Recoupment = subsidization across periods on the same market Foreign Market P ex < P rivals Lower margins Foreign Market Competitors out of the foreign market because they cannot match such a low price Internal Market P > P bm Extra-profits Recoupment = subsidization across markets during the same period Comp Market P < P rivals Lower margins Competitive Market Competitors out of the competitive market because they cannot match such a low price Regulated Market P > P bm Extra-profits Price squeeze – Price discrimination Public entity holding PSI Final customers Public entity supplying v.a. dataPrivate entity 5 5 > 5 < 5 Monopolized market Competitive market

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ MAIN POLICY CHOICES (2/2) Yet, such a demarcation line has to be constantly updated because, due to technological and socio-economic developments, the notion of public task keeps changing (KNMI). Corporate separation the public sector entity fulfilling its public task and, hence, holding raw PSI the public sector entity that competes against private firms, offering value added data in order to guarantee, via separated account books, transparency as to the costs of the exchange of PSI against money between the two public sector entities (Lantmateriet, Trading Funds)

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ TWO QUESTIONS Could a proper charging policy prevent the risk of higher prices? Should we consider that the risks of dumping and price squeeze are something different from the risk of windfall, which is inherent to the existence of taxpayers money?

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ ARTICLE 101 – ECOMET 1: NO VIOLATION To allow inter-firm exchange of information for their operational functions To ensure the widest availability of basic meteorological data To recover part of the infrastructural expenses of the European National Meteorological Services by a contribution from all commercial users Joint data licensing policy, which includes standard licenses for different user groups, volume discounts and special tariff schemes Free determination of prices Joint venture among national meteorologica l services Efficiency increasing Still competition among the parties of the JV

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ ARTCLE 102: THE RECURRING PARADIGM Grievances (2) and formal complaints (9) about: No access, via High charges ex 102(a) (4) Explicit refusals to supply ex 102(b) (4) Anticompetitive foreclosure of private companies ex 102(b) via Predatory prices – Dumping prices – Cross subsidization (2) Margin squeeze – Price discrimination – Rebates (3) Public entity holding PSI Final customers Public entity supplying v.a. data Private entity Monopolized market Competitive market

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ MAIN ANTITRUST ISSUES arising from non prohibition cases In general, it has been argued that Antitrust law cannot be applied because the dissemination of PSI is not a commercial activity, but a public service (Direction de la Meteorologie Nationale); or The offence is not a matter of antitrust law (Landmark) The available evidence is not enough (Environment agency, Court of appeal of Milano – also in Rijkswaterstaat) Some concerns, such that for national security, may justify the refusal (Direction de la Meteorologie Nationale) In particular, against the cases of excessive prices and refusal to supply, it has been argued that:

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ HOW SHOULD PSI HOLDERS BEHAVE? The Commission gives us some hints in Ecomet 2. It asked for: –equal treatment of private firms and the commercial divisions of the public sector organization with regard to access to the data and the invoicing of that data; –the public sector organization to keep analytical accounts in which its commercial activities are entered separately and which thus ensure that there is no cross- subsidization; –an arbitration procedure for settling disputes between private firms and the public sector organization on any matter.

LAPSI, Muenster 27/01/ A TENTATIVE CONCLUSION Some of the competitive issues that arose from our case studies can be addressed by using antitrust law. This kind of competitive issues are those immediately connected to that specific set of behaviors that a public sector body can endorse to harm competition (see art. 101 and 102). Nevertheless, the major risks are those inherent to the legal framework where the relationship between public sector and private sector bodies is placed. It is here that our job can really make a difference!