The project has received funding from the European Union. The Dilemma of Targeting Support with CAP post 2013 Tata, 22-24 April, 2010 Wanda Chmielewska-Gill.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Marten Westrup
Advertisements

Using public procurement to foster research and innovation More Research and Innovation COM(2005) 488 of 12 October 2005 Commission communication to the.
1 Dr. Peder Jensen Project Manager, Transport and Environment TERM TERM Transport and environment: on the way to a new common transport policy.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture EU rural development policy
Funded by DG Research 6 th Framework Programme Summary of Policy Conclusions and Implications for the EU SDS Simon Dresner, Policy Studies.
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
1 Introducing Multi-Level Government in the EUs Better Regulation Agenda Werner Stengg European Commission; DG Internal Market and Services; Impact Assessment,
The CAP reform process in perspective: issues of the post-2013 debate Tassos Haniotis, Director Directorate for Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
Directorate-General for Climate Action, European Commission
1 Implementing the Common Agricultural Policy in the New Member States and Candidate Countries Tomas Ratinger Institute for Prospective Technological Studies,
1 PROGRAMMING TRANSITION From SAPARD to RDPs and SPDs/OPs.
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy A simple CAP for Europe-a challenge for all Brussels, 3-4 October 2006 DG AGRIs assessment.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
CAP Reform Ref: CAPreform feb07.
1 SDC Climate Change Event Dr Keith MacLean Head of Policy and Public Affairs.
1 There is a major risk that Europe gets off-track in the 2020s The current policies will not achieve the EU ambition as CO 2 intensity will rise without.
The CAP reform process in perspective: issues of the post-2013 debate Carina Folkeson Directorate for Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations DG.
Zuzana Sarvasova National Forest Centre Zvolen
The CAP after the Health Check Agricultural Policy Analysis and Perspectives DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Should Governments Subsidise Food Prices? To see more of our products visit our website at Neil Folland.
Rural Development Programme 2014 – 2020 Local Government Practioners Workshop 12 th February Lorraine Lynas RDP Managing Authority.
Preparing for the “Health Check” of the CAP reform Soeren Kissmeyer, Tallinn 8 February 2008 Agricultural Policy Analysis and Perspectives DG for Agriculture.
CAP Second Pillar: From structural policies to rural development Lecture 15. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
CAP Second Pillar: From structural policies to rural development Lecture 10. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Japan in Copenhagen Fix the Unfair Kyoto Burden-Sharing! 5 May 2009 Anna Korppoo Senior Researcher The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES.
The CAP beyond 2013 | 26 May 2010 The CAP beyond 2013 The Dutch Outlook Roald Lapperre Department for the Common Agricultural Policy.
Medium-term prospects and impact assessment of the CAP reform EU - 15 & EU European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General.
D E P A R T M E N T O F A G R I C U L T U R E, F I S H E R I E S A N D F O R E S T R Y The Australian Model of Agriculture: What relevance to the EU? Presentation.
Social economic developments in rural Europe Arie Oskam (Professor Emeritus Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy, Wageningen University) European Heritage.
Ⓒ Olof S. Future directions of EU agricultural policies The CAP towards 2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations.
Ministry of Agriculture LATVIA Agricultural reform in Europe: 2013 and beyond May 14, 2008 Tallinn.
Common policy, common budget? Péter Halmai Professor of Economics Szent Isván University Budapest, The future of the EU budget.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
Wageningen International Introduction agri environment measures Pleven Agri environment in the Netherlands Background Natura 2000 and agricultere Common.
Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT.
“One year of EU 25 – Nature Conservation policy experience regarding the 2nd pillar of the CAP and reform prospects” The main points of the new EAFRD Regulation.
The Environment and Society. Below represents the value of the products and services provided by the Earth each year. 33,000,000,000,000.
Public money for Public goods A new CAP for Europe’s biodiversity Ariel Brunner EU Agriculture Policy Officer European Division, BirdLife International.
EIN Working Group 2, Seminar: Sustainable Farming and Food Safety Brussels 19 th June 2003 Sustainable use of land resources – policies and economics Allan.
Ⓒ Olof S. Communication on the future of the CAP “The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future” DG.
1 The CAP beyond 2013 Launch of the public debate Commission Communication November 2010 Summer 2011 Public conference 12 April July 2010 Legal.
Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005 Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion.
07/02/2011Rural Development in the CAP post RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CAP POST 2013 Attila JAMBOR Assistant Professor Corvinus University of Budapest.
CEPS, 1 Place du Congrès, 1000 Brussels, , 1 The Key Role of Education in Employment and Competitiveness THE LISBON STRATEGY.
European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development Rural Development Policy in the period and in the Future Financial Perspectives Pedro.
Agricultural Policy and Grasslands Jaak Herodes Estonian Farmers Federation.
Direct Payments in the CAP post 2013 EP Workshop "CAP towards 2020", Brussels, 7 February 2011 Stefan Tangermann Department of Agricultural Economics and.
The “Health Check” of the CAP reform: Impact Assessment DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
ROA and the policy landscape
For a more efficient, fair and sustainable Common Agricultural Policy PAC Group, Academy of Agriculture of France, September
Directore General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005
30th of November 2017 Antonia Lütteken
Current budgetary and regulatory position of the CAP
Sergiu Didicescu, Unit H1 DG Agriculture and Rural Development
Expert Group meeting “Agriculture and Water” 6 –7 April 2010, Sevilla
Next steps of the activity on WFD and Agriculture
The Implementation of Rural Development Policy in the New Member States: Constraints and Lessons for Romania Dr Robert Ackrill (Nottingham Trent University)
Strategic Steering Group WFD and CAP, 19/03/2009
A quick word on water and rural development policy after 2013
Common Agricultural Policy reform: contributing now to the debate
The Common Agricultural Policy and the Water Framework Directive
Meeting of the Water Directors - Athens, 17/18 June 2003
EU rural development policy
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Position of the European Farmers on the changes and news within the new CAP François GUERIN | Second National Farmers meeting in Bulgaria 6 February.
Presentation transcript:

The project has received funding from the European Union. The Dilemma of Targeting Support with CAP post 2013 Tata, April, 2010 Wanda Chmielewska-Gill Foundation of Assistance Programmes for Agriculture FAPA Agricultural Policy Analysis Unit, Warsaw

Needs of the Sector Heavy dependence on public support Growing volatility difficult to manage - in prices and costs - desease and weather related Burden of regulation on farming sector R&D needs - to revive faltering productivity growth - to reduce negative environmental impacts NMS- to catch up Diversity within and between MS extent of CAP help Europes agriculture is unsustainable economically, but has good natural conditions to produce.

Targeted policy Policy measure that targets specific outcomes, populations or areas. It requires: - identification of target actions, - target groups, - target area. (OECD)

Implementing targeted payments Contract with a farmer Clearly defined objectives Period of time (5-10 years) Cannot be inherited Effects measured (control) Auctions can work under specific contitions Not all farmers would receive payments Transaction costs can be high.

Costs and benefits of target policy Targeted policy Transfers to specific objectives Significant implementation costs Adjusted to costs Broad based policy Transfer per hectare or per farm, per product May be simple/cheap Not adjusted. Overcompensation influences land prices.

Land prices (eur/hectare) Eurostat, RIAE Bulletin, 2007

Targeting helps competitiveness if it affects: Investment improving efficiency, income diversification, Investment into human capital, Investment into value added (processing, marketing), Investment into cost reductions.

Support for agriculture in selected New Member States in years compared the UE (PSE) OECD

Targeting in 1 Pillar 85% of SPS funds go to the 17% of farmers who have 80% of land ( Agra Europe Weekly, 6 March 2009). - Capping - Modulation - Zoning instead of contracts? Targeting 2 Pilar easier

Conclusions Slow changes towards targeted instruments in the present CAP, particularly in RDP; Not everybody will get support; More efficient than present instruments Keeps land prices lower; Difficult and costly to implement.